Why Almost All the Sex Scandals Involve Liberals

[Swordsmyth]

Wait, I thought this was a new plot by the establishment to keep constitutional conservatives out of office?

They always accuse their enemies of what they are guilty of.

[dannno]

nyways, I did quickly count all of them 70s and after, Rs have way more than D. If I counted 80s and after it would be more than double.

*Bull$#@!*

[Ender]

You said:

That is not true freedom, in true freedom the taxpayers don't pick up the tab.

Did you mean something else?

In true freedom, there aren't "tax-payers".

[Influenza]

*Bull$#@!*

41 R
19 D
1980 - present

obviously without making any distinction on severity etc. you guys can do that if you want. I would personally give extra severity points to all the Rs with homosexual scandals

Someone mentioned all the famous liberals that have scandals and so few conservative famous people. I think it has something to do with the vast majority of famous people in Hollywood and sports being liberals, and less to do with anything else.

[anaconda]

Bette Midler says Geraldo Rivera drugged and groped her in the 1970s

Must have pissed off Aaron Russo.

[anaconda]

But if memory serves, during the Bush II administration it was typically some "anti-gay" closet Republican getting busted in a public restroom by undercover cops.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...usa.paulharris

[nikcers]

Evil loves to turn a good person bad. I always thought they controlled people by forcing people or tricking people intto committing immoral acts while recording evidence and blackmailing. This all seems targeted though, the blackmail racket is not partisan.

[Raginfridus]

Did you guys see that?!

Nobody's been sheksually assaulted have they?

[r3volution 3.0]

While I often write about the “relativism” of the Left, today I’ll keep it simple and relate the insight I had into this matter as a young, 20-something man: People embrace liberalism to justify their own misdeeds.
Think about leftism’s message: You’re not responsible for what you do (e.g., kid-glove “justice”), you don’t have to pay for what you get (e.g., government handouts), it can’t be wrong if it’s consensual (e.g., sexual perversion). The only homage you must pay is to bow at political correctness’ altar. But that’s fine because it’s actual morality leftists want a dispensation from — not faux “morality.”
Why do you think leftists continually attack (traditional) sexual morality? While there can be more than one reason, the dominant one — remember that people are governed by emotion more than reason — is that they themselves have an affinity for behaviors that this morality condemns. So they condemn it.
So it’s an old, and very human, story: People seek to justify themselves. They attack what threatens their power. They attack what threatens their wealth. They attack what threatens their status. So what would you conclude about the group that most attacks what threatens sin?

More at: https://www.thenewamerican.com/cultu...volve-liberals

Which of the persons accused of degenerate sexual conduct weren't leftists?

Let me rephrase, which Democrats or Republicans aren't leftists?

[anaconda]

Let me rephrase, which Democrats or Republicans aren't leftists?

Rand Paul, Mike Lee, Thomas Massie, Justin Amash.

[r3volution 3.0]

Rand Paul, Mike Lee, Thomas Massie, Justin Amash.

Yep, that about covers it.

[kpitcher]

Would you consider the hundreds of catholic priests who were part of their scandal liberal or conservative? Or are we just talking about people who have been recently caught?

[timosman]

Would you consider the hundreds of catholic priests who were part of their scandal liberal or conservative? Or are we just talking about people who have been recently caught?

Why don't you check some of these threads - http://www.ronpaulforums.com/search....pe&titleonly=1

[Swordsmyth]

Would you consider the hundreds of catholic priests who were part of their scandal liberal or conservative? Or are we just talking about people who have been recently caught?

The Catholics started "Social Justice" so I would tend to believe they are liberals.

[Weston White]

The Bush's are RINO; French socialist Dominique Strauss-Kahn; Jeffrey Epstein catered mostly to Democrats; Jared Fogle Jewish and Hollywood connected.

[Republicanguy]

Here are some cynical thoughts on this. With all the sexting, phone calls, emails, texting, travel, purchases, spending, meetings photos, messages, etc. involved, the all seeing eye of the total surveillance NSA is fully aware of every one of these transgressions including the horrible rapes and child sex crimes. Not to mention other crimes like money laundering through fake charity slush funds, destroying government property containing evidence and records, cover-ups, using IRS and government agencies to target political opposition, etc. Yet such heinous activities by powerful individuals continues unabated for years. Never getting called on unless and until a victim or whistleblower outs them with evidence. Why?

Why does the all-seeing deep state allow such abominable crimes against victims to continue unabated? What does the all-seeing deep state do with its boundless database of every electronic communication and transaction? Certainly then not to thwart corruption, uphold the constitution, or safeguard a Constitutional Republic. Why does the deep state seem to favor and protect the political leaders most covered in corruption and dark secrets? Why do the most corrupt tend to support and espouse deep state CIA/NSA/MIC propaganda and objectives despite all reason or evidence to the contra?

The cynical mind would ask “cui bono?” and answer that the deep state benefits itself from corrupt political and other leaders. A deep state that has proven it has no problem using torture, murder, assassination, proxy terrorists, false flags, lies, war on false pretenses, media manipulation, color revolutions, renditions, dictators, drug running, arms running, experimentation on unknowing US citizen, and more, likes and prefers corrupt leaders. The more heinous the skeletons in the closet, the more it enables the deep state to indirectly control select political leaders; to indirectly protect its puppet assets (both willing and unwitting) in the government; and to sabotage those politicos that threaten its interventionist power expanding agenda by selectively leaking unfavorable or embarrassing information from its bottomless pit of gathered data mining. Is it a Government of the blackmail, by the blackmail, for the deep state?

Just some musings of cynical speculation.

Cuis custodiet ipsos custodies? -- Who watches the watchmen?

The one who thinks he has an answer for everything.

[dannno]

The one who thinks he has an answer for everything.

I didn't see "answers" I just saw somebody thinking.

[oyarde]

Would you consider the hundreds of catholic priests who were part of their scandal liberal or conservative? Or are we just talking about people who have been recently caught?

It is a strange demographic , in my experience in the cities nearby here, like Jews and Blacks they vote Dem even though the dem platform is supposedly against the values they claim to have .

[Danke]

...

[VIDEODROME]

Not sure I agree with how the Left is characterized, but I'll play and suggest another angle. Abortion.

I think many people including the late Hugh Hefner liked to appear Progressive or even Feminist supporting a woman's right to choose. More likely, these guys really just wanted to preserve the option to terminate any accidental pregnancies.