Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
"Foreign aid is taking money from the poor people of a rich country, and giving it to the rich people of a poor country." - Ron Paul
"Beware the Military-Industrial-Financial-Pharma-Corporate-Internet-Media-Government Complex." - B4L update of General Dwight D. Eisenhower
"Debt is the drug, Wall St. Banksters are the dealers, and politicians are the addicts." - B4L
"Totally free immigration? I've never taken that position. I believe in national sovereignty." - Ron Paul
Proponent of real science.
The views and opinions expressed here are solely my own, and do not represent this forum or any other entities or persons.
"Foreign aid is taking money from the poor people of a rich country, and giving it to the rich people of a poor country." - Ron Paul
"Beware the Military-Industrial-Financial-Pharma-Corporate-Internet-Media-Government Complex." - B4L update of General Dwight D. Eisenhower
"Debt is the drug, Wall St. Banksters are the dealers, and politicians are the addicts." - B4L
"Totally free immigration? I've never taken that position. I believe in national sovereignty." - Ron Paul
Proponent of real science.
The views and opinions expressed here are solely my own, and do not represent this forum or any other entities or persons.
Who thinks the accusations that Trump is Putin's puppet played into this decision? I wonder if they weren't trying to goad Trump into opposing Russia by attacking his ego.
If he had voted, would anything be different at all?
If you had abstained, would anything be different at all?
Voting doesn't gain you anything, and abstaining doesn't lose you anything.
On anything but the smallest and most local of levels, it's nothing but an irrelvant distraction.
So why bother?
If everyone who voted Trump as the lesser of two evils had abstained, then we would have President Clinton. If everyone of my mindset had written in Rand Paul, we'd still have President Clinton. I don't see what is so hard to understand about that. I think there is a malicious, subversive element in conservative circles trying to convince them that voting is pointless.
ISIS has started attacking SAA positions in Homs.
https://www.rt.com/news/383815-putin...ia-aggression/President Putin “regards the strikes as aggression against a sovereign nation,” his spokesman Dmitry Peskov said, noting that the president believes the strikes were carried out “in violation of international law, and also under an invented pretext.”
"Let it not be said that we did nothing."-Ron Paul
"We have set them on the hobby-horse of an idea about the absorption of individuality by the symbolic unit of COLLECTIVISM. They have never yet and they never will have the sense to reflect that this hobby-horse is a manifest violation of the most important law of nature, which has established from the very creation of the world one unit unlike another and precisely for the purpose of instituting individuality."- A Quote From Some Old Book
"Let it not be said that we did nothing."-Ron Paul
"We have set them on the hobby-horse of an idea about the absorption of individuality by the symbolic unit of COLLECTIVISM. They have never yet and they never will have the sense to reflect that this hobby-horse is a manifest violation of the most important law of nature, which has established from the very creation of the world one unit unlike another and precisely for the purpose of instituting individuality."- A Quote From Some Old Book
I didn't say anything about "everyone who voted for Trump."
I asked "If he had voted, would anything be different?"
I asked "If you had abstained, would anything be different?"
I didn't say anything about "everyone of [your] mindset [writing] in Rand Paul."
I asked "If he had voted, would anything be different?"
I asked "If you had abstained, would anything be different?"
There isn't anything hard to understand about it.
It just doesn't have anything to do with what I asked.
Not being in "conservative circles" I wouldn't know anything about the motivations of its elements.
Last edited by Occam's Banana; 04-07-2017 at 01:31 AM.
^^^^Y'all need to ignore all of misterx's posts. Disruption shills gonna disrupt threads.
---------------------
Israelis and Saudis have both praised the missile attack. Why? Because there's no difference. Both are Yahudi crypto (fake) jews working together.
Last edited by devil21; 04-07-2017 at 01:32 AM.
"Let it not be said that we did nothing."-Ron Paul
"We have set them on the hobby-horse of an idea about the absorption of individuality by the symbolic unit of COLLECTIVISM. They have never yet and they never will have the sense to reflect that this hobby-horse is a manifest violation of the most important law of nature, which has established from the very creation of the world one unit unlike another and precisely for the purpose of instituting individuality."- A Quote From Some Old Book
Sorry, I live in the real world where the events that cause one person to abstain cause thousands of others to abstain. Had I chosen to abstain, the beliefs/events/influences that caused me to abstain would have caused thousands more to do the same, and could have swayed the election. Therefore, it's impossible to say that in the real world, my abstaining would have made zero difference.
Al Qaeda, ISIS, Marco Rubio, McCain, Graham, Chuck Schumer have all praised Trump on this attack. And of course, don't forget this gem:
Hillary Clinton calls for U.S. to bomb Syrian air fields
In her first interview since her stunning presidential election defeat by Republican rival Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton on Thursday called for the United States to bomb Syrian air fields.
Clinton, in an interview at the Women in the World Summit in New York, also called Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election a theft more damaging than Watergate.
Asked whether she now believes that failing to take a tougher stand against Syria was her worst foreign policy mistake as secretary of state under President Barack Obama, Clinton said she favored more aggressive action against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
"I think we should have been more willing to confront Assad," Clinton said in the interview, conducted by New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof.
"I really believe we should have and still should take out his air fields and prevent him from being able to use them to bomb innocent people and drop sarin gas on them."
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-pe...-idUSKBN179058
A sense of danger gives birth to fear. And fear is the time-honored cross for the crucifixion of liberty.
BREAKING!
Russia "halts" agreement with U.S. to avoid clashes in Syria airspace
Press TV,RT Citing officials.
Last edited by misterx; 04-07-2017 at 02:21 AM.
"Let it not be said that we did nothing."-Ron Paul
"We have set them on the hobby-horse of an idea about the absorption of individuality by the symbolic unit of COLLECTIVISM. They have never yet and they never will have the sense to reflect that this hobby-horse is a manifest violation of the most important law of nature, which has established from the very creation of the world one unit unlike another and precisely for the purpose of instituting individuality."- A Quote From Some Old Book
Connect With Us