Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 129

Thread: Are Retailers Breaking the Law?

  1. #1

    Default Are Retailers Breaking the Law?

    Are the retailers that are refusing Gun Sales to Legal Adults violating the Law..

    Should they lose their FFL License?.

    Not sure of the law on this,,but it does seem a violation to refuse a legal sale.

    Thoughts?
    Ammo?
    Liberty is lost through complacency and a subservient mindset. When we accept or even welcome automobile checkpoints, random searches, mandatory identification cards, and paramilitary police in our streets, we have lost a vital part of our American heritage. America was born of protest, revolution, and mistrust of government. Subservient societies neither maintain nor deserve freedom for long.
    Ron Paul 2004

    Registered Ron Paul supporter # 2202
    It's all about Freedom



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2

    Default

    Retailers should be able to buy from who they wish and sell to who they wish.

    It could be considered discriminatory based on the refusal of service due to age but all other areas of the businesses are open to doing business with those aged 18-21.

    It sets a bad precedent to badger businesses to do business with those they do not wish to and really, the progressive deciders of these anti-discrimination lawsuits are about as anti-gun as they come.

    That being said, they should be boycotted for furthering authoritarian policy and practically speaking it is a stupid business decision.
    “The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them.” --George Orwell

    Quote Originally Posted by AuH20 View Post
    In terms of a full spectrum candidate, Rand is leaps and bounds above Trump. I'm not disputing that.
    Who else in public life has called for a pre-emptive strike on North Korea?--Donald Trump

  4. #3

    Default

    ^ what chiefs said. They should have every right to sell what they want to whoever they want. We should have every right to not support businesses for whatever reason.

    The companies that go political are screwing up badly. Just sell $#@! FFS.

    I won’t set foot in another Dick’s...

  5. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Slave Mentality View Post
    ^ what chiefs said. They should have every right to sell what they want to whoever they want. We should have every right to not support businesses for whatever reason.

    The companies that go political are screwing up badly. Just sell $#@! FFS.

    I won’t set foot in another Dick’s...
    It should be... BUT IT IS NOT...!!

    It is Federal Licensed.. under Federal Law,,
    It is NOT discretionary.

    They are violating Federal Law by discriminating based on age.. when the legal age is Determined by Law.
    Liberty is lost through complacency and a subservient mindset. When we accept or even welcome automobile checkpoints, random searches, mandatory identification cards, and paramilitary police in our streets, we have lost a vital part of our American heritage. America was born of protest, revolution, and mistrust of government. Subservient societies neither maintain nor deserve freedom for long.
    Ron Paul 2004

    Registered Ron Paul supporter # 2202
    It's all about Freedom

  6. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Slave Mentality View Post

    I won’t set foot in another Dick’s...
    it ain't just Dicks,, this $hit is viral.
    Liberty is lost through complacency and a subservient mindset. When we accept or even welcome automobile checkpoints, random searches, mandatory identification cards, and paramilitary police in our streets, we have lost a vital part of our American heritage. America was born of protest, revolution, and mistrust of government. Subservient societies neither maintain nor deserve freedom for long.
    Ron Paul 2004

    Registered Ron Paul supporter # 2202
    It's all about Freedom

  7. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pcosmar View Post
    It should be... BUT IT IS NOT...!!

    It is Federal Licensed.. under Federal Law,,
    It is NOT discretionary.

    They are violating Federal Law by discriminating based on age.. when the legal age is Determined by Law.
    There should be a class action lawsuit coming soon.
    Truth is a social construct. 👁👁

  8. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pcosmar View Post
    It should be... BUT IT IS NOT...!!

    It is Federal Licensed.. under Federal Law,,
    It is NOT discretionary.

    They are violating Federal Law by discriminating based on age.. when the legal age is Determined by Law.
    That'd be an ironic case for those authoritarian $#@!s to preside over and I think they'd correctly side with the business discriminating based on whatever reasons they wish (for the wrong reason though).

    On principal I would not endorse the lawsuit.

