Meet The Southern Poverty Law Center

[AZJoe]

Chance that the SPLC convinces the government to label us a terrorist group? 0%

Seeing as how the SPLC already has, the chance is actually 100%, which equals to R3.0 once again exposing his ignorance.

The SPLC authored the MIAC Fusion Center Report that identified "potential domestic terrorists" as including":

outspoken critics of a Con-Con, critics of NAU, critics of human use of RFID, opponents of abortion, opponents of immigration policies, survivalists training, preppers, critics of the Federal Reserve, member of or people who display or posses material from "Constitutional Party, Campaign for Liberty, or Libertarian material", "supporters of former Presidential Candidate: Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, and Bob Barr", people who display or distribute Gadsen flag, Molon labe, Aaron Russo's America:Freedom to Fascism, Zeitgeist the Movie, among many others.

In addition, the SPLC published its absurd "extremist" list of potential domestic terrorist enablers watch list ("hit list") [since been taken down from its website] that included:

1. Chuck Baldwin, Pastor, Radio Broadcaster, Syndicated Columnist, 2008 Constitution Party Presidential nominee.
2. Joe Banister, former IRS special agent, tax protester.
3. Martin "Red" Beckman, tax protester
4. Catherine Bleish, head of the Liberty Restoration Project.
5. Chris Broughton, Second Amendment advocate, member of "We The People" group.
6. Bob Campbell, head of American Grand Jury.
7. Robert Crooks, Army veteran, retired commercial fisherman, anti-illegal immigration proponent.
8. Joseph Farah, CEO of World Net Daily
9. Gary Franchi, producer of "Camp FEMA: American Lockdown," national director of RestoreTheRepublic.com.
10. Al Garza, head of the Patriot's Coalition, an anti-illegal immigration group.
11. Ted Gunderson, retired FBI agent.
12. John Hassey, "The public face of Alabama's militia movement in the late 1990s," says SPLC.
13. Alex Jones, Radio Talk Show host.
14. Devvy Kidd, "prolific columnist, blogger, and public speaker."
15. Larry Kilgore, telecommunications consultant, former US Senate candidate from Texas, pro-secession advocate.
16. Cliff Kincaid, syndicated columnist and author, editor of AIM Report (Accuracy in Media's publication), founder and president of America's Survival, Inc., a UN watchdog group.
17. Mark Koernke, associated with the now-defunct Michigan Militia.
18. Richard Mack, former Graham County, Arizona, Sheriff, author, and public speaker.
19. Jack McLamb, former Phoenix, Arizona, police officer, author, and public speaker.
20. John McManus, former member of the US Marine Corps, president of the John Birch Society.
21. Daniel New, father of Michael New (the Army medic who refused to wear a UN uniform), author, public speaker.
22. Norm Olson, founder of the now-defunct Michigan Militia.
23. Larry Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America.
24. Stewart Rhodes, Army veteran and Yale Law School graduate, founder of Oath Keepers.
25. Jon Roland, computer specialist, founder of the Constitution Society.
26. Luke Rudkowski, founder We Are Change.
27. Robert "Bob" Schultz, founder of We The People.
28. Joel Skousen, editor, World Affairs Brief.
29. Jim Stachowiak, Radio Talk Show host, "Longtime militia organizer," claims SPLC.
30. John Stadtmiller, founder, Republic Broadcasting Network.
31. Orly Taitz, California attorney, a leader in the push to make President Obama disclose his US birth certificate.
32. Amanda Teegarden, executive director of Oklahomans for Sovereignty and Free Enterprise.
33. Mike Vanderboegh, anti-Obama health care activist.
34. Paul Venable, former candidate for the Idaho House of Representatives.
35. Edwin Vieira, Jr., attorney, author, proponent of constitutional State militias, lecturer.
36. Michele Bachmann, US Representative from Minnesota.
37. Glenn Beck, Fox News Channel TV host.
38. Paul Broun, medical doctor, US Representative from Georgia.
39. Andrew Napolitano, attorney, former State judge in New Jersey, Fox News Channel legal analyist, lecturer.

40. Ron Paul, former member of the US Air Force, medical doctor, US Representative from Texas, 2008 Republican candidate for President.

OMG. Look at all those scary "potential terrorists" - Ron Paul, Andrew Napolitano, Luke Rudkowski, Chuck Baldwin. Sure looks like a who's who of potential recruits for Washington's next ISIS, Al Qaeda, or patsy.

Yep, SPLC sure seems like a real responsible organization that R3.0 keeps trying to run cover for.

[RJB]

Chance that the SPLC convinces the government to label us a terrorist group? 0%

Chance that R3v 3.3 has any credibility? 0.3%

[Krugminator2]

Most of the people the SPLC calls racists are racists (from frothing at the mouth NAZIs to the relatively harmless Mexicuns r takin muh jerbs types).

They lump like the KKK in with Center for Immigration Studies for a reason. It is meant to shutdown debate.

Here is an example. Mark Krikorian is a "Mexicans take jobs" Republican in the Pat Buchanan mold. I don't agree with that argument, but it is a legitimate debate. I have watched him argue his points on Stossel and came across very well. Putting a center-right, National Review Republican on their list of HATE groups is beyond ridiculous.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...=.d459b93cf53b

My overarching point (...which needs to be made a lot these days), is that libertarians don't have a dog in this fight.

Well. Ron Paul gets put on their lists. https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C...54.lul7fYuNMfI

[AZJoe]

Info Website on SPLC: http://splcexposed.com/

[osan]

Meet The Southern Poverty Law Center

Do I have to?

[RestorationOfLiberty]

Use the IRS to crush them.

[pcosmar]

Chance that the SPLC convinces the government to label us a terrorist group? 0%

You said that out loud.

You can't seriously believe it to be true.. This Forum has documented proof to the contrary.

So,, Why would you post something so demonstrably false,, but downright stupid?

[Origanalist]

You said that out loud.

You can't seriously believe it to be true.. This Forum has documented proof to the contrary.

So,, Why would you post something so demonstrably false,, but downright stupid?

I have a couple ideas about that, but I should probably keep them to myself.

[RestorationOfLiberty]

You said that out loud.

You can't seriously believe it to be true.. This Forum has documented proof to the contrary.

So,, Why would you post something so demonstrably false,, but downright stupid?

'

Because he is a reality detached person who refuses to believe their are enemies/ people who differ from him/his world view and sees them/him as a threat.

[r3volution 3.0]

You said that out loud.

You can't seriously believe it to be true.. This Forum has documented proof to the contrary.

So,, Why would you post something so demonstrably false,, but downright stupid?

I'm not being put in a camp by the Deep State™.

The regular state is, however, continuing to consume an ever-increasing share of gross domestic product.

..but I guess we're better off because tell-it-like-it-is-TV-boy-that's-entertaining-what-a-breath-of-fresh-air-though-nothing-actually-changed.

[pcosmar]

I'm not being put in a camp by the Deep State™.

The regular state is, however, continuing to consume an ever-increasing share of gross domestic product.

..but I guess we're better off because tell-it-like-it-is-TV-boy-that's-entertaining-what-a-breath-of-fresh-air-though-nothing-actually-changed.

Well that is an interesting rant,, but totally pointless.

and in response to,

Chance that the SPLC convinces the government to label us a terrorist group? 0%

Why do you LIE?
and then pretend that you did not.

Why do you defend an organization (SPLC) so corrupt and contrary to liberty.?

Why would you try to convince those already maligned by this ordinization that it never happened?

answer please.

[r3volution 3.0]

Well that is an interesting rant,, but totally pointless.

and in response to,

Why do you LIE?
and then pretend that you did not.

Why do you defend an organization (SPLC) so corrupt and contrary to liberty.?

Why would you try to convince those already maligned by this ordinization that it never happened?

answer please.

Which statement of mine are you claiming was a lie (provide a quote)?

[pcosmar]

Which statement of mine are you claiming was a lie (provide a quote)?

Quote was provided.. (you really are dim)

Chance that the SPLC convinces the government to label us a terrorist group? 0%

And as others have posted, this is false. SPLC is an arm of Government and is entrenched in the Fusion Centers throughout the country.
This has been thoroughly researched here in the past.. Initially with the MIAC Report.

So the quote was provided.. and the proof of falsehood has been proven.

Why do you Lie?

and why defend the reprehensible actions of these Social Controllers?

[r3volution 3.0]

@pcosmar

It seems we're talking past one another. My point was that the SPLC is just some gang of people who have no power and don't matter. They might label Paulites or libertarians as extremists, but this doesn't affect things in the way you think. I'm not presently living in an SPLC camp run by FEMA (nor will I ever be); I'm at home, doing what I'd do if the SPLC didn't exist at all. The real purpose of the SPLC is to get the Democrats all hopped up and bring out their vote, which also gets out their opponents (i.e. you). You have an opinion about this obscure organization because the GOP wants your vote. Whereas I want nothing to do with your absurd and disgusting democratic political games. In short, whatever it is you're excited about is meaningless to me.

[dannno]

@pcosmar

It seems we're talking past one another. My point was that the SPLC is just some gang of people who have no power and don't matter. They might label Paulites or libertarians as extremists, but this doesn't affect things in the way you think. I'm not presently living in an SPLC camp run by FEMA (nor will I ever be); I'm at home, doing what I'd do if the SPLC didn't exist at all. The real purpose of the SPLC is to get the Democrats all hopped up and bring out their vote, which also gets out their opponents (i.e. you). You have an opinion about this obscure organization because the GOP wants your vote. Whereas I want nothing to do with your absurd and disgusting democratic political games. In short, whatever it is you're excited about is meaningless to me.

The point is that you're demonstrably wrong, they do have power and they do matter... I don't know why when you're called out you use the excuse that you're talking past each other, that isn't what is happening at all.

[pcosmar]

In short, whatever it is you're excited about is meaningless to me.

Because it has nothing to do with making you King.

But that does not answer the question asked. Why do you LIE? and then deliberately obfuscate?

What is the reason for your blatant dishonesty? or are you totally lacking in integrity?

[r3volution 3.0]

Because it has nothing to do with making you King.

..which has nothing to do with the subject at hand.

But that does not answer the question asked. Why do you LIE? and then deliberately obfuscate?

You obviously don't know what the word "lie" means.

I disagree with you about the importance of the SPLC.

That isn't a "lie."

[dannno]

I disagree with you about the importance of the SPLC.

That isn't a "lie."

That wasn't the quote.

[pcosmar]

That isn't a "lie."

And you are a lying sac of excrement.
Dishonest.. Deliberately.

I doubt you even possess the ability to be honest. and that is sad really.

You jumped into this thread to post lies in defense of the SPLC.
and then say you don't care.

Purely dishonest. Lying SAC OF EXCREMENT.
Why are you here? just to derail and clutter the forum?

[pcosmar]

That wasn't the quote.

and not a good answer.

[r3volution 3.0]

And you are a lying sac of excrement.
Dishonest.. Deliberately.

I doubt you even possess the ability to be honest. and that is sad really.

You jumped into this thread to post lies in defense of the SPLC.
and then say you don't care.

Purely dishonest. Lying SAC OF EXCREMENT.
Why are you here? just to derail and clutter the forum?

Alright, I'm just going to ignore you now.

[pcosmar]

Alright, I'm just going to ignore you now.

I'll be keeping an eye on you.

Can't be Trusted.

and I'm run out of tolerance for obfuscating phucks

[Origanalist]

Alright, I'm just going to ignore you now.

ROFL

[pcosmar]

https://hotair.com/archives/2014/03/...anything-else/
The FBI isn’t breaking up with the SPLC — it’s just not keeping the relationship “official”

http://www.frc.org/updatearticle/20170915/all-evidence

https://www.thesocialcontract.com/an...splc_info.html

[pcosmar]

.

I can type with one hand and hold DELETE with the other, but that would be dumb.

No,

That would be an improvement.

[AZJoe]

New John Stossel piece exposing the SPLC Southern Poverty Lie Center

[AuH20]

[pcosmar]

@pcosmar

It seems we're talking past one another. My point was that the SPLC is just some gang of people who have no power and don't matter. They might label Paulites or libertarians as extremists, but this doesn't affect things in the way you think. I'm not presently living in an SPLC camp run by FEMA (nor will I ever be); I'm at home, doing what I'd do if the SPLC didn't exist at all. The real purpose of the SPLC is to get the Democrats all hopped up and bring out their vote, which also gets out their opponents (i.e. you). You have an opinion about this obscure organization because the GOP wants your vote. Whereas I want nothing to do with your absurd and disgusting democratic political games. In short, whatever it is you're excited about is meaningless to me.

Not talking past each other..

I called you a LIAR..
YOU LIED openly and now try to obfuscate..

Why do you deliberately LIE. Why do you defend the indefensible?

Why do you pretend that the SPLC is not affecting policy(in a very bad way)?

They are connected to Federal Fusion Centers, They Train Police, and FBI. They are a deeply entrenched part of the Police State.


http://splcexposed.com/

[timosman]

[Suzanimal]

I tried to reTweet this and it said the tweet had been deleted.