Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Federal court rules state firearm laws invalid

  1. #1

    Thumbs down Federal court rules state firearm laws invalid

    Once again the feds trample individual rights and ignore the Constitution:


    WICHITA, Kan. (AP) — An appeals court on Tuesday upheld the firearms convictions against two Kansas men who mistakenly believed that a Kansas law can shield from federal prosecution anyone owning firearms made, sold and kept in the state.


    The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Shane Cox and Jeremy Kettler’s challenges to their federal convictions under the National Firearms Act.


    The three-judge panel did not address the constitutionality of the state’s Second Amendment Protection Act, which Kansas defended when intervening in the criminal case. The state gun law says firearms, accessories and ammunition manufactured and kept within Kansas borders are exempt from federal gun control.


    Cox was convicted of making and marketing unregistered firearms, and Kettler was convicted for possessing an unregistered gun silencer.


    The men challenged the constitutionality of the National Firearms Act, alleging it is an invalid exercise of congressional power and an invasion of the Second Amendment right to bear arms. They also challenged the lower court’s ruling that their reliance on the state law provided no defense to the federal charges.


    Separately, Kettler argued further that his prosecution resulted from the dispute between Kansas and the federal government over the Kansas law.


    The appeals court panel rejected all the defense arguments in a 47-page decision. It concluded the federal gun law falls within Congress’ power to tax. The court also noted that the men’s reliance on the state mitigated their sentences, if not their guilt. It noted the district court took their mistaken reliance on the state law into consideration when it sentenced them to probation.


    The appellate panel also rejected Kettler’s request for relief for what he described as being “ensnared in a constitutional dispute” between Kansas and the federal government.


    When Cox began selling his homemade firearms and silencers out of his military surplus store, he stamped “Made in Kansas” on them to assure buyers that a Kansas law would prevent federal prosecution of anyone owning firearms made, sold and kept in the state.


    Cox, a Chanute resident, also gave customers copies of the Second Amendment Protection Act, which was passed by the Kansas Legislature in 2013 and signed by then-Gov. Sam Brownback. Cox even collected sales taxes. His biggest-selling items were unregistered gun silencers, prosecutors have said. Kettler, who was one of Cox’s customers, was so enthusiastic about the silencer that he posted a video on Facebook.



    SOURCE:


    https://www.apnews.com/91541e86b9894...f0g-Z7N03qRq6Q
    __________________________________________________ ________________
    "A politician will do almost anything to keep their job, even become a patriot" - Hearst



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    Unless state authorities protect their citizens through force of arms then this is what you get. These individuals are still being kept in the state. Wherever they are being detained the State Troopers, local Sheriff and as many as can be deputized should walk in and turn them free.
    But, that won't happen. And we know it.

  4. #3
    "It concluded the federal gun law falls within Congress' powe to tax."

    Interesting. They did not decide on the issue of federalism vis a vis the commerce clause. I take that as tacit acknowledgement that the states right argument is correct.

    I wonder what tortured logic they used to justify a tax as not being an infringement on the second amendment.
    I compiled a "brief" history of events since October 2008 that are defining the global currency war and the role that gold is playing:

    Tin Foil Hats, Economic Reality and the Total Perspective Vortex

    Also, have you contacted your Congressional Rep and asked them co-sponsor Ron Paul's Rep. Paul Broun Jr.'s HR 1098 77: Free Competition in Currencies Act?

  5. #4
    Well we are living in MAGA times.
    Courts are often highly political institutions. And courts are finally in the mood to do something.








Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-30-2018, 09:20 PM
  2. AUSTRIA - Court rules elections invalid.
    By luctor-et-emergo in forum World News & Affairs
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-01-2016, 08:20 PM
  3. Top federal court rules against NSA's phone records program
    By presence in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 05-09-2015, 09:28 AM
  4. Federal Court Rules That the Bitcoin Is Money
    By FrankRep in forum Bitcoin / Cryptocurrencies
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-21-2013, 11:32 PM
  5. Do federal laws trump State laws?
    By robertwerden in forum U.S. Constitution
    Replies: 60
    Last Post: 05-24-2013, 04:51 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •