Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 91 to 113 of 113

Thread: “The Truth About Vaccines”

  1. #91
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    Vaccines (and science) have changed a lot since the 1880's.
    But the science is now settled today, correct?
    Uncensored Health Freedom News:
    http://healthimpactnews.com/

    Yes, I believe the science of vaccines is settled - Zippyjuan Team



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #92
    Quote Originally Posted by Created4 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan
    Vaccines (and science) have changed a lot since the 1880's.
    But the science is now settled today, correct?
    Before I started criticising vaccines, I really did try to find "scientific" evidence for the value of vaccines.

    According to the medical industry, we are to believe all of their claims - because they only act in our best interests.
    When people openly doubt big pharma's products, the least of the attacks against them is calling them pseudoscientific quacks.

    I've not only been called an "anti-vaxxer" and a "bad" scientist, I've even been accused of being a Nazi; for demanding evidence on the value of vaccines, and saying that the only acceptable scientific evidence is a proper placebo-controlled trial.
    Do NOT ever read my posts.
    Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...he-world/page2

  4. #93
    Quote Originally Posted by Firestarter View Post
    Before I started criticising vaccines, I really did try to find "scientific" evidence for the value of vaccines.

    According to the medical industry, we are to believe all of their claims - because they only act in our best interests.
    When people openly doubt big pharma's products, the least of the attacks against them is calling them pseudoscientific quacks.

    I've not only been called an "anti-vaxxer" and a "bad" scientist, I've even been accused of being a Nazi; for demanding evidence on the value of vaccines, and saying that the only acceptable scientific evidence is a proper placebo-controlled trial.
    Just like everything around us today, that is political, the accusers are the very ones who accuse others of things they are doing with impunity.

    It's like a real life version of the movie, "Invasion of the Body Snatchers."

    My website: https://www.theherbsofthefield.com/

    "No one is useless in this world who lightens the burdens of another.” ~ Charles Dickens

  5. #94
    CDC Whistleblower – Full transcript
    http://www.investmentwatchblog.com/c...ll-transcript/

    My website: https://www.theherbsofthefield.com/

    "No one is useless in this world who lightens the burdens of another.” ~ Charles Dickens

  6. #95
    Interesting......

    Hawking: a victim of a vaccine-related virus?

    And it may have been a virus that confined Hawking to a wheelchair rather than that motor neuron disease (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or ALS, aka Lou Gehrig’s disease) that befell him, beginning at age 21. He lived too long (76 years) for him to have ALS, which has a 2-year survival rate.

    Stephen Hawking may have been misdiagnosed and was actually a victim of polio, a US medical expert has suggested.

    Christopher B Cooper, Professor Emeritus of Medicine and Physiology at the University of California, Los Angeles, says the likelihood the physicist’s debilitating condition was in fact amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) was “low.” Hawking’s young age at diagnosis and 55-year survival is not typical of ALS.

    There is speculation that Hawking may have developed his nerve paralysis as a side effect from a genetically engineered virus which “possesses significant unpredictability and a number of inherent harmful potential hazards,” says a published report.

    He may actually have been a victim of vaccines.

    Non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) is a condition that became a widespread problem in India following mass vaccination against polio. The Indian Journal of Medical Ethics (IJME) explains that NPAFP is indistinguishable from polio paralysis.

    Vaccine-induced polio is now the predominant form of polio in the world now. For example, approximately eight people acquire poliomyelitis in the U.S annually and virtually all of these cases are vaccine-related. As early as 1936 vaccine-induced polio was reported.

    Vaccine-related polio is said to emanate from “rare strains of poliovirus that have genetically mutated from the strain contained in the oral polio vaccine.” It is possible Hawking discovered this himself, but only after he had become a poster boy for ALS.

    An even more hidden trigger of polio may be vaccination of any kind. In 1948 as documented in the Archives of Pediatrics, susceptibility to polio was associated with immunization for typhoid-paratyphoid vaccine. In 1952 it was reported polio was associated with any form of injected medicine.

    A study published in 1952 found a relationship between inoculation for tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough) and diphtheria with the development of paralytic poliomyelitis.
    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2018/04/...rom-a-vaccine/
    There is no spoon.

  7. #96
    Quote Originally Posted by donnay View Post
    CDC Whistleblower – Full transcript
    http://www.investmentwatchblog.com/c...ll-transcript/
    For more on the (censored) William Thompson study that shows that vaccines cause autism in Afro-American boys and the retracted report on the (real) findings: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...=1#post6543416

    Quote Originally Posted by Firestarter View Post
    In August 2014, CDC senior vaccine safety scientist, William Thompson, blew the whistle on a study, which showed that black boys got autistic because of the MMR vaccine, a 250% increase in autism diagnoses for black boys.
    A high CDC official, Frank DeStefano, ordered Thompson and his team to destroy that data in a large garbage can and omit the damning findings from the published study. That (censored) study forms the cornerstone of the CDC's orthodoxy that vaccines don't cause autism

    Staff level scientists,
    are intimidated and pressed to do things they know are not right," and that, "Senior management officials at CDC are clearly aware and even condone these behaviors.
    (…)
    questionable and unethical practices, occurring at all levels and in all of our respective units, threaten to undermine our credibility and reputation as a trusted leader in public health.
    https://www.ecowatch.com/cdc-corrupt...096438139.html
    (archived here: http://archive.li/Ksydy)

    Brian S. Hooker wrote the report of the (real) findings after getting raw data on the study. This report for some reason was retracted (but is still on the internet)…
    4) Brian S. Hooker – Measles-mumps-rubella vaccination timing and autism among young African american boys: a reanalysis of CDC data (2014): https://translationalneurodegenerati...2047-9158-3-16
    (archived here: http://archive.fo/Z7F4B)
    When comparing cases and controls receiving their first MMR vaccine before and after 36 months of age, there was a statistically significant increase in autism cases specifically among African American males who received the first MMR prior to 36 months of age.
    (…)
    The relationship between the MMR vaccine and autism was first hypothesized by Wakefield et al. [7] in 1999 after the observation of a regressive phenotype of autism that appeared in general after the administration of the first MMR vaccine. Although several studies have affirmed such a relationship between the MMR vaccine and neurodevelopmental disorders including autism [8, 9], many other studies purport no statistical relationship between the MMR vaccine and autism incidence.
    (…)
    Within this study, the age at the first MMR vaccine was assessed as a factor in the incidence of autism. Using conditional logistic regression, with first MMR age as the independent variable and autism incidence as the dependent variable, the study authors assessed relative risk for obtaining an autism diagnosis for those children receiving the first MMR vaccine before and after 18 months, 24 months and 36 months of age. Destefano et al. [14] found a statistically significant relative risk of 1.49 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04 – 2.14) at the 36 month cut-off (i.e., in a comparison of children receiving the MMR before versus after 36 months). Rather than concluding that the first MMR vaccine could be playing a causal role in autism in these children, the study authors instead attributed the increased risk to greater numbers of autistic children receiving timely vaccinations in order to participate in State of Georgia special education services.
    (…)
    When looking specifically at African American children (Table 2), the relationship between MMR timing and autism incidence became more profound (RR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.25-4.22, p = 0.0060) at 36 months of age. Again, this result was exclusively found in boys who showed statistically significant effects at both 24 months (RR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.09-2.77, p = 0.0200) and 36 months (RR = 3.36, 95% CI: 1.50-7.51, p = 0.0019) of age. This effect again was not seen in females.

    (…)
    The results show a strong relationship between child age at the administration of the first MMR and autism incidence exclusively for African American boys which could indicate a role of the vaccine in the etiology of autism within this population group. This particular analysis was not completed in the original Destefano et al. [14] (CDC) study. Although the previous study considered MMR timing and African Americans in general, no statistically significant effect was observed. This is in contrast to our result for African Americans in general, because the CDC study limited the total African American cohort to include only those individuals who possessed a valid State of Georgia birth certificate which decreased the statistical power of their analysis.
    (…)
    It should be noted that a recent publication has shown that the prevalence of autism in African Americans is nearly 25% higher than that of whites [15]. This value was obtained when CDC data were appropriately analyzed based on socioeconomic status. This could be due to issues regarding vitamin D status with African Americans as it has been estimated that vitamin D sufficiency among whites is between 30-60% but is only 5-10% among African Americans [16].
    Last edited by Firestarter; 04-15-2018 at 08:14 AM.
    Do NOT ever read my posts.
    Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...he-world/page2



  8. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  9. #97
    Quote Originally Posted by Firestarter View Post
    For more on the (censored) William Thompson study that shows that vaccines cause autism in Afro-American boys and the retracted report on the (real) findings: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...=1#post6543416
    The African American boys were enrolled in a school for autistic children. To be allowed into that school, they were required to be vaccinated. They were diagnosed in many cases before their vaccines meaning that the vaccine could not have caused it if it occurred before the child was vaccinated. Once that cohort was removed, there was no link.

    The paper was retracted:

    “The Editor and Publisher regretfully retract the article as there were undeclared competing interests on the part of the author which compromised the peer review process. Furthermore, post-publication peer review raised concerns about the validity of the methods and statistical analysis, therefore the Editors no longer have confidence in the soundness of the findings. We apologise to all affected parties for the inconvenience caused.”
    http://abcnews.go.com/Health/now-ret...ry?id=25248179


    Donald Trump: 'What you're seeing and what you're reading is not what's happening'

    "Truth isn't truth"- Rudy Giuliani

    "China has total respect for Donald Trump and for Donald Trump's very, very large brain," - Donald Trump.

    "Yeah, I have to say these guys(trolls) are pretty sharp. Sort of good to get a challenge and sharpen your thoughts." NorthCarolinaLiberty

    I am Zippy and I approve of this post. But you don't have to.

  10. #98
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    The African American boys were enrolled in a school for autistic children. To be allowed into that school, they were required to be vaccinated. They were diagnosed in many cases before their vaccines meaning that the vaccine could not have caused it if it occurred before the child was vaccinated. Once that cohort was removed, there was no link.

    The paper was retracted:



    http://abcnews.go.com/Health/now-ret...ry?id=25248179

    My website: https://www.theherbsofthefield.com/

    "No one is useless in this world who lightens the burdens of another.” ~ Charles Dickens

  11. #99
    My website: https://www.theherbsofthefield.com/

    "No one is useless in this world who lightens the burdens of another.” ~ Charles Dickens

  12. #100
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4639493/

    The monitoring of vaccine adverse events during the 10 days of mass vaccination campaigns and over the next 42 days following the end of the mass campaign did not reveal any safety issues [11]. The only negative vaccine-related event occurred in Gouro, Chad, in December 2013, where a small group of vaccinees developed a range of unusual symptoms after vaccination that were later identified as an instance of mass hysteria, an unusual phenomenon that has been well described in the context of mass immunization campaigns [12–14]. The episode is described in more detail in an accompanying communication article [15]. Initially, a Chadian reporter described paralysis in PsA-TT vaccine recipients. Careful clinical examinations by physicians and a neurologist revealed that there were no cases of paralysis and that all affected individuals fully recovered over the ensuing days.

    https://www.rawstory.com/2013/01/cha...sick-children/

    Chad officials: No link between meningitis vaccines and sick children

    Chad’s government on Tuesday said a team of international experts have not been able to find any links between the hospitalisation of 38 children and their recent vaccinations against meningitis.

    The children fell ill in the northern village of Gouro and were admitted to hospital after being vaccinated in a government campaign against the disease between December 11 and 15.

    In a statement, the country’s health ministry said tests “failed to establish a causal link between the clinical manifestations observed in the patients and the MenAfriVac vaccine.”

    Health Minister Mamouth Nahor N’Gawara said tests by experts at the World Health Organisation showed there was “no manufacturing fault” in the vaccine produced by the Serum Institute of India.

    According to the statement, one child who never received the meningitis shot “complained of suffering from the same symptoms” found in the other children.

    A local administration official said some of the children began to moan shortly after receiving their meningitis shot and then went into convulsions.

    N’Gawara, who on Monday said the children’s state of health “is not worrying,” added they are now leading “normal lives”.

    Meningitis outbreaks are frequent in the poor, landlocked Sahel country. “During the past 15 years, Chad has recorded more than 50,000 cases of meningitis with more than 5,000 deaths,” N’Gawara said.

    In total, more than 100 million people in 10 African countries have been vaccinated against the disease.
    500 were vaccinated in that one town alone.
    Last edited by Zippyjuan; 04-02-2018 at 03:13 PM.


    Donald Trump: 'What you're seeing and what you're reading is not what's happening'

    "Truth isn't truth"- Rudy Giuliani

    "China has total respect for Donald Trump and for Donald Trump's very, very large brain," - Donald Trump.

    "Yeah, I have to say these guys(trolls) are pretty sharp. Sort of good to get a challenge and sharpen your thoughts." NorthCarolinaLiberty

    I am Zippy and I approve of this post. But you don't have to.

  13. #101
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    The African American boys were enrolled in a school for autistic children. To be allowed into that school, they were required to be vaccinated. They were diagnosed in many cases before their vaccines meaning that the vaccine could not have caused it if it occurred before the child was vaccinated. Once that cohort was removed, there was no link.
    The lies by Zippyjuan just keep coming; on 25 Oct. Zippy posted the lie:
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    That study which found a potential link between black males and autism and the MMR vaccine was flawed which is why the data was removed. The survey asked if the boys had autism and if they had received the MMR vaccine.
    A notable amount said yes. The problem was that they had autism BEFORE they were vaccinated. The boys were enrolled in a special school for autistic children and were vaccinated as a condition of enrollment- after they had been diagnosed as being autistic. That means it is impossible that the vaccine caused their autism since they already had it. Once that group was removed from the study data base, they found no link between the vaccine and autism.
    http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...=1#post6543491


    After I asked for evidence, there was no reply at all:
    Quote Originally Posted by Firestarter View Post
    Do you have a source for these claims?!?

    I have read that the study was retracted over concerns of “competing interests”: https://translationalneurodegenerati...2047-9158-3-22
    That the study was retracted over “competing interests” shows that Zippyjuan is lying.
    I haven't found additional information on the “competing interests”...
    Last edited by Firestarter; 04-03-2018 at 03:37 AM.
    Do NOT ever read my posts.
    Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...he-world/page2

  14. #102
    HERE WE GO AGAIN: MORE VACCINE-AUTISM DENIALISM
    WORLD MERCURY PROJECTAPRIL 2, 2018

    BY DR. BRIAN S. HOOKER, PHD, PE AND THE WORLD MERCURY PROJECT TEAM

    Scientists like to pretend that they are above grubby conflicts of interest, and mainstream journalists often pay lip service to their “fourth estate” watchdog role. However, some scientists and journalists are all too willing to play more of a corporate lapdog role. A particularly large amount of ink has been spilled to discredit—nay, stomp out—the inconvenient notion that vaccines might have something to do with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), which now affects 1 in 36 children in the U.S. Despite extensive high-level scientific fraud at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to suppress evidence of a vaccine-autism link, the CDC has not been able to hide over 80 independent studies that connect the dots between the vaccine preservative thimerosal and autism. Other studies have pointed to additional vaccine-related culprits that may be contributing to ASD, including aluminum—used in a very high proportion of infant vaccines and recently reported in pathologically significant levels in the brains of individuals diagnosed with autism.

    …the JAMA Pediatrics researchers appear content to scold beleaguered ASD families for poor compliance with the vaccine schedule.
    Nonetheless, the disingenuous denials continue to circulate. The latest example is on display in a 2018 study published in JAMA Pediatrics titled “Vaccination patterns in children after autism spectrum disorder diagnosis and in their younger siblings.” The study reports that ASD children were significantly less likely to be vaccinated after receiving their ASD diagnosis (compared to children without ASD), and “parents of children with ASD were more likely to refuse vaccinating the children’s younger siblings compared with parents of children without ASD.” The strange study design, by the lead author’s own admission, “did not look at vaccination rates before the children were diagnosed with autism” [emphasis added]. Instead, the researchers “only assessed vaccines recommended after the child’s ASD diagnosis,” enabling them to informally “infer” that the diagnosis influenced parents’ decisions to delay or refuse further vaccines. Rather than try to understand the rational basis for these decisions, or support parents’ efforts to protect their children from further vaccine injuries, the JAMA Pediatricsresearchers appear content to scold beleaguered ASD families for poor compliance with the vaccine schedule.

    Meanwhile, CNN heralded the JAMA Pediatrics study with an extremely deceptive piece—“Children with autism less likely to be fully vaccinated”—with a title that tricks the reader into thinking that the study shows “vaccines don’t cause autism.” Although CNN’s reporter digs up another study that found that almost a third of parents of ASD children became “vaccine-hesitant” after their child’s autism diagnosis and that, for most of the parents, “hesitancy” was due to the belief that “toxins in vaccines caused their child’s developmental problems,” the researchers and CNN hastily dismiss this belief as “scientifically untrue.”

    …the five authors purportedly conspired to withhold measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) and autism data that implicated the MMR vaccine for specific subpopulations of children with ASD.

    The nine studies that the JAMA Pediatrics authors cite to “show” that autism is unrelated to vaccines are wholly inadequate to make any such assertion. Two of the studies are merely review articles published in 2001 and 2002, both written by the same corrupt CDC author who provides no original data on the subject. An additional paper headed up by the same author in 2004 has been shown to be fraudulent, as the five authors purportedly conspired to withhold measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) and autism data that implicated the MMR vaccine for specific subpopulations of children with ASD. Yet another of the papers cited by the JAMA Pediatrics authors, a 2003 paper involving thimerosal-containing vaccines in Denmark, was thoroughly debunked by a later CDC study that showed a reduction in ASD prevalence in Denmark after the removal of thimerosal from vaccines in 1992.

    The nine flimsy, flawed and out-and-out fraudulent studies that the JAMA Pediatricsauthors cite as a basis for their contention that vaccines don’t cause autism focus only on thimerosal in vaccines and the MMR vaccine. Setting aside the issue of these studies’ poor quality, one has to ask, “What about the rest of the vaccine schedule?” It is essentially unstudied! In fact, in 2011, the Institute of Medicine stated that there were insufficient data to judge whether the diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine—one of those included in the 2018 JAMA Pediatrics study—caused autism. The Institute acknowledged that there simply hadn’t been proper studies done by the CDC or other entities charged with vaccine safety in the U.S.

    In this way, the JAMA Pediatrics study indirectly furnishes a perfect demonstration of why families with ASD-diagnosed children become “vaccine-hesitant.” After sustaining such a diagnosis, who can blame them for hesitating to sacrifice another child to the “herd”? The federal agencies that are pushing countless vaccines on American infants and children have done less than nothing to gain the public’s confidence in the current vaccine schedule. Strangely, the lead author of the 2018 JAMA Pediatrics study published another paper in the same journal in 2017 that showed a statistically significant relationship between ASD in children and the prenatal flu shot given in the first trimester of pregnancy. This relationship would have been explained away as a “chance finding” if it had not been pointed out in a subsequent letter to the editor(Hooker, June 2017) in JAMA Pediatrics. For the same lead author to now state directly that there is no relationship between vaccines and autism is beyond disingenuous. And for CNN then to drone on incessantly about the supposed “lack of relationship” between vaccines and autism is equally shameful and constitutes, at a minimum, shoddy reporting in light of the large body of evidence showing a connection.
    http://www.collective-evolution.com/...zen.yandex.com
    My website: https://www.theherbsofthefield.com/

    "No one is useless in this world who lightens the burdens of another.” ~ Charles Dickens

  15. #103
    Quote Originally Posted by donnay View Post
    … The strange study design, by the lead author’s own admission, “did not look at vaccination rates before the children were diagnosed with autism” [emphasis added]. Instead, the researchers “only assessed vaccines recommended after the child’s ASD diagnosis,” enabling them to informally “infer” that the diagnosis influenced parents’ decisions to delay or refuse further vaccines. Rather than try to understand the rational basis for these decisions, or support parents’ efforts to protect their children from further vaccine injuries, the JAMA Pediatrics researchers appear content to scold beleaguered ASD families for poor compliance with the vaccine schedule.

    Meanwhile, CNN heralded the JAMA Pediatrics study with an extremely deceptive piece—“Children with autism less likely to be fully vaccinated”—with a title that tricks the reader into thinking that the study shows “vaccines don’t cause autism.” Although CNN’s reporter digs up another study that found that almost a third of parents of ASD children became “vaccine-hesitant” after their child’s autism diagnosis and that, for most of the parents, “hesitancy” was due to the belief that “toxins in vaccines caused their child’s developmental problems,” the researchers and CNN hastily dismiss this belief as “scientifically untrue.”
    http://www.collective-evolution.com/...zen.yandex.com

    What kind of big pharma supporter would use such a ridiculous study to support vaccines?
    None other than one of our most “respected” members:
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    If there is a link between vaccines and autism, one would expect a higher autism rate among those with more vaccines- not the ones with fewer of them.
    http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...lly-vaccinated
    Do NOT ever read my posts.
    Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...he-world/page2

  16. #104
    I once read about the following steps to get a vaccine approved by the CDC...
    1 - They inject lab animals with either vaccine or a placebo.
    2 – They inject the supposed virus into the lab animals.
    3 – If the vaccinated animals have better survival rates with the injected virus than the placebo (control) group, they say the vaccine is effective.
    4 – Then they test the vaccine on humans: not to see if it prevents any disease, but merely if the adverse effects aren’t too drastic.
    5 – Vaccine accepted.
    This doesn’t prove that the vaccines actually prevent any disease that humans (or even animals) contract naturally. But medical “science” is obviously not objective in our Brave new world...


    Vaccine induced immune deficiency
    There is also evidence that being poisoned yearly with the advised flu vaccines results in lower antibody responses - immune deficiency.
    The more influenza vaccinations you get poisoned with in your lifetime, the less you immune system can fight the flu virus in subsequent seasons.

    After the 2009 “flu epidemic”, the Canadian flu surveillance network reported that Canadians who had received a flu shot in late 2008 were between 1.4 and 2.5 times more likely to suffer from an adverse reaction from an H1N1 infection that required medical attention, compared with those who didn't get a shot.

    In 2016, Skowronski published a report that people, who were consecutively vaccinated in 2012, 2013 and 2014, have a higher risk of being infected with the flu.

    Big pharma supporting “doctors” maintain that people should take their flu shot - especially seniors, children younger than two and people suffering from chronic medical conditions (like immune deficiency?): https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/serial...hers-1.3147903
    (archived here: http://archive.is/1afvT)

    A study was done to track how prior vaccination affects immune responses in 141 expectant mothers - , 91 were poisoned with a flu shot the previous year, 50 were not.
    They found that women, who hadn't received a flu shot in the previous year, had better immune responses to the vaccine.

    They also claim that their results “suggest it does not meaningfully affect protection in their babies”.
    This really is an amazing conclusion. They found that the vaccines cause immune deficiency, but concluded that the babies were still protected just as well by the antibodies that they received from their mother...

    According to the big pharma supporting “scientists” that published these results, there can’t be any reason to not take flu shots: https://www.sciencedaily.com/release...0801101718.htm


    Flu vaccine induced abortions and other adverse effects
    In 2009 and 2010, foetal deaths caused by vaccines reported in VAERS increased by 4,250%. Probably caused by the additional H1N1 vaccine that was advised.
    Despite that the CDC knew of the 4,250% rise, it published a report authored by Dr. Pedro Moro in the fall of 2010 that there were only 23 miscarriages caused by the single flu vaccine in 19 years between 1990 – 2009, an average of 1.2 miscarriages per year.

    Eileen Dannemann accused the CDC of “wilful misconduct” in causing the deaths of thousands of unborn babies and deliberately misleading obstetricians and gynaecologists by advertising the flu vaccine as safe for pregnant women:
    The CDC, aware of their own incoming stream of early vaccine adverse events reports, clearly decided to allow the obstetricians to continue, unwittingly, murdering and damaging the unborn so that the CDC’s blunder of recommending the double-dose vaccination of pregnant women could be kept under the radar.
    http://vactruth.com/2012/11/23/flu-s...s-fetal-death/

    In 2017, the CDC published a report by Donaheu et al on data for the flu seasons from 2010 to 2012.
    Women vaccinated with the influenza vaccine (IIV) in the 2010-2011 season had 3.7-fold greater odds of experiencing an abortion within 28 days than women not receiving the vaccine.
    From 2010 to 2012, the odds for a spontaneous abortion for vaccinated women were 2.0 times greater than for women that weren’t poisoned with the flu vaccine.
    In women who also were poisoned with the H1N1 vaccine the previous year, the odds of spontaneous abortion in the 28 days after receiving a flu vaccine were even 7.7 times greater.

    The 2017 study confirms the findings of a previous report by Goldman.
    Using CDC’s VAERS database, Goldman showed a similar rise in the rate of miscarriages; this increased 11-fold in 2009 when the H1N1 vaccine was added to the recommended vaccine schedule (on top of the seasonal flu shot).

    In a 2014 report, Giuseppe Traversa et al found that in over 86,000 pregnancies H1N1-vaccinated women had significantly higher rates of gestational diabetes and eclampsia.
    Eclampsia is the development of seizures in women with severe toxaemia (high blood pressure and protein loss in the urine). Eclampsia is fatal in 2% of women and can result in long-term health problems. Foetal complications, including neurological damage and death, are also common.

    In another paper published in 2017, Zerbo et al showed that the maternal flu shot in the first trimester of pregnancy, causes autism (ASD).
    Between 2000 and 2010, vaccinated pregnant women were 25% more likely to give birth to a child that would later be diagnosed with ASD.

    A 2014 report by Alan Brown et al of over 1.2 million pregnant women found that elevations in CRP, which is caused by flu vaccination, are associated with a 43% greater risk of having a child with autism.

    In 2016, Chambers et al found an elevated risk for birth defects for children born to mothers who received one flu vaccine during the 2010-2014 flu seasons. “Scientists” working for the CDC were involved in this study.
    Shortly before this report was published, the CDC issued a gag order forbidding any CDC employee from talking to the press without first getting clearance from the communications office. This could not have been coincidental, could it?

    Vaccine manufacturers acknowledge that flu vaccines have not been shown to be safe for pregnant women.
    Most vaccines contain 25 micrograms of mercury via thimerosal. Health officials have warned women to avoid eating mercury-containing tuna.
    Overwhelming science shows that thimerosal is neurotoxic and deadly and that it may be particularly dangerous to the foetus.

    It has repeatedly been found that thimerosal exposure is associated with:
    - Birth defects - Heinonen et al 1977;
    - Tics – Thompson et al;
    - Speech delays – Andrews et al, Verstraeten et al: https://worldmercuryproject.org/news...uenza-vaccine/
    (archived here: http://archive.is/LXxdt)
    Last edited by Firestarter; 05-07-2018 at 03:12 AM.
    Do NOT ever read my posts.
    Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...he-world/page2



  17. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  18. #105
    Dr. Suzanne Humphries reveals the stunning fraud of the CDC and vaccine propagandists

    May 21, 2018
    by: Vicki Batts

    In a new interview with Mike Adams on CounterThink, Dr. Suzanne Humphries tells-all, revealing the corrupt vaccine industry’s dirtiest secrets and more. Humphries, a medical doctor and author of Dissolving Illusions: Diseases, Vaccines and the Forgotten History, was a highly regarded nephrologist — before she switched gears and set out to expose vaccines (and the CDC) for the sham they are.

    Dr. Humphries says that Dr. Sherry Tenpenny “cracked the visage in front of me,” after Tenpenny showed her that vaccines were the “backbone of the whole pharmaceutical industry.”

    “They keep people sick and that’s what’s so profitable,” Tenpenny reportedly told her. Humphries says that when the administration of a hospital she worked at told her that the adverse events she was witnessing with her own eyes weren’t real, she was driven to look deeper into the matters of vaccines on her own.

    Vaccines are just “witch’s brew”
    Those adverse events, Humphries says, included patients who suddenly developed kidney failure within 24 hours of being vaccinated. Hospital administrators told her that kind of thing simply didn’t happen, prompting her to look into what was actually in a vaccine.

    The doctor says that she believes inflammation caused by immunizations is the source of these kinds of kidney problems, noting that the kidneys are quite sensitive organs.

    Adams posits that vaccine-related inflammation is by design, pointing to adjuvants — ingredients added to vaccines to ‘stoke’ the immune system — as a key contributor to inflammation’s onset. Aluminum adjuvants are behind a number of ill effects.

    Support our mission and enhance your own self-reliance: The laboratory-verified Organic Emergency Survival Bucket provides certified organic, high-nutrition storable food for emergency preparedness. Completely free of corn syrup, MSG, GMOs and other food toxins. Ultra-clean solution for years of food security. Learn more at the Health Ranger Store.

    Humphries notes that even vaccines with no aluminum, like the flu shot, can pose a serious risk. The flu shot, she notes, contains mercury — a toxic heavy metal which can also cause inflammation. She says that really any organ can be a target of inflammation.

    Adams notes that heart disease, Alzheimer’s disease, cancer and other problems have all been linked to inflammation.

    “What we have to understand here,” said Humphries, “is that the inflammation happens throughout the body but some organs are more sensitive than others.”

    The brain and kidneys are notably sensitive when compared to an organ like the heart. Humphries says that vaccines are “clumsy substances” that are more of a “witch’s brew” than a science-based medicine.

    “Immune system psychosis” is Humphries’ term for what happens after this “witch’s brew” is injected into the human body. The body’s inflammatory response isn’t the only thing going haywire during the post-vaccination aftermath, she says — there are other reactions going on that “can’t even be measured.”

    “The end result is that there’s something happening there that shouldn’t be happening,” Humphries contended.

    Science fraud and the CDC
    Dr. Humphries says you can either be “progressive” or “regressive,” and that the CDC is regressive. She says that while CDC is coming along with all this “help,” that just so happens to correlate with a major regression across the population, especially regarding health.

    As Humphries and Adams note, the CDC is great at trying to sell people on vaccines — while obscuring the actual data on their safety and efficacy. Not long ago, the agency came under fire for literally destroying evidence linking vaccines to autism.

    Of course, the CDC also reportedly owns 56 vaccines, which Adams notes is a “grave conflict of interest.” But beyond the CDC’s refusal to acknowledge good science and stop hiding the truth, there are still darker forces at play.

    “Ridiculous aggression” in the marketplace, Humphries adds, is another major issue. Mandates to force vaccines on the public are highly concerning — especially when the regressive nature of governing bodies is taken into account. Big Pharma is on the road to “complete domination,” with zero opposition from the government.

    Watch the full video to learn more about Dr. Suzanne Humphries and her research, and don’t forget to stay up-to-date with all things vaccine at Vaccines.news.

    Sources for this article include:

    Vimeo.com

    Collective-Evolution.com
    http://www.investmentwatchblog.com/d...propagandists/
    My website: https://www.theherbsofthefield.com/

    "No one is useless in this world who lightens the burdens of another.” ~ Charles Dickens

  19. #106
    In this post are: 1) a 34 page paper about vaccines and 2) one of the referenced studies, showing that non-influenza disease rates more than quadrupled by a flu vaccine.

    Since passage of the 1986 Act, the number of required pediatric vaccines has grown rapidly. In 1983, the CDC’s childhood vaccine schedule included 11 injections of 4 vaccines.10 As of 2017, the CDC’s childhood vaccine schedule includes 56 injections of 30 different vaccines.11
    (…)

    Unfortunately, unlike all non-vaccine drugs licensed by the FDA, vaccines are not required to undergo long-term double-blind inert-placebo controlled trials to assess safety. In fact, not a single one of the clinical trials for vaccines given to babies and toddlers had a control group receiving an inert placebo. Further, most pediatric vaccines currently on the market have been approved based on studies with inadequate follow-up periods of only a few days or weeks.
    For example, there are two Hepatitis B vaccines licensed for one day old babies in the United States – one manufactured by Merck and the other by GlaxoSmithKline. Merck’s Hepatitis B vaccine was licensed by the FDA after trials which solicited adverse reactions for only five days after vaccination.17 Similarly, GlaxoSmithKline’s Hepatitis B vaccine was licensed by the FDA after trials which solicited adverse reactions for only four days after vaccination.18
    (…)

    Similarly, the HiB vaccines man-ufactured by Merck and GlaxoSmithKline were licensed by the FDA based on trials in which adverse reactions were monitored for only three days and four days, respectively, after vaccination.19 The only stand-alone polio vaccine in the United States was licensed after a mere 48-hour follow-up period.20
    Even more amazing is that unlike every drug licensed by the FDA, the control groups in these vaccine trials did not receive an inert placebo.21 Rather, the control group was given one or more previously licensed vaccines as the “placebo.”22
    (…)

    A pilot study comparing 650 vaccinated and unvaccinated homeschooled children in the United States provides a glimpse of the potential scope of vaccine harm.119 The study found that, compared to completely-unvaccinated children, fully-vaccinated children had an increased risk of 390% for allergies, 420% for ADHD, 420% for autism, 290% for eczema, 520% for learning disabilities, and 370% for any neuro-developmental delay.120 Fully-vaccinated pre-term infants had an increased risk of 1,450% for a neurodevelopmental disorder, which includes a learning disability, ADHD or autism, compared to completely unvaccinated preterm infants.121
    Another recent study compared children receiving the flu shot with those receiving a saline injection in a prospective randomized double-blind study.122 Both groups had the same rate of influenza but the group receiving the flu shot had a 340% increased rate of non-influenza infection.123
    (…)

    Children vaccinated with Hepatitis B vaccine in the first month of life, compared to children receiving no vaccines in the first month of life, had an increased risk of 829% for ADHD, 762% for autism, 638% for ADD, 565% for tics, 498% for sleep disorders, and 206% for speech delays.126
    ICAN – Introduction to Vaccine Safety Science & Policy in the United States (2017): http://icandecide.org/white-papers/V...ber-2-2017.pdf


    The best reference from this white paper is the following “scientific” report.

    In this study, 115 children (6–15 years) were injected with the trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) or placebo on average they were followed for some 272 days (unlike the couple of days in “normal” vaccine trials…).

    There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of respiratory illness (ARI or FARI) or confirmed seasonal influenza between subjects injected with TIV and those who received placebo, but TIV recipients did have a significantly lower risk of seasonal influenza infection based on serologic evidence…

    TIV recipients had an enormous increased rate of virologically-confirmed non-influenza infections (390) compared to the subjects that got placebo (88) - a 340% increase in the rate of non-influenza infections.


    Benjamin J. Cowling et al – Increased Risk of Noninfluenza Respiratory Virus Infections Associated With Receipt of Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (2012): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3404712/
    (archived here: http://archive.is/xz5sb)
    Do NOT ever read my posts.
    Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...he-world/page2

  20. #107

    Not reporting negative results

    This year, a group led by psychiatrist Goldacre reported that medical trials often violate EU legal requirements for reporting within a year after completion. In the US and the EU, certain categories of trials have to be reported within 1 year of completion by law.

    Of 7274 trials where results were due, only 49.5% reported results in time. While only 68% of company-sponsored trials reporting their results, universities reported only 11%.

    Of the 31,818 trials investigated, the study excluded 20,287 and 3392 trials because their status was never reported as completed. It is likely that many of these trials with “missing dates” (inconsistent data) also failed to report results within time.

    Ben Goldacre et al. – Compliance with requirement to report results on the EU Clinical Trials Register: cohort study and web resource (2018): https://www.bmj.com/content/362/bmj.k3218

    The following site managed by Goldacre gives more details on which companies and universities don’t report in time. Note the huge amount of universities that never report in time (0%).
    Also note the huge amount of studies with inconsistent data: http://eu.trialstracker.net/


    After Goldacre’s report, the Telegraph reported about 3 vaccine trials conducted by/for Public Health England (PHE) for which the results have never been published (according to the EU Clinical Trials Register). This is in violation with EU law that requires publication within one year.
    The EUCRT was set up after people found out that big pharma simply didn’t publish negative results on their drugs.

    The largest trial involved a new meningococcal and whooping cough booster vaccine with 640 children under the age of 16; concluded in 2016.
    The second PHE trial was concluded in 2010, investigated effectiveness of a meningitis C vaccine in a group of 130 one-year-olds.
    The third, concluded in 2011, involved 75 adults getting a meningitis B vaccine.

    Experts accused PHE of an “incomprehensible” violation of the trust of parents who gave their consent for their children participating in the tests.
    Ben Goldacre said:
    It is incomprehensible to me that Public Health England of all the trials it could leave unreported to have failed to comply with the legal requirements to report trials of vaccines.
    When patients participate and they take a risk with their own health. We have to respect their contribution by publishing the results properly. If we don’t, that is a betrayal of trust.
    Withholding the results of a clinical trial makes a mockery of all our efforts to promote trust in medicine, and i’m particularly sad to see vaccine trials going unreported.
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...ng-impossible/


    The following report suggests that only studies that show that the drugs of big pharma have no efficacy aren’t published.
    Erick H. Turner et al. – Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent Efficacy (2008): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...=1#post6684864
    Do NOT ever read my posts.
    Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...he-world/page2

  21. #108
    The following excellent post was made on the relation between Aluminium (Al, that’s added to vaccines) and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) in another thread.

    Quote Originally Posted by presence View Post
    2008 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18392545
    34 studies were selected, among which 68% established a relation between Al and AD, 23.5% were inconclusive and 8.5% did not establish a relation between Al and AD.

    2011 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21157018
    The hypothesis that Al significantly contributes to AD is built upon very solid experimental evidence and should not be dismissed. Immediate steps should be taken to lessen human exposure to Al, which may be the single most aggravating and avoidable factor related to AD.

    2011 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3056430/
    There is growing evidence for a link between Al and AD, and between other metals and AD.

    2013 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23380995
    Many humans routinely ingest aluminum salts as additives contained in processed foods and alum-treated drinking water. The physical properties of aluminum and ferric iron ions are similar, allowing aluminum to use mechanisms evolved for iron to enter vulnerable neurons involved in AD progression, accumulate in those neurons, and cause neurofibrillary damage.

    2014 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3986683/
    We think it important to emphasize that the most effective clinical treatment yet devised for moderate- to late-stage AD patients was the implementation of the first generation anti-oxidant and trivalent iron/aluminum chelator desferrioxamine to attempt to remove aluminum from the brains of AD patients

    2014 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3986683/
    Aluminum's contribution to AD is based upon at least seven independently derived observations:

    2014 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24577474
    AD is a human form of chronic aluminum neurotoxicity. The causality analysis demonstrates that chronic aluminum intake causes AD.

    2016 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26592479
    (with a total of 10567 individuals) Results showed that individuals chronically exposed to Al were 71% more likely to develop AD (95% confidence interval)

    2017 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28159219
    The unique quantitative data and the stunning images of aluminium in familial Alzheimer's disease brain tissue raise the spectre of aluminium's role in this devastating disease.
    Do NOT ever read my posts.
    Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...he-world/page2

  22. #109

    Censored data on MMR trials

    Del Bigtree has gotten hold on some information through a FOIA request on the 8 “studies” that were done to approve the MMR vaccine by the FDA in 1978...
    The vaccine trials only ran for only 42 days, most of them had no placebo group for controls. For none of the studies, placebo results have been released. The value of these studies is that they did report on a variety of illnesses. Because information has been blatantly deleted, it’s obvious that there was/is a cover-up!
    I’ll only look at the first 3 studies, if I understand correctly the other 5 only compared the new MMR vaccine to the old MMR vaccine, so these results don´t have much value anyway.

    First study #442, 199 children on the new MMR, 73 children reported complaints (“only” 36,7%), including – 22 Gastrointestinal illness; 23 Upper respitory illness; Anorexia 13.
    Data has been released on the Rubella “control” of 197 children.
    On the other MR “control” group, 150-200 children, information has blatantly been deleted.

    Second study #443, 102 children on the new MMR, 78 children reported complaints (76.4%), including - 43 Gastrointestinal illness; 64 Upper respitory illness; Anorexia 28.

    Third study #459 only 41 children on the new MMR, 34 children reported complaints (82.9%), including - 24 Gastrointestinal illness; 28 Upper respitory illness; Anorexia 20.
    More than 90% of the data has been blatantly deleted from the report, there were supposed to be 550 children included in this study - MMR (1) 150; MMR (2) 150; Measles 50; Mumps 50; Rubella (1) 50; Rubella (2) 50; Placebo 50.
    All of the other data on adverse effects (on more than 500 children) has intentionally been left out.

    Here is a link to the full set of received information (28 MB): https://icandecide.org/government/FD...ction-FOIA.pdf

    In the following relatively short video (9 minutes), Del Bigtree of High Wire that filed the FOIA request, tries to explain what he received.
    He makes some strong arguments, but doesn’t even realise that they fooled him by giving him a censored set, probably to hide the ugly truth!
    Last edited by Firestarter; 04-14-2019 at 09:23 AM.
    Do NOT ever read my posts.
    Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...he-world/page2

  23. #110
    Vaccine Science is just as trustworthy as Global Warming Séance.

  24. #111
    Quote Originally Posted by Stratovarious View Post
    Vaccine Science is just as trustworthy as Global Warming Séance.
    Yep and Big pHARMa owns the media / politicians, and most of the schools so they can get away with their distortions and lies.

    My website: https://www.theherbsofthefield.com/

    "No one is useless in this world who lightens the burdens of another.” ~ Charles Dickens

  25. #112
    Quote Originally Posted by donnay View Post
    Yep and Big pHARMa owns the media / politicians, and most of the schools so they can get away with their distortions and lies.

    Yes, and I was alerted to the fact , a few years ago, that the bulk of advertising dollars are
    coming out of that very Big Pharma 'loop' , so the MSM is never going to come out and bight
    that big fat hand (out).



  26. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  27. #113
    Quote Originally Posted by Stratovarious View Post
    Yes, and I was alerted to the fact , a few years ago, that the bulk of advertising dollars are
    coming out of that very Big Pharma 'loop' , so the MSM is never going to come out and bight
    that big fat hand (out).
    That is correct--they all have blood on their hands. Every once in a while we have some journalists like, Sharyl Attkisson, that does the research that exposes their lies.

    My website: https://www.theherbsofthefield.com/

    "No one is useless in this world who lightens the burdens of another.” ~ Charles Dickens

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234


Similar Threads

  1. Truth in Media: CDC, Vaccines and Autism
    By donnay in forum Personal Health & Well-Being
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-27-2016, 02:50 PM
  2. The Truth About Vaccines & Blue Foot Syndrome
    By donnay in forum Personal Health & Well-Being
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-24-2015, 08:35 PM
  3. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-11-2014, 08:51 PM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-20-2012, 01:33 AM
  5. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-08-2008, 09:15 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •