I don't think it is clear. Should children be able to buy guns? John Hinckley is free right now. Do you think he should legally possess a gun? I get that if someone really wants a gun they can get it. But commonsense would dictate that you make it as hard as possible for John Hinckley to get a gun.
And how do you define arms? Should you be able to possess all types of bombs? What about nuclear weapons?
The Framers were radicals. But they were much less so than today's hardcore libertarians. I would bet they would unanimously answer "NO" to all the questions about weapon's possession that I just asked.
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us