Page 14 of 25 FirstFirst ... 4121314151624 ... LastLast
Results 391 to 420 of 743

Thread: An army of illegal aliens is marching on America

  1. #391
    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
    You know, I'd like to hear the answer to that as well.

    If I have no stake in this operation, if I can make no claim to manage the real property of the territory know as the United States nor make any requirements on how the real property is used, then why the $#@! should I pay for it?
    You shouldn't... I suppose you do, because the tax collector has an army behind him, and you can't count on other "law-abiding tax payers" to back you up if they bust down your doors.
    Last edited by Raginfridus; 04-06-2018 at 03:55 PM.



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #392
    Quote Originally Posted by r3volution 3.0 View Post
    It appears that all anti-immigrant people are democratic socialists at heart, at least with respect to land ownership.
    Anti-immigrant people? Please define and apply to our system governed by the rule of law. I'm just curious. Not looking for an argument.

    JWK
    Last edited by johnwk; 04-06-2018 at 04:06 PM.



  4. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  5. #393
    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
    Oh, and you missed the point entirely, which is not surprising.

    The indigenous natives of what was to become the United States, initially traded and prospered with Europeans.

    The Wampanoag chief King Philip was the first to realize the danger of the foreign invaders, and launched what was to become known as King Philip's War in New England in 1675, when the English demanded the Indians turn in their guns as part of the earlier peace agreement signed by Philip's father, Massasoit.

    It would turn out to be an extremely deadly and bloody conflict, in proportion to population, one of the worst seen on continental soil. (Some historians claim a casualty rate higher than the Civil War)

    Broken treaties, genocides, roundups, reservations and all manner of horrors followed in the next two centuries.

    The end result was the utter and total annihilation of native Indian tribal culture and peoples, reducing a once proud people to a polite form of government incarceration and second class citizenship status.

    My family has been here since before Philip's war.

    I'd like to maybe not toss all that history and hard work and blood and treasure onto the trash heap.

    Tough to do, when you can't mount the slightest defense of your history, traditions (at this point it is critical to note that the very concept of individual liberty, of the individual being of more importance than the collective, is a "white" western European notion) and way of life, without being called a racist.

    Which is, of course, the point of framing the debate in such a way.
    Pretty much on the same page, AF, except being "free" isn't necessarily western civilization's perspective. What most consider "free" in this day and age, I consider prison.

    Some say the Hazda are the freest people on earth, and few have ever heard of them- but they are being exterminated by the take over of their lands.

    The Hadza: Freest People on Earth Face Extinction

    https://returntonow.net/2016/02/11/h...tys-last-hope/
    There is no spoon.

  6. #394
    Quote Originally Posted by Gumba of Liberty View Post
    People would care about the liberty of others if they realized (were educated to understand) that your own liberty fundamentally hinges on others understanding and exercising theirs. Liberty is a state of respect, peace, and civilization (cooperation). When Liberty reigns we respect the ability of others to live their own way without harming those around them. When people attempt to socially engineer their neighbors they are declaring war on their fellow man. When they use politicians to do their social engineering we call that (politics) war by other means.

    Respect, Liberty, Peace & Civilization or Hostility, Oppression, War, & Barbarism. Those are our choices. There is no middle ground.
    So we're 1/320,000,000th of the way there.

    Quote Originally Posted by johnwk View Post
    Anti-immigrant people? Please define and apply to our system governed by the rule of law. I'm just curious. Not looking for an argument.

    JWK
    You made a series of statements in this thread indicating that you reject private property rights in favor of collective land ownership.

  7. #395

    National Guard can set up tent cities to hold illegal entrants-end catch and release

    .

    If the Guard has to, they should set up a tent city and keep the illegal entrants there until a judge has time to kick them out of our country “legally”.

    No more catch and release into our communities!

    JWK


    American citizens are sick and tired of being made into tax-slaves to finance the economic needs of millions of poverty stricken, poorly educated, low and unskilled aliens who have invaded America borders.

    Quote Originally Posted by TheCount View Post


    The guard can't do that if they have been activated by Trump.


    Oh yes the can!


    SEE:
    Trump signs memo ordering end to 'catch and release' practices

    04/06/18 07:32 PM EDT


    As part of the order, Trump is requesting "a detailed list of all existing facilities, including military facilities, that could be used, modified, or repurposed to detain aliens for violations of immigration law at or near the borders of the United States."


    Thank you President Trump for working to end catch and release. We need to keep these traffickers, drug mules, gang members, and illegal entrants in custody until they can be deported to where they came from.



    JWK





    American citizens are sick and tired of being made into tax-slaves to finance the economic needs of millions of poverty stricken, poorly educated, low and unskilled aliens who have invaded America borders.


  8. #396
    Quote Originally Posted by johnwk View Post
    .

    If the Guard has to, they should set up a tent city and keep the illegal entrants there until a judge has time to kick them out of our country “legally”.

    No more catch and release into our communities!

    JWK


    American citizens are sick and tired of being made into tax-slaves to finance the economic needs of millions of poverty stricken, poorly educated, low and unskilled aliens who have invaded America borders.

    Oh yes the can!


    SEE:
    Trump signs memo ordering end to 'catch and release' practices

    04/06/18 07:32 PM ED


    As part of the order, Trump is requesting "a detailed list of all existing facilities, including military facilities, that could be used, modified, or repurposed to detain aliens for violations of immigration law at or near the borders of the United States."


    Thank you President Trump for working to end catch and release. We need to keep these traffickers, drug mules, gang members, and illegal entrants in custody until they can be deported to where they came from.



    JWK





    American citizens are sick and tired of being made into tax-slaves to finance the economic needs of millions of poverty stricken, poorly educated, low and unskilled aliens who have invaded America borders.

    Such a freedom advocate.

    Got news for ya, buddy- those "tent cities" you are crying for would soon turn into prison camps for Americans, as well. Read a little history.

    The ANSWER has always been: Get the gov out of welfare & entitlements and PRESTO! Your unconstitutional tax dollars will not be funding dem stinkin' brown people- only dem stinkin' DC people.
    There is no spoon.

  9. #397
    Quote Originally Posted by Ender View Post
    Such a freedom advocate.

    Got news for ya, buddy- those "tent cities" you are crying for would soon turn into prison camps for Americans, as well. Read a little history.

    The ANSWER has always been: Get the gov out of welfare & entitlements and PRESTO! Your unconstitutional tax dollars will not be funding dem stinkin' brown people- only dem stinkin' DC people.
    Then they argue it's too late for that, its never gonna happen. So they waste energy and time advocating for yet another thing which won't work and we'll need to pay for.

  10. #398
    Quote Originally Posted by johnwk View Post
    If the Guard has to, they should set up a tent city and keep the illegal entrants there until a judge has time to kick them out of our country “legally”.


    Again, are you arguing that a federal military force can or should have police powers?





    Quote Originally Posted by johnwk View Post
    Oh yes the can!


    SEE:
    Trump signs memo ordering end to 'catch and release' practices

    04/06/18 07:32 PM EDT


    As part of the order, Trump is requesting "a detailed list of all existing facilities, including military facilities, that could be used, modified, or repurposed to detain aliens for violations of immigration law at or near the borders of the United States."
    First, Trump's memos don't make things legal.

    Second, that memo has nothing to do with the military enforcement of law.

    Third, you should really look into the difference between what the national guard can do when controlled by their state governor vs. when federalized and under the control of the president. Entirely different.
    "The abiding purpose of every nationalist is to secure more power and more prestige, not for himself but for the nation or other unit in which he has chosen to sink his own individuality."
    -George Orwell, "Notes on nationalism"

  11. #399
    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
    you can't mount the slightest defense of your history, traditions and way of life
    Muh history!

    Muh truhditions!

    Muh way of life!


    ... Sorry, which one of those are the mean ol' Mexicans taking from you?

    Did you leave your White Culture out on the kitchen counter and when you came back it was gone?
    "The abiding purpose of every nationalist is to secure more power and more prestige, not for himself but for the nation or other unit in which he has chosen to sink his own individuality."
    -George Orwell, "Notes on nationalism"

  12. #400
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCount View Post


    Originally Posted by johnwk
    If the Guard has to, they should set up a tent city and keep the illegal entrants there until a judge has time to kick them out of our country “legally”.
    Again, are you arguing that a federal military force can or should have police powers?
    Keep in mind our Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land. The fact is, our federal government is specifically charged with power:


    ”To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions” See Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15



    As Commander in Chief, President Trump can lawfully exercise established emergency powers over our military and order them into action if, in his judgement, the common defense and general welfare of the United States are in jeopardy. In doing so, he must inform Congress within 48 hours of taking such action, and the troops cannot be committed for more than 60 days, unless Congress approves a longer time period. The President can also exercise an additional 30 days to re-deploy the troops.

    It’s time for President Trump to exercise his powers as Commander in Chief, and keep these traffickers, drug mules, gang members, and illegal entrants in custody until they can be deported to where they came from.


    Why do you have such a problem with our President exercising lawful powers to protect the good people of the United States from traffickers, drug mules, and gang members who invade our borders, and likewise protect us from illegal entrants?



    JWK


    There was a time not too long ago in New York when the able-bodied were ashamed to accept home relief, a program created by Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1931 when he was Governor. Now, New York City and many other major cities are infested with countless government cheese factions from poverty stricken countries, who not only demand welfare, but use it to buy beer, wine, drugs, sex, and Lotto tickets.




  13. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  14. #401
    Quote Originally Posted by r3volution 3.0 View Post
    Originally Posted by johnwk
    Anti-immigrant people? Please define and apply to our system governed by the rule of law. I'm just curious. Not looking for an argument.

    JWK
    You made a series of statements in this thread indicating that you reject private property rights in favor of collective land ownership.
    You never answered my question, nor did you substantiate your above insulting claim. In addition Mr. Smarty Pants, property does not have rights. Owners of property have rights associated with property ownership.

    Finally, property can be owned collectively and individually. In each case, there are rights associated with property ownership, a major right being protection against trespassers.


    JWK
    Last edited by johnwk; 04-07-2018 at 10:22 AM.

  15. #402
    Quote Originally Posted by johnwk View Post
    Keep in mind our Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land. The fact is, our federal government is specifically charged with power:


    ”To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions” See Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15



    As Commander in Chief, President Trump can lawfully exercise established emergency powers over our military and order them into action if, in his judgement, the common defense and general welfare of the United States are in jeopardy. In doing so, he must inform Congress within 48 hours of taking such action, and the troops cannot be committed for more than 60 days, unless Congress approves a longer time period. The President can also exercise an additional 30 days to re-deploy the troops.

    It’s time for President Trump to exercise his powers as Commander in Chief, and keep these traffickers, drug mules, gang members, and illegal entrants in custody until they can be deported to where they came from.


    Why do you have such a problem with our President exercising lawful powers to protect the good people of the United States from traffickers, drug mules, and gang members who invade our borders, and likewise protect us from illegal entrants?



    JWK


    There was a time not too long ago in New York when the able-bodied were ashamed to accept home relief, a program created by Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1931 when he was Governor. Now, New York City and many other major cities are infested with countless government cheese factions from poverty stricken countries, who not only demand welfare, but use it to buy beer, wine, drugs, sex, and Lotto tickets.

    The natl guard is a militia now?

  16. #403
    Quote Originally Posted by johnwk View Post
    Keep in mind our Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land. The fact is, our federal government is specifically charged with power:


    ”To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions” See Article 1, Section 8, Clause 15

    Article 1 is the legislature. The legislature "provided for" that by using the power that you quoted to pass the posse comitatus and insurrection acts, which limit the president's ability to domestically employ the military. The president cannot use the national guard in a manner which violates those laws.
    "The abiding purpose of every nationalist is to secure more power and more prestige, not for himself but for the nation or other unit in which he has chosen to sink his own individuality."
    -George Orwell, "Notes on nationalism"

  17. #404
    The Constitution doesn't matter during National Emergencies.

    There's an emergency around here somewhere...

  18. #405
    Quote Originally Posted by Raginfridus View Post
    The natl guard is a militia now?
    johnwk is unconcerned with the constitution. Really, it's okay as long as it's anybody but him shooting beaners trespassing on "his" national property.

    In the meantime, I'm still stuck at how non-military persons crossing a border constitute an invasion in any common or legal sense.
    Partisan politics, misleading or emotional bill titles, and 4D chess theories are manifestations of the same lie—that the text of the Constitution, the text of legislation, and plain facts do not matter; what matters is what you want to believe. From this comes hypocrisy. And where hypocrisy thrives, virtue recedes. Without virtue, liberty dies. - Justin Amash, March 2018

  19. #406
    Quote Originally Posted by undergroundrr View Post
    In the meantime, I'm still stuck at how non-military persons crossing a border constitute an invasion in any common or legal sense.
    It's the same sense that has us in 28 simultaneous states of national emergency, and has kept us in a state of emergency for 39 years consecutively.
    "The abiding purpose of every nationalist is to secure more power and more prestige, not for himself but for the nation or other unit in which he has chosen to sink his own individuality."
    -George Orwell, "Notes on nationalism"

  20. #407
    Quote Originally Posted by Ender View Post


    Quote Originally Posted by johnwk View Post
    .

    If the Guard has to, they should set up a tent city and keep the illegal entrants there until a judge has time to kick them out of our country “legally”.

    No more catch and release into our communities!

    JWK


    American citizens are sick and tired of being made into tax-slaves to finance the economic needs of millions of poverty stricken, poorly educated, low and unskilled aliens who have invaded America borders.





    Oh yes the can!


    SEE:
    Trump signs memo ordering end to 'catch and release' practices

    04/06/18 07:32 PM EDT


    As part of the order, Trump is requesting "a detailed list of all existing facilities, including military facilities, that could be used, modified, or repurposed to detain aliens for violations of immigration law at or near the borders of the United States."


    Thank you President Trump for working to end catch and release. We need to keep these traffickers, drug mules, gang members, and illegal entrants in custody until they can be deported to where they came from.



    JWK





    American citizens are sick and tired of being made into tax-slaves to finance the economic needs of millions of poverty stricken, poorly educated, low and unskilled aliens who have invaded America borders.




    Such a freedom advocate.

    Got news for ya, buddy- those "tent cities" you are crying for would soon turn into prison camps for Americans, as well. Read a little history.

    The ANSWER has always been: Get the gov out of welfare & entitlements and PRESTO! Your unconstitutional tax dollars will not be funding dem stinkin' brown people- only dem stinkin' DC people.
    Ending welfare and entitlements does nothing to stop human traffickers, drug mules, gang members, and others who would cause American Citizens harm from entering our country. Your premise is without merit.


    As to your claim about the tent cities for illegal entrants, etc., being turned into prison camps for American Citizens, we went through that crap during WWII with internment camps and Japanese-Americans. And if such activities are engaged in by folks in government it is our duty and responsibility to rise up and confront our government officials, and why our founders put the Second Amendment into our federal constitution.

    Having said that, I see nothing wrong with taking illegal entrants into custody at our borders and determining if they ought to be deported to where they came from. To not do so, and to allow them to freely enter the United States is shear madness, just as it would be madness for American Citizens to allow uninvited civilians in their community to enter their home without permission.


    JWK




    The unavoidable truth is, our social democrat political leaders’ plan for “free” college tuition will be paid for by confiscating the paychecks of millions of college graduates who worked for and paid their own way through college and are now trying to finance their own economic needs.


  21. #408
    Account Restricted. Admin to review account standing


    Posts
    28,739
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Quote Originally Posted by Ender View Post
    Such a freedom advocate.

    Got news for ya, buddy- those "tent cities" you are crying for would soon turn into prison camps for Americans, as well. Read a little history.

    The ANSWER has always been: Get the gov out of welfare & entitlements and PRESTO! Your unconstitutional tax dollars will not be funding dem stinkin' brown people- only dem stinkin' DC people.

    This has been decided in the USC. Never going to happen. Now we do it the hard way. We could have done it the easy way, but that was stolen from us. Now force comes into play.



  22. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  23. #409
    Quote Originally Posted by Raginfridus View Post
    The natl guard is a militia now?
    No.. Never have been..
    Liberty is lost through complacency and a subservient mindset. When we accept or even welcome automobile checkpoints, random searches, mandatory identification cards, and paramilitary police in our streets, we have lost a vital part of our American heritage. America was born of protest, revolution, and mistrust of government. Subservient societies neither maintain nor deserve freedom for long.
    Ron Paul 2004

    Registered Ron Paul supporter # 2202
    It's all about Freedom

  24. #410
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
    Article 1 is the legislature. The legislature "provided for" that by using the power that you quoted to pass the posse comitatus and insurrection acts, which limit the president's ability to domestically employ the military. The president cannot use the national guard in a manner which violates those laws.
    Using the National Guard to protect our borders is a lawful use of the Guard. It can be deployed by a state governor and/or the president, to respond to domestic emergencies, reconstruction missions such as rebuilding the Louisiana levees, foreign combat missions, anti-drugs efforts and other such assignments which includes protecting our borders!


    JWK
    Last edited by johnwk; 04-07-2018 at 11:14 AM.

  25. #411
    Quote Originally Posted by johnwk View Post
    Using the National Guard to protect our borders is a lawful use of the Guard. It can be deployed by a state governor and/or the president
    Of course. Just as long as you don't want them to do any policing or law enforcement.

    Quote Originally Posted by johnwk View Post
    To respond to domestic emergencies, reconstruction missions such as rebuilding the Louisiana levees, foreign combat missions, anti-drugs efforts and other such assignments which includes protecting our borders!
    As long as it's not anything illegal, as covered by the posse comitatus act, the insurrection act, and 10 USC 275.
    "The abiding purpose of every nationalist is to secure more power and more prestige, not for himself but for the nation or other unit in which he has chosen to sink his own individuality."
    -George Orwell, "Notes on nationalism"

  26. #412
    Quote Originally Posted by Raginfridus View Post
    The natl guard is a militia now?
    Quote Originally Posted by pcosmar View Post
    No.. Never have been..

    They are the organized militia according to federal law.
    Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig.

    Robert Heinlein

    Give a man an inch and right away he thinks he's a ruler

    Groucho Marx

    I love mankind…it’s people I can’t stand.

    Linus, from the Peanuts comic

    You cannot have liberty without morality and morality without faith

    Alexis de Torqueville

    Those who fail to learn from the past are condemned to repeat it.
    Those who learn from the past are condemned to watch everybody else repeat it

    A Zero Hedge comment

  27. #413
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippysmyth View Post
    They are the organized militia according to federal law.
    They are a federally organized - trained, equipped, lead, and funded - functionary of the military. A National Guard. Not a militia, whatever the law may say, and unless their mission is building camps or passing out water, they won't be "repelling invaders".

  28. #414
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
    Muh history!

    Muh truhditions!

    Muh way of life!


    ... Sorry, which one of those are the mean ol' Mexicans taking from you?

    Did you leave your White Culture out on the kitchen counter and when you came back it was gone?
    Yeah, those things mean something to me.

    Childish "neener neener" mocking doesn't change that.

    Get back to me when you can consider and comment on this situation like a rational adult.

    That said, do the native people of North Carolina have a right to oppose the changes to their political culture being imposed on them by millions of new residents from New Jersey, who are clamoring for higher taxes and more regulation?

    Should they oppose it?

    Or does it boil down to democracy uber alles?

    I say that they do and would be within their rights to restrict immigration form another state, or restrict voting privileges or restrict access to "public" services.
    Last edited by Anti Federalist; 04-07-2018 at 02:50 PM.

  29. #415
    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
    Yeah, those things mean something to me.

    Childish "neener neener" mocking doesn't change that.

    Get back to me when you can consider and comment on this situation like a rational adult.
    He just simply asked for a simple qualification of the argument. Why not just answer the question instead of attack the person asking the question?

  30. #416
    Quote Originally Posted by nikcers View Post
    He just simply asked for a simple qualification of the argument. Why not just answer the question instead of attack the person asking the question?
    I did.

    See edit.



  31. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  32. #417
    Quote Originally Posted by nikcers View Post
    He just simply asked for a simple qualification of the argument. Why not just answer the question instead of attack the person asking the question?
    Oh, and I don't see my response as "an attack".

    He was being a condescending jerkass and I called him on it.

  33. #418
    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
    Oh, and I don't see my response as "an attack".

    He was being a condescending jerkass and I called him on it.
    Sorry I see it now- Ron Paul liberty report the other day was having me pretty convinced the public schools were to blame for a lot of America's cultural decay, someone on reddit had me convinced it was the families neglecting their kids, since basically the public schools spend more time with them they get to influence their belief system.

  34. #419
    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
    Yeah, those things mean something to me.

    Childish "neener neener" mocking doesn't change that.

    Get back to me when you can consider and comment on this situation like a rational adult.

    That said, do the native people of North Carolina have a right to oppose the changes to their political culture being imposed on them by millions of new residents from New Jersey, who are clamoring for higher taxes and more regulation?

    Should they oppose it?

    Or does it boil down to democracy uber alles?

    I say that they do and would be within their rights to restrict immigration form another state, or restrict voting privileges or restrict access to "public" services.
    Enforced internal open borders was one of the worst elements of the Constitution.
    Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig.

    Robert Heinlein

    Give a man an inch and right away he thinks he's a ruler

    Groucho Marx

    I love mankind…it’s people I can’t stand.

    Linus, from the Peanuts comic

    You cannot have liberty without morality and morality without faith

    Alexis de Torqueville

    Those who fail to learn from the past are condemned to repeat it.
    Those who learn from the past are condemned to watch everybody else repeat it

    A Zero Hedge comment

  35. #420
    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
    Yeah, those things mean something to me.
    Good. They're important.

    Luckily, history, traditions, and culture are not stolen from you by the mere existence of people who do not share them.

    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
    That said, do the native people of North Carolina have a right to oppose the changes to their political culture being imposed on them by millions of new residents from New Jersey, who are clamoring for higher taxes and more regulation?
    New Jersey? Is that where Mexicans come from?

    Isn't New Jersey full of "cultural Americans?" Are "we" stealing our culture from "us?" This is all very confusing.

    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
    Or does it boil down to democracy uber alles?
    This takes me back to my previous point: the democracy uber alles types - @Swordsmyth being the most egregious example at hand - are arguing against immigration. Why do you suppose that is?

    There are two ways that I see to preserve "muh culture muh truhditions muh history:" Enforce homogeneity via government, or allow everyone to do their own thing, favoring none.

    In this regard, your precious majority of "cultural Americans" has backfired; the cultural enforcement was in your favor only so long as your culture was the favored culture. That is when the culture wars begun. Now, you're facing the possibility of being on the wrong end of that enforcement, and not just from the boogity boogity immigrants, but also from "cultural New Jersians" and other forms of "cultural Americans" whose culture you view as undesirable.

    In a shooting war, this is when a reasonable combatant would realize that they face two avenues to proceed: a negotiated truce, or continued warfare and eventual annihilation.

    Attempting to continue the culture war and enforce "muh culture" upon all "cultural Americans" only further enshrines cultural "preservation" as an appropriate role of government.

    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
    I say that they do and would be within their rights to restrict immigration form another state, or restrict voting privileges or restrict access to "public" services.
    Annihilation it is.
    Last edited by TheCount; 04-07-2018 at 03:40 PM.
    "The abiding purpose of every nationalist is to secure more power and more prestige, not for himself but for the nation or other unit in which he has chosen to sink his own individuality."
    -George Orwell, "Notes on nationalism"

Page 14 of 25 FirstFirst ... 4121314151624 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 169
    Last Post: 04-18-2017, 05:53 AM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-17-2013, 09:18 PM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-01-2012, 01:21 PM
  4. Ron Paul’s army also marching for Adam Kokesh
    By disorderlyvision in forum Adam Kokesh Forum 2010
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-13-2009, 06:58 PM
  5. Ron Paul’s army also marching for Adam Kokesh
    By qwerty in forum Adam Kokesh Forum 2010
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-13-2009, 12:33 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •