Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Imran Awan Still Has A Copy Of Congressional Data Linked To Wasserman Schultz

  1. #1

    Default Imran Awan Still Has A Copy Of Congressional Data Linked To Wasserman Schultz

    Cyber-Security breach/crime is now on the horizon... (still no 'charges')

    Luke Rosiak
    Investigative Reporter
    Imran Awan Still Has A Copy Of Congressional Data Linked To Wasserman Schultz

    Prosecutors have given Imran Awan a copy of the hard drive
    of a House laptop that Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz tried to keep law enforcement from looking at,
    court filings show, suggesting prosecutors intend to bring charges
    related to the underlying cybersecurity and theft probe.

    The hard-drive copy was included in discovery even though the Florida Democrat
    has said the laptop contains House information on it and is a government-paid work computer,
    even though Imran was fired and banned from the House network because of suspected cybersecurity violations.


    Imran left the laptop, with the username RepDWS, in a phone booth in circumstances that suggest
    that it was not accidentally forgotten there.

    (George believes it was 'dropped' by frightened co-perps who didn't want to get 'caught' that night 'holding the bag'...
    and NOT 'planted' by 'someone' to incriminate Imran,
    nor 'purposefully left' by Imran himself.)

    Alongside it, he left a copy of his ID and letters to the U.S. attorney
    that ensured it would be treated as evidence instead of simply returned as a missing laptop.


    Imran entered a House office building the night of April 6,
    two months after he was banned by House authorities from touching its network,
    and placed the laptop, a copy of his ID, and letters to the US Attorney in a phone booth, according to a police report.
    There would be little reason to enter the phone booth, and it would be difficult to forget items there.

    Imran also left in the phone booth a notebook that said “attorney client privilege,”
    which could be a reason why prosecutors gave Imran’s lawyer a copy of what could be Wasserman Schultz’s laptop.
    Prosecutors said they were giving him a copy under the legal process of discovery,
    in which defendants have a right to evidence being used against them.

    He has [still] only been charged with bank-fraud crimes related to trying to flee the country with cash,
    which is why its inclusion in discovery suggests prosecutors intend to bring charges
    related to the underlying cybersecurity and theft probe.

    Imran’s lawyer, Wasserman Schultz, and many in the media have said the misconduct involving Imran goes no further than bank fraud,
    the timeline makes clear that a serious criminal investigation into those House issues was the impetus for those moves,
    the notebook also included “case details” and letters about “the apparent owner of the bag being investigated,”
    well before he was accused of bank fraud.

    An Aug. 31 letter from prosecutors to Imran’s attorney reads:

    Wasserman Schultz frantically fought to stop police from looking at the laptop’s hard drive.
    For more than two months, police had been telling her they suspected him of cybersecurity breaches,
    including what she called “data transfer violations,”
    she maintained that she thought the police were picking on him and wanted to protect his “due process” —
    even though she knew how serious cyberbreaches can be because she was head of the DNC when its emails were released last year.

    Imran had access to all the emails and files of dozens of House Democrats.
    The bizarre refusal of members of Congress to criticize Imran
    no matter how many suspicious actions are tied to him
    raises questions
    about whether members may be afraid that he could release their emails if they assist in his prosecution,
    that some could implicated in a kickbacks scheme involving disappearing equipment and ghost employees.

    David Damron, a spokesman for the Florida lawmaker, declined to tell The Daily Caller News Foundation
    Wasserman Schultz would still be so adamant the allegations against Imran were made up
    even after Imran apparently took her laptop late at night
    left it where it would be found, alongside other seemingly carefully curated evidence.

    Damron would not clarify
    she said the laptop was hers and she had lost it,
    then said,
    that it was Imran’s and she had never even seen it,
    and finally,
    the revelation that it had the username RepDWS, rather than Imran’s username.

    Wasserman Schultz hired an outside attorney, Bill Pittard, to argue that police and prosecutors
    should not be allowed to keep or look at the laptop
    because it was full of sensitive legislative information, invoking the Constitution’s “speech and debate clause.”

    Wasserman Schultz was prohibited from allowing Imran to touch anything having to do with the House network after the Feb. 2 ban,
    she kept paying him and providing him access to the office, she said, "to have him work on “printers” and “websites.”

    Damron would not say whether Wasserman Schultz thought he had connected to the network using the laptop.

    He would also not say what Imran was doing roaming the House hallways at night.

    After learning that Imran was the subject of an investigation,
    Wasserman Schultz went out of her way to add his wife, Hina Alvi, to her payroll
    in a newly created position as a second IT aide.

    In March, Hina left the country with $12,000 in cash, her children, and large amounts of household goods
    while Wasserman Schultz knew she was the subject of a criminal investigation,
    but she kept paying Imran.

    Weeks later on April 6, the laptop and letters to the U.S. Attorney turned up in the phone booth.

    On May 18, she threatened the Capitol Police with “consequences” if they didn’t return the laptop, saying
    “if a member loses equipment… it should be returned” because “the member” is not the subject of an investigation.

    Police chief Matthew Verderosa noted that he was keeping the laptop because it was tied to a criminal suspect.
    Indeed, if the laptop had been found by itself, the laptop would have been returned,
    the seemingly carefully laid collection of items left with it, including multiple IDs and references to a criminal case,
    ensured that the laptop would be immediately considered evidence.

    Immediately after prosecutors gave Imran a copy of the laptop,
    Imran’s wife, Hina Alvi, told prosecutors she would agree to return from Pakistan to face charges,
    seemingly indicating she has confidence that she won’t face serious punishment for theft or cyberviolations,
    despite authorities
    being in possession of massive quantities of invoices that were systematically altered
    to prevent the equipment from appearing in House inventories.

    Bill Miller, a spokesman for the U.S. Attorney of the District of Columbia, declined to comment on giving Imran an image of the laptop.

    Wasserman Schultz’s brother, Steve Wasserman, is an attorney in the office.
    He has no role in prosecuting the case,
    he has tweeted an op-ed arguing that there should be no case against his sister.
    (of course not )
    Last edited by goldenequity; 09-08-2017 at 12:42 PM.

  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2


    George 2nd Floor Rayburn Bldg

    George 1st Floor Rayburn Bldg

    Today Review
    The Imran Awan Phone Booth and High Voltage Room

    Planted Laptop? Really? How About Dropped Bag With Two IDs?

    Did Imran's Surrogate's Use Cisco Router Monitor Port With Wire To Phone Booth?
    Last edited by goldenequity; 09-08-2017 at 12:53 PM.

  4. #3


    Exclusive: Police Report Indicates Wasserman Schultz IT Aide Planted Computer For Investigators To Find
    By Luke Rosiak- 09/06/2017

    A laptop that Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz has frantically fought to keep prosecutors from examining may have been planted for police to find by her since-indicted staffer, Imran Awan, along with a letter to the U.S. Attorney.

    U.S. Capitol Police found the laptop after midnight April 6, 2017, in a tiny room that formerly served as a phone booth in the Rayburn House Office Building, according to a Capitol Police report reviewed by The Daily Caller News Foundation’s Investigative Group. Alongside the laptop were a Pakistani ID card, copies of Awan’s driver’s license and congressional ID badge, and letters to the U.S. attorney. Police also found notes in a composition notebook marked “attorney-client privilege.”

    The laptop had the username “RepDWS,” even though the Florida Democrat and former Democratic National Committee chairman previously said it was Awan’s computer and that she had never even seen it.

    Awan was banned Feb. 2, 2017, from the congressional computer network because he is a suspect in a cybersecurity investigation, but he still had access to House facilities because Wasserman Schultz continued to employ him.

    The laptop was found on the second floor of the Rayburn building — a place Awan would have had no reason to go because Wasserman Schultz’s office is in the Longworth building and the other members who employed him had fired him.

    Wasserman Schultz used a televised May 18, 2017 congressional hearing on the Capitol Police budget to threaten “consequences” if Chief Matthew Verderosa did not give her the laptop. “If a member loses equipment,” it should be given back, she said.

    Verderosa told her the laptop couldn’t be returned because it was tied to a criminal suspect. Wasserman Schultz reiterated that, while Awan was a suspect, the computer should be returned because it is “a member’s … if the member is not under investigation.”

    She changed her story two months later, claiming it was Awan’s laptop — bought with taxpayer funds from her office — and she had never seen it. She said she only sought to protect Awan’s rights. “This was not my laptop,” she said August 3. “I have never seen that laptop. I don’t know what’s on the laptop.”
    Twitter: B4Liberty@USAB4L
    "Foreign aid is taking money from the poor people of a rich country, and giving it to the rich people of a poor country." - Ron Paul
    "Beware the Military-Industrial-Financial-Corporate-Media-Government Complex." - B4L update of General Dwight D. Eisenhower
    "Debt is the drug, Wall St. Banksters are the dealers, and politicians are the addicts." - B4L
    "Totally free immigration? I've never taken that position. I believe in national sovereignty." - Ron Paul

    The views and opinions expressed here are solely my own, and do not represent this forum or any other entities or persons.

  5. #4


    Best George Vids Ever!!

    not just negligence..
    not just obstruction...
    but George is proving malfeasance by the Federal Prosecution. (uh-ohh )

    We Are Now Down To How Fast Prosecutors Can Leak CYA Articles To Rosiak

    George Motions...

    Judge May Reconsider Magistrate Decision On Intervenor - Clerk Certifies

    Prosecution Has Been Served Appeal

    If you've been following George's lectures/thot process the last 5-6 days
    on the principles of the 'Intervenor' and the 'Grand Jury'...
    then you understand that being able to credibly argue MALFEASANCE on the part of the Government
    (aka the Prosecution/Gov't intentionally/knowingly covering up high crime making them an accomplice)
    as an intervenor in front of an appeals Judge/or Grand Jury...
    only cements his 'merits' and right to be heard.

    These latest Rosiak 'leaks'
    only help prove THEY KNEW AND WERE PURPOSEFULLY HIDING critical evidence from the judge/court
    on National Security issues/aka 'Spy Ring' implications.

    The 'bubble' is about to burst.
    Let's watch who 'suddenly' comes forward.

    Channing Phillips Doing the Gypsy Switch To Longworth From Rayburn Second Floor
    Last edited by goldenequity; 09-08-2017 at 01:39 PM.

  6. #5


    Luke Rosiak
    Investigative Reporter
    ‘Like a Slave:’ Three Muslim Women, At Least One Of Them Bloodied, Called Police on Imran Awan

    Multiple women in relationships with Imran Awan, the indicted former IT aide for Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz,
    have recently called Virginia law enforcement and alleged being abused by him,
    police reports obtained under Virginia’s Freedom of Information Act show.

    Officers found one of the women bloodied and she told them she “just wanted to leave,”
    while the second said she felt like a “slave,” according to Fairfax County Police reports obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation Investigative Group.
    A third woman claimed she was being kept “in captivity.”

    Day 335.6. Three Muslim Women Report Imran Abuse, One Beaten

    Day 335.2. As Far As Capitol Hill Goes, There Are Really Only Two Awan "Brothers"

    Day 335.5. Clarifying Why Debbie Did It

    Day 335.4. Imran Awan and Nadia Aman
    Last edited by goldenequity; 09-21-2017 at 09:29 AM.

  7. #6


    Day 335.1. George's Version Versus Washington Post's Version

    Day 336.1. Do Imran's Threat And Beating Victims Include the CAO?

    Day 336.2. DC Info To NYC - Weiner Resignation Changed Everything

  8. #7


    George explains his method

    Day 337.1 Scientific Method Applied To Journalism

    JTTF Operation Underground Railroad - Or is it Underhanded Railroading?

    Is Charles Freitag JTTF?

    (in this last video Geo disclosed he was 'warned' from Germany and also bluntly 'photographed' last night by some ratline types.)
    Last edited by goldenequity; 09-22-2017 at 10:06 AM.

  9. #8


    It's going to be interesting to see if anything changes now that Channing Phillips (Obama's lackey) no longer occupies the DC AG office and Jessie Liu has finally been confirmed. Phillips had seemingly been obstructing certain aspects of the case from moving forward, like blocking the ability of the FBI to pursue investigations into Awan based on congressional related activities, which is the crux of this case.

    No one cares about these petty bank charges, except the Washington Post, which in its first article on the topic just a few days ago, deemed this entire notion that Awan is a spy or doing nefarious deeds within the congress, nothing more than a farce and likely related to unfair racism aimed at his Muslim faith (DWS used same tactic). They failed to mention the names of any of the home renters of Awan and potential witnesses (Andre, Laurel) even a single time in their article or the IT/server equipment containing government labels that was handed over as evidence to the FBI and Capitol Police. Thanks for the thorough and unbiased reporting.

    It seems Ms. Liu wants to reform the legal system, but reforming it to whose benefit, the government or the people? Mr. Webb is pushing the issue and I believe showed up to her office to file some motions to see how she handles it.

Similar Threads

  1. We The People Have Been Compromised — Imran Awan Timeline
    By goldenequity in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-02-2017, 09:36 PM
  2. Replies: 102
    Last Post: 08-22-2017, 02:05 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-29-2017, 10:10 PM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-29-2017, 12:42 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-19-2015, 10:12 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts