Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Bake the cake, redux

  1. #1

    Bake the cake, redux

    Hostility unabated: Colorado seeks to punish cake artist Jack Phillips again



    ADF attorneys file suit against state officials

    Wednesday, August 15, 2018

    DENVER – Although the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in June that Colorado cannot treat cake artist Jack Phillips differently than others, state officials have continued to do just that in response to a more recent complaint filed against him. Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys representing Phillips and his cake shop filed a federal lawsuit late Tuesday against those officials for doubling down on their anti-religious hostility.

    On June 26, 2017, the same day that the Supreme Court agreed to take up Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, an attorney asked Phillips to create a cake designed pink on the inside and blue on the outside, which the attorney said was to celebrate a gender transition from male to female. Phillips declined the request because the custom cake would have expressed messages about sex and gender identity that conflict with his religious beliefs. Less than a month after the Supreme Court ruled for Phillips in his first case, the state surprised him by finding probable cause to believe that Colorado law requires him to create the requested gender-transition cake.

    “The state of Colorado is ignoring the message of the U.S. Supreme Court by continuing to single out Jack for punishment and to exhibit hostility toward his religious beliefs,” said ADF Senior Vice President of U.S. Legal Division Kristen Waggoner. “Even though Jack serves all customers and simply declines to create custom cakes that express messages or celebrate events in violation of his deeply held beliefs, the government is intent on destroying him—something the Supreme Court has already told it not to do. Neither Jack nor any other creative professionals should be targeted by the government for living consistently with their religious beliefs.”

    As the new lawsuit explains, “The Constitution stands as a bulwark against state officials who target people—and seek to ruin their lives—because of the government’s anti-religious animus. For over six years now, Colorado has been on a crusade to crush Plaintiff Jack Phillips…because its officials despise what he believes and how he practices his faith. After Phillips defended himself all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court and won, he thought Colorado’s hostility toward his faith was over. He was wrong. Colorado has renewed its war against him by embarking on another attempt to prosecute him, in direct conflict with the Supreme Court’s ruling in his favor. This lawsuit is necessary to stop Colorado’s continuing persecution of Phillips.”

    continued http://www.adfmedia.org/News/PRDetail/10601
    "The Patriarch"



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    Muh sex change cake, bake it you bigot.
    "The Patriarch"

  4. #3
    Poor guy the fruits won't leave him alone.

  5. #4

    Rocky Mountain Donnell - Colorado Log Cabin Republicans

    Quote Originally Posted by tod evans View Post
    Poor guy the fruits won't leave him alone.



    SJW Donnell rallies the Colorado Gay Mafia
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    You only show up to attack Trump when he is wrong
    Make America the Land of the Free & the Home of the Brave again

  6. #5
    I wouldn't cry if someone firebombed the Attorneys office.

  7. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by phill4paul View Post
    I wouldn't cry if someone firebombed the Attorneys office.

  8. #7
    Hold the phone...

    How is it perfectly acceptable to ban content on widely used public speech platforms on the basis that "it's their company, they can serve or or not serve whoever they please" but not in this case?

    $#@!ing hypocrites.

  9. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
    Hold the phone...

    How is it perfectly acceptable to ban content on widely used public speech platforms on the basis that "it's their company, they can serve or or not serve whoever they please" but not in this case?

    $#@!ing hypocrites.
    Is true.

    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Anti Federalist again.



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
    Hold the phone...

    How is it perfectly acceptable to ban content on widely used public speech platforms on the basis that "it's their company, they can serve or or not serve whoever they please" but not in this case?

    $#@!ing hypocrites.
    I typed this yesterday;

    Quote Originally Posted by tod evans View Post
    If you don't accept me you're a hater!

    If I don't accept you and attack you physically or verbally I'm fighting the good fight.

    See how that works?

  12. #10
    Pfizer Macht Frei!

    Openly Straight Man, Danke, Awarded Top Rated Influencer. Community Standards Enforcer.


    Quiz: Test Your "Income" Tax IQ!

    Short Income Tax Video

    The Income Tax Is An Excise, And Excise Taxes Are Privilege Taxes

    The Federalist Papers, No. 15:

    Except as to the rule of appointment, the United States have an indefinite discretion to make requisitions for men and money; but they have no authority to raise either by regulations extending to the individual citizens of America.

  13. #11
    an attorney asked Phillips to create a cake designed pink on the inside and blue on the outside, which the attorney said was to celebrate a gender transition from male to female.
    What if the attorney was lying
    "He's talkin' to his gut like it's a person!!" -me
    "dumpster diving isn't professional." - angelatc
    "You don't need a medical degree to spot obvious bullshit, that's actually a separate skill." -Scott Adams
    "When you are divided, and angry, and controlled, you target those 'different' from you, not those responsible [controllers]" -Q

    "Each of us must choose which course of action we should take: education, conventional political action, or even peaceful civil disobedience to bring about necessary changes. But let it not be said that we did nothing." - Ron Paul

    "Paul said "the wave of the future" is a coalition of anti-authoritarian progressive Democrats and libertarian Republicans in Congress opposed to domestic surveillance, opposed to starting new wars and in favor of ending the so-called War on Drugs."

  14. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Origanalist View Post
    Muh sex change cake, bake it you bigot.

    Quote Originally Posted by Origanalist View Post
    This intellectually stimulating conversation is the reason I keep coming here.
    ...
    Pfizer Macht Frei!

    Openly Straight Man, Danke, Awarded Top Rated Influencer. Community Standards Enforcer.


    Quiz: Test Your "Income" Tax IQ!

    Short Income Tax Video

    The Income Tax Is An Excise, And Excise Taxes Are Privilege Taxes

    The Federalist Papers, No. 15:

    Except as to the rule of appointment, the United States have an indefinite discretion to make requisitions for men and money; but they have no authority to raise either by regulations extending to the individual citizens of America.



Similar Threads

  1. Supremes Miss The Point On "Bake The Cake" Ruling
    By Ender in forum Ron Paul Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-05-2018, 08:29 PM
  2. Bake the Cake, But Don't Frost it
    By presence in forum Open Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 08-09-2016, 02:57 PM
  3. 2005 - Shake and Bake
    By presence in forum World News & Affairs
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-01-2013, 07:59 AM
  4. Replies: 35
    Last Post: 06-10-2013, 08:14 AM
  5. Ron's bake sale
    By heavenlyboy34 in forum Liberty Campaigns
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 06-23-2010, 10:05 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •