Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Public health fraud: Why water fluoridation is one of the greatest crimes against humanity

  1. #1

    Public health fraud: Why water fluoridation is one of the greatest crimes against humanity

    Public health fraud: Why water fluoridation is one of the greatest crimes against humanity

    BY VICKY BATTS ON 10/06/2018

    The mass medication of citizens via water fluoridation may be one of the greatest crimes against humanity taking place today — and it’s also one of the most under-reported scandals, too. Daring to speak out about the real facts on fluoride will get you stamped as a “crazy conspiracy theorist,” just like questioning vaccine safety or talking about the dangers of glyphosate will get you a fast-pass to being labeled “anti-science.”

    But, even though the cost may be great, a few brave souls are still willing to speak out about the health hazards foisted upon us by the powers that be. Dr. David Kennedy, a biological dentist, recently called water fluoridation a “public health fraud,” and his description couldn’t be any more correct.

    The fraud of fluoride

    First and foremost, fluoride is not an essential nutrient. Humans do not, and never will, need fluoride to be healthy. In fact, quite the opposite is true: Fluoride is a highly toxic substance. That’s why there is a poison warning on toothpaste and other fluoride-containing products.

    As Fluoride Action Network explains, fluoride has historically been used as a pesticide — and that’s why consuming too much fluoride in one sitting can lead to serious poisoning, and even death. But the dangers of fluoride don’t end with the acute. Long-term, there are many other negative side effects to be had.

    Dental fluorosis and skeletal fluorosis are the two most obvious forms of harm. Experts have noted that by the time fluoride has been deposited in bone tissue, it is very likely that other forms of less detectable damage have taken place. For example, studies have shown chronic fluoride consumption can lead to arthritic pain and an increased risk of fractures — even before skeletal fluorosis has set in.

    There are also substantial concerns about the effects lifetime fluoride consumption may have on the brain and thyroid. Multiple studies have shown that fluoride consumption can cause brain damage and lower IQ in children.

    Water fluoridation should be a crime

    Roughly 20 years ago, a union representing scientists and toxicologists from the EPA reportedly stated,”[W]e hold that water fluoridation is an unreasonable risk.”

    The union has, in the past, testified that water fluoridation has been linked to “cancer, genetic damage, neurological impairment and bone pathology.”

    A 2012 tudy piloted by Harvard Medical School found that water fluoridation was linked to lower IQs and adversely effected cognitive development in children.

    Senior study author Philippe Grandjean commented on the findings. “Fluoride seems to fit in with lead, mercury, and other poisons that cause chemical brain drain [emphasis added]. The effect of each toxicant may seem small, but the combined damage on a population scale can be serious, especially because the brain power of the next generation is crucial to all of us,” he stated.

    In 2015, Grandjean and his team published follow-up research, which examined the effects of consistent lifetime water fluoridation in first grade children. And again, the findings confirmed their suspicions about the neurotoxicity of fluoride. The researchers concluded again that their data “supports the notion that fluoride in drinking water may produce developmental neurotoxicity.”

    The evidence of harm is clear — yet nothing is being done to roll back water fluoridation efforts. The danger is real folks; water fluoridation is nothing more than a scheme to dumb down the masses and make people sick. In reality, water fluoridation is a crime; it’s not just a form of mass medication, but rather, mass poisoning. There is no reason for this toxic substance to be added to public water supplies. You can learn more about local efforts to end water fluoridation here.

    For more information about the dangers of fluoride and the public water poisoning scheme, read on at Fluoride.news.
    All embedded links are here.
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    Chester Copperpot
    Member

    in case you havent noticed.. nteu280.org took the fluorosilicate page off their website some years ago...

    its somewhere hidden on the site still, just no links to it... but you can still find screen shots of it online.

  4. #3
    Flash Back from 2005:

    EPA Scientists & Workers Call for an End to Water Fluoridation Because of Cancer Risk
    From: Environment News Service <www.ens-newswire.com

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    EPA UNIONS CALL FOR NATIONWIDE MORATORIUM ON FLUORIDATION, CONGRESSIONAL HEARING ON ADVERSE EFFECTS, YOUTH CANCER COVER UP

    WASHINGTON, DC, August 30, 2005 --/WORLD-WIRE/-- Eleven EPA employee unions representing over 7000 environmental and public health professionals of the Civil Service have called for a moratorium on drinking water fluoridation programs across the country, and have asked EPA management to recognize fluoride as posing a serious risk of causing cancer in people. The unions acted following revelations of an apparent cover-up of evidence from Harvard School of Dental Medicine linking fluoridation with elevated risk of a fatal bone cancer in young boys.

    The unions sent letters to key Congressional committees asking Congress to legislate a moratorium pending a review of all the science on the risks and benefits of fluoridation. The letters cited the weight of evidence supporting a classification of fluoride as a likely human carcinogen, which includes other epidemiology results similar to those in the Harvard study, animal studies, and biological reasons why fluoride can reasonably be expected to cause the bone cancer - osteosarcoma - seen in young boys and test animals.

    The unions also pointed out recent work by Richard Maas of the Environmental Quality Institute, University of North Carolina that links increases in lead levels in drinking water systems to use of silicofluoride fluoridating agents with chloramines disinfectant.

    The letter to EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson asked him to issue a public warning in the form of an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking setting the health-based drinking water standard for fluoride at zero, as it is for all known or probable human carcinogens, pending a recommendation from a National Academy of Sciences' National Research Council committee. That committee's work is not expected to be done before 2006.

    The unions also asked Congress and EPA's enforcement office, or the Department of Justice, to look into reasons why the Harvard study director, Chester Douglass, failed to report the seven-fold increased risk seen in the work he oversaw, and instead wrote to the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, the federal agency that funded the Harvard study, saying there was no link between fluoridation and osteosarcoma. Douglass sent the same negative report to the National Research Council committee studying possible changes in EPA's drinking water standards for fluoride.

    The unions who signed the letters represent EPA employees from across the nation, including laboratory scientists in Ohio, Oklahoma and Michigan, regulatory support scientists and other workers at EPA headquarters in Washington, D.C. and science and regulatory workers in Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Atlanta, and San Francisco.

    They are affiliated with the National Treasury Employees Union, the American Federation of Government Employees, Engineers and Scientists of California/International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, and the National Association of Government Employee/Service Employees International Union.

    The unions' letter is online at: http://nteu280.org/Issues/Fluoride/fluoridesummary.htm

    FOR INFORMATION CONTACT:

    Dr. William Hirzy Vice-President, NTEU Chapter 280
    Phone (cell) 202-285-0498 This is complete notice.

    USA Citizens can easily back-up the 7,000 EPA 'career employees.' Consider, you and your family need CLEAN & SAFE Drinking Water, every day. This is your opportunity to back those 7000+ EPA union members that care about scientific integrity and exposing the truth about 'corporate hazardous waste fluorosilicates' being metered into our drinking waters. Their common sense demand for a 'moratorium on fluoridation' along with Congressional Investigation incl. 'under oath' hearings is critical!

    We, the undersigned, join with members of eleven EPA unions in their call for an immediate Congressional act placing a national moratorium on water fluoridation pending a full Congressional investigation into this public policy, which affects - directly and indirectly - every resident of the United States.

    Read & Sign Citizens PETITION at: http://petition.powalliance.org/index.html
    http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/h...ide090105.html
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner

  5. #4

    Don't need a weather man to know which way the wind blows

  6. #5
    Dental fluorosis and skeletal fluorosis are the two most obvious forms of harm.
    So how common is skeletal flourosis in the US? Should you be worried about it?

    https://ilikemyteeth.org/facts-tea-s...rosis-article/

    In fact, a 1991 report by the U.S. Public Health Service found that skeletal fluorosis “is not a public health problem in the United States, as evidenced by the reports of only five cases in 30 years.”
    Five cases in thirty years in the US! Panic time!!!!!

    Better avoid tea too.

    https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmicm1200995

    Skeletal Fluorosis Due to Excessive Tea Drinking

    A 47-year-old woman was referred for bone pain and abnormal findings on radiography. The patient reported that for the past 17 years, she has habitually consumed a pitcher of tea made from 100 to 150 tea bags daily (estimated fluoride intake, >20 mg per day). She reported a 5-year history of pain in the lower back, arms, legs, and hips. Because of brittleness, all her teeth had been extracted. Radiography of the forearm revealed interosseous membrane calcifications (Panel A, arrows), and radiography of the spine revealed a rugger-jersey appearance (striated pattern of increased density in the upper and lower zones of the vertebrae) (Panel B, arrows), suggesting skeletal fluorosis. The serum fluoride concentration was 0.43 mg per liter (23 μmol per liter; normal concentration, <0.10 mg per liter [5 μmol per liter]). Skeletal fluorosis is endemic in areas with high concentrations of fluoride in the drinking water, but it is rare in other parts of the world. Brewed tea has one of the highest fluoride contents among beverages in the United States. After appropriate counseling, the patient discontinued tea consumption, with improvement in her symptoms. Since it can take years to deplete skeletal fluoride, we are considering whether to increase bone remodeling with the intermittent use of teriparatide to facilitate the elimination of skeletal fluoride.
    But who is going to consume over 100 bags of tea a day? This single case is also an extremely rare example.
    Last edited by Zippyjuan; 10-14-2018 at 07:54 PM.

  7. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    So how common is skeletal flourosis in the US? Should you be worried about it?

    https://ilikemyteeth.org/facts-tea-s...rosis-article/



    Five cases in thirty years in the US! Panic time!!!!!

    Better avoid tea too.

    https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmicm1200995



    But who is going to consume over 100 bags of tea a day? This single case is also an extremely rare example.

    SKELETAL FLUOROSIS IN THE U.S.
    https://fluoridealert.org/studies/skeletal_fluorosis06/
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner

  8. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by donnay View Post
    An anti-flouride source saying they don't know how many if any cases occur in the US. Awesome proof.

  9. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    An anti-flouride source saying they don't know how many if any cases occur in the US. Awesome proof.
    Who else will document it?

    If it was so safe why do you suppose they have warnings on the tube?

    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-12-2018, 09:10 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-21-2012, 02:07 PM
  3. Murray Rothbard against water fluoridation
    By Anti Federalist in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-07-2011, 11:13 PM
  4. Water fluoridation | What do you think?
    By sheepmoney in forum Personal Health & Well-Being
    Replies: 78
    Last Post: 11-10-2009, 03:40 PM
  5. Any Brits here agaist water fluoridation ?
    By shida in forum Health Freedom
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-11-2008, 03:49 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •