Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Promotion of LGBT Threatens to Destabilize Our Population and Decimate Our Rich Culture

  1. #1

    Promotion of LGBT Threatens to Destabilize Our Population and Decimate Our Rich Culture

    Promotion of LGBT Threatens to Destabilize Our Population and Decimate Our Rich Culture


    ''Change my mind''


    We have been psychologically beaten down, demonized and denounced
    for having more than 2.3 kids for 40 years, the tide is now going out , it
    has worked.
    Self loathing Liberals and agenda twenty-one have brought our population
    growth to a crawl giving them and excuse to dilute our rich culture with
    low iq 3rd world compliant people that hate us, 80% of which will be on
    welfare.
    The kicker being the Liberal neocultural promotion of
    LGBT to continue to chip away at maintaining our cultural roots.
    They are destroying us Economically and Culturally.
    Low Iq anti western populations breed like flies, no consideration of
    responsibility, once they've reached sufficient mass, and your right
    of self-protection under the 2nd amendment is erased, the genocide
    will begin, if the 3rd world blob is too slow in the task, NATO Troops
    will be brought in as 'closers' .
    Hegelian (Dialectic)



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    Promoting lgbtq is also promoting non-reproductive sexual feelings and behavior. Automatic population reduction.
    "There are two freedoms - the false, where a man is free to do what he likes; the true, where he is free to do what he ought."~~Charles Kingsley

  4. #3
    If the "JAFFE MEMO" (sp?)from 1969 is real, then yes it is.

    I won't change your mind about anything
    Last edited by jkr; 02-10-2019 at 04:06 PM.

    why I should worship the state (who apparently is the only party that can possess guns without question).
    The state's only purpose is to kill and control. Why do you worship it? - Sola_Fide

    Baptiste said.
    At which point will Americans realize that creating an unaccountable institution that is able to pass its liability on to tax-payers is immoral and attracts sociopaths?

  5. #4
    Promotion of LGBT agenda threatens the existence of families and the destruction of family values.

  6. #5
    I really don't think those LGBTQ people would be having kids if the government wasn't promoting it. Although it begs the question, what exactly do you mean by the government promoting LGBTQ lifestyles? Shouldn't the goal for it to just not matter what someones sexual orientation is?
    A society that places equality before freedom with get neither; A society that places freedom before equality will yield high degrees of both

    Make a move and plead the 5th because you can't plead the 1st

  7. #6
    Hegelian:

    Problem 1 : Over population, depletion of resouces

    Reaction: Gasp

    Solution: Curb Population Growth , promote infertility, lbgt, brow beat
    and demonize the 'family culture'.
    = = =
    Problem 2 : Sagging Population Growth

    Reaction: Gasp

    Solution: Solution , import 400 million 3rd world slugs , to breed slugs
    better than flies, diplace and destroy America's existing,
    prosperous Evangelical and Christian-Valued culture,
    resouces, and economy.

  8. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by dillo View Post
    I really don't think those LGBTQ people would be having kids if the government wasn't promoting it. Although it begs the question, what exactly do you mean by the government promoting LGBTQ lifestyles? Shouldn't the goal for it to just not matter what someones sexual orientation is?
    You are correct that gay people should be able to live their lives how they want to. Certainly it is ok to help influence others that we should not treat LGBTQ people poorly. The problem is the promotion of the lifestyle has been to show that it is something positive and should be celebrated. They don't know when to stop. Look at "Desmond is Amazing" or whatever.. that is just way overboard, Christian Apocalypse material, and I'm not even Christian.

    The problem is that kids are attention seakers. It is natural. They are dependent on their parents for survival and so it is important that they feel like their parents love them and won't abandon them. Clearly we can see cases of kids with gender fluidity issues whose mothers give them positive attention for acting like girls, and negative attention for acting like boys. AF made a thread recently about a mom who told her son that monsters only eat boys.

    When you celebrate homosexuality in society like our society is doing, then you give kids an outlet to seek attention.. they see that if they are gay, they will be celebrated and given more attention. So they may choose to act out in this way when they otherwise wouldn't.

    As far as the OP claiming that LGBTQ is destroying the family unit, well, it's partly true but a bit more complicated. I would say that the increase in LGBTQ and its promotion is a result of the destruction of the family unit, which has been ongoing for at least 50 years now. Typically, kids who have a mother and father in a loving, stable relationship, and whose mothers nurture them in a healthy way and whose father is a strong, healthy role model and gives them the attention and parenting they need will not become gay. This is much less likely to happen when you have a lot of single motherhood. Single motherhood has been driven largely by the welfare state.

    So I would say all this destruction of the family unit and LGBTQ celebration can be traced back to the welfare state. This is where we get terms like "Cultural Marxism".
    "He's talkin' to his gut like it's a person!!" -me
    "dumpster diving isn't professional." - angelatc


    "Each of us must choose which course of action we should take: education, conventional political action, or even peaceful civil disobedience to bring about necessary changes. But let it not be said that we did nothing." - Ron Paul

    "Paul said "the wave of the future" is a coalition of anti-authoritarian progressive Democrats and libertarian Republicans in Congress opposed to domestic surveillance, opposed to starting new wars and in favor of ending the so-called War on Drugs."

  9. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by jkr View Post
    If the "JAFFE MEMO" (sp?)from 1969 is real, then yes it is.

    I won't change your mind about anything
    ha ha, , the first line in an article I pulled up regarding Jaffe says it all in less than one
    sentence;
    ''...measures to reduce U.S. fertility''

    Good lord , then of course the founder of Planned Murderhood , Margerine' Margarete Sanger ,
    that was a piece of work, she was..........



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
    You are correct that gay people should be able to live their lives how they want to. Certainly it is ok to help influence others that we should not treat LGBTQ people poorly. The problem is the promotion of the lifestyle has been to show that it is something positive and should be celebrated. They don't know when to stop. Look at "Desmond is Amazing" or whatever.. that is just way overboard, Christian Apocalypse material, and I'm not even Christian.

    The problem is that kids are attention seakers. It is natural. They are dependent on their parents for survival and so it is important that they feel like their parents love them and won't abandon them. Clearly we can see cases of kids with gender fluidity issues whose mothers give them positive attention for acting like girls, and negative attention for acting like boys. AF made a thread recently about a mom who told her son that monsters only eat boys.

    When you celebrate homosexuality in society like our society is doing, then you give kids an outlet to seek attention.. they see that if they are gay, they will be celebrated and given more attention. So they may choose to act out in this way when they otherwise wouldn't.

    As far as the OP claiming that LGBTQ is destroying the family unit, well, it's partly true but a bit more complicated. I would say that the increase in LGBTQ and its promotion is a result of the destruction of the family unit, which has been ongoing for at least 50 years now. Typically, kids who have a mother and father in a loving, stable relationship, and whose mothers nurture them in a healthy way and whose father is a strong, healthy role model and gives them the attention and parenting they need will not become gay. This is much less likely to happen when you have a lot of single motherhood. Single motherhood has been driven largely by the welfare state.

    So I would say all this destruction of the family unit and LGBTQ celebration can be traced back to the welfare state. This is where we get terms like "Cultural Marxism".
    Nice, I would like to add though that my position does not so much address LGBT as a negative
    life style, as it does the institutional and liberal promotion of it.
    The effects of its promotion on society are massively negative, to the maintenance of
    cultural and population stability , but of course a great boon to agenda 21 and Globalism.

  12. #10
    To give credit where due, MAGA is a huge champion of LGBT community. His top funder Adelson, a former funder of democrats, would not have funded him if he wasn't.



  13. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
    You are correct that gay people should be able to live their lives how they want to. Certainly it is ok to help influence others that we should not treat LGBTQ people poorly. The problem is the promotion of the lifestyle has been to show that it is something positive and should be celebrated. They don't know when to stop. Look at "Desmond is Amazing" or whatever.. that is just way overboard, Christian Apocalypse material, and I'm not even Christian.

    The problem is that kids are attention seakers. It is natural. They are dependent on their parents for survival and so it is important that they feel like their parents love them and won't abandon them. Clearly we can see cases of kids with gender fluidity issues whose mothers give them positive attention for acting like girls, and negative attention for acting like boys. AF made a thread recently about a mom who told her son that monsters only eat boys.

    When you celebrate homosexuality in society like our society is doing, then you give kids an outlet to seek attention.. they see that if they are gay, they will be celebrated and given more attention. So they may choose to act out in this way when they otherwise wouldn't.

    As far as the OP claiming that LGBTQ is destroying the family unit, well, it's partly true but a bit more complicated. I would say that the increase in LGBTQ and its promotion is a result of the destruction of the family unit, which has been ongoing for at least 50 years now. Typically, kids who have a mother and father in a loving, stable relationship, and whose mothers nurture them in a healthy way and whose father is a strong, healthy role model and gives them the attention and parenting they need will not become gay. This is much less likely to happen when you have a lot of single motherhood. Single motherhood has been driven largely by the welfare state.

    So I would say all this destruction of the family unit and LGBTQ celebration can be traced back to the welfare state. This is where we get terms like "Cultural Marxism".
    Yea I hate the in your face Marxist $#@! too, but I blame liberals for that more than gays.

    While I 100% Agee about he importance of a family unit, again what percentage of single mother families have anything to do with gays?

    Being gay is something I’ll never comprehend, and the Marxism stuff is dangerous. I just tend to assign blame to the peddlers over the ones being peddled
    A society that places equality before freedom with get neither; A society that places freedom before equality will yield high degrees of both

    Make a move and plead the 5th because you can't plead the 1st

  14. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by euphemia View Post
    Promoting lgbtq is also promoting non-reproductive sexual feelings and behavior. Automatic population reduction.
    Thats what I was thinking too. Gaying everything is Population Management without the need to kill high percentages, if they simply stop breeding, that works just as well for them.
    1776 > 1984

    The FAILURE of the United States Government to operate and maintain an
    Honest Money System , which frees the ordinary man from the clutches of the money manipulators, is the single largest contributing factor to the World's current Economic Crisis.

    The Elimination of Privacy is the Architecture of Genocide

    Belief, Money, and Violence are the three ways all people are controlled

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    Our central bank is not privately owned.

  15. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by dillo View Post
    While I 100% Agee about he importance of a family unit, again what percentage of single mother families have anything to do with gays?
    Re-read the stuff I said about getting attention.. that has everything to do with it. Without a strong male role model to aspire to, some boys may feel the best way to gain attention is to aspire to be like their lone provider.

    Conversely, depending on the person, it can create an equal and opposite reaction where the male over-compensates and become too aggressive, without the proper role model to show them how to control it. This is where we see boys of single mothers being ten times more likely to commit violent felonies.
    "He's talkin' to his gut like it's a person!!" -me
    "dumpster diving isn't professional." - angelatc


    "Each of us must choose which course of action we should take: education, conventional political action, or even peaceful civil disobedience to bring about necessary changes. But let it not be said that we did nothing." - Ron Paul

    "Paul said "the wave of the future" is a coalition of anti-authoritarian progressive Democrats and libertarian Republicans in Congress opposed to domestic surveillance, opposed to starting new wars and in favor of ending the so-called War on Drugs."

  16. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by DamianTV View Post
    Thats what I was thinking too. Gaying everything is Population Management without the need to kill high percentages, if they simply stop breeding, that works just as well for them.
    -
    Exactly , that is the main reason I posted this, I didn't spell it out ,
    I assumed too much.
    I have posted this a thousand times, its a soft genocide similar to or perhaps in concert with
    the culture of low IQ socialist and liberal voting slugs,,,,,soft kill, soft genocide.

    Furthermore,
    who amongst us remembers being 4 and 5 years old.
    They're teaching sex ed to children that will be indelibly imprinted with
    abject disgust, never to be forgotten, in the back of their minds;
    SEX, ack!!!!!
    When I was 5, I can remember disgust at the mention or thought of sex.
    At 4 and 5 years old we are no where near the stage of wanting nor needing to know,
    that comes much later.
    Then again in high school (years ago) they saturated our minds with disturbing graphic photos
    of venereal disease, the 'program' today is much more pervasive and expanded.
    Again the soft genocide of our culture and people.
    Last edited by Stratovarious; 02-12-2019 at 06:37 AM.

  17. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
    Re-read the stuff I said about getting attention.. that has everything to do with it. Without a strong male role model to aspire to, some boys may feel the best way to gain attention is to aspire to be like their lone provider.

    Conversely, depending on the person, it can create an equal and opposite reaction where the male over-compensates and become too aggressive, without the proper role model to show them how to control it. This is where we see boys of single mothers being ten times more likely to commit violent felonies.
    I agree, single motherhood is not something that should be aspired too. I am just wondering how big of a factor you think homosexuality plays a role in single motherdom.
    A society that places equality before freedom with get neither; A society that places freedom before equality will yield high degrees of both

    Make a move and plead the 5th because you can't plead the 1st

  18. #16
    0.006% of the population get more media coverage, and more response by the public, for their "cause" than does issues regarding smaller government and increased individual liberty. Let THAT sink in.



  19. Remove this section of ads by registering.


Similar Threads

  1. If Culture isn't Genetic and Preservation of Culture is the Goal...
    By TheCount in forum Political Philosophy & Government Policy
    Replies: 246
    Last Post: 02-14-2019, 08:06 AM
  2. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-02-2013, 01:55 AM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-22-2013, 01:13 PM
  4. Culture Clash – New book charges multiculturalism threatens democracy
    By LarryLawrence in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-28-2011, 10:41 AM
  5. Replies: 221
    Last Post: 09-16-2011, 07:55 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •