Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Ep. 1156 Is the Term "Libertarian" Still Useful? Jeff Deist on Libertarian Division

  1. #1

    Ep. 1156 Is the Term "Libertarian" Still Useful? Jeff Deist on Libertarian Division




    Ep. 1156 LISTEN TO THIS ONE Is the Term “Libertarian” Still Useful? Jeff Deist on Libertarian Division

    This one’s a doozy, my friends.

    The Mises Institute’s Jeff Deist joins me to discuss libertarianism, left and right, and ongoing divisions within the movement. We pose the question: if you could have libertarianism triumph but it meant cultural outcomes of which you disapproved, would you still want it? Plus a lot more in this lively discussion.
    https://tomwoods.com/ep-1156-listen-...rian-division/


    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Paul View Post
    The intellectual battle for liberty can appear to be a lonely one at times. However, the numbers are not as important as the principles that we hold. Leonard Read always taught that "it's not a numbers game, but an ideological game." That's why it's important to continue to provide a principled philosophy as to what the role of government ought to be, despite the numbers that stare us in the face.
    Quote Originally Posted by Origanalist View Post
    This intellectually stimulating conversation is the reason I keep coming here.



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    I'm not inclined to give Tom ad revenue.

    Can someone give a summary?

  4. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by r3volution 3.0 View Post
    I'm not inclined to give Tom ad revenue.

    Can someone give a summary?
    Huh? Why?

  5. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by r3volution 3.0 View Post
    I'm not inclined to give Tom ad revenue.

    Can someone give a summary?
    This^^^^^

  6. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by A Son of Liberty View Post
    Huh? Why?
    Because he shat on Rand in the summer of 2015, for being insufficiently pure.

    ...and then jumped on the Trumpwagon fall 2015, winter-spring 2016, in an exercise in astonishing hypocrisy.

    Tom's a fine historian and economist, but is entirely, hopelessly naive when it comes to current affairs - no spine, no brain: a salamander.

    Quote Originally Posted by juleswin View Post
    This^^^^^
    ^^^

  7. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by r3volution 3.0 View Post
    I'm not inclined to give Tom ad revenue.

    Can someone give a summary?
    You can get the transcript at the link.

    Edited to add the shortcut for ya

    http://www.supportinglisteners.com/
    Last edited by Suzanimal; 05-31-2018 at 06:47 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Paul View Post
    The intellectual battle for liberty can appear to be a lonely one at times. However, the numbers are not as important as the principles that we hold. Leonard Read always taught that "it's not a numbers game, but an ideological game." That's why it's important to continue to provide a principled philosophy as to what the role of government ought to be, despite the numbers that stare us in the face.
    Quote Originally Posted by Origanalist View Post
    This intellectually stimulating conversation is the reason I keep coming here.



Similar Threads

  1. For a New Libertarian - Jeff Deist @ Mises U 2017
    By Brian4Liberty in forum Political Philosophy & Government Policy
    Replies: 111
    Last Post: 08-19-2017, 08:35 PM
  2. Tom Woods Ep. 928 Jeff Deist on the Key Libertarian Mistake, and What We Should Do Instead
    By Suzanimal in forum Political Philosophy & Government Policy
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-13-2017, 03:06 PM
  3. Jeff Deist: A Libertarian View of the Election
    By Suzanimal in forum 2016 Presidential Election: GOP & Dem
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-11-2016, 02:33 PM
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-28-2010, 01:36 PM
  5. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-07-2008, 11:10 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •