If that is Molyneux's thesis, it's a loser because if presupposes the inability of rational and clued-in men of the proper attitude are not able to refute the claims with cold and clinically cruel demolition.It's easy to say that I have the right to do what I want as long as I don't hurt others, it's easy to say I have a right to free speech, etc.. the problem is that it is too easy to start applying rights to anything else.. I have a right to free health care, I have a right to education, etc..
The NAP seems insufficient to me. I think there are better instruments to the same end.I believe he ends up falling back on NAP, but again I'll have to re-watch. I recommend you do, too. At least 10 or 15 minutes.
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.