Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Arizona Law Prohibits Warrantless Stingray Spying

  1. #1

    Arizona Law Prohibits Warrantless Stingray Spying

    PHOENIX, Ariz. (April 24, 2017) – Today, Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey signed a bill that bans the use of “stingrays” to track the location of phones and sweep up electronic communications without a warrant in most situations. The new law will not only protect privacy in Arizona, but will also hinder one aspect of the federal surveillance state.

    Sen. Bob Worsley (R-Mesa) introduced Senate bill 1342 (SB1342) back in January. The legislation will help block the use of cell site simulators, known as “stingrays.” These devices essentially spoof cell phone towers, tricking any device within range into connecting to the stingray instead of the tower, allowing law enforcement to sweep up communications content, as well as locate and track the person in possession of a specific phone or other electronic device.

    SB1342 will require police to get a search warrant based on probable cause before deploying a stingray to locate or track an electronic device. It will also require law enforcement agencies to obtain a warrant under existing wiretapping statutes before using a stingray to intercept, obtain or access the content of any stored oral, wire or electronic communication.

    Last Monday, the House passed an amended version of SB1342 by a 57-1 vote. The amendment decreases the time between the issuance of a warrant and notification of the target from 120 to 90 days. The Senate initially passed the legislation 30-0 in February. It approved the amended House version 28-0 last week.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Paul View Post
    The intellectual battle for liberty can appear to be a lonely one at times. However, the numbers are not as important as the principles that we hold. Leonard Read always taught that "it's not a numbers game, but an ideological game." That's why it's important to continue to provide a principled philosophy as to what the role of government ought to be, despite the numbers that stare us in the face.
    Quote Originally Posted by Origanalist View Post
    This intellectually stimulating conversation is the reason I keep coming here.

  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    I'm not so sure about that interpretation. Here's video from the committee hearing when that bill was first introducedl:

    I haven't read the bill yet, but from that testimony it appears that this bill is intended to ALLOW the use of Stingrays.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-09-2017, 04:59 PM
  2. Congressman introduces bill to end warrantless Stingray surveillance
    By timosman in forum Privacy & Data Security
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 11-05-2015, 02:33 PM
  3. Glenn Greenwald: Warrantless spying fight (FISA's ba-a-a-a-ack....)
    By sailingaway in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-24-2012, 01:03 PM
  4. EFF: Obama on Warrantless Spying WORSE THAN BUSH!
    By Matt Collins in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-10-2009, 12:23 AM
  5. Groups Challenge Warrantless E-Mail Spying Law
    By Matt Collins in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-26-2008, 10:35 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts