View Poll Results: A Monarchist Party?

Voters
16. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yea, I'd consider that

    4 25.00%
  • No, you're insane

    12 75.00%
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 61 to 77 of 77

Thread: A Monarchist Party?

  1. #61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Weston White View Post
    Heh, empirical history.
    That is a reference, not a presentation.
    Through lives and lives shalt thou pay, O' king.

    Pray for reset.




  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #62

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by r3volution 3.0 View Post
    Once again, please tell me what specifically is wrong with the three-part argument I posted.

    I'm not going to respond to your questions until do you me the courtesy of addressing what I said.
    His questions carry the response.

    Have you no analytic subtlety?
    Through lives and lives shalt thou pay, O' king.

    Pray for reset.


  4. #63

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by r3volution 3.0 View Post
    Once again, please tell me what specifically is wrong with the three-part argument I posted.
    Your entire premise is wrong.

    A Monarch is nothing but a tyrant who steals and enslaves.
    It is a Horrible form of Government and has always been historically.

    The American experiment of limited govt, was a new and novel approach,
    It has never seen a century of implementation and can not be evaluated in a historical manner.

    Monarchy has a proven history of failure,
    Liberty is lost through complacency and a subservient mindset. When we accept or even welcome automobile checkpoints, random searches, mandatory identification cards, and paramilitary police in our streets, we have lost a vital part of our American heritage. America was born of protest, revolution, and mistrust of government. Subservient societies neither maintain nor deserve freedom for long.
    Ron Paul 2004

    Registered Ron Paul supporter # 2202
    It's all about Freedom

  5. #64

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by r3volution 3.0 View Post
    My point is that a monarch has the incentives of an owner,
    How does this tyrant become the owner?

    How do you OWN human being?

    The only Owner of Humans is the Creator of Humans.

    any other claim of authority is usurpation.
    Liberty is lost through complacency and a subservient mindset. When we accept or even welcome automobile checkpoints, random searches, mandatory identification cards, and paramilitary police in our streets, we have lost a vital part of our American heritage. America was born of protest, revolution, and mistrust of government. Subservient societies neither maintain nor deserve freedom for long.
    Ron Paul 2004

    Registered Ron Paul supporter # 2202
    It's all about Freedom

  6. #65

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pcosmar View Post
    Your entire premise is wrong.

    A Monarch is nothing but a tyrant who steals and enslaves.
    It is a Horrible form of Government and has always been historically.

    The American experiment of limited govt, was a new and novel approach,
    It has never seen a century of implementation and can not be evaluated in a historical manner.

    Monarchy has a proven history of failure,
    Ah..

    As I said, this isn't for everybody.

  7. #66

    Default



    Someone mentioned Lucifer on the throne; there it is.

    ...the more graphic and realistic images were burned by the "freedom fighters."

  8. #67

    Default

    Lol, this thread got a 4 star rating? I guess I'll vote after all.


  9. #68

    Default

    I ought to have extended the polls to more days.

  10. #69

    Default

    This is the funeral of Otto von Habsburg.


  11. #70

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by r3volution 3.0 View Post
    @PierzStyx You're not going to answer my question?





    For your convenience, I've simplified the argument and broken it down into its component parts.

    Tell me exactly which of the parts is wrong and why.
    I've answered your question. The problem is that your assertion is a socialist fantasy. Give one person total power, collectivize the ownership of all property under their rule, and the end result will be starvation, oppression, and slavery. Just ask anyone who lived under Uncle Joe or any of his successors.

    “Maybe I forgot to mention something to you: I don’t believe in queens. You think freedom is something you can give and take on a whim. But to your people, freedom is as essential as air. And without it, there is no life. There is only darkness.” -Zaheer

    "A man chooses. A slave obeys."-Andrew Ryan

    "There are three things the parasite hates: free markets, free will, and free men."-Andrew Ryan

  12. #71

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by r3volution 3.0 View Post
    This is the funeral of Otto von Habsburg.
    I've seen a lot of funerals,, and even participated in some.

    What is your point? or are you just a fanboy?
    Liberty is lost through complacency and a subservient mindset. When we accept or even welcome automobile checkpoints, random searches, mandatory identification cards, and paramilitary police in our streets, we have lost a vital part of our American heritage. America was born of protest, revolution, and mistrust of government. Subservient societies neither maintain nor deserve freedom for long.
    Ron Paul 2004

    Registered Ron Paul supporter # 2202
    It's all about Freedom

  13. #72

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pcosmar View Post
    I've seen a lot of funerals,, and even participated in some.

    What is your point? or are you just a fanboy?
    I thought it was interesting (esp. the overwhelming celebration).

    Austrians still have some sense..

    ..for a dynasty that ceased to exist a century ago.

    Quote Originally Posted by PierzStyx View Post
    I've answered your question.
    No, you haven't.

  14. #73

    Default

    Why is this ridiculous $#@! in grass roots? Does RPF's now consider a monarchy relative to the liberty movement? I realize things have changed somewhat but when did a monarchy become something to be desired here?

  15. #74

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by r3volution 3.0 View Post


    Someone mentioned Lucifer on the throne; there it is.

    ...the more graphic and realistic images were burned by the "freedom fighters."
    How smugly you sit in judgment of people who knew far more than you do. It's long past time for you to go do some homework. Here's your assignment:

    Go read one of the works of Marquis de Sade.

    Go read a second work of Marquis de Sade.

    Go read a third work by Marquis de Sade.

    Come back and tell us how the French Revolution was an irrational act.
    'It ain't what we don't know that hurts us, it's what we "know" that ain't so.'--Will Rogers

    'I prefer someone who burns the flag and then wraps themselves up in the Constitution over someone who burns the Constitution and then wraps themselves up in the flag.'--Molly Ivins

  16. #75

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by r3volution 3.0 View Post


    Someone mentioned Lucifer on the throne; there it is.

    ...the more graphic and realistic images were burned by the "freedom fighters."
    Quote Originally Posted by acptulsa View Post
    How smugly you sit in judgment of people who knew far more than you do. It's long past time for you to go do some homework. Here's your assignment:

    Go read one of the works of Marquis de Sade.

    Go read a second work of Marquis de Sade.

    Go read a third work by Marquis de Sade.

    Come back and tell us how the French Revolution was an irrational act.
    Neither side was any good.
    Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig.

    Robert Heinlein

    Give a man an inch and right away he thinks he's a ruler

    Groucho Marx

    I love mankind…it’s people I can’t stand.

    Linus, from the Peanuts comic

    You cannot have liberty without morality and morality without faith

    Alexis de Torqueville

    Those who fail to learn from the past are condemned to repeat it.
    Those who learn from the past are condemned to watch everybody else repeat it

    A Zero Hedge comment

  17. #76

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    Neither side was any good.
    No, the side which encouraged the development of civilization was/is better than the side which put heads on sticks.

    ...fairly straightforward.

    Quote Originally Posted by acptulsa View Post
    How smugly you sit in judgment of people who knew far more than you do. It's long past time for you to go do some homework. Here's your assignment:

    Go read one of the works of Marquis de Sade.

    Go read a second work of Marquis de Sade.

    Go read a third work by Marquis de Sade.

    Come back and tell us how the French Revolution was an irrational act.
    The Marquis de Sade was an illiterate lunatic barbarian who represented the opposite of civilization.

    I'm not sure if you're kidding, but I certainly hope so.

  18. #77

    Default

    From @acptulsa:

    The 'illiterate lunatic barbarian' was on the side that 'encouraged the development of civilization' and you damned well know it.
    Sade was a revolutionary communist, militant atheist, and moral degenerate ("Sadist") of epic proportions.

    He sided with the Jacobins et al in their quest to destroy all property, religion, family, etc - civilization.

    His modern day equivalent would be a "Black Bloc" member who also directs hardcore porn.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123





Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 73
    Last Post: 11-04-2012, 11:54 AM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-27-2011, 06:44 PM
  3. Party split already happening: Conservative Party VS Republican Party
    By federalistnp in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: 10-26-2009, 02:00 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •