Quote Originally Posted by r3volution 3.0 View Post
In other words, it would be unjust to use force to oppose a majoritarian tyranny?
If you are a member of the society it would not be unjust to defend your rights, but it might be suicidal.
If you are an outsider it is none of your business.



Quote Originally Posted by r3volution 3.0 View Post
You could say that possessors never become owners and allow the de facto statute of limitations to operate (i.e. with the passage of enough time, proof becomes practically impossible); or you could have an arbitrary statute of limitations. I'm not sure that it makes much difference. Anyway, what does this have to do with the aggression-minimization theory? I mean, if your point is that there's no perfect way to determine who owns what, I agree, but what's the upshot of that? Therefore, property is bad...?
My point is that there is and must be a time limit on the return of property taken by one nation from another nation, you asked me what would be the way to handle such questions in my philosophy and I asked you how you would handle them.