Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Ron Paul on Syria strikes - RT 4/7

  1. #1



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2

    Default

    Great interview, as usual. Here's an article based on the interview for folks who don't have time to listen.

    ‘They’re terrified that peace was going to break out’ – Ron Paul on US Syria strike

    “A victory of neo-conservatives” – that’s how Ron Paul, a former member of the US House of Representatives and three-time presidential candidate, described the US strike on Syria, adding that he does not expect peace talks to resume any time soon.

    Speaking to RT, Ron Paul said that there is no proof of Damascus’ guilt that could trigger such a rash and violent response from the US.

    “I don't think the evidence is there, at least it hasn’t been presented, and they need a so-called excuse, they worked real hard, our government and their coalition.”

    This is not the first time something like this has happened in Syria or elsewhere, Paul said, but now it is convenient to pay attention and react immediately.

    “If any of this was true, I don’t know why they couldn’t wait and take a look at it. In 2013, there were similar stories that didn’t go anywhere, because with a little bit of a pause, there was a resistance to it built in our Congress and in the American people. They thought that it was a fraud and nothing like that was happening, and right now, I just can’t think of how it could conceivably be what they claim, because it’s helping ISIS, because it’s helping Al-Qaeda.”

    “From my point of view, there was no need to rush. There was no threat to national security. They have to give a reason to do these things,” Paul added.

    A factor that contributed to the speedy reaction was of course the US president, the politician told RT.

    “I have no idea what his purpose was. Maybe he just didn’t want to hear the debate, because the last time they debated it, they lost. And this time, it was necessary for them to jump onto this, before people came to know what was really going on.”

    READ MORE: Syria & Iraq: Anatomy of a 21st century conflict

    The Syrian situation now is “a victory for neo-conservatives, who’ve been looking for Assad to go,” Paul said.

    “They want to get rid of him, and you have to look for who is involved in that. Unfortunately, they are the ones who are winning out on this, and the radicals, too! There is a bit of hypocrisy going on here, because at one minute we say, well, maybe Assad has to stay, the next day he has to go, and we’re there fighting ISIS and Al-Qaeda. At the same time, what we end up doing is we actually strengthen them! It is a mess.

    “I don’t believe that our people or the American government should be the policemen of the world, it makes no sense, it causes us more trouble and more grief, it causes us more financial problems, and it’s hardly a way that we could defend our constitutional liberty.”

    This policy clearly does not lead to peace, Paul told RT.

    “The peace talks have ended now. They’re terrified that peace was going to break out! Al-Qaeda was on the run, peace talks were happening, and all of a sudden, they had to change, and this changes things dramatically! I don’t expect peace talks anytime soon or in the distant future.”

    Last but not least, the politician spoke out about the deeper reasons – and potential disastrous consequences – of the latest attack’s timing.

    “I was wondering about the fact that the announcement came when Trump was talking to Xi [Jinping, the Chinese president]. And of course, [North] Korea’s high on the list of targets for our president and our administration. It might be a warning: this is what’s going to happen to you if you don’t do what we tell you. I just don’t like us being involved in so many countries, in their internal affairs; I think it’s so detrimental.”
    https://www.rt.com/usa/384021-ron-paul-syria-strike/
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Paul View Post
    The intellectual battle for liberty can appear to be a lonely one at times. However, the numbers are not as important as the principles that we hold. Leonard Read always taught that "it's not a numbers game, but an ideological game." That's why it's important to continue to provide a principled philosophy as to what the role of government ought to be, despite the numbers that stare us in the face.

  4. #3

    Default

    Ron Paul 2020! All jokes aside, if we don't primary Trump in 2020 we suck.
    9/11 Thermate experiments

    Winston Churchhill on why the U.S. should have stayed OUT of World War I

    "I am so %^&*^ sick of this cult of Ron Paul. The Paulites. What is with these %^&*^ people? Why are there so many of them?" YouTube rant by "TheAmazingAtheist"

    "We as a country have lost faith and confidence in freedom." -- Ron Paul

    "It can be a challenge to follow the pronouncements of President Trump, as he often seems to change his position on any number of items from week to week, or from day to day, or even from minute to minute." -- Ron Paul
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post
    The road to hell is paved with good intentions. No need to make it a superhighway.
    Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
    The only way I see Trump as likely to affect any real change would be through martial law, and that has zero chances of success without strong buy-in by the JCS at the very minimum.






Similar Threads

  1. Republican opposition to Syria air strikes surges!
    By JCDenton0451 in forum Syria Intervention
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-10-2013, 06:40 AM
  2. [Video] TYT: Syria: 3 Things The US Must Do Before Strikes
    By orenbus in forum Syria Intervention
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-07-2013, 06:09 AM
  3. Gen Martin Dempsey comes out against strikes on Syria
    By beaker in forum Syria Intervention
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-05-2013, 10:27 AM
  4. England rules out a second vote over strikes on syria
    By orenbus in forum Syria Intervention
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-02-2013, 04:08 PM
  5. Here we go: US Mulls Attacking Syria with “kinetic strikes”
    By green73 in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-18-2013, 07:53 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •