View Poll Results: Libertarians Have NOTHING To Do With The Alt-Right/neo-NAZIs

Voters
8. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, we libertarians have NOTHING to do with these anti-liberty people

    8 100.00%
  • No, I approve of the alt-right/neo-NAZIs atrempt at subversion of the liberty movement

    0 0%
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 70

Thread: Restating the Obvious: An Open Letter from the Libertarian Movement

  1. #1

    Restating the Obvious: An Open Letter from the Libertarian Movement

    Big hat-tip to @Antischism for bringing this to our attention.

    This is currently on the front page, but as far as I'm concerned, it can't get enough attention.

    Vote in the poll if you please.

    Today (August 12th, 2017), the “Unite the Right” rally is scheduled to proceed in Charlottesville, VA. The “Right” being united there isn’t just any “Right,” but one that welcomes white supremacists and self-described fascists. Multiple speakers will say this themselves, and the chants at a chaotic pre-event march the night before included Neo-Nazi slogans.

    The purpose of this letter is to clarify the role for libertarianism in this rally – which is no role at all.

    That clarification is necessary because it might appear otherwise. Three of the listed speakers have at one time or another identified as libertarians: Mike Enoch, Augustus Invictus, and Christopher Cantwell. Mike Enoch previously called himself a libertarian, but now mocks the philosophy as “autistic.” Augustus Invictus previously attempted to run for Senate through the Libertarian Party. Recently, though, he publicly changed his registration to Republican in disgust. Christopher Cantwell now seems ambivalent about his relationship with libertarianism and anarchism, but his primary identification is with fascism.

    Regardless of how any speakers or attendees have identified in the past or present, we want to make clear that this event is not in any way a place for libertarianism. Among libertarians, some identify as “right-wing,” some as “left-wing,” and some as “radical centrists.” Virtually the entire outside political spectrum is mirrored within libertarianism, and this makes for no shortage of infighting. One area where the undersigned have consensus, however, is in a rejection of any attempt to connect white supremacy and fascism to libertarianism. Libertarians, including those who see themselves as on “the Right,” have no interest in uniting with the horrifically authoritarian “Right” – often called the “Alt-Right” – rallying in Charlottesville.

    All this should be exceedingly obvious from even a cursory glance at the two movements.

    On a historical note, modern-day libertarianism largely took root in the English-speaking world through Jewish intellectuals, some of whom fled the Nazis. Our movement grew as a revolt against fascism, Communism, and early twentieth-century progressivism. As Thomas Leonard has shown in his Illiberal Reformers, that third enemy’s intellectual history is closely interwoven with eugenics.

    On the level of philosophy, libertarianism stresses the freedom of individuals even when that freedom goes against some supposed collective will. The entire point behind a politics of white supremacy is to replace free association with endless central planning and regulation on collectivist racial grounds. “Unite the Right” speaker Richard Spencer actively seeks to turn the United States into a 100% white ethno-state. It is impossible to conceive of this happening without a return of the total state and its horrors.

    Despite the obvious incompatibility of that totalitarianism and libertarianism (of any kind), an attempted association between the two is unsurprising. Attempts at rebooting authoritarian movements often operate through a tactic called entryism. Entryism is where a smaller political movement attempts to capture a larger one and seize its resources. In cases like fascism and Communism, the tendency towards entryism is probably a joint product of amoral opportunism and an inability to rationally defend their views.

    It is necessary, then, for libertarians to restate the exceedingly obvious and insist on the stark differences between our views and those of anyone with any affinity for National Socialist Germany.

    We, the undersigned, affirm such a gulf between liberty and its opposite.



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2

  4. #3


    Last edited by r3volution 3.0; 08-13-2017 at 07:37 PM.

  5. #4
    NOTHING is too strong a word, however I would say that libertarians or conservatives or minarchists or just about anybody sane should avoid working with these nuts, many of them are government provocateurs who would love nothing better than to black-wash us with the madness they promote.
    Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig.

    Robert Heinlein

    Give a man an inch and right away he thinks he's a ruler

    Groucho Marx

    I love mankind…it’s people I can’t stand.

    Linus, from the Peanuts comic

    You cannot have liberty without morality and morality without faith

    Alexis de Torqueville

    Those who fail to learn from the past are condemned to repeat it.
    Those who learn from the past are condemned to watch everybody else repeat it

    A Zero Hedge comment

  6. #5
    Meh, already went through all this ten years ago with "newsletter-gate".

    Push poll, limited options, not taking part.

  7. #6
    Should have added another set of anti-liberty neos (neo-cons) as they have made themselves a party to this debate. But yea that is stating the obvious and bit redundant. Just declaring self a "libertarian" ( Bill O'Rielly, Bill Maher, WaPo neocons etc) or supporting same sex wedding cakes does not make one so.

    As noted elsewhere:

    Not sure what exactly constitutes "alt right" as referred to in MSM headlines but would agree with above criticism if applied to the subset of "Right" (or "Left" or "Middle" for that matter) that champions collectivist,racist instigation of violence.

    That said, recent history shows that violent, racist alt-Neocons supported by likes of WaPo have caused much more damage to humanity than current isolationst nationalist groups being labelled by them as "alt-Right" ever could. Racially motivated horrible revenge attack on people of Iraq, bloody spreading of freedom/racial equality values in Syria were just couple of the many recent examples of how deeply racist, collectivist WaPo supported political slave masters of likes of disgraced DGP have been in practice. They got no moral authority to be judge of racially motivated violence.

    2003: Washington Post ran 27 editorials in favor of Iraq invasion


    On a historical note, modern-day libertarianism largely took root in the English-speaking world through Jewish intellectuals, some of whom fled the Nazis.
    Max Blumenthal comes to mind too. Such facts should be publicized more often to counter impressions like these MSM news create about some preseent day high profile anti-liberty intellectuals.

    Henry Kissinger supports ISIS

  8. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
    Meh, already went through all this ten years ago with "newsletter-gate".

    Push poll, limited options, not taking part.
    I remember "newsletter-gate" just fine myself.

    Here's the difference AF; no one at that time was celebrating Ron's (alleged) connections to white nationalists.

    No one at that time thought it helpful to the liberty movement to associated with NAZIs.

    Now, evidently, some people do. Do you?

  9. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by r3volution 3.0 View Post
    I remember "newsletter-gate" just fine myself.

    Here's the difference AF; no one at that time was celebrating Ron's (alleged) connections to white nationalists.

    No one at that time thought it helpful to the liberty movement to associated with NAZIs.

    Now, evidently, some people do. Do you?
    Nobody saying that, that I can see or celebrating as far as I can see.

    I've already made my position clear: shame on us for sitting around with our thumbs up our asses while an agent of the leftist mob that is gearing itself up for real violence, attempted to assassinate the single most prominent political figure of the "liberty movement".

    If the "alt right" has gotten out ahead of us on standing up and finally pushing back against the hate filled, genocidal left, then that's our fault.
    Last edited by Anti Federalist; 08-13-2017 at 07:54 PM.



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    Silliness like this "poll" help show why some liberty people will always be on the losing end. Some RPFers here criticize attacks on things like confederate monuments, and what these same RPFers do here? They actually criticize the protestors in Charlottesville trying to do something about it.

    I am not even saying you had to show up. I'm saying some RPFers sit around and coffee klatch and STILL complain about someone who is trying to do something about the very thing the RPFer complains about.

    There is a member here named Southron who actually showed up at the rally and gave a decent account of what happened. Southron explicitly said he is not a white nationalist. I suspect many there were not so-called white nationalists. I'll bet a good number were simply conservative Univ. of VA students who had enough. This generation has been called all kinds of names by academic institutions, media, elitists, etc. They're called racist, hateful, privileged, etc. They are ridiculed and belittled at every turn. Is it any surprise that they act cornered and lash out?

    The world is not an either/or proposition. Yes, I am sure there were white nationalists protesting; however most rallies I have observed have people with views of varying degrees. I've attended a number of rallies in my life and there was always a great mix of political and social views, but still focused on one goal.

    I hardly like Donald Trump, but this idea that things are no different is baloney. Maybe not different in many areas or greatly significant areas, but this is one area where it seems to be different. I would bet that if Clinton were president, the response would be much, much different. The people who actually bothered to protest within legal parameters might be facing some real consequences, both legally and otherwise. There would be some really significant White House directives against these groups (or more than usual), and you would never even hear about it.

    Again, I find some of the passivity and criticism here rather ridiculous. If you think you can do better, then go out there. Some people will never do it, instead waiting in their fairy tale world with the hopes of all private roads and open borders. Now, coffee klatch away.
    Last edited by NorthCarolinaLiberty; 08-13-2017 at 07:59 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
    ...I believe that when the government is capable of doing a thing, it will.
    Quote Originally Posted by Influenza View Post
    which one of yall fuckers wrote the "ron paul" racist news letters
    Quote Originally Posted by Dforkus View Post
    Zippy's posts are a great contribution.




    Disrupt, Deny, Deflate. Read the RPF trolls' playbook here (post #3): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...eptive-members

  12. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by NorthCarolinaLiberty View Post
    Silliness like this "poll" help show why some liberty people will always be on the losing end. Some RPFers here criticize attacks on things like confederate monuments, and what these same RPFers do here? They actually criticize the protestors in Charlottesville trying to do something about it.

    I am not even saying you had to show up. I'm saying some RPFers sit around and coffee klatch and STILL complain about someone who is trying to do something about the very thing the RPFer complains about.

    There is a member here named Southron who actually showed up at the rally and gave a decent account of what happened. Southron explicitly said he is not a white nationalist. I suspect many there were not so-called white nationalists. I'll bet a good number were simply conservative Univ. of VA students who had enough. This generation has been called all kinds of names by academic institutions, media, elitists, etc. They're called racist, hateful, privileged, etc. They are ridiculed and belittled at every turn. Is it any surprise that they act cornered and lash out?

    The world is not an either/or proposition. Yes, I am sure there were white nationalists protesting; however most rallies I have observed have people with views of varying degrees. I've attended a number of rallies in my life and there was always a great mix of political and social views, but still focused on one goal.

    I hardly like Donald Trump, but this idea that things are no different is baloney. Maybe not different n many areas or greatly significant areas, but this is one area where it seems to be different. I would bet that if Clinton were president, the response would be much, much different. The people who actually bothered to protest within legal parameters might be facing some real consequences, both legally and otherwise. There would be some really significant White House directives against these groups (or more than usual), and you would never even hear about it.

    Again, I find some of the passivity and criticism here rather ridiculous. If you think you can do better, then go out there. Some people will never do it, instead waiting in their fairy tale world with the hopes of all private roads and open borders. Now, coffee klatch away.
    I agree with you about the rally, but the thread question did not ask about that, it simply refers to NAZIs and the alt-right.
    The sane people at the rally were only undercut and black-washed by working with them.
    Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig.

    Robert Heinlein

    Give a man an inch and right away he thinks he's a ruler

    Groucho Marx

    I love mankind…it’s people I can’t stand.

    Linus, from the Peanuts comic

    You cannot have liberty without morality and morality without faith

    Alexis de Torqueville

    Those who fail to learn from the past are condemned to repeat it.
    Those who learn from the past are condemned to watch everybody else repeat it

    A Zero Hedge comment

  13. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
    Nobody saying that, that I can see or celebrating as far as I can see.
    Then you need new glasses bud.

    I've already made my position clear: shame on us for sitting around with our thumbs up our asses while an agent of the leftist mob that is gearing itself up for real violence, attempted to assassinate the single most prominent political figure of the "liberty movement".

    If the "alt right" has gotten out ahead of us on standing up and finally pushing back against the hate filled, genocidal left, then that's our fault.
    Well, that's as good as a vote.

  14. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    I agree with you about the rally, but the thread question did not ask about that, it simply refers to NAZIs and the alt-right.
    The sane people at the rally were only undercut and black-washed by working with them.
    Perhaps the person you're speaking to thinks otherwise

  15. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    I agree with you about the rally, but the thread question did not ask about that, it simply refers to NAZIs and the alt-right.
    The sane people at the rally were only undercut and black-washed by working with them.

    The poll wording is nonsense.

    I also find it interesting that the thread title of RonPaulMall (guy with the John Wilkes Booth avatar) was changed from Unite the Right Rally to The libertarian movement has no affinity with the Unite the Right Rally. It seems to be linked with this "open letter" that is placed elsewhere on this site. RonPaulMall was not the one who changed it.

    That thread title was actually quite neutral, as far as thread titles go. Why change a thread title that actually describes the exact content of a thread? Why add a value judgment to someone else's thread? I'll tell you why. It's because the same passivity that permeates society about these issues is alive and well even on discussion forums. Speaking out about it on a forum is the first step. If you're not even willing to speak up or defend yourself (let alone go on the offensive), then good luck getting anything done.
    Last edited by NorthCarolinaLiberty; 08-13-2017 at 08:12 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
    ...I believe that when the government is capable of doing a thing, it will.
    Quote Originally Posted by Influenza View Post
    which one of yall fuckers wrote the "ron paul" racist news letters
    Quote Originally Posted by Dforkus View Post
    Zippy's posts are a great contribution.




    Disrupt, Deny, Deflate. Read the RPF trolls' playbook here (post #3): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...eptive-members

  16. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by NorthCarolinaLiberty View Post
    There is a member here named Southron who actually showed up at the rally and gave a decent account of what happened. Southron explicitly said he is not a white nationalist. I suspect many there were not so-called white nationalists. I'll bet a good number were simply conservative Univ. of VA students who had enough. This generation has been called all kinds of names by academic institutions, media, elitists, etc. They're called racist, hateful, privileged, etc. They are ridiculed and belittled at every turn. Is it any surprise that they act cornered and lash out?
    No surprise at all. I have seen many more than one prominent voice of the left over the last year or so, speak out in favor utter elimination of white people.

    Now, maybe the people that are showing fits of righteous indignation at this whole incident, maybe they are not white or maybe they consider it all just "blowhard-ism" or maybe they just don't care.

    The fact of the matter is that some people do care and have obviously, as you suggested, have had enough.

  17. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by r3volution 3.0 View Post
    Well, that's as good as a vote.
    Oh, what did I vote for?

  18. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by NorthCarolinaLiberty View Post
    I also find it interesting that the thread title of RonPaulMall (guy with the John Wilkes Booth avatar) was changed from Unite the Right Rally to The libertarian movement has no affinity with the Unite the Right Rally. It seems to be linked with this "open letter" that is placed elsewhere on this site. RonPaulMall was not the one who changed it.
    The Mods changed it, for the reason that this is a libertarian site, not a neo-NAZI site.

    Why change a thread title that actually describes the exact content of a thread? I'll tell you why. It's because the same passivity that permeates society about these issues is alive and well even on discussion forums. Speaking out about it on a forum is the first step. If you're not even willing to speak up or defend yourself (let alone go on the offensive), then good luck getting anything done.
    Much simpler explanation - the owner of this site is still a libertarian.

    This isn't Stormfront, however much certain people wish it were.



  19. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  20. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
    Oh, what did I vote for?
    Best I can tell, option #2 (if with hesitation, because you know it's wrong)

  21. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by r3volution 3.0 View Post
    The Mods changed it, for the reason that this is a libertarian site, not a neo-NAZI site.
    I know exactly who changed the title. The title was neutral, describing an event. It was not the value judgment you placed on it.
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
    ...I believe that when the government is capable of doing a thing, it will.
    Quote Originally Posted by Influenza View Post
    which one of yall fuckers wrote the "ron paul" racist news letters
    Quote Originally Posted by Dforkus View Post
    Zippy's posts are a great contribution.




    Disrupt, Deny, Deflate. Read the RPF trolls' playbook here (post #3): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...eptive-members

  22. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by r3volution 3.0 View Post
    Best I can tell, option #2 (if with hesitation, because you know it's wrong)
    Oh, OK, thanks for the clarification.

  23. #20
    I support their first amendment rights, unlike Antifa, who went and started throwing rocks, throwing urine on people and macing people.
    "He's talkin' to his gut like it's a person!!" -me
    "dumpster diving isn't professional." - angelatc
    "You don't need a medical degree to spot obvious bullshit, that's actually a separate skill." -Scott Adams
    "When you are divided, and angry, and controlled, you target those 'different' from you, not those responsible [controllers]" -Q

    "Each of us must choose which course of action we should take: education, conventional political action, or even peaceful civil disobedience to bring about necessary changes. But let it not be said that we did nothing." - Ron Paul

    "Paul said "the wave of the future" is a coalition of anti-authoritarian progressive Democrats and libertarian Republicans in Congress opposed to domestic surveillance, opposed to starting new wars and in favor of ending the so-called War on Drugs."

  24. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by r3volution 3.0 View Post
    The Mods changed it, for the reason that this is a libertarian site, not a neo-NAZI site.



    Much simpler explanation - the owner of this site is still a libertarian.
    The original thread title was also more than four words, and not all that neutral. In fact, it specifically mentioned the 'alt-right'.

    Furthermore, I see no sign that any significant number of people here believe the protestors were all stormfronters, or that they had no right to free speech, or even that they'd have had no right to free speech if they were all 'alt-right'.

    So I'm at a loss what the screed is all about.

    Quote Originally Posted by NorthCarolinaLiberty View Post
    I know exactly who changed the title. The title was neutral, describing an event. It was not the value judgment you placed on it.
    I have no doubt you're remembering correctly who changed it. I also have no doubt you're not remembering the original title correctly.
    Last edited by acptulsa; 08-13-2017 at 08:25 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    We believe our lying eyes...

  25. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
    No surprise at all. I have seen many more than one prominent voice of the left over the last year or so, speak out in favor utter elimination of white people.

    .

    And these people do all of this with a straight face, and spend money from your paycheck to boot. Here's one (link below). It's called the White Privilege Conference. It was held in Kansas City this year.

    Yeah, sure; white people are supposed to stand around to be ridiculed and belittled. White people decline to be ridiculed and belittled and that is somehow a problem. Yeah, and white people are the hateful ones.


    http://www.whiteprivilegeconference.com/
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
    ...I believe that when the government is capable of doing a thing, it will.
    Quote Originally Posted by Influenza View Post
    which one of yall fuckers wrote the "ron paul" racist news letters
    Quote Originally Posted by Dforkus View Post
    Zippy's posts are a great contribution.




    Disrupt, Deny, Deflate. Read the RPF trolls' playbook here (post #3): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...eptive-members

  26. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by acptulsa View Post
    The original thread title was also more than four words, and not all that neutral. In fact, it specifically mentioned the 'alt-right'.

    Furthermore, I see no sign that any significant number of people here believe the protestors were all stormfronters, or that they had no right to free speech, or even that they'd have had no right to free speech if they were all 'alt-right'.

    So I'm at a loss what the screed is all about.
    BLM et al say the same thing. It's a canard...

    No one's questioning anyone's right to free speech.

    Criticizing the asinine things that NAZIs or bolsheviks say is itself an exercise in free speech, of course.

    The purpose of the OP is to clearly distinguish between liberalism/libertarianism and the alt-right/neo-NAZIsm.

    ...which certain persons ($$$?) are hell bent on equating.

    ...for very obvious political purposes.

  27. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by acptulsa View Post
    The original thread title was also more than four words, and not all that neutral. In fact, it specifically mentioned the 'alt-right'.

    *
    I have no doubt you're remembering correctly who changed it. I also have no doubt you're not remembering the original title correctly.


    No, it was not more than four words. I was sitting here the exact minute RonPaulMall posted it. It was called Unite the Right Rally.

    It might have been changed to something longer and then changed a third time, but that was the original title. RonPaulMall did not change it because you have only one hour to change a thread title, and I was here for one hour after he posted it. It did not change in that one hour.
    Last edited by NorthCarolinaLiberty; 08-13-2017 at 08:30 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
    ...I believe that when the government is capable of doing a thing, it will.
    Quote Originally Posted by Influenza View Post
    which one of yall fuckers wrote the "ron paul" racist news letters
    Quote Originally Posted by Dforkus View Post
    Zippy's posts are a great contribution.




    Disrupt, Deny, Deflate. Read the RPF trolls' playbook here (post #3): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...eptive-members



  28. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  29. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
    Oh, OK, thanks for the clarification.
    My pleasure...

  30. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by r3volution 3.0 View Post
    Best I can tell, option #2 (if with hesitation, because you know it's wrong)
    It sounded to me like he didn't want to let them seize the position of opposing the maniac left as theirs so that all "sane" people could be herded into one camp of madmen or the other.
    Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig.

    Robert Heinlein

    Give a man an inch and right away he thinks he's a ruler

    Groucho Marx

    I love mankind…it’s people I can’t stand.

    Linus, from the Peanuts comic

    You cannot have liberty without morality and morality without faith

    Alexis de Torqueville

    Those who fail to learn from the past are condemned to repeat it.
    Those who learn from the past are condemned to watch everybody else repeat it

    A Zero Hedge comment

  31. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by NorthCarolinaLiberty View Post
    I know exactly who changed the title. The title was neutral, describing an event. It was not the value judgment you placed on it.
    LOL

  32. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    It sounded to me like he didn't want to let them seize the position of opposing the maniac left as theirs so that all "sane" people could be herded into one camp of madmen or the other.
    But of course that was exactly the purpose of this event, and it succeeded.

    To wit: this thread.

    Reds and browns are recruiting tonight; the only loser is liberalism (or "sanity").

  33. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by r3volution 3.0 View Post
    I remember "newsletter-gate" just fine myself.

    Here's the difference AF; no one at that time was celebrating Ron's (alleged) connections to white nationalists.

    No one at that time thought it helpful to the liberty movement to associated with NAZIs.

    Now, evidently, some people do. Do you?

  34. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by r3volution 3.0 View Post
    LOL

    val·ue judg·ment
    ˈvalyo͞o ˌjəjmənt/
    noun
    noun: value judgement; plural noun: value judgements; noun: value judgment; plural noun: value judgments

    an assessment of something as good or bad in terms of one's standards or priorities.




    1. Thread title describing an event: Unite the Right Rally

    2. Thread title attaching value judgment to an event: The libertarian movement has no affinity with the Unite the Right Rally.
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCount View Post
    ...I believe that when the government is capable of doing a thing, it will.
    Quote Originally Posted by Influenza View Post
    which one of yall fuckers wrote the "ron paul" racist news letters
    Quote Originally Posted by Dforkus View Post
    Zippy's posts are a great contribution.




    Disrupt, Deny, Deflate. Read the RPF trolls' playbook here (post #3): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...eptive-members

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. An Open Letter to the Peace Movement from Roderick Long
    By PeaceRequiresAnarchy in forum World News & Affairs
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 03-06-2013, 11:45 PM
  2. Matthew Showers: An Open Letter to the Liberty Movement
    By presence in forum Ron Paul Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-05-2012, 04:35 PM
  3. An Open Letter To The Occupy Wall Movement
    By PeacePlan in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-14-2011, 02:25 PM
  4. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-05-2011, 08:57 PM
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-04-2011, 01:24 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •