Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Sessions Warns California of Civil War

  1. #1

    Sessions Warns California of Civil War

    Let the thread begin...


    AG Sessions held a press conference today regarding the lawsuit filed against California on behalf of the Trump Administration
    regarding sanctuary cities, narcotics and human trafficking of illegal immigrants.

    Towards the end of the press conference,
    AG Sessions fired a shot across the proverbial bow by reminding the state of California
    that the first civil war was began because states believed they did not have to abide by federal law.

    ========


    California Gov. Jerry Brown said
    that the Department of Justice (DOJ) lawsuit filed against California over recently passed state laws was an “act of war” during a press conference with the California attorney general on Wednesday.

    The DOJ filed a lawsuit on Tuesday, which alleged three recently passed California laws deliberately interfered with federal immigration policies.

    Mayors directing law enforcement in sanctuary cities to arrest ICE agents.

    Municipalities ordering their local law enforcement to protect illegal aliens.



    This is twice now in one day that government officials have said the word WAR.



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2

  4. #3

  5. #4
    Sessions doesn't have the balls to act on anything so any discussion is moot before it starts.

  6. #5
    AG Sessions fired a shot across the proverbial bow by reminding the state of California
    that the first civil war was began because states believed they did not have to abide by federal law.
    Well, that's a crock of made-up history.
    There is no spoon.

  7. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Ender View Post
    Well, that's a crock of made-up history.
    haha... I know ain't it??

    there is however... this:



    Red State Real Estate: Conservative Move.com aids Blue State Exodus


  8. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by goldenequity View Post
    https://truepundit.com/federal-judge...ity-crackdown/

    Judge only granted a delay in the release of $1 million in funds. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...nt-over-calif/

    SAN FRANCISCO — The Trump administration will not immediately have to award California a grant being withheld over concerns the state is a sanctuary for people in the country illegally, a federal judge said Monday.

    The amount of money at issue – $1 million – was relatively small and was at this point only delayed, not denied, U.S. District Judge William Orrick said. While he rejected the state’s request for a preliminary injunction to turn over the money, he also rejected a request by the U.S. Department of Justice to dismiss California’s lawsuit.

    The judge said the suit raised “weighty and novel constitutional issues” that would benefit from additional argument.
    And back in September: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/l...915-story.html

    Judge rules in city's favor on sanctuary cities, grants nationwide injunction


    In a ruling with national impact, a federal judge in Chicago on Friday blocked the Trump administration's rules requiring so-called sanctuary cities to cooperate with immigration agents in order to get a public safety grant.

    U.S. District Judge Harry Leinenweber held that Chicago has shown a "likelihood of success" in its arguments that U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions exceeded his authority in imposing new standards governing Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grants across the country.

    He also said Mayor Rahm Emanuel's administration has shown the city could suffer "irreparable harm" in its relationship with the immigrant community if it were to comply with the U.S. Department of Justice's new standards.

    "Once such trust is lost, it cannot be repaired through an award of money damages, making it the type of harm that is especially hard to rectify" were he to wait until the lawsuit is settled, Leinenweber wrote in the 41-page ruling.

    The preliminary injunction granted by Leinenweber applies to districts nationwide.
    Last edited by Zippyjuan; 03-07-2018 at 08:09 PM.

  9. #8
    La Raza will never surrender californio so easily this time around . Those washington senators better fix bayonets .
    Last edited by oyarde; 03-07-2018 at 09:53 PM.



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    Summary of California Laws Being Challenged:

    ►First law mandates Employers to demand ICE agents present a warrant or subpoena before entering certain areas of the premises,
    or when accessing employee records.

    Senior Justice Department officials have said it’s prevented companies from voluntarily cooperating with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials.

    Companies have complained they’ve felt torn between trying to comply with seemingly contradictory state and federal statutes,
    since penalties for non-compliance can be steep from both entities.

    ►Second law known as “the sanctuary state bill” limits state and municipal cooperation with the feds,
    including what information can be shared about illegal-immigrant inmates.

    ►Third law gives state officials the power to monitor and inspect immigrant detention facilities
    either run directly by, or contracted through, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

  12. #10
    This is fantastic.

    Now California needs to print its own money, borrow from the IMF and tax the $#@! even harder on its citizens. I'm going to love seeing the liberal anti-gun start to realize that they are going to need them when Trump sends National Guard Troops here.

    We're being governed ruled by a geriatric Alzheimer patient/puppet whose strings are being pulled by an elitist oligarchy who believe they can manage the world... imagine the utter maniacal, sociopathic hubris!

  13. #11
    He will be here next week.

    https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/07/polit...all/index.html

    Trump heads to California next week

    Donald Trump will visit California next week, his first visit to the Golden State as president, the White House announced on Wednesday.

    Sources familiar with Trump's plans say he is expected to visit California to the US-Mexico border to look at border wall prototypes in the San Diego area.

    The President and White House have been looking to schedule a trip to the border "for a while," one source said. Trump has not visited California since he was sworn into office, though Vice President Mike Pence did a lucrative fundraising swing through the state in October.

    White House press secretary Sarah Sanders confirmed Trump is traveling to California next week but did not provide more specific details.

    Asked why he hasn't visited before now, Sanders said Trump had been busy enacting elements of his agenda, such as creating jobs and growing the economy.
    ...and playing golf. Last weekend he passed 100 total days spent at one of his golf resorts. One quarter of his total time in office. But he will be too busy working for you to even have time to leave the White House let alone play golf.

  14. #12
    California won't need a national defense at all since its a sanctuary state everyone is welcome.

    We're being governed ruled by a geriatric Alzheimer patient/puppet whose strings are being pulled by an elitist oligarchy who believe they can manage the world... imagine the utter maniacal, sociopathic hubris!

  15. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    He will be here next week.
    https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/07/polit...all/index.html
    ...and playing golf. Last weekend he passed 100 total days spent at one of his golf resorts. One quarter of his total time in office. But he will be too busy working for you to even have time to leave the White House let alone play golf.
    Well... it looks like Sessions hasn't been worried about his handicap.
    He's been busy...

    06/28/2012
    https://www.politico.com/story/2012/...ongress-077988

    The House has voted to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress over his failure to turn over documents related to the Fast and Furious scandal, the first time Congress has taken such a dramatic move against a sitting Cabinet official.

    The vote was 255-67, with 17 Democrats voting in support of a criminal contempt resolution, which authorizes Republicans leaders to seek criminal charges against Holder.

    That went nowhere...
    or did it?


    Today:

    https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/depar...ious-documents

    Department of Justice Enters Into Conditional Settlement Agreement to Produce Fast and Furious Documents to House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

    “The Department of Justice under my watch is committed to transparency and the rule of law. This settlement agreement is an important step to make sure that the public finally receives all the facts related to Operation Fast and Furious.”



    Fore!
    Last edited by goldenequity; 03-07-2018 at 09:51 PM.

  16. #14
    Bet they wish they had got on the stick quicker with CalExit .

  17. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by oyarde View Post
    Bet they wish they had got on the stick quicker with CalExit .
    Ain't gonna happen. They need somebody to blame for their misery.

  18. #16
    I probably better start working on Dannos release now .



  19. Remove this section of ads by registering.


Similar Threads

  1. AG Sessions Reinstates Civil Asset Forfeiture (7/19 Article)
    By jllundqu in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-20-2017, 09:23 AM
  2. Civil forfeiture finds a champion in Jeff Sessions
    By jct74 in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 01-09-2017, 09:36 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-03-2016, 06:59 PM
  4. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-09-2016, 12:56 PM
  5. Sen. Sessions Warns Washington on Immigration and Amnesty
    By itshappening in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-28-2013, 11:21 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •