Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Oooh, the guy/girl calling other people intolerant is now calling people "retard;" did your snowflake sensibilities get triggered?
And please, if you can't actually add to the actual discussion, which is about whether the government should have the power to execute people or not based on the American idea that government only has delegated powers, keep your man-child acting out to supermarkets where your mommy can give you a lollipop to keep you form thrashing around on the floor.
But you did inadvertently destroy your own argument. If you can't lock up a person for life yourself, then you do not have the right to delegate that power to any other government agency or organization to act in your name. Therefore the entire prison and policing system, base don that assumption, is invalidated.
Seriously, how dare I bring little things like facts and evidence into a discussion! And you can't even muster up an insult in return? Well, continue to glorify in your own stupidity. If you can't bother educating yourself and instead insist on remaining blind, you aren't worth wasting time on. Enjoy the ditch.
hey retard - I called you a bigot because you are so intolerant of my position you negative rep'd me telling me to go away. you are a bigot. and a pussy. and probably a retard. but you can stay, I'll tolerate it. I'm not the bigot you are
you are the one only singling out the death penalty. I'm pointing out that you don't have the right to lock a person up.But you did inadvertently destroy your own argument. If you can't lock up a person for life yourself, then you do not have the right to delegate that power to any other government agency or organization to act in your name.
based on such logic - neither the death penalty, nor prisons can be allowed based on such understanding of a transfer of power from individuals to groups.
“I don’t think that there will be any curtailing of Donald Trump as president,” he said. "He controls the media, he controls the sentiment [and] he controls everybody. He’s the one who will resort to executive orders more so than [President] Obama ever used them." - Ron Paul
this is an argument on if we should just lock people up for life, or kill them.
Why do you care what a conservative - who must obviously be statist - thinks on the subject?
Before wasting my time explaining the nuances of statism to an anarchist, I need to know why you care for me to elaborate.
So your saying a home owner that has a gun should go for the kill shot when a poor thief enters his home with a 3 inch knife ?
That is more justified than putting Jeffery Dahmer down ?
Or should everybody pay taxes to keep him incarcerated for the rest of his natural life ?
These are ideological questions worthy of discussions.
As for the State ideology we can't say well leave it to the states on this but not on that, I actually agree that federally if you commit a 1st degree murder such as a paid assassin, the penalty should be the same through the entire country whatever that is life imprisonment or the death penalty.
Gun control seems to be a good one to leave to the States, but not abortion or the death penalty, those are my thought anyways.
Last edited by ProBlue33; 04-24-2017 at 06:41 PM.
Now you're bold enough to hang the 'anarchist' label on me.....
You're not able to 'splain the nuances of anything yet why should I think you'd make an exception in my case?
As far as me asking you to elaborate on your foundation to make such an assertion as I quoted, I remember some dude a year or two back who came on this board spouting all kinds of pro-government BS who left with his tail firmly between his legs and I have the feeling you are he..............Are you?
I feel like I know you...maybe I'm wrong.
Am I wrong?
I have never backed down from you on here. I recall calling you insane a time or two thoughAs far as me asking you to elaborate on your foundation to make such an assertion as I quoted, I remember some dude a year or two back who came on this board spouting all kinds of pro-government BS who left with his tail firmly between his legs and I have the feeling you are he..............Are you?
as I have said many times.
insane. my hypothetical had no "lady at home" BTW
this forum was once a place for grassroots activism. We simply have no real reason to associate in that regard - which makes this forum wholly unique as I continue to read your weird creed shaking my head - as I'm sure you do to mine.
I don't get your stand with Rand through. You don't have any illusion he stands with your insane ideas do you?
Of course they do.
Why the appeal to authority? Do you wish to emulate Rand Paul or are you hoping to make an impression?
Where pray-tell have I disparaged anyone for expressing their views? This thread only has 80 some posts so given your superior 'puter skills you should be able to point those instances right out...
Only a pencil-necked geek would use the word 'poser' that or a child............Which are you?
Learn to read.
I didn't say it would "make everything ok" - I said it would prevent the hypocritical killing of innocents.
If you discover someone did not commit a crime, you can let him out prison. You can't let him out of the grave.
LOL. What makes you think $#@!s like me wouldn't just let them escape? (You're really not too bright, are you? Spiteful, definitely. But not too bright ...)
*yawn*
lame troll is lame
*plonk*
The Bastiat Collection · FREE PDF · FREE EPUB · PAPER Frédéric Bastiat (1801-1850)
- "When law and morality are in contradiction to each other, the citizen finds himself in the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense, or of losing his respect for the law."
-- The Law (p. 54)- "Government is that great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
-- Government (p. 99)- "[W]ar is always begun in the interest of the few, and at the expense of the many."
-- Economic Sophisms - Second Series (p. 312)- "There are two principles that can never be reconciled - Liberty and Constraint."
-- Harmonies of Political Economy - Book One (p. 447)· tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito ·
I asked if you were aware of Rand's positions as they seem to be in contrast with yours. so your appeal to authority is denied. it requires logic to use logical fallacies, so don't feel too bad.
it's funny. I'd take the time showing you, but you are such a $#@!ing moron, this happens right afterWhere pray-tell have I disparaged anyone for expressing their views?
disparaging, no?Only a pencil-necked geek would use the word 'poser' that or a child............Which are you?
dumbass.
bwahahahahahahahahahaha
Connect With Us