Well then mission accomplished. Roll out the banners and the flight suits.Originally Posted by NorthCarolinaLiberty
No, you have this all totally backwards.
4 out of 5 women specify that they DO NOT IDENTIFY AS FEMINISTS. There is a reason for that.
The vast majority of women who identify as feminists want equal outcome for women, they don't want women to merely be treated as equals. They also tend to hate men and the patriarchy.
"He's talkin' to his gut like it's a person!!" -me
"dumpster diving isn't professional." - angelatc
"You don't need a medical degree to spot obvious bullshit, that's actually a separate skill." -Scott Adams
"When you are divided, and angry, and controlled, you target those 'different' from you, not those responsible [controllers]" -Q
"Each of us must choose which course of action we should take: education, conventional political action, or even peaceful civil disobedience to bring about necessary changes. But let it not be said that we did nothing." - Ron Paul
"Paul said "the wave of the future" is a coalition of anti-authoritarian progressive Democrats and libertarian Republicans in Congress opposed to domestic surveillance, opposed to starting new wars and in favor of ending the so-called War on Drugs."
Oh man those straw men will never recover from that thrashing.
Yes, there is definitely a reason for that.
I presume your name is Rasmussen.
There's no "mission" involved. Rights do not come from you or your progressive colleagues' legislation or edicts.
Disrupt, Deny, Deflate. Read the RPF trolls' playbook here (post #3): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...eptive-members
Rights also don't come out of the back of your van or the vans of any of your fellow child molesters.
They can, however, be restored via legislation to remove past legislation or edict.
Can you tell me how women are not equal to men in our society? yea, they are exempt from selective service sign on but I doubt woman is asking to be burdened by such a law. And as for promoting a libertine lifestyle, this is not a gendered issue.
I am all for equal rights but lets be serious, this is not what most feminists are asking for cos it has for the most part been achieved today in the US
People get demonized for labels- what used to be a label for someone who isn't sexist has turned into something else entirely. Are you against forced government vaccinations, well that means you are an anti vaxxer. Don't like abortion after 6 months, you must be some sort of crazy right winger. Don't want to go to war with Russia, god you must be colluding with Putin.
But all those issues are at play in this day of age. People running about with the feminist label is like me running around with anti segregationist label. It sets off all sorts of red flags
No important issues like the cops being able to track/trace your cell phone without a search warrant is at play, the rest is a distraction.
I think they are out .
Do something Danke
You are never going to get men and woman to be completely equal in all ways. The best you can hope for is inequalities that balance out. Maybe women face judgment and discrimination if they work, but they also get the benefit when it comes to child custody. Maybe men have higher rates of suicide and depression but have to deal with less harassment and stalking. Etc, etc.
I would generally agree with you. The problem is the history of this whole issue.
"Anti-feminists" have been attacking feminism since the dawn of time. The line of argument that "equality has been achieved today" has been used for more than fifty years. It's very true now, but the problem is it wasn't true back then, and people aren't going to listen to you now since you've been lying about it before.
For example, look at Milton Friedman and Thomas Sowell. Friedman argued from the 50s that sex-based discrimination had largely disappeared. Sowell made that same point since the 70s, pointing to some very ***** studies that this was the case. The thing is, back then, not only did you have a cornucopia of studies showing a wage gap, but you had literal stories of companies having policies of not hiring women, glass ceilings, etc. It was a ridiculous argument to say that equality had been even close to reality. And, the feminists remember. By being so erroneously used, the arguments can't even be used when accurate.
It doesn't help that the "skeptic"/"anti-feminist" community, for the most part, like the "feminist" community, is not approaching the issue rationally and in good faith. They have an ideology and a goal which just happens, in this time and age, to coincide with the bulk of the data. I don't doubt that if the data went against them, they'd just twist or cherry pick the data, or just ignore it.
Say what? LOL
No, rights are not granted, legislated, restored, bestowed, etc. by government. Governments can only restrict.They can, however, be restored via legislation to remove past legislation or edict.
No one can take away your rights.
Disrupt, Deny, Deflate. Read the RPF trolls' playbook here (post #3): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...eptive-members
That femnazi has a nice rack.
Carry on.
I didn't say that. I said that's the concept of feminism. Whether or not it's been achieved is something else entirely.
If magically the United States were transformed into a libertarian paradise tomorrow, libertarianism wouldn't cease to exist, not would it suddenly be called something else. It would continue to persist as a philosophy of upholding the status quo.
As stated above, I disagree.
'Don't call yourself that because people might think bad things about you' is not an effective argument to use against a feminist because it turns out that's been said about them for more than a century.
Last edited by TheCount; 06-19-2017 at 11:14 PM.
You also are not the source of rights regardless of the vast numbers of farm animals you have sex with.
The removal of which would be restoration.
Feminism does nothing but make women miserable and drive them insane. Lawrence is well on her way to becoming the bitter, barren, old, batshyt insane cat lady that so many other Hollywood "starlets" turn in to these days once Hollywood robs them of the years they should have been finding a husband and starting a family.
I never said I was the source.
Are you getting mad?...regardless of the vast numbers of farm animals you have sex with.
No. Again, government can't remove your rights.The removal of which would be restoration.
Disrupt, Deny, Deflate. Read the RPF trolls' playbook here (post #3): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...eptive-members
What? I thought that you, as cat-stranglers like youself often do, were playing a game where we see what baseless, unrelated allegations we can include in our questions and statements.
The removal of the restriction is a restoration.
Last edited by TheCount; 06-20-2017 at 12:45 PM.
Where did I play that?
No. Government can't take rights. Government does not bestow rights. Government does not grant rights. Government does not restore rights.The removal of the restriction is a restoration.
What is the source of rights?
Disrupt, Deny, Deflate. Read the RPF trolls' playbook here (post #3): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...eptive-members
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Connect With Us