Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: "Segwit2x" canceled

  1. #1

    "Segwit2x" canceled

    News is a couple days old... but relevant: TechCrunch

    Segwit2x would have caused a "hard fork" of Bitcoin's blockchain and would have resulted in some serious problems for non-savvy Bitcoin users, especially what is called a "replay attack". Joe is a non-savvy Bitcoin user who does not understand the difference between standard Bitcoin and Bitcoin2x. He buys something with his forked bitcoins on the Bitcoin2x network. But since the transaction he submits to Bitcoin2x network contains all the information required to spend his bitcoins on the standard Bitcoin network, Hacker McHackface comes along and spends Joe's regular bitcoins on the standard Bitcoin network. When Joe comes along later to find out what has happened to his regular bitcoins, he is astonished to find that they're simply gone.

    Anyway, it's a good thing that Segwit2x is dead.



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by ClaytonB View Post
    News is a couple days old... but relevant: TechCrunch

    Segwit2x would have caused a "hard fork" of Bitcoin's blockchain and would have resulted in some serious problems for non-savvy Bitcoin users, especially what is called a "replay attack". Joe is a non-savvy Bitcoin user who does not understand the difference between standard Bitcoin and Bitcoin2x. He buys something with his forked bitcoins on the Bitcoin2x network. But since the transaction he submits to Bitcoin2x network contains all the information required to spend his bitcoins on the standard Bitcoin network, Hacker McHackface comes along and spends Joe's regular bitcoins on the standard Bitcoin network. When Joe comes along later to find out what has happened to his regular bitcoins, he is astonished to find that they're simply gone.

    Anyway, it's a good thing that Segwit2x is dead.
    I worry about the transaction capacity being full and the transaction cost being a few dollars instead of pennies in order to get high enough in the queue to go through.

    Right now there are 98179 uncomfirmed transactions
    https://blockchain.info/unconfirmed-transactions


    This just kicked the problem down the road
    “…let us teach them that all who draw breath are of equal worth, and that those who seek to press heel upon the throat of liberty, will fall to the cry of FREEDOM!!!” – Spartacus, War of the Damned

    BTC: 1AFbCLYU3G1dkbsSJnk3spWeEwpqYVC2Pq

  4. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by kpitcher View Post
    I worry about the transaction capacity being full and the transaction cost being a few dollars instead of pennies in order to get high enough in the queue to go through.

    Right now there are 98179 uncomfirmed transactions
    https://blockchain.info/unconfirmed-transactions


    This just kicked the problem down the road
    Yes, those are serious problems. Segwit2x was not the solution to those problems, however. The time and energy that was being wasted on trying to increase the block size could have been better spent implementing Lightning Networks, a technology that the blockchain already supports today. LN will enable Bitcoin to support dozens of times more transaction capacity than a simple doubling of the blocksize could ever have supported, without it. That's why Segwit2x was the wrong solution.



Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-21-2017, 11:28 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-16-2012, 05:29 PM
  3. Ron Paul Glenn Beck Interview "Canceled"
    By Knightskye in forum Grassroots Central
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-21-2009, 12:40 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-17-2007, 04:41 PM
  5. We need a "I canceled my cable" website
    By walt in forum Grassroots Central
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-09-2007, 07:37 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •