https://www.wsj.com/articles/donald-...gal-1541786601
He's denied knowing about any of this, but today the WSJ is reporting that's not exactly true.
I hate starting a Trump thread but I wanted to deprive Zippy of the orgasm. Anyway, there's a lot at the link.The Trump Tower meeting and its aftermath are among several previously unreported instances in which Mr. Trump intervened directly to suppress stories about his alleged sexual encounters with women, according to interviews with three dozen people who have direct knowledge of the events or who have been briefed on them, as well as court papers, corporate records and other documents.
My take away is that this might be Clinton-esque. Trump might not be guilty of a campaign violation if he spent the money to hide it from his wife and not influence the election, but the impeachment could come from lying about the involvement.
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us