Ginsburg Misses Day Two at SCOTUS

[dannno]

Riiiight. Andrew Napolitano has been in this movement - and let's face it, you're not in THIS movement - for literally decades, and did more to promote Ron Paul's candidacies than anyone else that occupied a spot on an MSM outlet, but you disagree with him on a couple of items related to his take regarding - wait for it - Donald Trump (I just can't believe it), and suddenly he's Judge Swamp?

So I really don't give a $#@! what you think of him.

Swordsmyth has made some pretty compelling arguments that what the Judge has been saying lately is unconstitutional, that is beyond just being anti-Trump... and that is not like the Judge at all.. which is why I think he is being anti-Trump on purpose so he can more easily be confirmed for something after being nominated by Trump.

[Swordsmyth]

I'd go dig that up, but who has time to look through 30K posts (in under 3 years)?



Well I certainly can't compete with you... not when you're being paid per post.

And your activism here is FAR MORE crude than pointing it out with some off-color comments. Grow a set.

You are the one who needs to grow a set, you are such a snowflake that you can't handle someone daring to have different opinions than you.
It pains you so much that you start throwing around insults and baseless accusations.

[A Son of Liberty]

Swordsmyth has made some pretty compelling arguments that what the Judge has been saying lately is unconstitutional, that is beyond just being anti-Trump... and that is not like the Judge at all.. which is why I think he is being anti-Trump on purpose so he can more easily be confirmed for something after being nominated by Trump.

The guy AVERAGES 1.25 POSTS PER HOUR.

You better start thinking about who's behind the keyboard before you accept "compelling arguments" from him/them.

[A Son of Liberty]

You are the one who needs to grow a set, you are such a snowflake that you can't handle someone daring to have different opinions than you.
It pains you so much that you start throwing around insults and baseless accusations.

NO YOU ARE



There's nothing baseless about my accusation. The volume you generate here is suspicious in itself, but when the content is considered, and the number of threads started that are pro- or defend-Trump such that the highest volume subforum (this one) looks like a digital Trump campaign rally... yeah, there's nothing baseless about my accusation.

[Swordsmyth]

The guy AVERAGES 1.25 POSTS PER HOUR.

You better start thinking about who's behind the keyboard before you accept "compelling arguments" from him/them.

Typical leftist.

It doesn't matter what the argument is or how compelling it is, what matters is who makes it.

[A Son of Liberty]

Typical leftist.

It doesn't matter what the argument is or how compelling it is, what matters is who makes it.

Right. The counter-argument hasn't been made by the libertarians that you haven't managed to strategically run out of here at all.

And it's funny, you average 1.25 posts per hour [ETA: per 24 hour day, by the way. You guys must work shifts, I guess], but we're supposed to run around countering everything or we're just "attacking the poster". Sorry, I have a job that doesn't involve posting at this forum.

[Swordsmyth]

Back on topic:


Raja Flores, the chief of the division of thoracic surgery at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, told CNBC that Ginsburg’s post-operative recovery could take several weeks, but she could be back at work sometime in February. Ginsburg, who is now 85 years old, has reportedly been given transcripts of oral arguments, and case briefs to read at home during her recovery. She was seen this week being helped from a wheelchair into an automobile, but it was not revealed where she was being taken.

More at: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnew...and-the-nation

[A Son of Liberty]

It's amazing how you have all these articles all cued up and ready to post.

This is like the 4th I've seen in a few threads in like a half-hour...

So not only do you have time to average 1.25 posts/hour (assuming 24 hours in a day - you know, no sleep, no eat, no sex [obv], no job... well...ahem), yet you ALSO have time to read all these articles!? And not only read them, but have links and text ready to - BOOM - slam into your latest post here at RPF's?!? AMAZING!

And all while just coincidentally showing up here in April '16!?

That's just something, isn't it?!

lol

You're more obvious than Zippy.

[Swordsmyth]

It's amazing how you have all these articles all cued up and ready to post.

This is like the 4th I've seen in a few threads in like a half-hour...

So not only do you have time to average 1.25 posts/hour (assuming 24 hours in a day - you know, no sleep, no eat, no sex [obv], no job... well...ahem), yet you ALSO have time to read all these articles!? And not only read them, but have links and text ready to - BOOM - slam into your latest post here at RPF's?!? AMAZING!

And all while just coincidentally showing up here in April '16!?

That's just something, isn't it?!

lol

You're more obvious than Zippy.

[A Son of Liberty]

Like you have TIME to sleep...

[Swordsmyth]

Like you have TIME to sleep...

You claim to not have time to "waste" responding to my arguments but you have plenty of time to waste attacking the messenger over and over?

[A Son of Liberty]

You claim to not have time to "waste" responding to my arguments but you have plenty of time to waste attacking the messenger over and over?

lol "attacking the messenger"? You poor thing.

You seem awfully upset that the near-impossibility of the amount of time you've spent here over not even 3 years yet is being pointed out.


Just watching this forum over the past hour or two, it's really impressive... not only in the number of posts you manage to make, but - again - having articles linked that one would assume you've read, and the content NEARLY singularly pro- or defend-Trump...

1.25 posts per hour, assuming 24 hours in a day, for 33 months. That pace is INSANE, when you start taking out things like sleep, a job and/or school - something that should take you away from the forums for at least SOME time during a given day - eating dinner... and that's just within a given day; that doesn't account for days you're not in front of a computer, or vacations, or any of the other things ACTUAL people do in their lives. You start subtracting that stuff out and your posts/hour average would go up significantly. And again, we're not taking into account time spent reading all those articles you read, then snip, then link in many of your posts.

In all seriousness, it's all too obvious what's going on with your "contribution" here.

[Swordsmyth]

lol "attacking the messenger"? You poor thing.

You seem awfully upset that the near-impossibility of the amount of time you've spent here over not even 3 years yet is being pointed out.


Just watching this forum over the past hour or two, it's really impressive... not only in the number of posts you manage to make, but - again - having articles linked that one would assume you've read, and the content NEARLY singularly pro- or defend-Trump...

1.25 posts per hour, assuming 24 hours in a day, for 33 months. That pace is INSANE, when you start taking out things like sleep, a job and/or school - something that should take you away from the forums for at least SOME time during a given day - eating dinner... and that's just within a given day; that doesn't account for days you're not in front of a computer, or vacations, or any of the other things ACTUAL people do in their lives. You start subtracting that stuff out and your posts/hour average would go up significantly. And again, we're not taking into account time spent reading all those articles you read, then snip, then link in many of your posts.

In all seriousness, it's all too obvious what's going on with your "contribution" here.

[A Son of Liberty]

[Swordsmyth]

[A Son of Liberty]

WAKE UP!

You still got some shillin' to do today!

[Swordsmyth]

WAKE UP!

You still got some shillin' to do today!

I can't help it, your brainless posts are boring me to sleep.

[specsaregood]

I suspect that a sane, loving, normal person at her age on her 3rd bout with cancer would retire and try to spend her remaining time with family, kids, grandkids, etc.

[Swordsmyth]

I suspect that a sane, loving, normal person at her age on her 3rd bout with cancer would retire and try to spend her remaining time with family, kids, grandkids, etc.

If she was even one of those she would.

[Gumba of Liberty]

Just for the record, I don’t trust any of you guys #strangerdanger

[Swordsmyth]

Just for the record, I don’t trust any of you guys #strangerdanger

A wise outlook.

[A Son of Liberty]

A wise outlook.

said the snake.

[Swordsmyth]

said the snake.

Projection.

[Slave Mentality]

@A Son of Liberty

I have not been on RPFs that long, but did indeed notice Swordsmyth’s rampant uptick in posting. I mostly look at this site on my phone (quite regularly, but don’t post much) and am amazed at how much is posted, how many new threads each day, and the consistent “ don’t like Trump, buuuuuut he is da best ever” drum beats.

Swordsmyth I ain’t calling you a shill brah, but may suggest that you pick up a hobby. You would literally need to spend 8 hours a day (with a half hour lunch) reading and copypastaing all that $#@!. Get a bike or something.

I know that the lifers see the pattern too. Zippy can’t keep up FFS! He is getting his ass kicked up in here.

[Swordsmyth]

@A Son of Liberty

I have not been on RPFs that long, but did indeed notice Swordsmyth’s rampant uptick in posting. I mostly look at this site on my phone (quite regularly, but don’t post much) and am amazed at how much is posted, how many new threads each day, and the consistent “ don’t like Trump, buuuuuut he is da best ever” drum beats.

Swordsmyth I ain’t calling you a shill brah, but may suggest that you pick up a hobby. You would literally need to spend 8 hours a day (with a half hour lunch) reading and copypastaing all that $#@!. Get a bike or something.

I know that the lifers see the pattern too. Zippy can’t keep up FFS! He is getting his ass kicked up in here.

You have your hobbies and I have mine.
Kicking zippy's ass is a bonus.

[dannno]

I know that the lifers see the pattern too. Zippy can’t keep up FFS! He is getting his ass kicked up in here.

If anything the fact he is here so much is probably a sign he isn't getting paid and is doing it because it is something he is just really passionate about.. pretty sure zippy and thecount have a laundry list of other forums to keep on lockdown.

[CaptainAmerica]

Ginsburg is a turd sandwich on legs.

[timosman]

Projection.

The libs are projecting like hell lately. I personally find it disgusting.

[Swordsmyth]

According to Kathleen Arberg, public information officer for the Supreme Court: “Two nodules in the lower lobe of her left lung were discovered incidentally during tests performed at George Washington University Hospital to diagnose and treat rib fractures sustained in a fall on November 7. [2018]” According to the surgeon who operated on the justice, Dr. Valerie Rusch, both nodules removed during surgery were found to be malignant. However, “post-surgery, there was no evidence of any remaining disease. Scans performed before surgery indicated no evidence of disease elsewhere in the body. Currently, no further treatment is planned.”
Thus, from published reports from reputable sources, we know the following:
1. She had non-metastatic colon cancer removed in 1999
2. She had non-metastatic pancreatic cancer removed in 2010.
3. She had a stent placed in her coronary arteries in 2014
4. She fell in November of 2018 and broke three ribs.
5. She had surgery in December of 2018 and had two malignant nodules removed from her lungs.
6. Scans found no other cancer in her body.
7. She is 85 years old and has no history of being a smoker.
The most significant words from above are “two malignant nodules.” What does this mean?
First of all, malignant nodules are fancy words for small tumors, in general one that is about an inch or smaller in size. When a nodule is removed during surgery, it is quickly examined under the microscope by a pathologist. These doctors rarely see patients; rather they examine tissues and determine the cause of disease. Pathologists can usually determine quickly whether a nodule is benign or malignant, but in order to determine the actually type of cancer (that is the tissue source of the cancer), special preparation is required before microscopic examination. This can take several days or weeks to complete. At the time of this writing, we have no published reports stating the results of these tests – or even if they were ever done.
But since there were “two malignant nodules,” the odds are is that this is Stage IV or metastatic cancer – meaning that it has spread to the lungs from another organ system. Even with today’s modern technology, it is difficult to pinpoint small primary tumors. Otherwise we would be screening everyone to catch cancer earlier when it is easier to cure.
As noted above, Justice Ginsburg had colon cancer and pancreatic cancer in the past. Again, it is unlikely that these cancers are the source of her possible lung metastases. These cancers do not lie dormant for years. What is much more likely is that a small primary cancer exists – either a new one in the colon or pancreas, or another from another organ such as the liver, kidney or breast. If this is the case, her prognosis is poor, as summarized in the chart below.

This chart is not as complicated as in looks. For example, if 100 patients are diagnosed with metastatic colon cancer (meaning the cancer is not only in the colon but in another organ), 50 of those patients will still be alive and 50 will not be alive two years later. By five years, 12 will be alive and 88 will not. Keep in mind that these numbers vary according to various academic studies and oncologists (cancer doctors) may quibble as to their exact accuracy. Also keep in mind that there are other types of metastatic cancer that are not listed here. These are simply the more common ones.
However, there another more optimistic possibility: that the tumors removed are primary lung tumors. This is obviously what her doctors hoped for, or else they would not have subjected this frail-appearing 85-year-old woman to this brutal surgery. But it is unusual for there to be two primary tumors in the lungs at once – especially in a non-smoker. But if these are primary tumors and they have been completely excised, her prognosis could be excellent, up to a 92% 5-year survival.
But if this were the case, there should have been published reports stating that the pathology reports showed this to be a type of primary lung cancer. At the time of this writing, this has not occurred. Furthermore Justice Ginsburg appears to be so incapacitated that she cannot attend oral arguments at the Supreme Court – but this could be because she needs more time to recover from her surgery, not because she has cancer.

More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-...ably-quite-ill

[Swordsmyth]

Among those reportedly on Trump’s short list of candidates is 7th Circuit Court Judge Amy Coney Barrett, whose name was floated last year as a potential pick for the seat that Kavanaugh eventually got. Coney Barrett was harassed last year in her confirmation hearing for the Circuit Court by Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) who, referencing Barrett’s Catholic faith, said, “The dogma lives loudly within you.”
Also reportedly on Trump’s short list of candidates are Joan Larsen of the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, Raymond Kethledge of the 6th Circuit Court, Britt Grant of the 11th Circuit, and Thomas Hardiman of the 3rd Circuit.

More at: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnew...urt-nomination

Petition: Appoint Mike Lee as next Supreme Court Justice