    Abolish FFLs.
    “The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them.” --George Orwell

    Quote Originally Posted by AuH20 View Post
    In terms of a full spectrum candidate, Rand is leaps and bounds above Trump. I'm not disputing that.
    Who else in public life has called for a pre-emptive strike on North Korea?--Donald Trump

  9. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by timosman View Post
    There should be a class action lawsuit coming soon.
    I do not believe that a Prohibited Person has standing. (anywhere)
    Liberty is lost through complacency and a subservient mindset. When we accept or even welcome automobile checkpoints, random searches, mandatory identification cards, and paramilitary police in our streets, we have lost a vital part of our American heritage. America was born of protest, revolution, and mistrust of government. Subservient societies neither maintain nor deserve freedom for long.
    Ron Paul 2004

    Registered Ron Paul supporter # 2202
    It's all about Freedom

  10. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pcosmar View Post
    it ain't just Dicks,, this $hit is viral.
    Stores that barely even sell firearms are jumping on the bandwagon (Kroger). And Wal-Mart too. Despicable.
    “The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them.” --George Orwell

    Quote Originally Posted by AuH20 View Post
    In terms of a full spectrum candidate, Rand is leaps and bounds above Trump. I'm not disputing that.
    Who else in public life has called for a pre-emptive strike on North Korea?--Donald Trump

  11. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pcosmar View Post
    Are the retailers that are refusing Gun Sales to Legal Adults violating the Law..
    Should they lose their FFL License?.
    Not sure of the law on this,,but it does seem a violation to refuse a legal sale.
    Thoughts?
    Ammo?
    I would think so, but rental car companies and hotels have been doing the same thing for a long time without any problems evidently.

  12. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pcosmar View Post
    I do not believe that a Prohibited Person has standing. (anywhere)
    Maybe somebody just coming coming back from a "tour of duty"?
    Truth is a social construct. 👁👁

  13. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pcosmar View Post
    Are the retailers that are refusing Gun Sales to Legal Adults violating the Law..

    Should they lose their FFL License?.

    Not sure of the law on this,,but it does seem a violation to refuse a legal sale.

    Thoughts?
    Ammo?
    It might be considered discrimination, however as a libertarian it should be no-brainer. Discrimination laws are immoral and should not exist.

  14. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Madison320 View Post
    It might be considered discrimination, however as a libertarian it should be no-brainer. Discrimination laws are immoral and should not exist.
    Neither should Federal Firearm Laws.. but there we are.
    Liberty is lost through complacency and a subservient mindset. When we accept or even welcome automobile checkpoints, random searches, mandatory identification cards, and paramilitary police in our streets, we have lost a vital part of our American heritage. America was born of protest, revolution, and mistrust of government. Subservient societies neither maintain nor deserve freedom for long.
    Ron Paul 2004

    Registered Ron Paul supporter # 2202
    It's all about Freedom

  15. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Madison320 View Post
    It might be considered discrimination, however as a libertarian it should be no-brainer. Discrimination laws are immoral and should not exist.
    Agreed on all accounts, but if a baker has to make gay cakes on demand, then retailers should have to sell legal goods to people of any age.

  16. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by specsaregood View Post
    I would think so, but rental car companies and hotels have been doing the same thing for a long time without any problems evidently.
    Are car companies required to be Federally Licensed to rent cars?
    Are there Federal rules in place as to age requirements/restrictions?

    is there any way this can bite them in the a$$,, quickly and decisively.
    Liberty is lost through complacency and a subservient mindset. When we accept or even welcome automobile checkpoints, random searches, mandatory identification cards, and paramilitary police in our streets, we have lost a vital part of our American heritage. America was born of protest, revolution, and mistrust of government. Subservient societies neither maintain nor deserve freedom for long.
    Ron Paul 2004

    Registered Ron Paul supporter # 2202
    It's all about Freedom

  17. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pcosmar View Post
    Neither should Federal Firearm Laws.. but there we are.
    And I'm not going to get mad if either goes unenforced.

  18. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by specsaregood View Post
    Agreed on all accounts, but if a baker has to make gay cakes on demand, then retailers should have to sell legal goods to people of any age.
    Bingo !
    Liberty is lost through complacency and a subservient mindset. When we accept or even welcome automobile checkpoints, random searches, mandatory identification cards, and paramilitary police in our streets, we have lost a vital part of our American heritage. America was born of protest, revolution, and mistrust of government. Subservient societies neither maintain nor deserve freedom for long.
    Ron Paul 2004

    Registered Ron Paul supporter # 2202
    It's all about Freedom

  19. #18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kcchiefs6465 View Post
    On principal I would not endorse the lawsuit.
    Yep, that is the problem with being on the right when it comes to discrimination.

    The left makes laws that discriminate against the right, and the right opposes them. But when the left breaks those same laws to discriminate further against the right, the right is 'too principled' to defend themselves.
    "He's talkin' to his gut like it's a person!!" -me
    "dumpster diving isn't professional." - angelatc


    "Each of us must choose which course of action we should take: education, conventional political action, or even peaceful civil disobedience to bring about necessary changes. But let it not be said that we did nothing." - Ron Paul

    "Paul said "the wave of the future" is a coalition of anti-authoritarian progressive Democrats and libertarian Republicans in Congress opposed to domestic surveillance, opposed to starting new wars and in favor of ending the so-called War on Drugs."

  20. #19

    Default

    This is presenting a convincing argument for allowing retailers to sell or not sell at their discretion. Turning that around to try to force retailers to sell is simply reinforcing the anti-liberty position.
    Throwback Signature: Before They Were Trumpkins Edition

    Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
    Sorry that your candidate is a fascist and you can't even see it.
    Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
    I heard he called for 30k troops in Syria in the debate this evening. /Deal breaker.

  21. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
    This is presenting a convincing argument for allowing retailers to sell or not sell at their discretion. Turning that around to try to force retailers to sell is simply reinforcing the anti-liberty position.
    Yes, I think that's the resounding opinion. However, one can argue that the only way to get the anti-liberty people to see the validity of that argument is to use their own tactics against them.

  22. #21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
    This is presenting a convincing argument for allowing retailers to sell or not sell at their discretion.
    Is it??
    A retailer can not sell to me under penalty,, not much discretion there.

    I would say that is a pretty Unconvincing argument.
    Liberty is lost through complacency and a subservient mindset. When we accept or even welcome automobile checkpoints, random searches, mandatory identification cards, and paramilitary police in our streets, we have lost a vital part of our American heritage. America was born of protest, revolution, and mistrust of government. Subservient societies neither maintain nor deserve freedom for long.
    Ron Paul 2004

    Registered Ron Paul supporter # 2202
    It's all about Freedom

  23. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
    Yep, that is the problem with being on the right when it comes to discrimination.

    The left makes laws that discriminate against the right, and the right opposes them. But when the left breaks those same laws to discriminate further against the right, the right is 'too principled' to defend themselves.
    The left also determines what is and is not discrimination.

    Their kangaroo courts would think of the children and get a ruling right for once. Albeit for the wrong reasons.
    “The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them.” --George Orwell

    Quote Originally Posted by AuH20 View Post
    In terms of a full spectrum candidate, Rand is leaps and bounds above Trump. I'm not disputing that.
    Who else in public life has called for a pre-emptive strike on North Korea?--Donald Trump

  24. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pcosmar View Post
    They are violating Federal Law by discriminating based on age.. when the legal age is Determined by Law.
    The federal law forbidding discrimination on the basis of age protects only those who are at least 40 and applies only to employment matters. Some state laws banning age discrimination might apply, however. See https://reason.com/volokh/2018/02/28...ell-rifles-and

    It may be a bad business decision, but it's the owner's decision to make.
    We have long had death and taxes as the two standards of inevitability. But there are those who believe that death is the preferable of the two. "At least," as one man said, "there's one advantage about death; it doesn't get worse every time Congress meets."
    Erwin N. Griswold

    Taxes: Of life's two certainties, the only one for which you can get an automatic extension.
    Anonymous

  25. #24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pcosmar View Post
    it ain't just Dicks,, this $hit is viral.
    No doubt, friend.

  26. #25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pcosmar View Post
    it ain't just Dicks,, this $hit is viral.
    Dicks is choosing to no longer carry a certain type of merchandise. Should the government tell them what items they should have in their stores?
    Quote Originally Posted by NorthCarolinaLiberty View Post

    Half the crap I write here is just to entertain myself.
    I am Zippy and I approve of this post. But you don't have to.

  27. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    Dicks is choosing to no longer carry a certain type of merchandise. Should the government tell them what items they should have in their stores?
    Obviously not and they are not selling rifles to those under 21 (which is the subject of this thread).
    “The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them.” --George Orwell

    Quote Originally Posted by AuH20 View Post
    In terms of a full spectrum candidate, Rand is leaps and bounds above Trump. I'm not disputing that.
    Who else in public life has called for a pre-emptive strike on North Korea?--Donald Trump

  28. #27

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    Dicks is choosing to no longer carry a certain type of merchandise. Should the government tell them what items they should have in their stores?
    It would be my contention that due to their policy in violation of the law,, their FFL should be revoked and no guns or ammo sold in their stores.

    Federal law says 18 for long guns,, Federal Firearms License can be revoked.

    They have been revoked elsewhere for less reason.
    Liberty is lost through complacency and a subservient mindset. When we accept or even welcome automobile checkpoints, random searches, mandatory identification cards, and paramilitary police in our streets, we have lost a vital part of our American heritage. America was born of protest, revolution, and mistrust of government. Subservient societies neither maintain nor deserve freedom for long.
    Ron Paul 2004

    Registered Ron Paul supporter # 2202
    It's all about Freedom

  29. #28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pcosmar View Post
    It would be my contention that due to their policy in violation of the law,, their FFL should be revoked and no guns or ammo sold in their stores.

    Federal law says 18 for long guns,, Federal Firearms License can be revoked.
    Federal law sets the minimum age to buy a long gun at 18, but this doesn't mean the seller must sell to an 18 year old. It just means he can't sell to someone under 18.
    We have long had death and taxes as the two standards of inevitability. But there are those who believe that death is the preferable of the two. "At least," as one man said, "there's one advantage about death; it doesn't get worse every time Congress meets."
    Erwin N. Griswold

    Taxes: Of life's two certainties, the only one for which you can get an automatic extension.
    Anonymous

  30. #29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sonny Tufts View Post
    Federal law sets the minimum age to buy a long gun at 18, but this doesn't mean the seller must sell to an 18 year old. It just means he can't sell to someone under 18.
    No it means that the person is eligible to purchase, Refusing the purchase is discrimination based on age. and also violation of that persons 2nd amendment right. It is an infringement.

    Federal law sets the age.. FFL must follow the law.
    Liberty is lost through complacency and a subservient mindset. When we accept or even welcome automobile checkpoints, random searches, mandatory identification cards, and paramilitary police in our streets, we have lost a vital part of our American heritage. America was born of protest, revolution, and mistrust of government. Subservient societies neither maintain nor deserve freedom for long.
    Ron Paul 2004

    Registered Ron Paul supporter # 2202
    It's all about Freedom

  31. #30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pcosmar View Post
    No it means that the person is eligible to purchase, Refusing the purchase is discrimination based on age. and also violation of that persons 2nd amendment right. It is an infringement.
    The 2nd Amendment applies to Congress (lol).

    You don't become an arm of Congress because you are required to apply for a license to transact in something.

    Eta: As has been posted, age discrimination, maybe, depending location but all that would be argued, to a leftist court, is that the 18-20 year old is still permitted on premises to purchase any other item they wished to and that they are simply limiting their company's possible liability. The court would seem sensible in allowing this specific discrimination in the name of public safety.
    Last edited by kcchiefs6465; 03-02-2018 at 03:31 PM.
    “The nationalist not only does not disapprove of atrocities committed by his own side, but he has a remarkable capacity for not even hearing about them.” --George Orwell

    Quote Originally Posted by AuH20 View Post
    In terms of a full spectrum candidate, Rand is leaps and bounds above Trump. I'm not disputing that.
    Who else in public life has called for a pre-emptive strike on North Korea?--Donald Trump

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast





Similar Threads

  1. DHS to tell retailers to watch their customers
    By green73 in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 09-13-2014, 12:23 AM
  2. Retailers are Thieves!!!!!
    By Flash in forum Open Discussion
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 08-20-2010, 05:30 AM
  3. Pundits: 220,000 retailers to close in 2009
    By Pauls' Revere in forum Economy & Markets
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-20-2009, 11:49 AM
  4. Need some quotes from Ron Paul Retailers...
    By micahnelson in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-14-2007, 11:19 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •