Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: 6 U.S. Agencies Conspired to Illegally Wiretap Trump; NSA Used British to Spy on Campaign

  1. #1

    Default 6 U.S. Agencies Conspired to Illegally Wiretap Trump; NSA Used British to Spy on Campaign

    From the beginning it was a set up to find dirt on Trump campaign insiders and if possible
    to topple Donald Trump’s presidential aspirations.


    Six U.S. Agencies Conspired to Illegally Wiretap Trump; British Intel Used as Front to Spy on Campaign for NSA
    http://truepundit.com/exclusive-six-...paign-for-nsa/





    Before and after the 2016 election. And while this operation had many moving parts and alternating players,
    the mission to unseat Trump never changed. And it remains ongoing.

    Paul Manafort was wiretapped.
    Cater Page was wiretapped.
    Donald Trump Jr. was wiretapped.
    Jared Kushner was wiretapped.
    Gen. Michael Flynn was wiretapped.
    And likely there were others.

    And none of it was very legal.

    In fact, most of it was very illegal, according to federal law enforcement sources
    who are blowing the whistle on a sweeping scheme to undermine the Executive branch
    and the electorate’s choice for president of the United States.

    And according to high ranking FBI sources, the Bureau played a definitive role in plotting this sweeping privacy breach.
    But
    the FBI had much help from:
    the NSA,
    the CIA,
    the (ODNI) Office of of the Director of National Intelligence,
    Treasury financial crimes division under DHS,
    and
    the DOJ Justice Department,
    federal law enforcement sources confirmed.



    The Deep State caretakers involved are familiar names:
    James Comey (FBI),
    John Brennan (CIA),
    James Clapper (ODNI),
    Loretta Lynch (DOJ),
    Jeh Johnson (DHS),
    Admiral Michael Rogers (NSA).
    And then-director of GCHQ Robert Hannigan who has since resigned from the esteemed British spy agency.

    President Barack Obama’s White House too could be implicated, sources said.
    But while evidence certainly points to involvement of the Obama administration,
    sources said they did not have access to definitive intelligence proving such a link.


    Here is what we now know
    ,
    per intelligence gleaned form federal law enforcement sources with insider knowledge
    of what amounts to a plot by U.S. intelligence agencies to secure back door and illegal wiretaps of President Trump’s associates:

    ►Six U.S. agencies created a stealth task force, spearhead by CIA’s Brennan, to run domestic surveillance on Trump associates and possibly Trump himself.
    ►To feign ignorance and to seemingly operate within U.S. laws, the agencies freelanced the wiretapping of Trump associates to the British spy agency GCHQ.
    ►The decision to insert GCHQ as a back door to eavesdrop was sparked by the denial of two FISA Court warrant applications filed by the FBI to seek wiretaps of Trump associates.
    ►GCHQ did not work from London or the UK. In fact the spy agency worked from NSA’s headquarters in Fort Meade, MD with direct NSA supervision and guidance to conduct sweeping surveillance on Trump associates.
    ►The illegal wiretaps were initiated months before the controversial Trump dossier compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele.
    ►The Justice Department and FBI set up the meeting at Trump Tower between Trump Jr., Manafort and Kushner with controversial Russian officials to make Trump’s associates appear compromised.
    ►Following the Trump Tower sit down, GCHQ began digitally wiretapping Manafort, Trump Jr., and Kushner.
    ►After the concocted meeting by the Deep State, the British spy agency could officially justify wiretapping Trump associates as an intelligence front for NSA because the Russian lawyer at the meeting Natalia Veselnitskaya was considered an international security risk and prior to the June sit down was not even allowed entry into the United States or the UK, federal sources said.
    ►By using GCHQ, the NSA and its intelligence partners had carved out a loophole to wiretap Trump without a warrant. While it is illegal for U.S. agencies to monitor phones and emails of U.S. citizens inside the United States absent a warrant, it is not illegal for British intelligence to do so. Even if the GCHQ was tapping Trump on U.S. soil at Fort Meade.
    ►The wiretaps, secured through illicit scheming, have been used by U.S. Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe of alleged Russian collusion in the 2016 election, even though the evidence is considered “poisoned fruit.”


    Veselnitskaya, the Russian lawyer who spearheaded the Trump Tower meeting with the Trump campaign trio,
    was previously barred from entering the United Sates due to her alleged connections to the Russian FSB
    (the modern replacement of the cold-war-era KGB).

    Yet mere days before the June meeting, Veselnitskaya was granted a rare visa to enter the United States from Preet Bharara,
    the then U.S. Attorney for the southern district of New York.
    Bharara could not be reached for comment and did not respond the a Twitter inquiry on the Russian’s visa by True Pundit.

    Federal law enforcement sources said Bharara was simply following the orders of Attorney General Lynch,
    who lobbied the State Department to issue the disavowed Russian a B1/B2 non-immigrant visa.
    This permitted Veselnitskaya entry into the United States for the sole purpose of entrapping Trump associates
    to use as fuel to commission wiretaps, federal sources said.

    Veselnitskaya may have been paid as well by the U.S. government, FBI sources said.
    It was reported last week that Steele, who compiled the Trump dossier was paid at least $100,000 from FBI funds as well.
    But that came later, after the wiretapping was well underway.

    The illegal eavesdropping started long before Steele’s dossier.
    Federal sources said the wiretaps on Trump insiders began in late 2015,
    almost a year before the 2016 election.
    The targets then were Flynn and Page, sources confirmed.
    When no smoking gun was recovered from those initial taps, U.S. intelligence agencies moved to broaden the scope through their newly-formed alliance.

    Intelligence garnered from the British eavesdropping, which again was merely a front for the NSA,
    was then used in August 2016 to secure a legitimate FISA warrant on Manafort, Trump Jr. and Kushner.

    That warrant was issued on or about September, 2016, federal sources confirm.

    It was the third time the cabal of U.S. intelligence agencies sought a FISA warrant for the Trump associates and this time it was approved.

    FBI sources said finally obtaining the FISA warrant was important because it provided the agencies cover
    for previous illegal wiretapping which they believed would never be discovered.

    “This would make for an incredible string of Senate hearings,” one federal law enforcement source said.
    “I don’t think they ever thought he (Trump) would win
    and information would come out about how they manipulated evidence.”



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by goldenequity View Post
    Here is what we now know,
    per intelligence gleaned form federal law enforcement sources with insider knowledge
    of what amounts to a plot by U.S. intelligence agencies to secure back door and illegal wiretaps of President Trump’s associates:

    ►Six U.S. agencies created a stealth task force, spearhead by CIA’s Brennan, to run domestic surveillance on Trump associates and possibly Trump himself.
    ►To feign ignorance and to seemingly operate within U.S. laws, the agencies freelanced the wiretapping of Trump associates to the British spy agency GCHQ.
    ►The decision to insert GCHQ as a back door to eavesdrop was sparked by the denial of two FISA Court warrant applications filed by the FBI to seek wiretaps of Trump associates.
    ►GCHQ did not work from London or the UK. In fact the spy agency worked from NSA’s headquarters in Fort Meade, MD with direct NSA supervision and guidance to conduct sweeping surveillance on Trump associates.
    ►The illegal wiretaps were initiated months before the controversial Trump dossier compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele.
    ►The Justice Department and FBI set up the meeting at Trump Tower between Trump Jr., Manafort and Kushner with controversial Russian officials to make Trump’s associates appear compromised.
    ►Following the Trump Tower sit down, GCHQ began digitally wiretapping Manafort, Trump Jr., and Kushner.
    ►After the concocted meeting by the Deep State, the British spy agency could officially justify wiretapping Trump associates as an intelligence front for NSA because the Russian lawyer at the meeting Natalia Veselnitskaya was considered an international security risk and prior to the June sit down was not even allowed entry into the United States or the UK, federal sources said.
    ►By using GCHQ, the NSA and its intelligence partners had carved out a loophole to wiretap Trump without a warrant. While it is illegal for U.S. agencies to monitor phones and emails of U.S. citizens inside the United States absent a warrant, it is not illegal for British intelligence to do so. Even if the GCHQ was tapping Trump on U.S. soil at Fort Meade.
    ►The wiretaps, secured through illicit scheming, have been used by U.S. Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe of alleged Russian collusion in the 2016 election, even though the evidence is considered “poisoned fruit.”

    ...

    The illegal eavesdropping started long before Steele’s dossier.
    Federal sources said the wiretaps on Trump insiders began in late 2015,
    almost a year before the 2016 election.
    The targets then were Flynn and Page, sources confirmed.
    When no smoking gun was recovered from those initial taps, U.S. intelligence agencies moved to broaden the scope through their newly-formed alliance.

    Intelligence garnered from the British eavesdropping, which again was merely a front for the NSA,
    was then used in August 2016 to secure a legitimate FISA warrant on Manafort, Trump Jr. and Kushner.

    That warrant was issued on or about September, 2016, federal sources confirm.

    It was the third time the cabal of U.S. intelligence agencies sought a FISA warrant for the Trump associates and this time it was approved.

    FBI sources said finally obtaining the FISA warrant was important because it provided the agencies cover
    for previous illegal wiretapping which they believed would never be discovered.

    “This would make for an incredible string of Senate hearings,” one federal law enforcement source said.
    “I don’t think they ever thought he (Trump) would win
    and information would come out about how they manipulated evidence.”
    Who and what are these sources? With what do Manafort et al. go about proving the government were attempting blackmail or a sting, or are the alleged plot's details still privy knowledge? Because this is the Patriot Act we're talking about, Murka should know by now their government can spy on anybody, by taking imagery from communications while maintaining plausible deniability.
    If freedom isn't free, it isn't liberty - its license.

    "And maybe my life spent in a New Jersey-New York/Bay Area-L.A. pro-Semitic cocoon has left me naive. But I don't care if Americans think we're running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them."
    - Joel Stein, LA TIMES

  4. #3

    Default

    The term 'legal' is subjective, don'tchaknow?
    Theye have refused their Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

    Theye have erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

    Theye kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies

    Theye have combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution,

    For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

    For cutting off our Trade with parts of the world:

    For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

    For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

    Theye plundered and destroyed the lives of our people.

    Theye are at this time transporting Armies of Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy of a civilized nation.

  5. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Raginfridus View Post
    Who and what are these sources? With what do Manafort et al. go about proving the government were attempting blackmail or a sting, or are the alleged plot's details still privy knowledge? Because this is the Patriot Act we're talking about, Murka should know by now their government can spy on anybody, by taking imagery from communications while maintaining plausible deniability.
    You (and I) know there are white hats and black hats in the intelligence 'community'.
    So this is obviously 'white hat' sourced (and protected.)

    Whether or not it will EVER come to 'indictment' much less prosecution/conviction
    is really not the purpose of an article like this.
    Its' importance lies in being a violent, open and public PUSH BACK in the infowar;
    an OVERT threat to 'shut it down' (the targeting; the witchhunt)

    The agencies need an internal 'Night of the Long Knives' to start gutting the rot.
    Congress is not needed for that... just leaks and whistleblowers via articles like this.
    Operations need to be shut down and house cleaning started..... or 'else'.

    --------

    As far a Manafort...
    I know he has 'requested' the DoJ make the 702's (his wiretaps/conversations) be made PUBLIC.
    Great idea. They should be compelled to do so.
    I doubt they will.
    Last edited by goldenequity; 09-20-2017 at 06:21 PM.

  6. #5

  7. #6

    Default

    Liar Lying about Lying.



    James Clapper Says He Was Unaware Of Manafort Wiretap Order
    http://dailycaller.com/2017/09/21/ja...p-order-video/


    “Did you know about a FISA warrant against Paul Manafort at the time?”
    CNN’s Don Lemon asked Clapper in an interview Wednesday night.

    “I did not,” Clapper replied.

    The Obama administration official was asked about his knowledge of the warrant,
    issued last year under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA),
    because of his denial back in March that the Obama administration obtained any FISA warrants on the Trump campaign.

    In the March 5 interview on “Meet the Press,”

    “There was no such wire tap activity mounted against the President-elect at the time or as a candidate or against his campaign,”
    Clapper told “Meet the Press” host Chuck Todd.

    Clapper unequivocally denied that a wiretap order was granted.

    Asked by Todd if he would have been aware of a FISA order
    issued for someone affiliated with the Trump campaign,
    Clapper said “absolutely.”


    Clapper came under heavy criticism this week after CNN reported that
    U.S. investigators obtained a surveillance warrant against Manafort
    at some point before the election in November.
    The surveillance continued through this year.


  8. #7






Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-20-2017, 03:12 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-26-2017, 12:29 PM
  3. Fox News pulls Judge Napolitano over his Trump wiretap claims
    By TruthBTold in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 03-21-2017, 11:41 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-14-2017, 11:38 AM
  5. Campaign Signs Illegally Placed in Riv, CA
    By ghemminger in forum Grassroots Central
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 12-31-2007, 08:55 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •