Peter Strzok: Partisan FBI infiltrator

[AZJoe]

Now the US preeminent law breaker law enforcer, the FBI claims they lost ALL of Andrew McCabe's text messages:

"[Judicial Watch] sued back in September for the text messages of the number two at the FBI, Andrew McCabe. And they just told us this week, they gave us everything they’re going to give us, and not one text message was turned over. They lost all of Andrew McCabe’s text messages! I don’t believe it. There’s still gamesmanship going on."


Appears the FBI would rather portray itself as utterly incompetent, inept, useless, irresponsible, and grossly negligent, then reveal the truths contained in the text messages on government issued phones. In which case, fire every last one of them.

[Jan2017]

January 23, 2018
New FBI texts highlight a motive to conceal President Obama's involvement.
In any prosecution of Clinton, the Clinton–Obama emails would have been in the spotlight.

. . . the FBI’s failure to retain five months of text messages between Strzok and Page, those chattiest of star-crossed lovers. Yes, this “glitch” closes our window on a critical time in the Trump-Russia investigation: mid December 2016 through mid May 2017. That is when the bureau and Justice Department were reportedly conducting and renewing (in 90-day intervals) court-approved FISA surveillance that may well have focused on the newly sworn-in president of the United States.

On July 5, 2016, Comey held the press conference at which he delivered a statement describing Mrs. Clinton’s criminal conduct but nevertheless recommending against an indictment. We now know that Comey’s remarks had been in the works for two months and were revised several times by the director and his advisers.

This past weekend, in a letter to the FBI regarding the missing texts, Senate Homeland Security Committee chairman Ron Johnson (R., Wis.) addressed some of these revisions. According to Senator Johnson, a draft dated June 30, 2016 (i.e., five days before Comey delivered the final version), contained a passage expressly referring to a troublesome email exchange between Clinton and Obama. (I note that the FBI’s report of its eventual interview of Clinton contains a cryptic reference to a July 1, 2012, email that Clinton sent from Russia to Obama’s email address.

On the same day, (June 30, 2016) according to a Strzok–Page text, a revised draft of Comey’s remarks was circulated
by his chief of staff, Jim Rybicki. It replaced “the President” with “another senior government official.”
http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...indict-hillary

Hillary Clinton FBI 302 -V2-6
(page 2/11)
After reviewing an email dated July 1, 2012 with subject line "Fw: Congratulations!", Clinton stated she received
no guidance on how to use the President's email address at (redacted xxxx wh) .gov from Russia)
(page 4/11)
After reviewing an email from (Colin) Powell . . .
"Clinton understood it to mean any communications of official business would be government records."
https://www.scribd.com/document/3228...n-FBI-302-V2-6

[goldenequity]

Bob Goodlatte: Are Indictments Coming for Hillary, Strzok, and Page?


Oh Lordy, “Destruction of Evidence? Yes.”..... "Will there BE indictments?"... and at the very end.. (wait 4 it) ...
Awan Brothers!
Good job Maria

[Jan2017]

Hillary Clinton FBI Interview Summary
(page 2/58)
"The FBI did find that hostile foreign actors successfully gained access to the personal email accounts of individuals
with whom Clinton was in regular contact and, in so doing, obtained emails sent to and received by Clinton on her personal account."
https://www.scribd.com/document/3228...rnview-Summary

[Swordsmyth]

FBI Texts Discuss "Destroying Evidence", Scramble To Find Hard Drives: Report

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-29/fbi-texts-discuss-destroying-evidence-scramble-find-hard-drives-report

[Swordsmyth]

[Swordsmyth]

House Judiciary Tells FBI To Preserve McCabe Emails Pertaining To Trump Election

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-30/house-judiciary-tells-fbi-preserve-mccabe-emails-pertaining-trump-election

[Danke]

House Judiciary Tells FBI To Preserve McCabe Emails Pertaining To Trump Election

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-30/house-judiciary-tells-fbi-preserve-mccabe-emails-pertaining-trump-election

[Swordsmyth]

Andrew McCabe Under Active DOJ Investigation For Sitting On Weiner Laptop Emails

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-31/andrew-mccabe-under-active-doj-investigation-sitting-weiner-laptop-emails

[timosman]

I don't support Hillary nor pedophilia.

[Swordsmyth]

A new batch of text messages between anti-Trump FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page show that they wanted to "get around" technologically cumbersome data retention requirements to retain text messages.

The August 2016 messages discuss "piloting" a new program to "get around our security/monitoring issues," noting that "Dd" (thought to be Deputy Director Andrew McCabe) "had a terrible time with his phone [redacted] which made him concerned for our folks all over the place."
In a later portion of the exchange, Strzok notes that if he wanted to copy or take classified information, he "sure as hell" wouldn't do it on his FBI issued phone.
The texts, detailed in a Wednesday letter from HSGAC Chairman Sen. Ron Johnson, read in part:

Ms. Page: Have a meeting with turgal about getting iphone in a day or so
Mr. Strzok: Oh hot damn. I’m happy to pilot that . . . We get around our security/monitoring issues?
Ms. Page: No, he’s proposing that we just stop following them. Apparently the requirement to capture texts came from omb, but we’re the only org (I’m told) who is following that rule. His point is, if no one else is doing it why should we.
Ms. Page: Helps that Dd had a terrible time with his phone [redacted] which made him concerned for our folks all over the place.
Ms. Page: These phones suck as much as they do because of the program we use to capture texts, full stop.
Mr. Strzok: No doubt.
Mr. Strzok: I’m not convinced short of OPR, that text capture capability really deters anything.
Mr. Strzok: If I want to copy/take classified, I’m sure as hell not going to do it on this phone.
Ms. Page: I thought it was more from a discovery perspective.
Mr. Strzok: Probably. So just make a rule no texts of a discoverable nature. Like you said, what are CBP, DEA, others doing?

Sen. Johnson requests "additional communications including texts, emails, memos, and voicemails relating to the FBI’s investigation of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and candidates for the 2016 presidential election for 16 F.B.I. and DOJ officials."
The letter also points to Deputy Director Andrew McCabe's sudden resignation following a meeting with FBI Director Christopher Wray, who reportedly expressed concerns over the findings of FBI internal watchdog, Inspector General Michael Horowitz.
Johnson's letter then requests answers to several questions along with requests for documents and communications from a variety of individuals.

More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-...egal-discovery

[Jan2017]

Peter P. Strozk II is still very much a key figure in this Clinton machine cover-up of domestic election meddling after the Nunes memo -
and it does not matter if a conspiracy no longer exists per se, but rather that at one time period/during the period alleged in an indictment
that a conspiracy of two or more persons did factually exist.

The "government" referred to in Smith Act . . . is present government of United States, not some hypothetical future government
affording people no democratic means for bringing about desired changes."

"adding word "knowingly" to Smith Act was to insure that no one would be convicted for an act done because of mistake, inadvertence or other innocent reason"

"force" means the use of physical power other than the power of oral and written speech"

above excerpts are from
United States of America v. William Schneiderman, Oleta O'Connor Yates, et al. (14 total defendants) at 106 F.Supp 906 (S.D. California 1952)

Attempt of domestic organization to attack and subvert existing structure of government is criminal
if carried on through unlawful means, such as invasion of rights of others by use of force
from United States of America v. John Sinclair, Lawrence R. Plamondon, John W. Forrest 321 F.Supp. 1074 (E.D. Michigan 1971)

[Jan2017]

Domestic organization to election meddle has been very obvious in the 2016 Presidential election, right up to the insurance policy.

The "force" that some will argue is needed for crimes like seditious conspiracy is distinguished from acts of "violence" by the Court cited above.
Coercion is force, and prosecutors use that to violate 4th Amendment Rights all the time. Some get away with it.
Let P.P. Strzok have his day in Court, and connect the dots from there.

Rosenstein convinced which DC Circuit Court judge to plea down the Uranium One case, with McCabe ?

[seapilot]

New text revealed to the public today. Seems Obama was lying about not being involved in Hillary email investigations.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/pe...rticle/2648347

FBI agent Lisa Page told her fellow agent that President Obama "wants to know everything we're doing" related to the investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails, according to a newly released text.

"Potus wants to know everything we're doing," Page texted Peter Strzok on Sept. 2, 2016. That text was in reference to then-FBI Director James Comey, who had been preparing talking points for Obama regarding the probe into the former secretary of state.

The messages are part of a report published Wednesday by the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee titled "The Clinton Email Scandal and the FBI's Investigation of it." Strzok and Page later worked together on Robert Mueller's special counsel investigation of the Russian government's relationship with President Trump's campaign.

[seapilot]

Link to all their recent released texts. They really openly despised Trump and republicans in general.

https://www.scribd.com/document/3709...xts#from_embed

[Jan2017]

Link to all their recent released texts. They really openly despised Trump and republicans in general.

https://www.scribd.com/document/3709...xts#from_embed

502 pages, and I got to page 9 . . . these start off from McCabe. If the government just disbars him NOW, the paid leave stops NOW
and so he doesn't make it to his pension date after all.

on page 16 of 502 email from Comey to Rybicki on June 30, 2016 . . .

"She also used her personal email extensively while outside the United States,
including from the territory of sophisticated adversaries.
That use included an email exchange with the President while Secretary Clinton was on the territory of such an adversary."

This is of course the email exchange from Russia in the FBI interview report where Clinton "does not recollect"
ever being given instructions on how to email to the President while in Russia.

[Hilly-hon . . . no instructions were ever given to you on how to use your rogue email by the State Dept. -
you were instructed to use government servers - get it ?]

Comey has renamed this all "SophisticatedAdversaryGate" and the the Sophisticated Adversary Investigation
for reasons he can tell a jury - unless he decides to plead his Fifth Amendment Rights.

[timosman]

Link to all their recent released texts. They really openly despised Trump and republicans in general.

https://www.scribd.com/document/3709...xts#from_embed

You don't seriously think that's what we did, do you? We always follow the rule of law even if the evidence does not corroborate.

[goldenequity]

@Jan2017 check this one out.

specific edits made by senior FBI agents when Deputy Director Andrew McCabe exchanged drafts of Comey's statement with senior FBI officials, including Peter Strzok, Strzok's direct supervisor, E.W. "Bill" Priestap, Jonathan Moffa, and an unnamed employee from the Office of General Counsel (identified by Newsweek as DOJ Deputy General Counsel Trisha Anderson) - in what was a coordinated conspiracy among top FBI brass to decriminalize Clinton's conduct by changing legal terms and phrases, omitting key information, and minimizing the role of the Intelligence Community in the email investigation. Doing so virtually assured that then-candidate Hillary Clinton would not be prosecuted.


http://i.magaimg.net/img/2l9o.jpg magnifier

This exchange proves that Obammy used an unsecured server despite feigning ignorance (ie LIED), knew HRC was using an unsecured server despite claiming he “learned about it from the news like everybody else” (ie LIED to cover his ass, as explained in the next point), and that both of them were exchanging classified information over an unsecured server (ie ILLEGAL), and even exchanged classified info over an unsecured server WHILE IN HOSTILE COUNTRIES (eg China, Russia, etc) THAT COULD INTERCEPT THE TRANSMISSION OF SUCH CLASSIFIED MATERIALS (ie HIGHLY ILLEGAL).
Oh, and then there’s the part where the FBI and DOJ covered for Obammy’s illegal crimes by changing the wording to “senior government official” instead of implicating the President directly. Funny, where have we heard the FBI and DOJ changing language to protect “senior government official(s)” before? How about changing “investigation” to “matter” at the direction of Lynch? Or when Comey danced around “intent?” THE PRESIDENT AND SECRETARY OF STATE COMMITTED MULTIPLE CRIMES, AND THE FBI AND DOJ COVERED IT UP FOR THEM.

------------------

Above 'sample' is Team Ron Johnson's ONLY focus.... the 'edits' and the FBI conspiracy to exonerate Hillary (Obama's ass is on fire too.)

Chairman Ron Johnson: Interim Report on FBI Purposeful Intent To Exonerate Hillary Clinton During Email Scandal…
https://theconservativetreehouse.com...email-scandal/

Senator Ron Johnson, chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee,
has a very narrow focus on the DOJ/FBI ‘small team’ involvement into the 2016 election.

Johnson’s authority focuses on how the group inside the FBI worked to exonerate Hillary Clinton
despite evidence of intentional wrongdoing.

Special Bonus Tip:

Page and Strzok were not lovers.
The "lovers" angle is a cover story to explain their 'small group' collaboration/communication.
The "paramour" angle was needed after they realized the IG had their text messages.
They needed to justify. Nothing more.

[AuH20]

[AuH20]

You want real change? Well, are you willing to get your hands dirty? Honor & Integrity will return to the weary land, once the horror begins.

What I want, and what many Americans want – is blood. Blood that is spilled cannot be repaid, except by blood. I want to see mass public executions, in some of the most creative and twisted ways imaginable. Something that will make people remember, you know? Make people imagine the consequences before following the same road of folly, and be marked with the dead. Not only the dead, but the tormented dead, whose memory would serve as a warning. Don’t $#@! with Vlad, or you might wind up on a pole. Remember Ceaușescu?

[goldenequity]

Rep. Jim Jordan Summarizes FBI Crew Shaping Clinton Investigation and Starting Trump Investigation…

[goldenequity]

(It's their SOLE purpose/focus)
Senator Ron Johnson Drops Bombshell Report! “The Clinton Email Scandal And The FBI’s Investigation Of It,”

PDF https://t.co/5znf1KKZ4B

[Swordsmyth]

You want real change? Well, are you willing to get your hands dirty? Honor & Integrity will return to the weary land, once the horror begins.

Cry 'Havoc,' and let slip the dogs of war;
That this foul deed shall smell above the earth
With carrion men, groaning for burial.

William Shakespeare

...

[goldenequity]

Why Not All 50,000?

Regarding the 'trickle' of released texts....

aka: They're keeping a lid on it and enforcing the same 'Hannity narrative'. It's being 'steered' by omissions.
otherwise known as 'strategic leaking'...
and CAN BE JUST as 'politically motivated' as those they are ACCUSING!!

[Swordsmyth]

FBI investigators who interviewed Michael Flynn last January - one of which was anti-Trumper Peter Strzok - thought Flynn was telling the truth about his conversations with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak, and that any inaccuracies in his answers were unintentional - according to accounts of a closed-door March 2017 briefing given to lawmakers by former FBI Director James Comey.

According to two sources familiar with the meetings, Comey told lawmakers that the FBI agents who interviewed Flynn did not believe that Flynn had lied to them, or that any inaccuracies in his answers were intentional. As a result, some of those in attendance came away with the impression that Flynn would not be charged with a crime pertaining to the January 24 interview. -Washington Examiner

This new revelation from the closed-door briefing held nearly a year ago (apparently leaks which benefit conservatives take much longer), complicates an already murky case considering that Flynn pleaded guilty nine months later to one count of making a false statement to the FBI.

More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-...ink-flynn-lied

[Swordsmyth]

FBI investigators who interviewed Michael Flynn last January - one of which was anti-Trumper Peter Strzok - thought Flynn was telling the truth about his conversations with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak, and that any inaccuracies in his answers were unintentional - according to accounts of a closed-door March 2017 briefing given to lawmakers by former FBI Director James Comey.

According to two sources familiar with the meetings, Comey told lawmakers that the FBI agents who interviewed Flynn did not believe that Flynn had lied to them, or that any inaccuracies in his answers were intentional. As a result, some of those in attendance came away with the impression that Flynn would not be charged with a crime pertaining to the January 24 interview. -Washington Examiner

This new revelation from the closed-door briefing held nearly a year ago (apparently leaks which benefit conservatives take much longer), complicates an already murky case considering that Flynn pleaded guilty nine months later to one count of making a false statement to the FBI.

More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-...ink-flynn-lied

When does Flynn get his job back?

[Swordsmyth]

Former CIA Director John Brennan is in a "world of trouble" over statement's he's made concerning British spy Christopher Steele's dossier linking President Donald Trump to Russia, former Secret Service agent Dan Bongino said Monday.
"My sources on this are telling me John Brennan is in a world of trouble right now," Bongino told Fox News' "Fox & Friends" program.


"Back in August of 2016 he gives a private briefing to Sen. Harry Reid, Democrat, of course. He gives that briefing to Reid. Reid fires off a letter to the FBI. In that letter is information that clearly came from the dossier."
That means that at that point, Brennan was aware of the dossier, but in May of 2017, under oath, he denied knowing who commissioned it, said Bongino, a frequent Fox News commentator and owner of "The Dan Bongino Show" podcast.
"The CIA has a central role in the verification of foreign assets and information we get from foreign assets," Bongino said. "It is not plausibly deniable that John Brennan did not know who commissioned that dossier he is in a world of trouble because he raised his right hand and he said the exact opposite."

More at: https://www.newsmax.com/politics/dan.../12/id/842791/

[Swordsmyth]

Word of BuzzFeed's suit against the DNC comes on the heels of a Monday revelation that the news outlet hired a former top FBI and White House cybersecurity official to fly around the globe on a secret mission to corroborate various claims in the dossier.

The probe is being conducted by Anthony Ferrante - formerly the FBI's top official in charge of "cyber incident response" at the U.S. National Security Council under the Obama administration. Ferrante is leading the investigation from his new employer, D.C.-based business advisory firm, Forensic Technologies International (FTI) consulting reports Foreign Policy.

At FTI, Ferrante launched what’s now been a months-long stealth effort chasing down documents and conducting interviews on the ground in various countries around the world. His team directed BuzzFeed lawyers to subpoena specific data and testimony from dozens of agencies or companies across the country and assembled a cyber ops war room to analyze that data, according to sources familiar with the work.

Considering that much of the Steele dossier came from a collaboration with high level Kremlin officials (a collusion if you will), one has to wonder exactly what channels Ferrante and FTI have tapped in order to access such information.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-...ey-were-hacked

[Swordsmyth]

To continue the timeline, on Dec. 12, 2017, Judge Sullivan gave Mueller the unusual set of instructions, demanding that Mueller turn over to the defense anything that could be considered exculpatory.
Then on Jan. 31, 2018, Mueller requested a delay in sentencing, pushing Flynn’s sentencing into May of this year.
Finally, on Feb. 14, 2014, Mueller asked Judge Sullivan to seal the information the special prosecutor’s team had handed over to Flynn’s defense.
The request by Mueller to seal the exculpatory material handed over to Flynn’s defense team suggests Flynn’s prosecution may have derived from the anti-Trump animus between FBI agent Peter Strzok (the FBI agent Flynn allegedly lied to) and Strzok’s lover, FBI agent Lisa Page.
Another concern is that Strzok (and others in the FBI) may have altered their interrogation reports (known as FBI “302” forms) in order to make Flynn appear guilty of an offense Flynn did not commit.
On Feb. 5, 2018, Flynn’s attorneys filed a motion to dismiss all charges against him on the basis that the FBI and DOJ violated his Fourth Amendment rights, requiring the case to be dismissed under the Supreme Court doctrine known as “the fruit of the poisonous tree” – a Supreme Court dictate that requires the dismissal of any prosecution or guilty verdict where the defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights were violated, regardless whether or not the evidence so obtained was essential for the prosecution.
As an important backdrop to the case, in March 2017, then FBI Director James Comey briefed a number of Capitol Hill lawmakers on the “Russian Collusion” investigation and reportedly insisted he believed Flynn did not lie to the FBI.
As a result of that interview, the lawmakers interviewing Comey told reporters they came away with the impression Flynn would not be charged with a crime pertaining to his interview with the FBI on Jan. 24, 2017.

More at: https://www.infowars.com/flynn-rulin...al-prosecutor/

[Swordsmyth]

FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok reportedly ignored "an irregularity in the metadata" indicating that Hillary Clinton's server may had been breached, while FBI top brass made significant edits to former Director James Comey's statement specifically minimizing how likely it was that hostile actors had gained access.
Sources told Fox News that Strzok, who sent anti-Trump text messages that got him removed from the ongoing Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia probe, was told about the metadata anomaly in 2016, but Strzok did not support a formal damage assessment. One source said: “Nothing happened.”


More at: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-...-server-breach