Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Population Density Key Factor in Declining Human Fertility

  1. #1

    Population Density Key Factor in Declining Human Fertility

    Self regulation? Birth rates also tend to go down as incomes go up.

    https://www.researchgate.net/publica...uman_Fertility


    Abstract
    In studying the complex determinants of human fertility, social scientists have given little attention to population density, although reproduction has been shown to be density-dependent for a wide variety of other species. Using fixed effects models on the time series of 145 countries and controlling for key social and economic variables, we find a consistent and significant negative relationship between human fertility and population density. Moreover, we find that individual fertility preferences also decline with population density. These findings suggest that population density should be included as a variable in future studies of fertility determinants.
    Over the last four decades birth rates have been declining in virtually all countries ofthe world, suggesting that world population growth is likely to end during thiscentury (Lutz, Sanderson, & Scherbov, 2001). In many parts of Europe and someAsian countries, fertility rates have recently fallen to such low levels that the resultant rapid population ageing and shrinking already causes widespread concern.Various social, economic, political and bio-medical factors are associated withdeclines in birth rates but few social scientists have considered population densityeven though density has been shown to be a key determinant in many animalpopulations (Sibly & Hone, 2003). If human fertility also depends on populationdensity, this will have important implications for population projections whichconventionally assume universal convergence of fertility rates (United Nations,2004).Although global birth rates are declining, there is much regional variation inhuman fertility, and today we face a demographically divided world. Populationgrowth in the developing world is mainly due to high fertility rates combined with avery young age structure that results in increasing cohorts of women enteringreproductive age (i.e., the momentum of population growth) (Bongaarts, 1994). InEurope, by contrast, below-replacement fertility has resulted in an age structure withfewer children and therefore fewer women entering reproductive age in the future(‘‘negative momentum’’) (Lutz, O’Neill, & Scherbov, 2003). Combined withincreasing life expectancy and limited immigration, this low fertility is resulting inrapid population ageing, posing serious challenges for existing systems of old agesecurity and care for the elderly. Global population dynamics are likely to continueto be dominated by reproduction, and therefore meaningful projections requireidentifying the main determinants of fertility. Explanations and projections offertility trends in different parts of the world have usually been guided by theparadigm of demographic transition which assumes that after an initial decline indeath rates, birth rates will also start to fall with a certain lag time (Davis, 1954). Inthis general form, the model has received overwhelming empirical support incapturing the remarkable fertility changes that occurred during the 20th century,although it is not without shortcomings (Kirk, 1996). The demographic transitionmodel is not useful for anticipating the probable level of post-transition fertility incountries that are already at or below replacement fertility. It used to be assumedthat fertility declines cease upon reaching replacement fertility, but empiricalevidence shows that in the vast majority of countries, the fertility decline did notstop at replacement but continued to fall below that level (United Nations, 2004).The social sciences have not yet come up with a useful theory to predict the futurefertility level of post-demographic transition societies.

    More at link.
    Last edited by Zippyjuan; 05-25-2017 at 11:37 AM.



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    Which is interesting from an evolutionary standpoint.

    The poorest are the ones doing the procreating and the successful are having much less children... That does not bode well for the long term.
    There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket.
    -Major General Smedley Butler, USMC,
    Two-Time Congressional Medal of Honor Winner
    Author of, War is a Racket!

    It is not that I am mad, it is only that my head is different from yours.
    - Diogenes of Sinope

  4. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by jllundqu View Post
    Which is interesting from an evolutionary standpoint.

    The poorest are the ones doing the procreating and the successful are having much less children... That does not bode well for the long term.
    Historically, fewer children of the poor survived into adulthood meaning more kids necessary for the family to survive and pass on their genes. It also took more people working to acquire the resources to help the family get by.



Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-18-2014, 03:53 PM
  2. Declining world population by 2070
    By enoch150 in forum Economy & Markets
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 01-12-2013, 01:56 PM
  3. Replies: 20
    Last Post: 04-21-2009, 11:36 PM
  4. Population Density
    By RickLovesRon in forum Iowa
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-03-2008, 09:11 PM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-29-2007, 11:37 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •