Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Landmark Study Establishes Link Between the Aluminum in Most Vaccines & Autism

  1. #1

    Landmark Study Establishes Link Between the Aluminum in Most Vaccines & Autism

    Landmark Study Establishes Link Between the Aluminum in Most Vaccines & Autism

    peer-reviewed study conducted by scientists at the University of British Columbia, has established a link between a popular aluminum vaccine and autism.

    By Matt Agorist - September 23, 2017

    It is no question that the subject of vaccines is profoundly controversial. On both sides of the argument exists truth and lies that can hinder the ability of some to make rational decisions.

    While we have everyone from attorneys to biologists, to political scientists who write for the Free Thought Project, none of us are doctors, so we do not make recommendations about what you and your family should do in regards to vaccination. That being said, when we see critical information about vaccines that fails to be covered in the mainstream media, we will cover it every time.

    This is one of those times.

    A peer-reviewed study published online this week and set to be published in the December volume of the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, conducted by scientists at the University of British Columbia, has established a link between a popular aluminum vaccine ingredient and autism.


    According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Aluminum is present in U.S. childhood vaccines that prevent hepatitis A, hepatitis B, diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTaP, Tdap), Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), human papillomavirus (HPV) and pneumococcus infection.

    This aluminum is added, according to the CDC, “ to increase the body’s immune response to the vaccine.”

    While the CDC considers the addition of aluminum to vaccines to be safe, this study refutes that claim. Even outside of this study, it has been well established that Aluminum is a known neurotoxin and is highly biologically reactive and uniquely equipped to do damage to essential cellular (neuronal) biochemistry.

    However, the findings of this study show the specific reactions aluminum administered through vaccines have in the brain that are homologous with biomarkers of autism.

    The study’s title says it all.

    Subcutaneous injections of aluminum at vaccine adjuvant levels activate innate immune genes in mouse brain that are homologous with biomarkers of autism

    As J.B. Handley, Jr., co-founder of Generation Rescue, points out, this study corroborates a previous study conducted in France by Université Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), published in the journal Toxicology earlier this year which came to a similar conclusion. According to that study, the authors disputed the reasoning the FDA and CDC use to claim that it is safe to inject developing children with known neurotoxins.

    “As a possible consequence, comparing vaccine adjuvant exposure to other non-relevant aluminum exposures, e.g. soluble aluminum and other routes of exposure, may not represent valid approaches.”

    The French study found that as small doses of aluminum are injected over time, like during childhood vaccinations, it was more likely to end up in the brain. They concluded with the following warning:

    “In the context of massive development of vaccine-based strategies worldwide, the present study may suggest that aluminum adjuvant toxicokinetics and safety require reevaluation.”

    Now, only months after the French study, this Canadian study is showing similar results.

    It thus appears that Al [aluminum adjuvant] triggered innate immune system activation and altered cholinergic activity in male mice, observations which are consistent with those in autism. Female mice were less susceptible to Al exposure as only the expression levels of NF-κB inhibitor and TNFA were altered. Regional patterns of gene expression alterations also exhibited gender differences, as frontal cortex was the most affected area in males and cerebellum in females. Thus, Al adjuvant promotes brain inflammation and males appear to be more susceptible to Al′s toxic effects.
    What is important to note here is the fact that autism is more prevalent in male humans as well — about 80% of autistic children are boys — which coincides with the results of this study.

    While the CDC claims the aluminum injected into children stays at the injection sites, this study actually showed the opposite.

    Collectively, these findings refute the notion that adjuvant nanoparticles remain localized and act through a “depot effect”. On the contrary, Al derived from vaccine formulations can cross the blood-brain and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barriers and incite immunoinflammatory responses in neural tissues.
    While this study is not a smoking gun, the fact that it corroborates a similar study on the other side of the globe, published in a different journal just months prior, should not be overlooked.

    While the vitriolic crowd, who refers to everyone who seeks to make vaccines safer as rabid anti-vaxxers, will undoubtedly attempt to shout this study down, it is important that everyone heed the warning from the scientists who conducted it. They are not calling for the end of vaccinations, only issuing a warning about the potentially dangerous effects of injection aluminum.

