Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Study Finds Potential Link Between Aborted Human DNA Fragments In Vaccines To Autism

  1. #1

    Default Study Finds Potential Link Between Aborted Human DNA Fragments In Vaccines To Autism

    STUDY FINDS POTENTIAL LINK BETWEEN ABORTED HUMAN DNA FRAGMENTS IN VACCINES TO AUTISM

    ARJUN WALIA OCTOBER 19, 2017


    “The co-authors scheduled a meeting to destroy documents related to the study. The remaining four co-authors all met and brought a big garbage can into the meeting room and reviewed and went through all the hard copy documents that we had thought we should discard and put them in a huge garbage can.”

    Do vaccines cause autism? The science speaks for itself, and it shows that vaccines could be one of multiple causes of autism, or autism spectrum disorder (ASD). There are well over 100 peer-reviewed studies that make this link, but perhaps even more convincing is the whistleblower testimony from a senior CDC scientist, who has authored multiple commonly cited studies that show no link whatsoever between the MMR vaccine and autism. In fact, one of his studies, published in 2004, is the most commonly cited study used to debunk the link between the MMR vaccine and autism.

    His name is Dr. William Thompson, and he bravely told the world that it was “the lowest point” in his career that he “went along with that paper.” He said that the authors “didn’t report significant findings” and that he is “completely ashamed” of what he did, that he was “complicit and went along with this, and that he regrets that he has “been part of the problem.” (source)(source)(source)

    The quote at the beginning of this article comes from him via Congressman Bill Posey.

    Here is an official statement of Dr. Thompson describing the situation in his own words. This is perhaps the best source of information regrading this matter.

    Here is the study now in question, published with the new information.

    It’s important to mention this story at the onset of any article that discusses vaccines and autism, primarily because the story went virtually untouched by mainstream media.

    Not long after Dr. Thompson’s disclosure, a group of scientists from the CDC, calling themselves ‘Scientists Preserving Integrity, Dilligence and Ethics (SPIDER),” put out a list of complains in the form of a letter to the CDC’s Chief of Staff, where they say, “It appears that our mission is being influenced and shaped by outside parties and rogue interests… and Congressional intent for our agency is being circumvented by some of our leaders. What concerns us most, is that it is becoming the norm and not the rare exception.”

    This was covered by several activists, from Robert F. Kennedy Jr to this blog for the Huffington Post, but unfortunately it received no mainstream media attention.

    Human Fetal DNA and Vaccines

    Aborted fetal tissue is one of many potentially harmful ingredients found within most vaccines. Addressing this problem, a study published in 2015 concludes:

    Vaccines manufactured in human fetal cell lines contain unacceptably high levels of fetal DNA fragment contaminants. The human genome naturally contains regions that are susceptible to double strand break formation and DNA insertional mutagenesis. The “Wakefield Scare” created a natural experiment that may demonstrate a causal relationship between fetal cell-line manufactured vaccines and ASD prevalence.

    You can read the full study here.

    We’re starting to learn that autism might not be a genetic issue, and that several environmental factors need to be looked at, which include vaccines, prescription drugs taken during pregnancy, agricultural pesticides, and more. As the authors note in their paper, “the autism epidemic obviously creates significant public health and demands critical assessment of environmental factors that may trigger this epidemic.”

    “It’s time to start looking for the environmental culprits responsible for the remarkable increase in the rate of autism in California.”

    – Irva Hertz-Picciotto, Epidemiology Professor at University of California, Davis

    The authors of this study also point out that environmental influences are a major component of ASD, rather than heredity.

    The study points out how using human fetal cell lines to manufacture childhood vaccines leaves behind residual human DNA as well as “human endogenous retrovirus K” in the final vaccine product Retroviruses are classified in a group of RNA viruses called RNA tumour viruses. They are called “retro” because they only have an RNA genome and function differently than other viruses. In most viruses, DNA is transcribed (or written) into RNA, then RNA is translated into protein. Retroviruses, on the other hand, work by reverse transcribing, that is “writing backwards” into DNA by using an enzyme only retroviruses encode called “Reverse Transcriptase” (RT). The DNA form of the virus is called a provirus. The provirus is then inserted into the DNA of the host using another enzyme encoded exclusively by retroviruses called “Integrase” (IN). Integrase cuts open the DNA and then pastes the provirus into the cellular DNA where the provirus lives for the life of the cell.

    The problem is, this new DNA will be taken up by a cell and a large percentage of that added DNA, as the study points out, will be delivered to the nucleus, “demonstrating the rapidity with which DNA can enter a cell.”

    How does this happen? Well, genetic analysis of ASD individuals have identified hundreds of de novo mutations, deletions, and duplications present in a large chunk of cases of autism where only one child in a family was affected. A de novo mutation is a genetic alternation that is seen, for the first time, in one family member as a result of their parent’s egg or sperm having a genetic mutation. That would be a hereditary mutation, which might have been caused by environmental factors in the first place.

    But then we have Somatic mutations, which are genetic changes that are not present in a parent’s egg or sperm cells, or in the fertilized egg, but happen later on during fetal development, when the embryo is composed of several cells. Among these cells, there is a gene alteration. When and how it occurred is impossible to tell, but according to the authors of this study, “susceptibility for autism in simplex cases originates from a de novo source, indicating environmental influences as a major component of ASD, rather than heredity.”

    They go on to mention that these mutations are not only associated with ASD, but many other human diseases as well.

    So, what really causes these mutations to arise?

    The authors explain:

    During meiosis genomic material is exchanged between the maternal and the paternal chromosomes, a process called meiotic recombination (MR). Hotspots are sites in the genome of varying length where MR occurs most frequently. This process creates genetic diversity in our offspring, and is beneficial in that sense. The human genome contains over 25,000 known recombination hotspots.26 Curiously, regions of the genome where meiotic recombination has occurred (hotspots) have been shown to be highly predisposed to subsequent somatic cell double strand breaks (DSB) and disease causing mutations,27-29 including single nucleotide variation, copy number variation, gene deletion events, and insertion/integration of foreign DNA during DSB repair.

    One of multiple disease known to be influenced by genomic deletions or insertions of foreign DNA is autism.

    The study went on to identify specific sites where fetal DNA fragment integration into a child’s genome is most likely to occur.

    It’s one of the first laboratory and ecological studies to examine the relationship between human fetal cell line manufactured vaccines, cellular DNA damage, and the autism epidemic.

    Multiple vaccine ingredients have now been linked to ASD, from mercury, to aluminum, and now, to aborted fetal DNA.

    Below is a lecture given a few years ago by one of the authors, Dr. Theresa Deisher. She has a PhD in Molecular and Cellular Physiology from Stanford University.

    http://www.collective-evolution.com/...zen.yandex.com
    "Logic is an enemy and truth is a menace." ~ Rod Serling
    "Cops today are nothing but an armed tax collector" ~ Frank Serpico
    "To be normal, to drink Coca-Cola and eat Kentucky Fried Chicken is to be in a conspiracy against yourself."
    "People that don't want to make waves sit in stagnant waters."



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2

    Default

    I don't find the scientific looking report I found in the Original post worth the read...
    T.A. Deisher et al – Epidemiologic and Molecular Relationship Between Vaccine Manufacture and Autism Spectrum Disorder Prevalence (2015): https://soundchoice.s3.amazonaws.com...e-2-FINAL1.pdf
    There is a lot of information presented about how much "fetal DNA" is in the vaccines.
    But I'm more interested in how much the rate of autism increased, which numbers I couldn't find at all.

    Results: The average MMR coverage for the three countries fell below 90% after Dr. Wakefield’s infamous 1998 publication but started to recover slowly after 2001 until reaching over 90% coverage again by 2004. During the same time period, the average autism spectrum disorder prevalence in the United Kingdom, Norway and Sweden dropped substantially after birth year 1998 and gradually increased again after birth year 2000.
    (…)
    In order to prove cause and effect, or a causal, relationship rather than a correlation: 1) the cause must occur before the effect, 2) removal of the cause must result in removal of the effect, and 3) reintroduction of the cause must reintroduce the effect. The abrupt drop and recovery in MMR coverage provides a spontaneous real world experiment to examine fetal manufactured vaccine use and ASD prevalence. During the MMR drop and recovery period, ASD prevalence demonstrated a drop after birth year 1998, followed by an upswing that began for birth year 2001 and later. Notably, there is an intriguing association between reductions in MMR coverage and lower AD/ASD rates in Norway, Sweden and UK shortly following Wakefield’s 1998 Lancet publication.5

    More interesting is the report by Brian S .Hooker, after he was given evidence by William Thomson.
    This study was however retracted…
    Brian S Hooker – Measles-mumps-rubella vaccination timing and autism among young african american boys: a reanalysis of CDC data (2014): https://translationalneurodegenerati...2047-9158-3-16
    (archived here: http://archive.fo/Z7F4B)

    When comparing cases and controls receiving their first MMR vaccine before and after 36 months of age, there was a statistically significant increase in autism cases specifically among African American males who received the first MMR prior to 36 months of age.
    (…)
    The relationship between the MMR vaccine and autism was first hypothesized by Wakefield et al. [7] in 1999 after the observation of a regressive phenotype of autism that appeared in general after the administration of the first MMR vaccine. Although several studies have affirmed such a relationship between the MMR vaccine and neurodevelopmental disorders including autism [8, 9], many other studies purport no statistical relationship between the MMR vaccine and autism incidence. The latter studies have been performed using cohorts from Denmark [10], Japan [11] and Poland [12], as well as the MMR vaccine and pervasive developmental disorder in Canada [13]. In addition, in 2004, Destefano et al. [14] published a paper describing a case–control study completed on children, in metropolitan Atlanta, who had been born between 1986 and 1993.
    Within this study, the age at the first MMR vaccine was assessed as a factor in the incidence of autism. Using conditional logistic regression, with first MMR age as the independent variable and autism incidence as the dependent variable, the study authors assessed relative risk for obtaining an autism diagnosis for those children receiving the first MMR vaccine before and after 18 months, 24 months and 36 months of age. Destefano et al. [14] found a statistically significant relative risk of 1.49 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04 – 2.14) at the 36 month cut-off (i.e., in a comparison of children receiving the MMR before versus after 36 months). Rather than concluding that the first MMR vaccine could be playing a causal role in autism in these children, the study authors instead attributed the increased risk to greater numbers of autistic children receiving timely vaccinations in order to participate in State of Georgia special education services.
    (…)
    When looking specifically at African American children (Table 2), the relationship between MMR timing and autism incidence became more profound (RR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.25-4.22, p = 0.0060) at 36 months of age. Again, this result was exclusively found in boys who showed statistically significant effects at both 24 months (RR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.09-2.77, p = 0.0200) and 36 months (RR = 3.36, 95% CI: 1.50-7.51, p = 0.0019) of age. This effect again was not seen in females.

    (…)
    The results show a strong relationship between child age at the administration of the first MMR and autism incidence exclusively for African American boys which could indicate a role of the vaccine in the etiology of autism within this population group. This particular analysis was not completed in the original Destefano et al. [14] (CDC) study. Although the previous study considered MMR timing and African Americans in general, no statistically significant effect was observed. This is in contrast to our result for African Americans in general, because the CDC study limited the total African American cohort to include only those individuals who possessed a valid State of Georgia birth certificate which decreased the statistical power of their analysis.
    (…)
    It should be noted that a recent publication has shown that the prevalence of autism in African Americans is nearly 25% higher than that of whites [15]. This value was obtained when CDC data were appropriately analyzed based on socioeconomic status. This could be due to issues regarding vitamin D status with African Americans as it has been estimated that vitamin D sufficiency among whites is between 30-60% but is only 5-10% among African Americans [16].
    Do NOT ever read my posts.
    Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason.

  4. #3

    Default

    Multiple vaccine ingredients have now been linked to ASD, from mercury, to aluminum, and now, to aborted fetal DNA.
    Aside from being utter and complete bull$#@! - pick one FFS. At least pick a story and stick to it.
    * Enforce Border Security – America should be guarding her own borders and enforcing her own laws instead of policing the world and implementing UN mandates.

    * No Amnesty - The Obama Administration’s endorsement of so-called “Comprehensive Immigration Reform,” granting amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants, will only encourage more law-breaking.

    * Abolish the Welfare State – Taxpayers cannot continue to pay the high costs to sustain this powerful incentive for illegal immigration. As Milton Friedman famously said, you can’t have open borders and a welfare state.

    * End Birthright Citizenship – As long as illegal immigrants know their children born here will be granted U.S. citizenship, we’ll never be able to control our immigration problem.




    Reprinted from http://www.ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/immigration/ [Nov. 29, 2011]

  5. #4

    Default

    You can read the full study here.
    Pro tips: Actual peer-reviewed studies don't spend the first page listing the "credentials" of the people who wrote it primarily because it isn't relevant to the results.

    Any study that's 2+ years old being used as the foundation to justify yet another opinion piece will provide no actual new information: instead it just gives Donnay a chance to make a new scary headline.

    Actual peer reviewed papers stand up to peer review. This one doesn't.
    Last edited by angelatc; 10-20-2017 at 10:31 AM.
    * Enforce Border Security – America should be guarding her own borders and enforcing her own laws instead of policing the world and implementing UN mandates.

    * No Amnesty - The Obama Administration’s endorsement of so-called “Comprehensive Immigration Reform,” granting amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants, will only encourage more law-breaking.

    * Abolish the Welfare State – Taxpayers cannot continue to pay the high costs to sustain this powerful incentive for illegal immigration. As Milton Friedman famously said, you can’t have open borders and a welfare state.

    * End Birthright Citizenship – As long as illegal immigrants know their children born here will be granted U.S. citizenship, we’ll never be able to control our immigration problem.




    Reprinted from http://www.ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/immigration/ [Nov. 29, 2011]






Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 09-24-2017, 09:02 PM
  2. New Yale study finds link between vaccines and brain-related autoimmune and inflammation
    By Anti Federalist in forum Personal Health & Well-Being
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 02-19-2017, 03:07 PM
  3. Warning: Many childhood vaccines contain aborted human fetal protein, DNA
    By donnay in forum Personal Health & Well-Being
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 02-15-2013, 11:40 AM
  4. New Study Finds Direct Link Between Vaccines and Infant Mortality
    By Anti Federalist in forum Health Freedom
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 07-14-2011, 12:02 PM
  5. CDC to Study Vaccines and Autism
    By PatriotOne in forum Health Freedom
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-29-2011, 05:00 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •