Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Ron Paul: Trump To Embrace Nuclear First Strike - Video

  1. #1

    Default Ron Paul: Trump To Embrace Nuclear First Strike - Video

    Ron Paul: Trump To Embrace Nuclear First Strike
    http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives...-first-strike/



    Title is a little misleading, Ron talks about Nuclear Policies and modernizing our current arsenal. Title itself is what was put on the Ron Paul Institute site, so Im not trying to change things to create fear, or say Ron Paul is saying something he is not. I just wanted to make that clear.
    Last edited by DamianTV; 01-16-2018 at 04:43 PM.
    1776 > 1984

    The FAILURE of the United States Government to operate and maintian an
    Honest Money System , which frees the ordinary man from the clutches of the money manipulators, is the single largest contributing factor to the World's current Economic Crisis.

    The Elimination of Privacy is the Architecture of Genocide

    You are Ron Paul's Media!

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    Our central bank is not privately owned.



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2

    Default

    Great line by Dr. Paul at about 4:00. "It's not that we lack weapons, we lack sanity"
    "Let it not be said that we did nothing." - Dr. Ron Paul. "Stand up for what you believe in, even if you are standing alone." - Sophie Magdalena Scholl
    "War is the health of the State." - Randolph Bourne "Freedom is the answer. ... Now, what's the question?" - Ernie Hancock.

  4. #3

    Default

    This nuclear first strike policy is insanely dangerous. Even if you trusted Trump and his advisers to exercise extreme wisdom, insight and judgment in the use of nuclear first strike (which no one should), this policy still opens the door for the next Trump or Hillary and every future president, administration or neocon infiltrated cabinet to initiate nuclear war with a nuclear first strike for any of the pretexts created.

    It is a propaganda campaign to make use of nuclear weapons acceptable to the public. As McAdams points out they call them "low yield" or tactical nukes to make it sound more acceptable for destroying other nations. Keep in mind the nightmare infernos dropped are Hiroshima and Nagasaki are super low yield nukes compared to today's technology.

    It sends a message to every other nation on the planet that they can be targeted with nuclear weapons by the US. It tells them they must get their own weapons. After witnessing Washington destruction of Libya, Syria, Yugoslavia, and regime changes in Ukraine and others, any nation that has ever disagreed with Washington policy on anything or ever may must get their own nuclear weapons as defense to Washington's nuclear first strike policy.

    This is worse than bad policy. It is obscenely insane.
    Last edited by AZJoe; 01-17-2018 at 08:05 PM.
    "Let it not be said that we did nothing." - Dr. Ron Paul. "Stand up for what you believe in, even if you are standing alone." - Sophie Magdalena Scholl
    "War is the health of the State." - Randolph Bourne "Freedom is the answer. ... Now, what's the question?" - Ernie Hancock.

  5. #4

    Default

    Pentagon Proposes Nuclear First-Strikes to Counter Cyberattacks

    on the Pentagon’s new Nuclear Posture Review ... the details continue to slowly emerge, and show a scramble to establish more pretexts for nuclear first strikes.

    This includes cyberattacks.... Pentagon’s document proposes the use of nuclear first strikes against cyber foes, presenting that as the only “realistic” option to such threats. ...

    Which is another problem. US assignments of blame in cyberattacks are rarely grounded in evidence or reality, but rather they blame whoever is politically expedient at the time, whether it’s Russia, China, or North Korea. Such reckless blame is relatively consequence-free when the US just responds with angry threats, but nuclear strikes could quickly start massive, civilization ending nuclear warfare.

    Making nuclear war more likely is the general theme of the Nuclear Posture Review ... The Trump Administration has spent its entire time in power easing restrictions on the military, and giving commanders more and more leeway on their operations. It might not be such a surprise for that to spill over into nuclear weapon policy.

    "Let it not be said that we did nothing." - Dr. Ron Paul. "Stand up for what you believe in, even if you are standing alone." - Sophie Magdalena Scholl
    "War is the health of the State." - Randolph Bourne "Freedom is the answer. ... Now, what's the question?" - Ernie Hancock.

  6. #5

    Default

    trumptards are eerily quiet. Just ignore what you cant defend

  7. #6

    Default

    Trump Vows Massive Expansion of US Nuclear Arsenal

    President Trump has told reporters that the US intends to conduct a massive expansion of its nuclear weapons arsenal, with an eye toward building a number ďfar, far in excess of anybody else.Ē ...

    Estimates on what nuclear modernization would cost were already in the trillions of dollars, and that was not including President Trumpís intention to make the arsenal much bigger than it already is ...
    "Let it not be said that we did nothing." - Dr. Ron Paul. "Stand up for what you believe in, even if you are standing alone." - Sophie Magdalena Scholl
    "War is the health of the State." - Randolph Bourne "Freedom is the answer. ... Now, what's the question?" - Ernie Hancock.

  8. #7

    Default

    From Caitln Johnstone: Dems Ignore Trumpís Nuclear Recklessness With Russia

    Political commentary throughout 2016 was filled with scary sound bytes by partisan opponents of the Republican party warning how dangerous and horrifying it would be if Donald Trump ever gained access to the nuclear codes. ... Over and over and over again I encountered Democrats on social media in 2016 telling me ... Trump was going to get everyone nuked in a fit of stupid impulsiveness if elected ... Isn't it surprising, then, that these people are all completely ignoring this administration's insane, world-threatening nuclear escalations against Russia? Of course it $#@!ing isn't.

    A couple of great articles have come out recently about the Trump administration's Nuclear Posture Review and other omnicidal cold war escalations with the only other nuclear superpower on the planet. The first is Anti-Media's "How Donald Trumpís Policies Have Brought Us to the Brink of World War 3", and the second is titled "Normalizing Nukes, Pentagon-Style" ... Both provide good insight into the dangers inherent in further blurring the lines between when nuclear weapons use is and is not acceptable, and the completely illogical rationale for doing so. ... it's very telling that such insightful takes on this issue of unparalleled importance are relegated to small alternative media outlets. ...

    "$#@! hole countries"? ... offensive things on Twitter? ... due to the frenetic coverage these issues receive from Democrat-allied mainstream media, a very large percentage of registered Democrats are aware of them. How about the fact that this administration is imperiling the life of every organism on earth with needless escalations against a nuclear superpower? ... Nuclear holocaust is the worst thing that can possibly happen. There are many, many things to hate and criticize the current president for, but the fact that he has overseen steady escalations which increase the likelihood of nuclear holocaust is far and away the most urgently worthy of condemnation. If you were going to attack this president on one thing, this would be it. But Trump's ostensible political opponents ignore it, because they ignore all despicable acts of warmongering. ...

    Democrats have been collaborating with Republicans to inflate the already staggering US military budget and exacerbate the new cold war, as well as expand Trump's Orwellian spying powers and expand his unconstitutional war powers. Propaganda has been used to keep rank-and-file Democrats fixated on ... baseless Russiagate conspiracy theories, while hiding its most horrific aspects from the spotlight. ... pay no attention to the steadily mounting nuclear tensions behind the curtain.

    The US-centralized empire is making an omnicidal gamble ... as it attempts to maneuver Russia off the world stage to prevent the rise of any rival superpowers, already having killed Russians in Syria, expanded NATO, kept troops along Russia's border, established a permanent military presence in Syria with the goal of effecting regime change, forced Russian outlets to register as foreign agents, and allowed the sale of arms to Ukraine. Hot proxy conflicts and increasingly unclear lines could lead at any time to an inflammation ... But sure, let's talk about Trump's $#@!ing tweets instead.

    The Democratic party does not resist Trump. ... The Democratic party exists to co-opt grassroots movements and divert their energy back towards the machine. ...
    "Let it not be said that we did nothing." - Dr. Ron Paul. "Stand up for what you believe in, even if you are standing alone." - Sophie Magdalena Scholl
    "War is the health of the State." - Randolph Bourne "Freedom is the answer. ... Now, what's the question?" - Ernie Hancock.

  9. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Influenza View Post
    trumptards are eerily quiet. Just ignore what you cant defend
    Is this sort of like how Trump embraced banning bumpstocks and assault rifles and deteriorating our due process in order to diffuse the left and then two days later decided he didn't want gun control anymore and wanted to have strong due process and protect the 2nd amendment?

    I'm going to take a wild guess and say yes, Trump doesn't actually want to drop a nuclear bomb, he just pretends like he will so other countries being lead by tyrants get their act together and stop treating their citizens like crap and stop taking advantage of us through trade agreements and such.
    "He's talkin' to his gut like it's a person!!" -me
    "dumpster diving isn't professional." - angelatc


    "Each of us must choose which course of action we should take: education, conventional political action, or even peaceful civil disobedience to bring about necessary changes. But let it not be said that we did nothing." - Ron Paul

    "Paul said "the wave of the future" is a coalition of anti-authoritarian progressive Democrats and libertarian Republicans in Congress opposed to domestic surveillance, opposed to starting new wars and in favor of ending the so-called War on Drugs."

  10. #9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DamianTV View Post
    Ron Paul: Trump To Embrace Nuclear First Strike
    http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives...-first-strike/



    Title is a little misleading, Ron talks about Nuclear Policies and modernizing our current arsenal. Title itself is what was put on the Ron Paul Institute site, so Im not trying to change things to create fear, or say Ron Paul is saying something he is not. I just wanted to make that clear.
    Are you accusing Dr. Paul for click baiting?






Similar Threads

  1. Bill Introduced Restricting Nuclear First Strike
    By AZJoe in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-27-2016, 10:08 PM
  2. Chinese nuclear strike
    By 69360 in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 11-01-2013, 07:34 PM
  3. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-19-2011, 11:55 AM
  4. Are Americans prepared for a nuclear strike?
    By Reason in forum World News & Affairs
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 11-24-2010, 09:56 PM
  5. Nuclear strike on Iran Is Imminent
    By Pedro TT in forum World News & Affairs
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 01-18-2008, 02:04 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •