Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: FBI Insiders Blow Whistle on Massive Las Vegas Cover Up; Told Not to Investigate Key Evidence

  1. #1

    Default FBI Insiders Blow Whistle on Massive Las Vegas Cover Up; Told Not to Investigate Key Evidence

    Finally: FBI Insiders Blow Whistle on Massive Las Vegas Cover Up; Told Not to Investigate Key Evidence
    https://truepundit.com/fbi-insiders-...-bay-massacre/



    ►When FBI brass was provided with forensic evidence of multiple gunmen, they told agents to stand down and focus on Paddock only.

    ►Even a key internal audio captured by a hotel guest of multiple rifles firing from Mandalay Bay went ignored, covered up.



    ►When FBI brass was provided the names of persons of interest who likely assisted Paddock, agents were instructed not to interview the individuals. One would-be target was never pursued despite pleadings from intelligence officials and agents that he was possibly the second shooter.


    ►The FBI uncovered specific evidence showing that Paddock was anti-Trump and had an affiliation with ANTIFA, though it never was divulged to the public and agents did not follow such leads,
    per orders of their superiors.


    ►When FBI brass was given evidence that the shooting was possibly linked to ANTIFA radicals working with an ISIS-linked terror faction — including the full identities of some of the suspects with ties to both radical groups and at or near Mandalay Bay the night of the deadly shooting —
    agents were never instructed to follow up on the investigation and pursue the suspects.


    ►When intelligence officials approached the FBI and LVMPD with external evidence that Paddock was only one member of an organized terror cell —
    which included as many as five gunman who planned to fire from the Mandalay Bay suite — the compelling evidence was covered up. Never pursued.


    ►When FBI brass was provided with forensic evidence that Paddock’s death was not a suicide, the intelligence was never pursued by the FBI and LVMPD.
    FBI sources said Paddock suffered two gunshots.
    His autopsy report only details a single bullet to the head.
    FBI sources maintain Paddock’s autopsy was doctored and is a fraud.


    ►When an ISIS-linked “businessman” from Turkey was pinpointed in the investigation — and found to be residing near Las Vegas at the time of the shooting —
    FBI agents were not instructed to follow up and pursue intelligence leads showing possible links to the massacre.


    ►FBI and intelligence officials believe Paddock and associates chose to strike the Las Vegas country music concert with over 22,000 people because they likely supported President Trump.
    FBI agents said they were instructed to keep that key motive quiet too.


    ►When MGM refused to share cctv footage from Mandalay Bay, FBI agents were threatened by superiors that any whistle blowers divulging such revelations to the media would lose their jobs.
    The FBI still has never been provided all the camera footage from the Mandalay Bay.


    ►When FBI agents and agents from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives informed FBI bosses that Paddock didn’t start buying dozens of guns until after Trump’s election,
    they were told to keep that fact quiet and shrouded.


    ►When FBI agents followed up on an ABC News report that Paddock wired $100,000 to the Philippines shortly before the rampage they confirmed the report was untrue.
    Instead of disputing it, FBI bosses embraced the false story, saying it helped build the narrative the Bureau was constructing about Paddock.
    FBI agents believe the story was planted with ABC by their superiors.



    LONE GUNMAN

    Narrative:
    "Stephen Paddock — the reported lone gunman — was a mystery man and his motive for killing dozens and injuring over 500 people still has not been pinpointed."

    Those assertions are simply untrue.

    The “official” narrative about the Oct. 1 massacre at Mandalay Bay that claimed 58 lives is purely fiction according the FBI insiders and high-ranking intelligence officials.

    “The investigation is an entirely different story that we are not allowed to talk about. If we do and get caught, we get fired and probably charged (criminally).”




    They lied to Americans about key facts, trying to paint Paddock as a mysterious lone wolf.
    But even more egregious,
    the FBI in what can be described as nothing short of a conspiracy and cover up — intentionally quashed credible leads
    to identify Paddock’s co-conspirators
    and at least one additional gunman
    who is walking around today in another American city.

    Free to kill again.



    Does President Trump know about this? White House officials say he does not. Or did not prior to today.

    We have named this investigative series “Fear and Lying in Las Vegas” and it will certainly live up to its name, based on the findings of our ongoing research and intelligence gathering.

    At every turn, the FBI lied to the American public.

    Much more to come.



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2

    Default

    You must spread some reputation around before giving it to goldenequity again.
    Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig.

    Robert Heinlein

    Give a man an inch and right away he thinks he's a ruler

    Groucho Marx

    I love mankindÖitís people I canít stand.

    Linus, from the Peanuts comic

    You cannot have liberty without morality and morality without faith

    Alexis de Torqueville

    Those who fail to learn from the past are condemned to repeat it.
    Those who learn from the past are condemned to watch everybody else repeat it

    A Zero Hedge comment

  4. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    You must spread some reputation around before giving it to goldenequity again.
    Covered.
    There is no spoon.

  5. #4

    Default

    Let's not rush to conclusions and wait till investigations are completed & all the facts come out.
    This matter was already being pushed from the highest levels.



    Casino mogul Adelson met with Trump hours after Las Vegas shooting

    Pre-arranged meeting was to review policy, but also looked at ways to help victims of massacre

    By Stuart Winer 4 October 2017


    Sheldon Adelson is seated prior to the inauguration of then President-elect Donald Trump at the US Capitol in Washington, DC on January 20, 2017. (AFP PHOTO/Paul J. Richards)


    Casino billionaire Sheldon Adelson met Monday with US President Donald Trump in the White House, where they discussed how to help victims of a deadly shooting hours earlier at a Las Vegas country music festival that killed 59 people and injured hundreds.
    The afternoon meeting had been scheduled before the shooting attack and was aimed at discussing policy, the Las Vegas Review-Journal reported on Tuesday, citing a representative from the Sheldon’s Las Vegas Sands casino and resort company.



    Adelson, who owns the Review-Journal, was one of Trump’s biggest financial backers during his successful 2016 presidential election campaign, donating millions to the Republican candidate’s cause. The two men both own casinos in Las Vegas.
    People run from the Route 91 Harvest country music festival after apparent gun fire was heard in Las Vegas, Nevada, October 1, 2017. (David Becker/Getty Images/AFP)

    Adelson is also a major backer of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and owns the widely circulated Israel Hayom free daily.
    According to Sands representative Andy Abboud, Trump and Adelson discussed the shooting in Las Vegas the night before and how they might help victims, among other topics, the Review-Journal reported.

  6. #5

    Default

    I don't want to call the OP article "fake news", but I have a hard time believing articles written by "Investigative Bureau". I understand the need to keep the names of FBI insiders anonymous. What I don't understand is why that anonymity must apply to the person writing the article. Even if a reader doesn't believe the article, at least they know there is an actual person writing that piece who's putting their own professional integrity to the test. If Ben Swann can put his own name on the stories he produces, then the reporters working for True Pundit should be able to do the same.

  7. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by revgen View Post
    I don't want to call the OP article "fake news", but I have a hard time believing articles written by "Investigative Bureau". I understand the need to keep the names of FBI insiders anonymous. What I don't understand is why that anonymity must apply to the person writing the article. Even if a reader doesn't believe the article, at least they know there is an actual person writing that piece who's putting their own professional integrity to the test. If Ben Swann can put his own name on the stories he produces, then the reporters working for True Pundit should be able to do the same.
    I'll take this and relay as much as I know.

    There are 2 very good & very prolific 'new comer' sources of news
    pushing back against the MSM 'Journalism' spin and omissions/unreporting.

    One is True Pundit which is headed by Thomas Paine, a real person but not his real name.
    I have heard one on one interviews w/ him... his background is law enforcement and intelligence.
    He lives/works in (I believe) the Bronx, NY along with his staff 'team'.

    The other is TheLastRefuge/ConservativeTreehouse.
    From what I've been able to research, this is a 'group' of Ex-DoJ lawyers and analysts
    headed up by a 'chief' analyst going by the pen-name 'Sundance'.

    They are both pro-Trump to an excess and bias I do NOT like/appreciate.
    They differ from ZeroHedge and Drudge in that respect.

    Other than that, I find their 'news' to be very digestible.

    The DailyCaller hosts another Investigative 'team' who produce joint effort 'articles'
    and also host 'featured' writers who produce their own stuff.
    Generally good stuff. Like the Awan investigative articles w/ Luke Rosiak.


    As far as TruePundit and their 'FBI insiders'... I believe it (U don't have to)
    Why do I believe it?
    Their track record. I've been following their 'breaking' stuff for months now.
    It's has proven time and again to be accurate and MORE than just 'insightful'....
    it is hard intel... names/places and documents. Good stuff.
    Last edited by goldenequity; 03-13-2018 at 08:30 PM.

  8. #7

    Default

    As most rational folks expected. It is however, very good to see confirmation.

    +rep
    1. Don't lie.
    2. Don't cheat.
    3. Don't steal.
    4. Don't kill.
    5. Don't commit adultery.
    6. Don't covet what your neighbor has, especially his wife.
    7. Honor your father and mother.
    8. Remember the Sabbath and keep it holy.
    9. Donít use your Higher Power's name in vain, or anyone else's.
    10. Do unto others as you would have them do to you.

    "For the love of money is the root of all evil..." -- I Timothy 6:10, KJV

  9. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by revgen View Post
    I understand the need to keep the names of FBI insiders anonymous. What I don't understand is why that anonymity must apply to the person writing the article.
    In the days of yore, nobody could call up all the D.C. Area cell phone records, punch in the names "Woodward", " Bernstein" and "Felt", and have the computer check for a correlation. Do you really think Deep Throat's identity would have remained protected if it could have been done back then?

    I think you're judging by the standards of a different world than the one you live in now.
    'It ain't what we don't know that hurts us, it's what we "know" that ain't so.'--Will Rogers

    'I prefer someone who burns the flag and then wraps themselves up in the Constitution over someone who burns the Constitution and then wraps themselves up in the flag.'--Molly Ivins






Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-03-2014, 02:54 PM
  2. Former NSA Codebreaker: I Tried To Blow Whistle on Government Spying
    By presence in forum Individual Rights Violations: Case Studies
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-06-2013, 09:29 PM
  3. New TV ad: Republicans Blow the Whistle on Romney
    By Zack in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-06-2012, 07:14 AM
  4. Offer 500K for an insider to blow the whistle
    By Lord Xar in forum New Hampshire
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-10-2008, 12:16 AM
  5. Reporters blow whistle on FOX
    By arbnranger in forum Bad Media Reporting on Ron Paul
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-04-2008, 09:06 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •