Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 34 of 34

Thread: No Justice to be found at Bunkerville retrial....

  1. #31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    The two appointees are the slim connection, they approved of this judge, they were appointed by Dump.

    Your reading comprehension stinks.
    Regardless, it would have been nice if these two had given the judge $#@! over her biased handling of the case.

    We know where the Left stands on this issue but the Right too?

    Yet another example of there being very little real difference between the two sides.
    "An idea whose time has come cannot be stopped by any army or any government" - Ron Paul.



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by unknown View Post
    Regardless, it would have been nice if these two had given the judge $#@! over her biased handling of the case.

    We know where the Left stands on this issue but the Right too?

    Yet another example of there being very little real difference between the two sides.
    I definitely agree with you, "the establishment" is embedded in both ends of the spectrum.
    Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig.

    Robert Heinlein

    Give a man an inch and right away he thinks he's a ruler

    Groucho Marx

    I love mankind…it’s people I can’t stand.

    Linus, from the Peanuts comic

    You cannot have liberty without morality and morality without faith

    Alexis de Torqueville

    Those who fail to learn from the past are condemned to repeat it.
    Those who learn from the past are condemned to watch everybody else repeat it

    A Zero Hedge comment

  4. #33

    Default

    Bunkerville retrial goes to deliberation.

    Let's say a prayer that these jurists' eyes will be opened to the wickedness of the court and it's representative Judge Navarro.

    THE GENERAL CONSENSUS OUTSIDE THE COURTHOUSE IS “WE PUSHED THE FEDS BACK ONCE AGAIN!”

    by Shari Dovale

    The Bunkerville Retrial has gone to the jury to begin their deliberations.

    The defense case has been wrought with drama. Judge Gloria Navarro began by forcing the defense witnesses to proffer, or preview, their testimony out of the jury’s hearing. After 4 witnesses testified via SKYPE last week, including a witness that previously was called by the prosecution, Navarro ruled that none of them could testify.

    Navarro made the ruling based on her belief that the witnesses were only there to bolster a self-defense claim. She ruled previously that this was not a valid defense in this case.

    The following day, Eric Parker attempted to testify in his own defense, as is his right to do. After a few questions, Navarro stopped him from testifying, had him removed from the witness stand, and had his testimony completely stricken from the official court record. She instructed the jury to disregard his testimony, as if he had never been on the witness stand.

    Monday brought Scott Drexler to the stand, however, she severely limited him in what he was allowed to say while testifying. He was not allowed to tell the jury why he went to Nevada, nor testify to any of the Constitutional violations that he witnessed.

    The jury attempted to question Drexler after his testimony, yet Judge Navarro shut them down as well when she only allowed 4 of 12 questions to be asked. She told the jury that their remaining questions were not relevant and they did not need those answers.


    Tuesday began the closing arguments. Nadia Ahmed gave the closing arguments for the prosecution. Some of the highlights from her closing included calling the Bundy cattle “property of the BLM” yet later stating the defendants went to Bunkerville to aid Cliven Bundy in “getting his cattle back”.

    Ahmed also accused the defendants of using “travelers to impede officers from eliminating them as a threat.” Well, okay, the defendants did not want to be eliminated, or killed, by the BLM snipers. But the prosecution would have you believe that is the crime.

    You are not allowed to defend yourself against BLM snipers?

    Several times the defense objected to statements that Ahmed made, and each time Judge Navarro would rule in the favor of the prosecution.

    When it came time for the defense to begin their closing arguments, each of the four defense attorneys stood and made the statement, “On behalf of Mr. [Client], we have no closing argument.”

    Judge Gloria Navarro never asked the defense to rest their case, and seems to have forgotten the necessity for them to do so. They each sat down and Navarro immediately gave the case to the jury and excused them to begin their deliberations. Now, we have speculation as to the legal issues this brings.

    Rich Tanasi, attorney for Steven Stewart, stood after the jury left and requested to make a motion before the official recess, yet Navarro would not allow it. She told him that he needed to file it in writing.

    The drama did not end there. It seems that one of the jurors caught the eye of several people, including AUSA Myhre. She was seen ‘blowing a kiss’. She was later brought in front of Judge Navarro, as well as the prosecution and defense attorneys, for questioning.

    She claimed that she was blowing a kiss to the alternate jurors, and not any of the participants in the trial. Navarro has allowed her to remain on the jury for the time being.

    Speculation is running rampant about the strategy the defense is using by not giving closing arguments. Most believe it was a form of mass protest against Judge Navarro, knowing they would never have gotten through the closings without multiple objections.

    Whether or not the jury will understand the protest is yet to be seen. It does seem to resonate throughout the spectators that it was a powerful statement.


    The general consensus outside the courthouse is “We pushed the Feds back once again!”
    https://www.oathkeepers.org/defense-...ville-retrial/
    Theye have refused their Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

    Theye have erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

    Theye kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies

    Theye have combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution,

    For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

    For cutting off our Trade with parts of the world:

    For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

    For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

    Theye plundered and destroyed the lives of our people.

    Theye are at this time transporting Armies of Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy of a civilized nation.

  5. #34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phill4paul View Post
    Speculation is running rampant about the strategy the defense is using by not giving closing arguments. Most believe it was a form of mass protest against Judge Navarro, knowing they would never have gotten through the closings without multiple objections.



    https://www.oathkeepers.org/defense-...ville-retrial/
    My closing argument:

    "The ridiculous limitations that the court has placed on what is allowed to be discussed in this case does not allow me to make a closing argument or convey any relevant, pertinent information to the jurors regarding why my client is innocent. My hands are tied."
    "He's talkin' to his gut like it's a person!!" -me
    "dumpster diving isn't professional." - angelatc


    "Each of us must choose which course of action we should take: education, conventional political action, or even peaceful civil disobedience to bring about necessary changes. But let it not be said that we did nothing." - Ron Paul

    "Paul said "the wave of the future" is a coalition of anti-authoritarian progressive Democrats and libertarian Republicans in Congress opposed to domestic surveillance, opposed to starting new wars and in favor of ending the so-called War on Drugs."

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12





Similar Threads

  1. Bunkerville Trial News
    By phill4paul in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 04-24-2017, 07:21 PM
  2. Kent Hovind retrial Monday May 18th Need boots on the ground.
    By bubbleboy in forum Individual Rights Violations: Case Studies
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-11-2015, 01:25 PM
  3. Bunkerville Was Not the BLM’s First Rustler’s Roundup
    By tod evans in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-23-2014, 05:38 PM
  4. Dutch retrial ordered for Wilders hate speech case
    By bobbyw24 in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-24-2010, 03:28 PM
  5. Pirate Bay trial was fixed, lawyer demands retrial
    By cindy25 in forum Individual Rights Violations: Case Studies
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-23-2009, 01:20 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •