Chelsea Clinton Claims Roe v Wade “Added $3.5 Trillion to Our Economy”

[ThePaleoLibertarian]

This is what I mean when I say that the problems that face the US and the West are spiritual and not exclusively economic or fiscal. Even if it's true, the transformation of children from a blessing and a privilege to a burden and a "choice" outweigh any alleged economic benefits. Women choosing not to have kids because it will mess up some plan they have to be a corporate drone at some awful conglomerate is NOT a good thing.

[ThePaleoLibertarian]

I'll be honest. I am pretty indifferent on abortion. It can be argued both ways. I am probably pro-choice if for no other reason, I believe it reduces crime. http://freakonomics.com/2005/05/15/a...d-you-believe/

I don't think Chelsea Clinton's argument about improving the economy is correct, but if it were, I see it as a good argument to make.

Steven Pinker has pretty expertly debunked the claim that abortion reduced crime.

[Jan2017]

Jane Doe v Wade . . . oops I mean ROE . . ,.
was an engineered case . . . the lady didn't want this - it was lawyer-induced.

[euphemia]

Over 60 million murders since Rove v Wade was decided. I don't see where Clinton is getting $3.5 trillion. She has to be pretty sick to actually doing that kind of math.

[Anti Globalist]

Once again a Clinton has no idea what they're talking about.

[William Tell]

Disgusting! what a nasty woman.

[EBounding]