Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Supreme Court to Hear Indiana Civil Asset Forfeiture Case

  1. #1

    Supreme Court to Hear Indiana Civil Asset Forfeiture Case

    Here’s a brief background on the case, as reported by WFYI in Indianapolis:
    A Marion [Indiana] resident named Tyson Timbs claims police violated the Eight Amendment’s excessive fines clause when they seized his vehicle – worth more than $40,000 – because he used it to transport a few hundred dollars worth of drugs.
    When Tyson Timbs moved to Marion, Indiana a few years ago, he hoped it would be a fresh start.
    He'd been living in Ohio and struggling with an opioid addiction for years. When his Aunt Wendy got sick, he decided to move to Indiana to help.
    "I actually thought, 'Hey, maybe this is going to be the cure to all my problems,'" Timbs says. "Unfortunately I came with me. So, you know, you can't run from yourself.”
    Marion is a small town, and Timbs soon learned who to go to in order to find the drugs he needed to function. He eventually turned to heroin, using some life insurance money from his father's death to cover the costs of his habit.
    Timbs also used more than $42,000 from the payout to buy a Land Rover. Court documents say he drove the car to Richmond to buy heroin. And, at least twice, he sold heroin. The buyers were informants and an undercover detective. Court documents say Timbs sold a total of just more than $500 worth of heroin to them.
    Police arrested Timbs and took his Land Rover. A couple months after filing felony charges against Timbs, the state started a civil forfeiture case in an attempt to keep Timbs' vehicle.



    More at: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnew...orfeiture-case
    Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig.

    Robert Heinlein

    Give a man an inch and right away he thinks he's a ruler

    Groucho Marx

    I love mankind…it’s people I can’t stand.

    Linus, from the Peanuts comic

    You cannot have liberty without morality and morality without faith

    Alexis de Torqueville

    Those who fail to learn from the past are condemned to repeat it.
    Those who learn from the past are condemned to watch everybody else repeat it

    A Zero Hedge comment



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    His money would have gone to drugs or drug enforcement either way.

    Out of all the cases the court could choose to hear they pick this one. I have read of people traveling to purchase cars, winners coming home from casino's and other totally innocent people that have been robbed via civil asset forfeiture.

    Just goes to show you better off to not have things paid for. They cannot civil asset forfeiture a vehicle that has a bigger lien than it is worth or an underwater house.



Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-30-2018, 09:20 PM
  2. Supreme Court won’t hear Kim Dotcom’s civil forfeiture case
    By Swordsmyth in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-02-2017, 09:21 PM
  3. Supreme Court to hear TX redistricting case
    By Number19 in forum Rand Paul Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-10-2011, 10:20 AM
  4. Supreme Court to hear Chicago gun case
    By Wampy in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-30-2009, 08:44 AM
  5. US Supreme Court agrees to hear DC gun case
    By Bradley in DC in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-20-2007, 03:05 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •