Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Forty Percent of Oklahoma Could Become Indian Territory Again

  1. #1

    Forty Percent of Oklahoma Could Become Indian Territory Again

    In a legal quirk for the ages, a 1990s capital murder case involving two Native Americans could restore tribal sovereignty to almost half of Oklahoma for the first time in a century—unless the Supreme Court intervenes, that is.

    The federal government asked the justices last Friday to review and reverse the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in Royal v. Murphy, an unusual case in which Patrick Murphy, a death-row inmate and member of the Muscogee Creek Nation, claimed Oklahoma lacked the jurisdiction to try him for the murder of another tribal member on what was part of the Creek Nation’s reservation.

    Until now, state and federal officials assumed those boundaries no longer existed. To prepare Oklahoma for statehood in the late nineteenth century, Congress stripped the Creek Nation and other tribes in the territory of their courts, governments, and laws. The federal government also compelled the Creek to convert their tribal lands into allotments for private ownership by the tribe’s members, with the surplus land to be sold to white settlers. When Oklahoma joined the Union in 1907, state and federal power held total sway.

    A three-judge panel in the Tenth Circuit ruled last summer, however, that Congress never explicitly abolished the Creek Nation’s reservation along the way. Under the Supreme Court’s precedents, the judges concluded, the oversight left the reservation legally intact until the present day. As a result, the panel ruled that the defendant’s murder case could only be tried in federal courts, like other major crimes between Native Americans on tribal land under current federal law.

    That was good news for Murphy, who could be retried in federal court if the ruling stands. But the Tenth Circuit’s decision has ramifications beyond a single capital case. It effectively restores the Creek Nation’s sovereign territory after a century in abeyance, handing the tribe a significant and perhaps unintentional legal victory. (Tribal officials did not return a request for comment.) The ruling also raises the possibility of sovereignty claims by other Oklahoma tribes, including the other four of what are known as the Five Civilized Tribes.

    “This is something that almost all other tribes in this country have outside of Oklahoma, and this would put Oklahoma tribes on an equal footing with Indian tribes elsewhere,” Judith Royster, a University of Tulsa law professor who specializes in Indian law, told me.

    A reservation delineated by the Creek Nation’s 1866 boundaries alone would fill 4,600 square miles of eastern Oklahoma and include more than 750,000 inhabitants, the state of Oklahoma told the Supreme Court in its petition for review. “The 1866 boundaries also include most of Tulsa, the State’s second largest city and home to more than 403,000 Oklahomans,” the state told the court. “A reconstituted Creek territory would be by far the largest Indian reservation by population in the United States.” If the ruling is applied to the rest of the Five Tribes, the state added, just over 40 percent of Oklahoma would become Indian country.
    https://newrepublic.com/article/1474...k-tribal-lands
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    We believe our lying eyes...



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    The Trail of Tears stopped in OK. Those tribes came from the Carolinas and Florida.

    Do the tribes really want equal footing with concentration camps?

  4. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Raginfridus View Post
    The Trail of Tears stopped in OK. Those tribes came from the Carolinas and Florida.
    All through the deep south.

    Quote Originally Posted by Raginfridus View Post
    Do the tribes really want equal footing with concentration camps?
    If it gives them more autonomy than they have now? Probably.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    We believe our lying eyes...

  5. #4
    Could the Indian Country then tax the inhabitants within its borders?
    No - No - No - No
    2016

  6. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by acptulsa View Post
    All through the deep south.



    If it gives them more autonomy than they have now? Probably.
    Something tells me the SCROTUS won't acknowledge their autonomy, but good luck.

  7. #6
    Agreed. But it's interesting that the Allotment is coming up at all, after having been considered a fait accompli for 152 years.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    We believe our lying eyes...

  8. #7
    At this rate, 100% of Oklahoma could repudiate all treaties with the U.S.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    We believe our lying eyes...

  9. #8
    I need to get out my family genealogy again.



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by acptulsa View Post
    At this rate, 100% of Oklahoma could repudiate all treaties with the U.S.
    They keep going with the Liberals.

    As long as the Natives take over the "Rich gated communities" with this agreement there shouldn't be a problem?

  12. #10
    Muscogee Nation sues City of Tulsa over city enforcement on tribal lands.

    https://www.muscogeenation.com/2023/...city-of-tulsa/

    Today, the Muscogee (Creek) Nation (“Nation”) filed suit against the City of Tulsa in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma.

    The Nation’s suit alleges that Tulsa is deliberately and unlawfully prosecuting tribal citizens for conduct occurring within the Nation’s Reservation boundaries despite the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in McGirt v. Oklahoma, which affirmed that the Nation’s treaty-defined reservation boundaries remain intact, and that states and their political subdivisions accordingly have no criminal jurisdiction over Indians within those boundaries absent congressional authorization.

    Tulsa’s ongoing prosecutions therefore violate federal law, infringe on the rights of Tribal citizens within the Nation’s jurisdiction, and interfere with the Nation’s federally protected right to self-government, including the functioning of its own comprehensive and robust criminal justice system.

    The Mayor of Tulsa has recently stated that litigation is not the preferable means to resolve Indian country jurisdictional issues, and the Nation fully agrees. However, Tulsa is presently asserting criminal jurisdiction over individual Indians in the state and municipal courts, and aggressively so, notwithstanding clear and binding precedent against its practices. Tulsa cannot reasonably expect the Nation to stay on the sidelines while Tulsa attacks its sovereignty within the Nation’s Reservation in cases to which the Nation is not even a party.



Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 41
    Last Post: 01-25-2014, 03:23 AM
  2. Replies: 39
    Last Post: 06-10-2012, 10:30 PM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-22-2011, 06:56 PM
  4. Replies: 31
    Last Post: 09-17-2009, 10:18 AM
  5. Forty Seven Percent of Americans 'Definitely' Won't Vote for Ron Paul <!~~ lies
    By Seth M. in forum Bad Media Reporting on Ron Paul
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-22-2007, 11:09 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •