BREAKING: Gunman opens fire on GOP congressional baseball team practice session

[Swordsmyth]

You don't do your own dirty work either, you promote violence in the hopes that others will do it for you.

Those who might "do their own dirty work" under the appropriate justifying conditions are not going to be stupid enough to declare it publicly.
And your attempts to goad them into it smell like a fedrat.

[ChristianAnarchist]

As for the jargon, I use it precisely because it describes the truth with accuracy and precision. Looking at the world and describing it in statistical terms, where appropriate, is the way one sees the truth of things and separates it from the noise. It is so very easy to be confused by noise, which is why I have dedicated some nontrivial portion of my life to discovering my methods of noiseless analysis. Confusion by noise can be demonstrated in countless billions of exchanges between human beings daily precisely because it is so common and the method of using statistical eyes can be so powerful when used properly. The statistical view doesn't apply to all situations, but those where large populations of people are in question, it oftentimes does and that is why I use it.

My purpose in engaging in these conversations is not to show how smart I am - I am not terribly smart in fact - but because I like getting to the truth of matters I think important to the quality of our lives. I like giving examples of how to see through the bull$#@! that flies all around us - bull$#@! that obscures truth and keeps the vast and overwhelming majority of the people of this world impotently chasing their tails. I choose my methods because they work and I want to share them with everyone. Just as I have been able to see what others here have done in terms of their apparent analytic methods and add them to my own, everything I do here I offer for the world to make its own, for whatever they may be worth.

Don't take anything I write here personally, because I don't offer it in the spirit of being mean.

You think the peace movement was a wonderful thing. The idea of it is - on that you and I agree as I assume we do on the value of peaceable relations between all men. We depart where the notion ends and the subsurface realities underpinning the real-world events begin.

This isn't about winning - at least not for me. It's about better understanding the world around us.

Sure, and don't take it personally when I tell you there are lies, damned lies, and statistics. One thing I've learned after years of listening to the "experts" is their "statistics" are usually at the very least, exaggerated...

So when I see "statistics" or "science" conflicting with my own personal experiences, I believe my gut before the experts. I lived in the 60's. I have personal experience in that subject. If you have "statistics" that conflict with my personal experiences, sorry, but I'll believe my experiences long before I'll believe your "science".

[enhanced_deficit]

On a different note, NBC had strange reporting on this, stated it was not terrorism. Terrorism is defined as violent action against civilians with a political agenda. Did the shooter fit the definition of being a "terrorist"?

Only if he has brown skin.

No only if he was religious. (muslim or Christian)

Terrorism | Definition of Terrorism by Merriam-Webster

Define terrorism: the use of violent acts to frighten the people in an area as a way of trying to achieve a political goal — terrorism in a sentence

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/terrorism

Could it be media's reporting is evolving ?
For example in this news report today, despite obvious political/religious citations, they are still qualifying use of the term by adding "possible":


Man in custody after Bishop airport stabbing identified as Canadian resident Amor Ftouhi

By ABC12 News Team |
Wed 10:05 AM, Jun 21, 2017


FLINT (WJRT) - (06/21/17) - One person is in custody and being questioned after an airport police officer was stabbed at Flint's Bishop Airport at around 9:30 a.m. Wednesday. The FBI is investigating the incident as a possible act of terrorism.

The man in police custody has been identified as 50-year-old Amor Ftouhi, a Canadian citizen. He legally entered the country on June 16 in New York. He arrived at Bishop Wednesday morning. Special Agent in Charge David Gellius says Ftouhi yelled “Allah Akbar” before stabbing Lieutenant Jeff Neville.
Gellius says Ftouhi said something to the effect of, “You have killed people in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and we’re all going to die.”

There were dozens of people in the airport at the time of the incident. Traffic has now resumed at the airport.

http://www.abc12.com/content/news/BR...429895643.html

[osan]

Sure, and don't take it personally when I tell you there are lies, damned lies, and statistics.

Statistics has gotten a bad rap because of ignorant people who don't understand what they are, as well as those who misuse them in deceitful ways.

One thing I've learned after years of listening to the "experts" is their "statistics" are usually at the very least, exaggerated...

That's the deceitful misuse of the label "statistics" applied to something that is decidedly NOT statistical.

Have you ever studied statistics? I would guess maybe not. Regardless, properly applied statistical methods show the incredible power in their ability to predict. I've seen it firsthand in my professional life more times than I could count. The operative term here is "properly applied". What you are complaining about is the aforementioned masquerade of bull$#@! as valid statistics. Your complaint is eminently valid. The only problem, so far as I can see, is that you are painting with too broad a brush. I will add that it can be difficult to know when something being presented as "stats" is valid vis-à-vis nonsense, whether intentionally done or through ignorance.

I will add that there is another dimension to "statistical" thinking as a way of looking at the broader patterns that one may observe in the world. The understanding of basic distributions, as well as what is meant by the "mean", sigmas, standard deviation, z-scoring, and that sort of thing is extremely useful in understanding how large populations work. Understanding the mean and how it defines things is very helpful in understanding what one is looking at in the broader senses. You say you saw good stuff in the peace movement. I'm sure your experiences are valid, but I do not think your conclusions are quite right. If the peace movement was so wonderful, why then are we more warlike than ever? Hell, at least with WWII we can claim to have been attacked. From Korea onward, we have done little other than invade foreign lands and murder people by the millions. If the peace movement had been so great as you claim, I would have thought the American people would have taken the war machine by the balls and put it out of business for all considerations save those where the land was under direct attack. So perhaps I am misunderstanding something in your position that, were I to see the light, I would alter my view. If you can help me there, please give it a whirl.

So when I see "statistics" or "science" conflicting with my own personal experiences, I believe my gut before the experts. I lived in the 60's. I have personal experience in that subject. If you have "statistics" that conflict with my personal experiences, sorry, but I'll believe my experiences long before I'll believe your "science".

Again, we have to understand that just because someone calls something "science", it does not perforce follow that that is what it is. Same for stats. Your points are well taken, but also understand that sometimes good science and stats will produce some result that will chafe your "gut", yet will nonetheless be correct. Compounding the problem is the storm of false science and statistics that assail us daily. There is so much bull$#@! out there these days, it can be nearly impossible to separate the wheat from the chaff.

Global warming is a great example of non-science being peddled as the real thing. Quantum mechanics is a good example of valid science that leaves one's gut in a knot.

[Anti Federalist]

A few months ago, 38-year-old Justin Barkley shot and killed a UPS driver in a Walmart parking lot in Ithaca, New York, then ran over his body, because he thought he was killing Donald Trump. During his arraignment, Barkley told the judge: “I shot and killed Donald Trump purposely, intentionally, and very proudly.”

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journal...argument-kill/

Had never even heard of that guy...

[Swordsmyth]

FBI Insists A Politically Motivated Attack On Members Of Congress Isn't Terrorism

https://www.yahoo.com/news/man-shot-republicans-baseball-practice-150155641.html

[Swordsmyth]

Scalise is now in ‘fair’ condition after shooting at congressional baseball practice

http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article157357154.html

[Swordsmyth]

Prof Blasts 'Inhuman' White People, Endorses Idea EMT's Should've Let Scalise Die

http://insider.foxnews.com/amp/article/56537

[ChristianAnarchist]

Prof Blasts 'Inhuman' White People, Endorses Idea EMT's Should've Let Scalise Die

http://insider.foxnews.com/amp/article/56537

I know people from South Africa. We seem to be going down that same path...

[Wooden Indian]

Oh, war most certainly has been declared on conservatives. Has been for quite some time.

The far left have now seamlessly moved onto violence which is only going to grow worse as their behavior is excused by those in power and even encouraged.

And I will NOT allow myself or my family fall victim to one of these lunatics.

[enhanced_deficit]

FBI Insists A Politically Motivated Attack On Members Of Congress Isn't Terrorism

https://www.yahoo.com/news/man-shot-...150155641.html

Terrorism | Definition of Terrorism by Merriam-Webster

Define terrorism: the use of violent acts to frighten the people in an area as a way of trying to achieve a political goal

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/terrorism

This will cause some confusion for dictionary makers.

That said, memes and charts like these also do not help though and can make the situation even more polarized.

[heavenlyboy34]

There are plenty of Asians that have roots going well beyond first and second generation in this country, and they consistently perform at a high level too. This is not a mistake, it is a result of their cultural integrity.

They tend to be overly educated because their culture is better than many of the alternatives. Their cultures typically value education. It is no surprise at all that they consistently outperform whites on IQ tests, and why they can integrate themselves into western civilization successfully. They demonstrate the behaviors that successfully build civilizations, and no surprise! - Asians have consistently established very successful countries.

And then you have South America, Africa, and the Middle East. In the Middle East you have the Jews, the only group consistently performing higher than Asians in IQ tests, and unsurprisingly they possess the only country that can be considered successful in that part of the world.

Better people create better cultures, and better cultures result in successful civilizations. Successful civilizations possess cultures that routinely produce individuals of higher quality than the alternatives.

People are only equal in a purely negative sense.

Heroic are those individuals that rise above their $#@!ty cultures and become excellent. They are heroes because they are rare. Most do not.

Ashkenazi jews specifically-who emigrated to Israel from Eastern Europe in the 20th century and have no ethnic or historic ties to Palestine (now called "Israel"). (but don't let me spoil your ignorant racialist narrative too much)

[BSWPaulsen]

Ashkenazi jews specifically-who emigrated to Israel from Eastern Europe in the 20th century and have no ethnic or historic ties to Palestine (now called "Israel"). (but don't let me spoil your ignorant racialist narrative too much)

You didn't spoil anything. The Sephardim and Ashkenazi are both tied together by Judaism, which is why they've produced a successful country together. A shared culture with an emphasis on education significantly higher than that found in the surrounding countries. They're also not stupid enough to invite social discord by importing ingrates.

Common religious beliefs are also why Protestant colonists to the USA from various ethnicities were able to get along with more harmony than could reasonably be expected of different ethnicities otherwise. You could just as well have used the USA as an attempt to destroy my "racialist narrative" (correct term: culture narrative) given the much wider inclusion of ethnicities (British, Irish, Scots-Irish, German, and so on) than the Jews achieved, and with the notable distinction that Protestants ended up absorbing Catholics in the case of the former. Jews managed to have less diversity than the Catholic to Protestant divide, making the integration less difficult, but at least the USA managed along under the heading of Christianity.

You didn't say anything of which I wasn't already aware, and your counterargument, unsurprisingly, lacks any merit as a result.

[Swordsmyth]

Caught On Tape: Democratic Party Official Says He's "Glad [Scalise] Got Shot, I Wish He Was F*cking Dead"

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-06-23/caught-tape-democratic-party-official-says-hes-glad-scalise-got-shot-i-wish-he-was-f

[Anti Federalist]

One of "Bill Nye - the Left Wing sellout guy's" writers:

[phill4paul]

One of "Bill Nye - the Left Wing sellout guy's" writers:

What's to $#@!ing discuss? No laws in place or any laws or ideas proposed, besides total confiscation, would have prevented this guy from buying a weapon. And total confiscation ain't gonna happen sweet tits.

[Anti Federalist]

What's to $#@!ing discuss? No laws in place or any laws or ideas proposed, besides total confiscation, would have prevented this guy from buying a weapon. And total confiscation ain't gonna happen sweet tits.

And lets not forget, when they say "old white men die", remember Rand was on that field, and his father would have been as well.

[phill4paul]

And lets not forget, when they say "old white men die", remember Rand was on that field, and his father would have been as well.

Not lost by me.

[unknown]

And then you have South America, Africa, and the Middle East. In the Middle East you have the Jews, the only group consistently performing higher than Asians in IQ tests, and unsurprisingly they possess the only country that can be considered successful in that part of the world.

Not sure how this turned into a discussion about iZrael but ok.

Building the world's largest open air prison, unchecked sense of entitlement, stealing land by force, collective punishment, extermination, all hallmarks of a successful State.

And how did it achieve any so-called success? By leeching off the backs of the American tax payer.

Arab nations have been under constant attack since the creation of iZrael.

Clearly, TPTB, the Globalists etc. have made the decision that the Arab states have no right to self determination.

In 1953 we overthrew Iran's democratically elected leader via Operation Ajax.

And sine then its been non-stop attacks right up to present day with the US led bombardment of Syria resulting in 450,000 dead and the creation of millions of refugees.

Although your self-serving bias is impressive.

But I dont necessarily blame you.

We've been taught to view history in a bubble.

[BSWPaulsen]

Not sure how this turned into a discussion about iZrael but ok.

If all you took out of that post was the mention of Israel, then that is rather sad, and a strong indicator that you have a serious problem. The point is Jews have done quite well with Israel, like the Chinese with China, and the Japanese with Japan. Rich, successful cultures that retain substantial modern day relevance. Additionally, prior to the creation of the modern state of Israel the Jews consistently found their way into positions of influence in various countries. This is the mark of a successful culture with an intelligent people highly adaptable to their circumstances.

Building the world's largest open air prison, unchecked sense of entitlement, stealing land by force, collective punishment, extermination, all hallmarks of a successful State.

And how did it achieve any so-called success? By leeching off the backs of the American tax payer.

"The world's largest open air prison" and "unchecked sense of entitlement" are symptoms of cultural decadence. All abuses of government power stem from a lack of popular vigilance.

Otherwise this is the classically myopic case of only being able to see one side of the coin, the tyrant. This sort of nonsense coming from someone that later attempts to chide me for analyzing history in a bubble. Laughable. The American tax payer saw substantial benefit from the State over the history of this country's existence, and some of those benefits impact us today. This is setting aside that the rapacious income tax has not always been a fixture of this country's history, of course, which would render your leeching comment mostly null-and-void prior to its enactment.

The key point is when the leeches no longer provide a benefit in line with what they extract. The government, as it exists now, most definitely sucks up more than it contributes. It has grossly exceeded its primary duties for reasons easily explained by the decadence and apathy of the population. Severe correction is in order.

Americans never settle the West without that successful "State" you obviously hate so much. A very substantial amount of the wealth Americans enjoy today springs from those supposedly misbegotten gains. Hell, without the British State this country never would have had an opportunity to get started in the first place. Of course, I do not doubt that some anarchist out there thinks that anything a State is involved with must necessarily be tainted, and that the world would have been much better off without the involvement of one.

Looking back at posterity all Americans should be thankful for the British Empire giving the settlers an opportunity to get a foothold and defend it. It doesn't happen without them, and if it wasn't them it would have been the French, Spanish, Dutch or God only knows what else. Failure to recognize that is sheer ungratefulness, the sort of myopia I expect from people that can only see tyrants.

Are Americans supposed to apologize for conquering lands formerly held by the Native Americans? Apologizing for what we benefit from and will not relinquish is ludicrously stupid. To that end I find your comments about "stealing land by force, collective punishment, and extermination" utterly useless.

Successful States are the ones that do not fall, successful cultures are ones that will outlast a State that does fall and the most successful rise again. States are composed of the people that give them power. The American people wanted to expand and so they did. The State supported them, and when the State won battles of conquest it was the American people that benefited. This is the boiled down history of Westward expansion. American settlers repeatedly violated treaties to stake out their own claims, ones opposed by that of the Natives, and when the settlers complained the State supported their own.

Arab nations have been under constant attack since the creation of iZrael. The overthrow of Iran's democratically elected leader via Operation Ajax in 1953 right up to present day with the US led bombardment of Syria resulting in the deaths of 450,000 Syrians and the creation of millions of refugees.

Arab nations had been performing pathetically since the Middle Ages. They had their golden age and then decided to aggressively regress. Even that great bastion of Islamic achievement, the Ottoman Empire, was basically $#@! despite its longevity.

Persian culture has largely been subverted by the cultural rot that is Islam. Operation Ajax should never have occurred, but if you think the Persians (Iranians) weren't going to have problems with hardline Muslims then you have no understanding of the history of the region. Similarly, Syria would probably still be fighting Muslim militants regardless, the only difference is it would be on a more manageable scale if the US hadn't already screwed around in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The USA should not be screwing around in the region, of course. It serves no purpose and drains resources. This goes back to decadence and apathy, Americans not doing their damn job in getting the government under control.

The rest of your post was deleted as it was useless.

[unknown]

Additionally, prior to the creation of the modern state of Israel the Jews consistently found their way into positions of influence in various countries. This is the mark of a successful culture with an intelligent people highly adaptable to their circumstances.

iZrael's entire creation (among many other things) were underwritten by the Rothschilds, specifically Walter Rothschild (Balfour Declaration) and Edmond James de Rothschild.

You know, the Rothschilds, the fathers of our current day debt based ponzi central banking scheme.


The American taxpayer has no choice.

AIPAC runs our government thru coercion.

And no, we dont see value in subsidizing a rogue state like iZrael, not strategically nor morally.


iZrael's actions are justified because the settlers killed off the Indians, WTF...?

We dont acknowledge 200 year old claims by the Indians. But we should entertain a 5,000 year old claim over Palestine...


Your "argument"/premise isnt just wrong, its a lie.


You acknowledge that the US and iZrael have been wreaking havoc and subverting that region since 1947 but then say that its the Moslems and the "cultural rot of Islam" that are at fault...

It was the Stern, Leahy and Irgun terrorist groups (which would later become the IDF) who blew up the King David Hotel dressed as Arabs.

King David Hotel bombing.

Cultural rot of Judaism to blame? The bloodthirstiness of the Zionists? Or are false flag attacks just in their nature?


Iran seemed to be headed in the right direction, they had just democratically elected a leader.

Beirut was known as "the Paris of the Middle East" until iZrael destroyed it.

See Why Beirut Was Once Known As 'The Paris Of The Middle East'.


Youve literally said nothing based in truth or reality...

[BSWPaulsen]

.
iZrael's actions are justified because the settlers killed off the Indians, WTF...?

You were whining about the American State becoming successful through the theft of land, extermination and so on. I was addressing that. You clearly have a problem staying focused when anything about Jews comes up.

We dont acknowledge 200 year old claims by the Indians. But we should entertain a 5,000 year old claim over Palestine...

There is no "entertaining" the claim. Israel is not going to be relinquished, regardless of how they obtained their current state. Just like Americans are not going to relinquish more recent claims by the Native Americans. This renders whining about how they came to be mostly illusory.

You acknowledge that the US and iZrael have been wreaking havoc and subverting that region since 1947 but then say that its the Moslems and the "cultural rot of Islam" that are at fault...

The cultural rot of Islam was evident prior to 1947. The Middle East didn't just discover how to regress with the creation of Israel. In fact, you grossly exaggerate the significance of Israel when it comes to the damage Muslims have done to the region over their entire history. It's a ridiculously poisonous ideology.

Cultural rot of Judaism to blame? The bloodthirstiness of the Zionists? Or are false flag attacks just in their nature?

Their stereotype of unethical dealings with non-Jews did not come about by accident. From false flags to usury, they most certainly have their problems as it concerns someone that is not a Jew dealing with them. Anyone dealing with them is well advised to watch their ass, but much the same could be said of dealing with anyone you do not know intimately.

That does not mean they have not been highly successful in their own right, using what means they have had at their disposal to advance the goals of their very small population. It is the fault of Americans for getting duped into serving the interests of their group instead of advancing their own.

The USA should only deal with Israel insofar as there is a clear benefit to this country. Anything else is unethical.

Iran seemed to be headed in the right direction, they had just democratically elected a leader.

Democracy doesn't equate to success. It sure as hell doesn't mean it would have lasted, because Islam and Democracy have a terrible track record of coexistence.

The rest of your post was deleted due to irrelevance.

[unknown]

You were whining about the American State becoming successful through the theft of land, extermination and so on. I was addressing that. You clearly have a problem staying focused when anything about Jews comes up.

Rewriting history I see, I'm not surprised.

You said that iZrael was the only successful state in the region which is when I listed iZrael's various "successes": stealing land by force, mass genocide, open air prison, collective punishment, welfare State etc.

Youre the one who justified iZrael's actions by drawing a comparison to the settlers.

iZrael is not going to be relinquished but if someone did come along and "steal" (recoup) land by force from the iZraelis, that would be a sign of a successful State, at-least according to you.

We havent been "duped" into iZrael's welfare, its via FORCE AND COERCION, something youve justified repeatedly.

iZrael's creation was a major source of upheaval and conflict in the Middle East. As though we wouldnt react if the UN decided to establish a new nation on top of Texas.

We installed and or supported dictators in Iran (the Shah), Iraq and Egypt.

We have since leveled Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria, while dropping thousands of bombs into Yemen and Pakistan via drones, all nations which present no danger to the United States.

But the Moslems are to blame because... wait, why are they to blame again?

[BSWPaulsen]

Rewriting history I see, I'm not surprised.

You said that iZrael was the only successful state in the region which is when I listed iZrael's various "successes": stealing land by force, mass genocide, open air prison, collective punishment, welfare State etc.

Oh good God. You seriously believe they accomplished that solely on the backs of the American taxpayer? You are delusional. They've done their own fighting and subverting of their enemies for some time now. Why do you think those with Jew paranoia always have Mossad on the brain?

Youre the one who justified iZrael's actions by drawing a comparison to the settlers.

They did nothing different from what our own settlers did.

iZrael is not going to be relinquished but if someone did come along and "steal" (recoup) land by force from the iZraelis, that would be a sign of a successful State, at-least according to you.

It is a consistent trait of successful States in human history.

We havent been "duped" into iZrael's welfare, its via FORCE AND COERCION, something youve justified repeatedly.

When Americans allow groups like AIPAC a disproportionate say in our politics it amounts to being duped by propaganda. When the Holocaust is taught to the exclusion of other historical atrocities (Stalin, Mao) it amounts to being duped. When a good number of Christians believe they have a theological duty to support the Jews it has nothing to do with force and coercion.

Americans have played the role of useful idiots willingly. It's high time you face the facts. We've been had, we're still had, and not enough Americans have had enough of being their pawn. If most Americans had enough of it, then it would end. Clearly that is not the case.

iZrael's creation was a major source of upheaval and conflict in the Middle East. As though we wouldnt react if the UN decided to establish a new nation on top of Texas.

We installed and or supported dictators in Iran (the Shah), Iraq and Egypt.

Again, those places were already cesspools of humanity prior to the establishment of Israel. They were already backwards before the United States of America even existed, let alone when we started interfering in their politics.

There's this asinine belief that if only they had been left alone they would have been so much better. No, they wouldn't have. Quite the opposite, in fact. Islam is poisonous to humanity. The best thing Europe, Russia, China, and India has ever done is check the spread of that cancerous ideology.

Muslims do not like Jews. That is the chief reason they hate that country so much, not because of the displacement of Palestinians they do not, in fact, care at all for. This is self-evident in the fact Muslim countries have done extraordinarily little to aid refugees that lost their land to Israel.

We have since leveled Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria, while dropping thousands of bombs into Yemen and Pakistan via drones, all nations which present no danger to the United States.

A waste of time, clearly.

Again, the end of your post was inane and deleted.

[unknown]

Why do you think those with Jew paranoia always have Mossad on the brain?

Whats "Jew paranoia"?

King David Hotel bombing.

Lavon Affair.

Israel attacks USS Liberty.

By Way of Deception.

Israel Gives Secret Aid to Syrian Rebels.

Report: Israel Treating Al-Qaida Fighters Wounded in Syria.

[devil21]

One of "Bill Nye - the Left Wing sellout guy's" writers:

Just FYI but Bill Nye was always nothing more than an actor. He was never a scientist, just an actor and he's doing what he's always done. His Science Guy character was a sketch comedy schtick that schtuck.

[Brian4Liberty]

Compare and contrast bump...

His twiiter:

https://twitter.com/JTHInspections/with_replies

1. Hodgkinson Wrote on Facebook, ‘Trump is a Traitor. Trump Has Destroyed Our Democracy. It’s Time to Destroy Trump & Co.’

(Facebook)

His twitter handle: @JTHInspections

Where were the calls to ban Twitter and Facebook? And leftists were all over Twitter saying that the shooting was a good thing. How many of them were banned?

In case you have missed the coverage, it's important to know that this guy was a Bernie Sanders supporter. He was not a Hillary supporter. Probably not even a Democrat. A crazy Bernie supporter.

That was a sarcastic remark about the media coverage at the time. For those who don’t remember, they either played down or ignored the political motivations of the shooter. “Just a crazy guy. GOP deserved it anyway. Nothing to see here, move along”.

[Brian4Liberty]

The headlines you never saw:

Gab Twitter, the social network used by the Pittsburgh Virginia suspect, has been taken offline
...
https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/29/tech/...rgh/index.html

GOODBYE GAB TWITTER, A HAVEN FOR THE FAR RIGHT LEFT
...
https://www.wired.com/story/gab-offl...ech-alt-right/

Far-right left social network Gab Facebook goes offline after GoDaddy tells it to find another domain registrar
...
https://techcrunch.com/2018/10/28/fa...ain-registrar/

[phill4paul]

The headlines you never saw:

+rep

[Anti Federalist]

Three years gone now...the crazy is accelerating so fast it seems like 30 years has gone by