Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Makeup Artist Vetoes Idaho's First Lady After Governor Vetoed Cosmetology Licensing Reforms

  1. #1

    Default Makeup Artist Vetoes Idaho's First Lady After Governor Vetoed Cosmetology Licensing Reforms

    When the governor called, Sherry Japhet answered.

    Japhet is a freelance makeup artist from Boise, Idaho. She's worked in the business for more than 20 years, but without a license. That's never been a problem for her. She's landed gigs from coast-to-coast, working on television sets and for fashion magazines.

    Some of those calls came from Idaho Gov. Butch Otter. Japhet has helped Otter and his wife, Lori, look their best for televised public service announcements and political ads.

    No more, she says.

    Japhet, a 41-year old who works as a stand-up comedian, laughed at a request this week that she work her magic on Idaho's first lady for an upcoming television appearance. After all, she said, the governor (and his wife) ought to know the law.

    "I told them that I would be more than happy to do it, but her husband vetoed a bill to make it legal for me or any other makeup artist or stylist to do so," Japhet says. "She will have to go to a salon or do it all herself."

    In April, Otter vetoed a bill that would, among other things, have exempted makeup artists like Japhet from having to offering their services only in licensed salons. The bill would have legalized work freelancers like Japhet are already doing and opened the door to the stylist-on-demand services, where a smart phone app can bring a makeup artist to your front door, just like if you were ordering an Uber.

    The common sense reforms sailed through the state legislature, but Otter caved in to opposition from the State Board of Cosmetology, which complained that "stakeholders" did not have enough input into the final version of the bill, he said in his veto message.

    Japhet used her connections in the governor's office to try to convince Otter to sign the bill. She emailed the governor and the first lady personally to explain why it was important to let makeup artists practice their trade without getting an expensive and time-consuming cosmetology license from the state.

    Idaho requires 467 days of training in makeup and hair-styling for a license (and an even more insane 630 days of training to be a barber), even if an applicant doesn't have any interest in doing hair-styling, which is why Japhet says she's never sought a license.

    "I may be an outlaw," she told Reason in a phone interview Tuesday, "but I'm an outlaw that pays taxes."

    Japhet's story is about more than just her rejection of Lori Otter. It also raises questions about why professions like cosmetologists and makeup artists are required to be licensed at all. If she's not licensed, but is good enough to be on the first lady's speed dial, then what purpose are those goverment-issed permission slips serving? The answer, of course, is that licensing in any profession—and particularly so in many middle and lower income trades—is not about guaranteeing quality or efficacy, but rather serves as a barrier to entry into that line of work. Japhet is a rare example of someone who has ignored that barrier and made a living for herself anyway, but many are not so lucky.

    ...
    http://reason.com/blog/2017/06/07/go...osmetology-lic
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Paul View Post
    The intellectual battle for liberty can appear to be a lonely one at times. However, the numbers are not as important as the principles that we hold. Leonard Read always taught that "it's not a numbers game, but an ideological game." That's why it's important to continue to provide a principled philosophy as to what the role of government ought to be, despite the numbers that stare us in the face.



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2

    Default

    Licensing for this stuff is ridiculous.

    My sister got her license in cosmetology and said that no one in the school ever taught her to cut hair. Everything she learned, she learned from my mother, who has a natural talent with hair and always kept the family looking good.
    There is no spoon.

  4. #3

    Default

    Good on her. I'm sure the governor, being of the privileged class, didn't even consider it. I'm sure that she could have continued without recourse. If she had wanted to she could have kept working with him until the next election. Then she could have come out against him for hiring unlicensed workers.
    Theye have refused their Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

    Theye have erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

    Theye kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies

    Theye have combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution,

    For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

    For cutting off our Trade with parts of the world:

    For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

    For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

    Theye plundered and destroyed the lives of our people.

    Theye are at this time transporting Armies of Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy of a civilized nation.






Similar Threads

  1. WV Governor vetoes Constitutional Carry
    By Matt Collins in forum Personal Security & Defense
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 03-24-2015, 06:56 AM
  2. California governor vetoes worst of gun bills
    By Acala in forum Second Amendment
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 10-15-2013, 04:47 PM
  3. Arkansas governor vetoes voter ID bill
    By Anti Federalist in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-25-2013, 04:12 PM
  4. Arizona Governor Vetoes Sheriffs First Bill
    By Southron in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-14-2012, 08:13 AM
  5. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-17-2008, 06:14 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •