Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 61 to 67 of 67

Thread: $100 reward for proof that Steve Bannon and/or Breitbart.com is racist

  1. #61
    Quote Originally Posted by Identity View Post
    [Emphasis mine]


    Oh, you'd be quite mistaken in that silly assessment of the situation:









    Do you find any of the above 'racist?' Curious as well: do you give an ounce of effort combating the 'waycism' found in the Indian caste system, Latin America class segregation, or the daily struggle of the indigenous people of Taiwan & Tibet against Han Chinese ethnics? Or is it just these extremely tenuous classic SJW-esque assertions of "rampant" racism in the largely secular, democratic, & tolerant West? Silly arguments, all around.




    No, just no. Out of all the things Molyneux can be criticized for (parading around an obscure, controversial theory such as Austrian economics, NAP, sloppy philosophical justifications for AnCapistan, etc..) the race issue isn't one of them.
    Have to disagree with u about the part about Molyneux, the man who believes in white and Holocaust genocide and not the genocide of Native Americans. Yea, that guys is not racist at all



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #62
    Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
    Maybe. I'd have to see. I've seen more evidence that Stefan Molyeneux might be racist than I have Steve Bannon. That said, Islam != "brown people." When I did my own research into the claims of racism made by the ADL, I realized they were full of crap. There argument seemed similar to the argument you are making.
    To you islam doesn't equate to race of brown people but to the Breitbart target audience, there is little to no difference between brown people and muslims. They are one and the same and that is all that matters.

    It is a code word that people with the right ear to pick up aka dog whistle

  4. #63
    If it intends to troll RPF with substance-free jabs at Austrian economics., while parroting white nationalist pap, "Identity" can expect more negs.

  5. #64
    ...do you imagine you hid your true colors?


    Uh oh, you got me- I'm a Socialist. Just like I said in about every single post since I joined here as of late. Wow, what a shocking
    exposé. For most of the world (and most young Americans) "Socialism" is merely an acceptable alternative economic structure (thank you Bernie <3 ) so trying to use it as an ad hominem is a poor propaganda tactic- it's non-offensive. Care to derail the thread further with your barely legible temper tantrum? I'm having a good enough laugh thus far.

    , while parroting white nationalist pap, "Identity" can expect more negs.


    What a shame, negative reps on a message board- you sure showed me, that'll bring the hustle & bustle back to RPF. Also curious as to how anything I said in this thread constituted "parroting white nationalist pap?" Apparently talking about Salon's headlines and rampant anti-white racism on the Left means one is a "white nationalist." More cigar ashes, Detective Columbo? Also, be cautious about your use of the word 'racist' when you worship at the feet of a Congressman who openly defends the slave-empire known as the Confederate States of America and suggested that slave-owners be "compensated for their property loss."

    If it intends to troll RPF with substance-free jabs at Austrian economics.
    As opposed to the great intellectual "revolution" parroting unsophisticated moral dogmas and clumsily applying it in real world scenarios, such as laughably equating taxation with theft. Have to hand it to you, it's quite an amazing feat to post 11,000 times and still exist in a virtual echo chamber.
    Last edited by Identity; 10-03-2017 at 06:44 PM.



  6. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  7. #65
    Maybe. I'd have to see. I've seen more evidence that Stefan Molyeneux might be racist than I have Steve Bannon. That said, Islam != "brown people." When I did my own research into the claims of racism made by the ADL, I realized they were full of crap. There argument seemed similar to the argument you are making.


    So far the Anti-Bannon crowd seemed to go off of inferences, guesswork, and sloppy equivocations based on terminology. We're hitting page 3 (on my end) of the thread and little has been said to make the case of Breitbart's racism. Any objective bystander would be wholly unimpressed.

    Concerning the term "Alt-Right," its genesis is two-fold which adds to the confusion. The above posters participating in this thread trying to link the two are clearly ignorant of how it developed. Despite it being coined by Spencer it was shortly abandoned thereafter due to obscurity; if memory serves me correctly the registered domain by Richard was dropped since it was so rarely used. Afterwards, MRA types started picking up on it as a "Right-wing" position (culture, tad nativistic, language, Conservative values, all the typical Republican social talking points) whilst not necessarily holding typical Conservative economic views. Shortly after this happened Milo & the PJW types picked up and ran with it, along with us Donald Trump supporters. So there's a dual "New Right" & Spencer origin of the word. My inclination is that Bannon's self-identification has more to do with the former than the latter, as I'm unaware of any other connections and the users in this thread have raged empty-handed. It's also interesting to note that most of these mainstream "Alt-Righters" (like Milo) are just typical Republicans that tend to be non-PC as opposed to having great ideological divergence from the Austrian/Small government/Conservative rhetoric that dominates the Republican Party. If we're going the "He's alt-right, alt-right are evil bad racist people" route then one could define Ron Paul as an ideological heir to Proudhon based upon his misusage of the term "Libertarianism." Silly arguments, all around.
    Last edited by Identity; 10-03-2017 at 05:59 PM.

  8. #66
    Quote Originally Posted by jllundqu View Post
    I honestly think if Mike Rowe ran for office, he'd win. I'd vote for him. He is what Trump SHOULD have been. Someone who can connect with everyday people. Someone who doesn't take $#@!. But also someone who can articulate thoughts and positions based in principle and reason.
    Rowe 2020?

    We're being governed ruled by a geriatric Alzheimer patient/puppet whose strings are being pulled by an elitist oligarchy who believe they can manage the world... imagine the utter maniacal, sociopathic hubris!

  9. #67
    I hope no one took this bet seriously. Aren't you the same christard that owes me 200$?

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123


Similar Threads

  1. Steve Bannon: American Patriot
    By Gumba of Liberty in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 252
    Last Post: 08-07-2022, 12:04 PM
  2. The Truth about Steve Bannon
    By Jamesiv1 in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-28-2016, 11:32 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-16-2016, 02:45 PM
  4. Breitbart Boss Stephen Bannon Bragged in 2015: ‘I’m Trump’s Campaign Manager’
    By CPUd in forum 2016 Presidential Election: GOP & Dem
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-11-2016, 06:34 PM
  5. Steve Bannon and the alt-right: a primer
    By CPUd in forum 2016 Presidential Election: GOP & Dem
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 09-15-2016, 01:03 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •