Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Urge your representatives to Get US Out of neocons' Foreign Interventions and WARS

  1. #1

    Urge your representatives to Get US Out of neocons' Foreign Interventions and WARS

    Enough is enough, urge your reps to stand up against so called bipartisan support for foreign interventions & elective wars/occupations and entanglements with foreign dictators/parasite regimes etc and a globalist perpetual foreign welfare aid regime taxing Americans. Such massive investments supported by same bipartisan neocon funders have only brought sharp degradation and erosion of liberties.



    Related
    U.S. vs. Iran: Military Action 'On the Table,' Trump Administration Says
    https://www.newsweek.com/us-military...upport-1237100
    Nov 29, 2018

    Trump's Top Funder in 2013: US should drop atomic bomb on Iran

    Respected Neocon/former Democrat turned MAGA top funder wants GOP to shape up

    No, Trump and Nancy Pelosi did not watch midterm election results together or made secret deal

    Trump: "Nancy Pelosi loves this country"



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    Syria withdrawal has been paused
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G65BqqgsDQo

    Israeli official: Trump agreed to Netanyahu request to stagger Syria exit
    Itamar Eichner, AgenciesPublished: 12.31.18


    Senator Graham , second from left, in Israel with like minded Senators and Senior White House advisors



    Lindsey Graham’s description of Trump’s Syria withdrawal plan sounds suspiciously like a plan to stay in Syria


    By Adam Taylor
    December 31 at 11:23 AM
    Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) has become one of President Trump’s key allies on Capitol Hill. However, the famously hawkish politician was publicly dismayed this month when Trump announced he would pull U.S. troops out of Syria.
    After the announcement, Graham issued a statement that denounced the decision as “an Obama-like mistake made by the Trump Administration.”
    But this weekend, the senator had a change of heart after a meeting at the White House, later telling reporters the president “told me some things I didn’t know that made me feel a lot better about where we’re headed in Syria.”
    What explains Graham’s newfound optimism about Trump’s plan to leave Syria?
    Well, there is one big but rather confusing reason. In Graham’s retelling, Trump’s plan to leave Syria sounds suspiciously like a plan to stay in Syria — one that could be extended indefinitely, too. Speaking to reporters Sunday, Graham described Trump’s Syria plan as a “pause situation” rather than a withdrawal.
    The senator went into more detail in some tweets Sunday evening:
    The President will make sure any withdrawal from Syria will be done in a fashion to ensure:

    1) ISIS is permanently destroyed.

    2) Iran doesn’t fill in the back end, and

    3) our Kurdish allies are protected.
    — Lindsey Graham (@LindseyGrahamSC) December 30, 2018

    Considering these three elements, a full withdrawal would not be possible in the immediate future.
    Trump has previously suggested the Islamic State militant group, also known as ISIS, has been defeated — which is why he feels comfortable pulling U.S. troops out of Syria. “We have defeated ISIS in Syria, my only reason for being there during the Trump Presidency,” he tweeted Dec. 19.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...an-stay-syria/

  4. #3

  5. #4

  6. #5
    U.S. will send more troops to Poland in a move likely to anger Russia

    By David S. Cloud
    Jun 12, 2019
    | Washington

    Click here to view the original image of 800x450px.


    U.S. President Trump and Polish President Andrzej Duda sign a defense deal at the White House on Thursday. (Mark Wilson / Getty Images)


    Trump described the added troops, who will join about 4,000 U.S. soldiers who rotate in and out of Poland
    https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-...612-story.html


    US still pondering military options in Venezuela

    U.S. sending Patriot missile system and another warship to Middle East

  7. #6

  8. #7
    It's NYT reporting, so exercise caution.


    Senior White House advisers have proposed secretly expanding the C.I.A.’s presence in Afghanistan

    Sept. 2, 2019
    WASHINGTON — Senior White House advisers have proposed secretly expanding the C.I.A.’s presence in Afghanistan if international forces begin to withdraw from the country, according to American officials. But C.I.A. and military officials have expressed reservations, prompting a debate in the administration that could complicate negotiations with the Taliban to end the war.
    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/02/u...ghanistan.html




    Developing..
    Urge your representatives to end all foreign aid immediately

    Related
    Poll: Would you support ending all US foreign aid immediately?

    Potentially Related
    The US Military is a Bigger Polluter Than as Many as 140 Countries — Study

  9. #8
    Secretary of State Pompeo Declines to Sign Afghan Peace Deal

    By Kimberly Dozier September 4, 2019

    The U.S. is closing in on a deal with the Taliban that is designed to wind down America’s 18-year war in Afghanistan, but the best indication of how risky the pact may be is this: Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is declining to sign it, according to senior U.S., Afghan and European officials.
    The “agreement in principle” that U.S. envoy Zalmay Khalilzad has hammered out in nine rounds of talks with Taliban representatives in Qatar would take the first tentative steps toward peace since U.S. and allied forces deployed to Afghanistan following the attacks on 9/11, according to senior Afghan and Trump Administration officials familiar with its general terms. Defense Secretary Mark Esper was scheduled to discuss the closely held details of the deal with President Donald Trump in a Sept. 3 meeting, according to senior administration officials. If Trump approves and a deal is struck, it could begin a withdrawal of some 5,400 U.S. troops, roughly a third of the present force, from five bases within 135 days.
    But the deal doesn’t ensure several crucial things, those familiar with the discussions tell TIME. It doesn’t guarantee the continued presence of U.S. counterterrorism forces to battle al Qaeda, the survival of the pro-U.S. government in Kabul, or even an end to the fighting in Afghanistan.



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 65
    Last Post: 10-15-2020, 08:21 AM
  2. Urge your representatives to Get US Out! of NAFTA & USMCA
    By Swordsmyth in forum Grassroots Central
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-04-2018, 08:15 AM
  3. Urge your representatives to Get US Out! of NAFTA & USMCA
    By Swordsmyth in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-04-2018, 04:49 PM
  4. Predicting Foreign Interventions
    By Icymudpuppy in forum World News & Affairs
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-04-2011, 08:25 AM
  5. List of US Foreign Interventions
    By shadowhooch in forum Grassroots Central
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-12-2007, 10:12 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •