Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
To you islam doesn't equate to race of brown people but to the Breitbart target audience, there is little to no difference between brown people and muslims. They are one and the same and that is all that matters.
It is a code word that people with the right ear to pick up aka dog whistle
If it intends to troll RPF with substance-free jabs at Austrian economics., while parroting white nationalist pap, "Identity" can expect more negs.
...do you imagine you hid your true colors?
Uh oh, you got me- I'm a Socialist. Just like I said in about every single post since I joined here as of late. Wow, what a shocking exposé. For most of the world (and most young Americans) "Socialism" is merely an acceptable alternative economic structure (thank you Bernie <3 ) so trying to use it as an ad hominem is a poor propaganda tactic- it's non-offensive. Care to derail the thread further with your barely legible temper tantrum? I'm having a good enough laugh thus far.
, while parroting white nationalist pap, "Identity" can expect more negs.
What a shame, negative reps on a message board- you sure showed me, that'll bring the hustle & bustle back to RPF. Also curious as to how anything I said in this thread constituted "parroting white nationalist pap?" Apparently talking about Salon's headlines and rampant anti-white racism on the Left means one is a "white nationalist." More cigar ashes, Detective Columbo? Also, be cautious about your use of the word 'racist' when you worship at the feet of a Congressman who openly defends the slave-empire known as the Confederate States of America and suggested that slave-owners be "compensated for their property loss."
As opposed to the great intellectual "revolution" parroting unsophisticated moral dogmas and clumsily applying it in real world scenarios, such as laughably equating taxation with theft. Have to hand it to you, it's quite an amazing feat to post 11,000 times and still exist in a virtual echo chamber.If it intends to troll RPF with substance-free jabs at Austrian economics.
Last edited by Identity; 10-03-2017 at 06:44 PM.
Maybe. I'd have to see. I've seen more evidence that Stefan Molyeneux might be racist than I have Steve Bannon. That said, Islam != "brown people." When I did my own research into the claims of racism made by the ADL, I realized they were full of crap. There argument seemed similar to the argument you are making.
So far the Anti-Bannon crowd seemed to go off of inferences, guesswork, and sloppy equivocations based on terminology. We're hitting page 3 (on my end) of the thread and little has been said to make the case of Breitbart's racism. Any objective bystander would be wholly unimpressed.
Concerning the term "Alt-Right," its genesis is two-fold which adds to the confusion. The above posters participating in this thread trying to link the two are clearly ignorant of how it developed. Despite it being coined by Spencer it was shortly abandoned thereafter due to obscurity; if memory serves me correctly the registered domain by Richard was dropped since it was so rarely used. Afterwards, MRA types started picking up on it as a "Right-wing" position (culture, tad nativistic, language, Conservative values, all the typical Republican social talking points) whilst not necessarily holding typical Conservative economic views. Shortly after this happened Milo & the PJW types picked up and ran with it, along with us Donald Trump supporters. So there's a dual "New Right" & Spencer origin of the word. My inclination is that Bannon's self-identification has more to do with the former than the latter, as I'm unaware of any other connections and the users in this thread have raged empty-handed. It's also interesting to note that most of these mainstream "Alt-Righters" (like Milo) are just typical Republicans that tend to be non-PC as opposed to having great ideological divergence from the Austrian/Small government/Conservative rhetoric that dominates the Republican Party. If we're going the "He's alt-right, alt-right are evil bad racist people" route then one could define Ron Paul as an ideological heir to Proudhon based upon his misusage of the term "Libertarianism." Silly arguments, all around.
Last edited by Identity; 10-03-2017 at 05:59 PM.
The Creature from Jekyll Island:
We're being governed ruled by a geriatric Alzheimer patient/puppet whose strings are being pulled by an elitist oligarchy who believe they can manage the world... imagine the utter maniacal, sociopathic hubris!
I hope no one took this bet seriously. Aren't you the same christard that owes me 200$?
Connect With Us