Democrats Winning 90% of Congressional Districts with Large Foreign-Born Populations

[Swordsmyth]

Mass legal immigration is driving Democrats towards full electoral dominance, with left-wing politicians winning nearly 90 percent of congressional districts with larger than average foreign-born populations, analysis finds.

The Atlantic senior editor Ronald Brownstein analyzed Census Bureau statistics for the 2018 midterm elections, finding that the country’s admission of more than a million legal immigrants every year is set to hand over electoral dominance to House and Senate Democrats.
Among Brownstein’s findings is that nearly 90 percent of House congressional districts with a foreign-born population above the national average were won by Democrats. This concludes that every congressional district with a foreign-born population exceeding 14 percent had a 90 percent chance of being controlled by Democrats and only a ten percent chance of electing a Republican.


“After the 2018 result, Democrats now control more than 80 percent of the House seats in which minorities exceed their national share of the population, and nearly 90 percent of the seats with more immigrants than average, according to Census Bureau figures,” Brownstein writes.

Report: Booming Foreign-Born Population Handing Over Electoral Dominance to Democratshttps://t.co/SvPccY5aKK
— John Binder 👽 (@JxhnBinder) March 7, 2018

Likewise, less than one-in-ten House Republicans represent a congressional district that has a foreign-born population larger than 14 percent.
It is not just congressional districts that are being driven towards Democrats through mass legal immigration. Entire states have been transformed, not only demographically, but electorally by the country’s current legal immigration levels.
For example, Brownstein finds that Republicans hold about 30 Senate seats in the 20 U.S. states with the smallest foreign-born populations. Meanwhile, Democrats control 32 Senate seats in the 20 U.S. states with the largest share of foreign-born residents.
Brownstein expects Democrats to largely target the remaining Senate Republicans in states with large foreign-born populations in the 2020 elections.
“Several of the remaining Republican Senate seats in that grouping (including Colorado, Arizona, Georgia, and perhaps Texas) will be among the top Democratic targets next year,” Brownstein writes.
Even the New York Times admits that continued legal immigration at its current rate of importing more than 1.2 million residents a year will transform the U.S. towards electoral dominance for Democrats.
This is most recently evident in Orange County, California — once a Republican stronghold — that has become entirely controlled by Democrats. The dominance of Democrats in Orange County has coincided with the county’s booming foreign-born population.




Analysis by Axios has revealed the correlation between large foreign-born populations and Democrats increasingly winning elections in previously Republican areas of the country.
In a chart, the Axios research notes how districts like New York’s 15th District region go strongly to Democrats, with a foreign-born population that is near almost 40 percent. Likewise, California’s 34th District, which has a foreign-born population of 46.5 percent, is a Democrat stronghold.
The chart’s most revealing aspect is how congressional districts with a foreign-born population larger than 20 percent swing enormously for Democrats over Republicans. The research, though, does not explain why House Districts with small foreign-born populations continue to be Democratic strongholds.




The 2016 presidential election between then-candidate Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton revealed a similar trend.
For example, among native-born Americans, Trump slightly won 49 percent to Clinton’s 45 percent, according to exit polling data. Among foreign-born residents, Clinton dominated against Trump, garnering 64 percent of the immigrant population’s vote compared to Trump’s mere 31 percent.

Currently, the U.S. admits more than a million legal immigrants annually, with the vast majority deriving from chain migration, whereby newly naturalized citizens can bring an unlimited number of foreign relatives to the country. In 2017, the foreign-born population reached a record high of 44.5 million.
The U.S. is on track to import about 15 million new foreign-born voters in the next two decades should current legal immigration levels continue. Those 15 million new foreign-born voters include about eight million who will arrive in the country through chain migration.
University of Maryland, College Park researcher James Gimpel has found in recent years that more immigrants to the U.S. inevitably means more Democrat voters and thus, increasing electoral victories for the Democrat Party.


https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...n-populations/

[AuH20]

Listen to the enemy when they talk.

[dillo]

Trojan Horse politics

[Stratovarious]

Swordsmyth

Why do we still have chain Migration?

[acptulsa]

Sounds like a chicken-or-egg conundrum.

Do those districts vote that way because of the immigrants? Or do immigrants settle there because that's where they're welcome?

[invisible]

Sounds like a chicken-or-egg conundrum.

Do those districts vote that way because of the immigrants? Or do immigrants settle there because that's where they're welcome?

Are they voting for the person who repeatedly states that they hate them and want to persecute and harass them? Or are they voting for the opposing candidate, no matter what platform they're running on? Why do you think racial minorities have disappeared from this place? This stuff should be readily obvious, to state otherwise is just as absurd as "they hate us because we're rich and free".

[Swordsmyth]

Sounds like a chicken-or-egg conundrum.

Do those districts vote that way because of the immigrants? Or do immigrants settle there because that's where they're welcome?

The districts vote that way because of the immigrants, conservatives have been too welcoming of immigrants and all it has gotten us is ever increasing communism.

[Swordsmyth]

Are they voting for the person who repeatedly states that they hate them and want to persecute and harass them? Or are they voting for the opposing candidate, no matter what platform they're running on? Why do you think racial minorities have disappeared from this place? This stuff should be readily obvious, to state otherwise is just as absurd as "they hate us because we're rich and free".

Nobody says those things, they vote that way because they have been raised in socialist cultures and the Demoncrats offer them more free stuff than the Republicans.

[Stratovarious]

Sounds like a chicken-or-egg conundrum.

Do those districts vote that way because of the immigrants? Or do immigrants settle there because that's where they're welcome?

My vote is both.
Welfare recipients 'welcome' anyone that will vote for more welfare.

[acptulsa]

The districts vote that way because of the immigrants, conservatives have been too welcoming of immigrants and all it has gotten us is ever increasing communism.

Got a link to the data that backs that opinion up?

[Swordsmyth]

Got a link to the data that backs that opinion up?

It has been posted before and you didn't post any data to back up yours.

Are you related to zippy?

[acptulsa]

It has been posted before and you didn't post any data to back up yours.

Are you related to zippy?

I didn't post an opinion, I posted a question. And since new immigrants don't make up ninety percent of any jurisdiction in the country, I doubt this data you allude to proves your opinion in any way.

But, you know, if it were posted here, in addition to having been posted somewhere some time ago, we could all judge for ourselves.

You're the one who shares that Left Coast cubicle with your co-shill. Ask him who his relatives are.

You and dannno. Both of you post an opinion as if it were a fact, and when I inquire about it, both of you point out that I didn't post anything to back my opinion up. Which is true, but conveniently overlooks the fact that I had posted no opinion, whether phrased as a fact or not. Must be a Left Coast thing.