    “In addition, the continued use of aluminum adjuvants in various vaccines (i.e., Hepatitis A and B, DPT, and so on) for the general public may have even more widespread health implications. Until vaccine safety can be comprehensively demonstrated by controlled long-term studies that examine the impact on the nervous system in detail, many of those already vaccinated as well as those currently receiving injections may be at risk in the future. Whether the risk of protection from a dreaded disease outweighs the risk of toxicity is a question that demands urgent attention.”
    http://thefreethoughtproject.com/stu...zen.yandex.com
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    No name of this study or its authors? No link?

    The study’s title says it all.
    https://beta.theglobeandmail.com/lif...beandmail.com&

    UBC stands behind vaccine studies discredited by WHO

    The University of British Columbia is defending two of its researchers who have published vaccine-related studies discredited by the World Health Organization and described by several medical experts as weak and misleading.

    Organizations that promote messages about the dangers of vaccines, such as the Children's Medical Safety Research Institute (CMSRI), have used the results of the UBC research as evidence that vaccines cause autism and other serious harm. The front page of the CMSRI website states that in a "landmark" 2013 paper, the two UBC researchers show that "the more children receive vaccines with aluminum adjuvants, the greater their chance is of developing autism, autoimmune diseases and neurological problems later in life." In that study, the researchers note that the rate of autism spectrum disorders increased along with the number of pediatric vaccines that contain aluminum.

    The findings do not show that the vaccines caused the rates of autism to climb, and making that leap is scientifically irresponsible, said Michael Gardam, director of infection prevention and control at the University Health Network in Toronto. Correlation does not mean causation, he said, adding that kids are also exposed to more junk food these days, but that does not mean it causes autism.

    "This is really disturbing stuff," Dr. Gardam said. "I'm not saying it's disturbing because people may … question vaccines." He said the problem for him is that the conclusions are misleading.

    UBC declined an interview request on Wednesday. In an e-mail, Helen Burt, associate vice-president research and international, said the school "holds dear the value of academic freedom that allows faculty to challenge any and all established conventions."

    David Juurlink, head of the division of clinical pharmacology and toxicology at Toronto's Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, said the researchers appear convinced aluminum in vaccines is dangerous, even though the amounts are too small to have any ill effects.

    "The lines of reasoning used to support their various assertions are exceedingly thin, and in several instances, they draw inferences from their data that no objective reader could possibly draw," Dr. Juurlink said in an e-mail.

    In 2012, the World Health Organization singled out two studies conducted by the UBC researchers suggesting a link between aluminum in vaccines and autism and said they provide no evidence of a causal link between vaccines and rising autism rates.

    Numerous peer-reviewed, high-quality studies have shown that vaccines are not linked to autism. Although they are not risk-free, the incidence of adverse events linked to vaccination is low.
    Last edited by Zippyjuan; 09-24-2017 at 12:13 PM.

  4. #3
    Here's the peer-reviewed study, which if you went to the link provided you would have seen it.

    Subcutaneous injections of aluminum at vaccine adjuvant levels activate innate immune genes in mouse brain that are homologous with biomarkers of autism
    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science...2013417300417#!
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner

  5. #4
    Side note- autism is determined by behavior. How does on determine if a mouse is autistic?

    (study notes that they did not control for dietary consumption of aluminum)

    The amount of Al in Purina chow brands can vary and may well have significant effects in the long term.
    However the addition of such controls was beyond the scope of the current preliminary study.
    Which means the aluminum in the rats could have come from their diet.

    and also:

    The second limitation is that no controls were included to ascertain that Al, if perhaps present after RNA extraction from Al-treated mice, did not influence reverse transcriptase enzyme activity hence yielding a spurious result.

    They admit their results are questionable.

  6. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    Side note- autism is determined by behavior. How does on determine if a mouse is autistic?

    (study notes that they did not control for dietary consumption of aluminum)





    Which means the aluminum in the rats could have come from their diet.

    and also:




    They admit their results are questionable.
    You cannot distinguish different behaviour in mice? Zippy might not know this or pretend he doesn't know this but there are lots of studies done on autism in mice.

    Just had to point this out. Carry on

  7. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by juleswin View Post
    You cannot distinguish different behaviour in mice? Zippy might not know this or pretend he doesn't know this but there are lots of studies done on autism in mice.

    Just had to point this out. Carry on
    So you don't have an answer to the question? Do you know how autism is diagnosed in mice? If so, why didn't you answer the question?

    Just had to point this out.

  8. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post

    They admit their results are questionable.

    FYI, here's the scientific rebuttal. https://www.skepticalraptor.com/skep...novic-vaccine/

  9. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by angelatc View Post
    So you don't have an answer to the question? Do you know how autism is diagnosed in mice? If so, why didn't you answer the question?

    Just had to point this out.
    Mouse behavioral assays relevant to the symptoms of autism.

    Crawley JN1.

    Author information

    Abstract
    While the cause of autism remains unknown, the high concordance between monozygotic twins supports a strong genetic component. The importance of genetic factors in autism encourages the development of mutant mouse models, to advance our understanding of biological mechanisms underlying autistic behaviors. Mouse models of human neuropsychiatric diseases are designed to optimize (i) face validity (resemblance to the human symptoms) (ii) construct validity (similarity to the underlying causes of the disease) and (iii) predictive validity (expected responses to treatments that are effective in the human disease). There is a growing need for mouse behavioral tasks with all three types of validity, to define robust phenotypes in mouse models of autism. Ideal mouse models will incorporate analogies to the three diagnostic symptoms of autism: abnormal social interactions, deficits in communication and high levels of repetitive behaviors. Social approach is tested in an automated three chambered apparatus that offers the subject a choice between spending time with another mouse, with a novel object, or remaining in an empty familiar environment. Reciprocal social interaction is scored from videotapes of interactions between pairs of unfamiliar mice. Communication is evaluated by measuring emission and responses to vocalizations and olfactory cues. Repetitive behaviors are scored for measures of grooming, jumping, or stereotyped sniffing of one location or object. Insistence on sameness is modeled by scoring a change in habit, for example, reversal of the spatial location of a reinforcer in the Morris water maze or T-maze. Associated features of autism, for example, mouse phenotypes relevant to anxiety, seizures, sleep disturbances and sensory hypersensitivity, may be useful to include in a mouse model that meets some of the core diagnostic criteria. Applications of these assays include (i) behavioral phenotyping of transgenic and knockout mice with mutations in genes relevant to autism; (ii) characterization of inbred strains of mice; (iii) evaluation of environmental toxins; (iv) comparison of behavioral phenotypes with genetic factors, such as unusual expression patterns of genes or unusual single nucleotide polymorphisms; and (v) evaluation of proposed therapeutics for the treatment of autism.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17919130

    Google is your friend



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by juleswin View Post
    You cannot distinguish different behaviour in mice? Zippy might not know this or pretend he doesn't know this but there are lots of studies done on autism in mice.

    Just had to point this out. Carry on
    There isn't even a fixed definition of what exactly is autism in humans- no test you can give to say "this child has it, this one does not". It is autism "spectrum" and now includes a wide range of symptoms. In some kids it may be obvious, in others more questionable. Kids which would not have been classified as autistic 20 years ago are given the title now. Expanding the definition expands the number of reported cases.

  12. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by juleswin View Post
    That does not answer the question. The paper you linked to offers a hypothesis. In the years that have passed, researchers genetically modify mice in order to test autism treatments, but so far less than 1% of mouse research ever ends up being clinically significant.

    Aside from the mice - which part of the research did you find convincing?

  13. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by angelatc View Post
    That does not answer the question. The paper you linked to offers a hypothesis. In the years that have passed, researchers genetically modify mice in order to test autism treatments, but so far less than 1% of mouse research ever ends up being clinically significant.

    Aside from the mice - which part of the research did you find convincing?
    I did answer your question as to how they diagnosed autism in mice.

    Also, I did not read the research just the abstract. The only reason I posted the paper is to show that there are ways of diagnosing autism in mice. That is all.



Similar Threads

  1. Study of 92,727 Children Confirms No MMR-Autism Link
    By TheCount in forum Personal Health & Well-Being
    Replies: 69
    Last Post: 04-25-2015, 06:00 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-01-2013, 08:13 AM
  3. CDC to Study Vaccines and Autism
    By PatriotOne in forum Health Freedom
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-29-2011, 05:00 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-12-2010, 05:24 PM
  5. Study on vaccines and autism retracted
    By Zippyjuan in forum Personal Health & Well-Being
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 02-08-2010, 07:21 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •