Third Woeman now: "I saw Kavanaugh line up to participate in gang rape"

[Anti Federalist]

BREAKING: Michael Avenatti Reveals Client Making ‘Gang Rape’ Allegation Against Kavanaugh

https://www.mediaite.com/online/brea...nst-kavanaugh/

Attorney for Stormy Daniels, Michael Avenatti, earlier this week, claimed to have a client with a third allegation against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. He made the announcement, and tweeted lurid accusations, without offering the identity of the client or any evidence.

Today, Avenatti tweeted a name and photo of that client, along with a sworn statement from the alleged victim laying out her serious allegations.

In the statement, Julie Swetnick, a current government employee, alleges Kavanaugh and his friend Mark Judge attended a party where she was drugged and gang raped by a series of boys. While she does not accuse Kavanaugh of assaulting her, she claims she witnessed him participate in the gang rapes.

In his tweet that included the screenshots, Avenatti asserted that Kavanaugh’s nomination must not go forward without more investigation of the claims.

Paragraph 13 of the sworn statement (below) has the specific personal allegation.

In approximately 1982, I became the victim of one of these “gang” or “train” rapes where Mark Judge and Brett Kavanaugh were present. Shortly after the incident, I shared what had transpired with at least two other people. During the incident, I was incapacitated without my consent and unable to fight off the boys raping me. I believe I was drugged using Quaaludes or something similar placed in what I was drinking.”

Davis’ statement (below) also alleges that she witnessed Kavanaugh waiting in a rape line for his “turn” in the gang rape of another woman, whom they allegedly incapacitated.

I also witnessed efforts by Mark Judge, Brett Kavanaugh and others to cause girls to become inebriated and disoriented so they could then be “gang raped” in a side room or bedroom by a “train” of numerous boys. I have a firm recollection of seeing boys lined up outside rooms at many of these parties waiting for their “turn” with a girl inside the room. These boys included Mark Judge and Brett Kavanaugh.”

[phill4paul]

So this chick goes to parties between '81 and '82. Witnesses "numerous" cases of girls being "spiked" and "gang" raped. So, she doesn't tell an adult. She just keeps going to these parties and then it happens to her.

She worked as an IBM digital analyst, for Homeland Security as a senior web production manager, for the Department of Justice as a senior production webmaster, the Department of State in the same job

https://heavy.com/news/2018/09/julie-swetnick/

[Brian4Liberty]

So this chick goes to parties between '81 and '82. Witnesses "numerous" cases of girls being "spiked" and "gang" raped. So, she doesn't tell an adult. She just keeps going to these parties and then it happens to her.

https://heavy.com/news/2018/09/julie-swetnick/

Exactly.

I have a firm recollection of seeing boys lined up outside rooms at many of these parties waiting for their “turn” with a girl inside the room.

“It was horrible! It was awful! It happened every weekend for two years!”

[CCTelander]

Breaking! New Kavanaugh accuser, Ima Fulla$#@!, comes forward and issues startling new allegations. "I witnessed Kavanaugh consorting with Satan and various Satanic demons and devouring infants every weekend at parties. It traumatized me for life."

Are even the rubes actually buying this $#@! anymore? I don't even like the guy, but this is farcical.

[Anti Federalist]

Breaking! New Kavanaugh accuser, Ima Fulla$#@!, comes forward and issues startling new allegations. "I witnessed Kavanaugh consorting with Satan and various Satanic demons and devouring infants every weekend at parties. It traumatized me for life."

Are even the rubes actually buying this $#@! anymore? I don't even like the guy, but this is farcical.

That's pretty much where I'm at on this.

[PierzStyx]

Isn't it just fascinating how all the "minarchists" on here leap to the defense of a National Socialist who has openly declared his support for the PATRIOT Act and everything that goes with it? It is almost as if their loyalty to a specific party is more important than the actual struggle for liberty. They declare loyalty to the party of big government, mass surveillance, elimination of the Constitution, unending war, and police state power and defend it and its endless hoard of parasites, moochers, and thugs from any defamation.

[phill4paul]

Isn't it just fascinating how all the "minarchists" on here leap to the defense of a National Socialist who has openly declared his support for the PATRIOT Act and everything that goes with it? It is almost as if their loyalty to a specific party is more important than the actual struggle for liberty. They declare loyalty to the party of big government, mass surveillance, elimination of the Constitution, unending war, and police state power and defend it and its endless hoard of parasites, moochers, and thugs from any defamation.

Next you'll be telling us how many of these parties you attended before you were gang raped.

[specsaregood]

Isn't it just fascinating how all the "minarchists" on here leap to the defense of a National Socialist who has openly declared his support for the PATRIOT Act and everything that goes with it? It is almost as if their loyalty to a specific party is more important than the actual struggle for liberty. They declare loyalty to the party of big government, mass surveillance, elimination of the Constitution, unending war, and police state power and defend it and its endless hoard of parasites, moochers, and thugs from any defamation.

Please point out where people here are defending his position on the Patriot Act.

[Anti Federalist]

Isn't it just fascinating how all the "minarchists" on here leap to the defense of a National Socialist who has openly declared his support for the PATRIOT Act and everything that goes with it? It is almost as if their loyalty to a specific party is more important than the actual struggle for liberty. They declare loyalty to the party of big government, mass surveillance, elimination of the Constitution, unending war, and police state power and defend it and its endless hoard of parasites, moochers, and thugs from any defamation.

Already explained this to you.

You are confusing support for Kavanaugh, with opposition to the idea that people can just say something happened 40 years ago and ruin your life or send you to prison.

[Brian4Liberty]

Isn't it just fascinating how all the "minarchists" on here leap to the defense of a National Socialist who has openly declared his support for the PATRIOT Act and everything that goes with it? It is almost as if their loyalty to a specific party is more important than the actual struggle for liberty. They declare loyalty to the party of big government, mass surveillance, elimination of the Constitution, unending war, and police state power and defend it and its endless hoard of parasites, moochers, and thugs from any defamation.

Isn’t it fascinating how you constantly create straw men?

[specsaregood]

Already explained this to you.

You are confusing support for Kavanaugh, with opposition to the idea that people can just say something happened 40 years ago and ruin your life or send you to prison.

TDS is serious business.

[Anti Federalist]

Please point out where people here are defending his position on the Patriot Act.

I'd like PS to point out where anybody here is defending him on any position.

All I know about him, based on a very cursory review, is that he is slightly better on the 2nd Amendment than your average clown in a gown.

Seems to me the very definition of a police state is when you are publicly accused and have no recourse, no presumption of innocence, and can be ruined and possibly jailed based on decades old "memories".

[Anti Federalist]

Hey, look at it this way, maybe this will lead to an epiphany on his part.

Brett, after going through what just happened to you, maybe you'll want to re-consider judicial "logic" that allows such assaults on the freedoms of millions of other citizens, falsely accused and ruined and/or imprisoned due to running afoul of CPS or asset forfeiture laws or "no fly lists" or PATRIOT Act provisions or illegal and unwarranted surveillance or a million other ways you can go to jail in AmeriKa these days.

[CaptUSA]

Isn't it just fascinating how all the "minarchists" on here leap to the defense of a National Socialist who has openly declared his support for the PATRIOT Act and everything that goes with it? It is almost as if their loyalty to a specific party is more important than the actual struggle for liberty. They declare loyalty to the party of big government, mass surveillance, elimination of the Constitution, unending war, and police state power and defend it and its endless hoard of parasites, moochers, and thugs from any defamation.

Hey, I'm with you. I already stated that I hope this charade works, the dems lose big in Nov., then Trump selects a real judge. Of course, I don't see any of that happening.

In the meantime, it certainly seems like the script writers have jumped the shark on this one. But hey, it's sweeps week. Maybe more people will get tired of the show?? One can only hope.

[Krugminator2]

Already explained this to you.

You are confusing support for Kavanaugh, with opposition to the idea that people can just say something happened 40 years ago and ruin your life or send you to prison.

Let's be honest, the opposition to Kavanaugh even among people here and Judge Napolitano is a little over the top.

Stossel just did a thing on him. Kavanaugh is a pretty decent choice. Certainly an improvement over Kennedy. And National Socialist? LOL. The guy was a chosen by The Federalist Society which is a libertarian-conservative group. He has been a regular speaker there for 20 years. It would have been unthinkable to have someone this good on the court 40 years ago.

[shakey1]

Hey, look at it this way, maybe this will lead to an epiphany on his part.

Brett, after going through what just happened to you, maybe you'll want to re-consider judicial "logic" that allows such assaults on the freedoms of millions of other citizens, falsely accused and ruined and/or imprisoned due to running afoul of CPS or asset forfeiture laws or "no fly lists" or PATRIOT Act provisions or illegal and unwarranted surveillance or a million other ways you can go to jail in AmeriKa these days.

Will probably just wind up being cowed into submission... a few additional allegations outta do it.

[Anti Federalist]

Let's be honest, the opposition to Kavanaugh even among people here and Judge Napolitano is a little over the top.

Stossel just did a thing on him. Kavanaugh is a pretty decent choice. Certainly an improvement over Kennedy. And National Socialist? LOL. The guy was a chosen by The Federalist Society which is a libertarian-conservative group. He has been a regular speaker there for 20 years. It would have been unthinkable to have someone this good on the court 40 years ago.

Yah, I don't recall writing anything in support or in opposition to him.

Based on what you posted, yeah, he seems pretty decent.

And everybody scoffs, but the fact is, it's a much better choice than anything you'd have gotten from Hillary.

[Anti Federalist]

Will probably just wind up being cowed into submission... a few additional allegations outta do it.

I'm wondering what's next...Satan himself?

He had sex with Cthulhu?

"I saw him BBQing babies on his back deck!"?

[phill4paul]

Yah, I don't recall writing anything in support or in opposition to him.

Based on what you posted, yeah, he seems pretty decent.

And everybody scoffs, but the fact is, it's a much better choice than anything you'd have gotten from Hillary.

Which is why progressives are in support of these kinds of tactics. It's all meant to delay until after the mid-terms and the anticipated blue-wave. This confirmation comes down to only one vote.

[CaptUSA]

And everybody scoffs, but the fact is, it's a much better choice than anything you'd have gotten from Hillary.

You realize that excuse is universal, right. "Oh, he started WWIII, but it's better than what Hillary would have done!"

When does that excuse go away? It's as bad as Obama blaming Bush. The hope was that if we ever got the chance to shift the balance of the Court, we'd do it with an eye towards liberty. Kavanaugh is a swamp-monster. As someone opposed to the surveillance state, I'm surprised to hear you say he's pretty decent. His record there is horrible.

[Anti Federalist]

Which is why progressives are in support of these kinds of tactics. It's all meant to delay until after the mid-terms and the anticipated blue-wave. This confirmation comes down to only one vote.

Oh yeah, it's obvious what's happening here.

Once a democrat Senate is in place, then every single judicial nomination can be dead lettered until 2020.

[Anti Federalist]

You realize that excuse is universal, right. "Oh, he started WWIII, but it's better than what Hillary would have done!"

When does that excuse go away? It's as bad as Obama blaming Bush. The hope was that if we ever got the chance to shift the balance of the Court, we'd do it with an eye towards liberty. Kavanaugh is a swamp-monster. As someone opposed to the surveillance state, I'm surprised to hear you say he's pretty decent. His record there is horrible.

Not an excuse, a statement of plain fact.

Again, I know very little about him, I'm just going by that Stossel clip, which I just now saw.

we'd do it with an eye towards liberty.

I'm hoping that is the case here, especially, as I noted above, he has gone through this nonsense...I would hope he would learn a valuable lesson about individual rights, due process, and false accusations.

[phill4paul]

You realize that excuse is universal, right. "Oh, he started WWIII, but it's better than what Hillary would have done!"

When does that excuse go away? It's as bad as Obama blaming Bush. The hope was that if we ever got the chance to shift the balance of the Court, we'd do it with an eye towards liberty. Kavanaugh is a swamp-monster. As someone opposed to the surveillance state, I'm surprised to hear you say he's pretty decent. His record there is horrible.

Rand met with him one on one and came away feeling that Kavanaugh would be a fair pick. Given Rand's stance against the surveillance state I'm going to have to trust him on this one.
End the end one should hope to go to a confirmation vote Fri. regardless. If Kav isn't confirmed then that gives the conservatives a chance to float another nominee. Hopefully one more liberty oriented. Because, believe me , though you don't care to pick a side either right or left, you honestly can't prefer progressive on the court.

[fcreature]

Isn't it just fascinating how all the "minarchists" on here leap to the defense of a National Socialist who has openly declared his support for the PATRIOT Act and everything that goes with it? It is almost as if their loyalty to a specific party is more important than the actual struggle for liberty. They declare loyalty to the party of big government, mass surveillance, elimination of the Constitution, unending war, and police state power and defend it and its endless hoard of parasites, moochers, and thugs from any defamation.

Has literally nothing to do with the accusations at hand.

One can be outraged at false rape accusations and offer a defense of the victim (kavanaugh) on the issue, and still disagree with him on policy issues.

[dean.engelhardt]

So this chick goes to parties between '81 and '82. Witnesses "numerous" cases of girls being "spiked" and "gang" raped. So, she doesn't tell an adult. She just keeps going to these parties and then it happens to her.



https://heavy.com/news/2018/09/julie-swetnick/

If you or I, knew women were being drugged and gang raped at parties, and did not report it to police, we would be an accessory to a crime. I feel bad if Swetnick was a victim of rape, but that should not give her a pass for confessing to being a part of covering up multiple gang rape incidents. If the statement is to be taken seriously, she should be facing charges.

[specsaregood]

If you or I, knew women were being drugged and gang raped at parties, and did not report it to police, we would be an accessory to a crime. I feel bad if Swetnick was a victim of rape, but that should not give her a pass for confessing to being a part of covering up multiple gang rape incidents. If the statement is to be taken seriously, she should be facing charges.

She is also 2 years older than him; she would have been 18+...

[dean.engelhardt]

She is also 2 years older than him; she would have been 18+...

So she was an adult, confessing to accessory to rape of minors? I wonder how this is going to work out for her. Will she be receive "political" protection for her confessed crime?

I believe there will be a quick retraction of the statement. I can't believe her attorney allowed it to be released.

[phill4paul]

So she was an adult, confessing to accessory to rape of minors? I wonder how this is going to work out for her. Will she be receive "political" protection for her confessed crime?

I believe there will be a quick retraction of the statement. I can't believe her attorney allowed it to be released.

Yep. Legally an adult. Witnessed "numerous" rape crimes. Never reported. Charges should be forth coming on this admission.

[donnay]

Hope they all realize if this woman really witnessed all these rapes she will be charged with felony accessory after the fact and conspiracy. No statute of limitations then.

Creepy porn lawyer probably doesn't care he just like the attention.

[CaptUSA]

Creepy porn lawyer probably doesn't care he just like the attention.

Gloria Allred showed people how to make money at this. No surprise someone like Avenatti picked up on it.