Originally Posted by
dannno
No, that's the whole point, IT IS BETTER TO HAVE SOMEBODY BETTER THAN SOMEBODY WORSE. Sorry, you are $#@!ing wrong as $#@! on this one. Take it to the extreme, to see how wrong you are. Pretend Ron Paul got brain damage and decided that the Federal Govt. should definitely sell hot dogs in front of the White House but didn't change any of his other positions. Is that in the Constitution? No. Should tax payers pay for it? No. But is this "new" Ron Paul a million times better than Lindsey Graham? Hell ya.. So if this new Ron Paul ran against Lindsey Graham, would you vote for him even though he believes in the unconstitutional issue of selling hot dogs in front of the White House?? Of course you would!!
Again, that is an extreme example, but it shows that a better candidate is preferable to a worse candidate.. Like I said, Bush was no better than Obama, who was no better than Kerry or McCain or any of them.. But Trump is BETTER than ALL of them. He is far from perfect, but he is much better, and thus preferable to those other candidates. Demonstrably... I predicted it would be true, now the facts say that is true. None of those other deep state candidates would be playing golf and working with Rand to the extent that Trump is.
You were wrong. Learn to admit it sometime.
Well either you are retarded or not paying attention, because Rand is currently ECSTATIC that he passed his EO and is helping make health care more free market.. if you don't think liberty is a good thing, then why the $#@! are you advocating for liberty??
Connect With Us