Originally Posted by
Snowball
How did you guess?
As a matter of fact, when I was considering which small group of foreign governments deserve some assistance, and I mean assistance that can manifest in various ways, not exclusively monetary, and in some cases not monetary at all, but still relevant, some of them were the Zionist Entity's persecuted and ravaged neighbors, formerly stable and modern states which "we", a.k.a. "THE UNITED STATES" - owes a debt of recompense to. Yes, I believe the government of "THE UNITED STATES" should seek to make amends, inadequate as they might be, to Syria, Lebanon, The Palestinian State (which I would immediately recognize), and Iraq.
There are a handful of other nation states around the world which I would like to assist in some way. In most cases, that assistance wouldn't be given in the wasteful, corrupt method by which "our" government has "given" aid in the past. For example, with the stroke of a pen, and costing nothing, sanctions, blockades, and surreptitious intelligence and paramilitary operations against "regimes" the previous government sought to overthrow would, in some cases, be lifted. New trade deals and specific industrial contracts could be formed, according to the needs of those nations to be stable, especially in the medical and infrastructure sectors. You understand, Russia and China are picking up partners around the world that "our" country deems adversarial, solely for the reason that their governments are not allied or subjugated to the wills of the most powerful groups and individuals in Washington, D.C. and London.
You know, it was just last week when "the radical left" of the Democratic Party forced the "mainstream Democrats" and President Biden to not include an automatic, full refill of the Iron Dome "defense" system that "we" built for the Zionist Entity so that it might slaughter the Palestinians without suffering the consquences. I'm certainly against all of the domestic programs of these people, but isn't it funny how the Republicans wouldn't have done such a thing? But don't worry, the "Israelis" will still get the Iron Dome we gave them refilled with American tax dollars, one way or another. There is a very likely movement happening among the Swamp in D.C. right now to build a similar Iron Dome system for the Zionist satellite in Eastern Europe, Khazaria 2.0, d.b.a. "Ukraine". I'm sure many pockets will be filled, even if there is no real military application, and very few Republicans will complain about THAT.
I would immediately withdraw from Iraq and Syria, assist the redevelopment of those countries, encourage the repatriation of Iraqi and Syrian refugees from Europe, the waves of which "we" bear total responsibility for, and not treat the Zionist Entity as an enemy (unless they do something to deserve it from here forward), but rescind the Trump-Biden "recognition" of the Golan Heights as Zionist territory. I would encourage peace in the region and integrate the Islamic Republic of Iran in negotiations, forcing the Zionists to look the Iranians in the eye, in a new summit that would be followed by another with Putin and Xi. You see, I believe it is in the best interest not only of Arabs but also of the Zionist people to be encouraged not to seek military "solutions" to deep-seated disagreements that have resulted in, and could result further into a truly regrettable catastrophe, but rather to find a way to embrace humanity outside themselves; something they need a helping hand to accomplish.
There would be great savings, none of this would cost a penny, for example, "we" wouldn't even have most of those bases around the world anymore, certainly not in Germany, Italy, or South Korea. I don't believe in occuping defeated enemies perpetually just to line the pockets of connected political interests.
Reply With Quote
Connect With Us