So I was listening to talk radio the other day with the host almost having verbal orgasms about how great the MOAB is. No discussion of whether or not this was the right policy decision mind you. One air force ordinance specialist called in to point out that the MOAB, which is detonated above ground, not only destroys everything in its path, but it sucks out the oxygen so that anything within a mile radius that somehow survives the blast (maybe deep down far enough in a cave) is killed by suffocation. So...here's my question. How is that any better than...say....dropping poison gas on someone? With poison gas at least I have the possibility of living if I have a gas mask. I suppose I could survive a MOAB if I had an oxygen tank.
Of course we know that everything was a-okay because there was nobody at the compound but ISIS/ISIL/IS/Whatever fighters right? I mean, when these fighters are in Syria they use human shields, but apparently when they are in Afghanistan they are careful to keep all civilians outside of a mile radius of their facilities so that the U.S. can bomb with impunity without and danger of killing little kids. (Of course that unfortunate accident where the U.S. Air Force bombed a "Doctors Without Border" hospital will be conveniently forgotten.)
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us