Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: VACCINE STUDY: Peer-reviewed study shows vaccinated children have a 700% higher chance of neur

  1. #1

    VACCINE STUDY: Peer-reviewed study shows vaccinated children have a 700% higher chance of neur

    VACCINE STUDY: Peer-reviewed study shows vaccinated children have a 700% higher chance of neurodevelopmental disorder

    March 07, 2017 by: Vicki Batts


    On Valentine’s Day, a 34-page study that illustrated some of the harmful effects of vaccination was made available for viewing online. Six hours later, the URL had vanished, and the study was seemingly erased from the depths of the internet — likely in the hopes that the “controversial” information it contained would be forgotten.

    Vaccination and Health Outcomes: A Survey of 6- to 12-year-old Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Children based on Mothers’ Reports, by Anthony R. Mawson, et al. seemed like any other standard report on vaccination at first glance, according to author James Grundvig. The paper had been linked to Grundvig, and he recently published an article about the study, how he authenticated it with the study’s author, and he even described how the publishing journal went about censoring the information.

    Grundvig writes that after reading Mawson’s conclusions in the study, it appears that perhaps the CDC has purposefully avoided conducting such research themselves because “it would have run counter to CDC’s messaging that all ‘vaccines are safe.'”

    Research: vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders

    To conduct their research, Mawson and his team engaged in a cross-sectional survey of mothers of children who were educated at home. Homeschooling organizations from Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Oregon were asked to forward an email to their members, requesting mothers to fill out an anonymous online survey. The questionnaire gathered information on vaccination status and health outcomes of their biological children who were between the ages of 6 and 12. In total, 415 mothers provided information about 666 children. Of those, just 261 (or 39 percent) had not been vaccinated. Information on pregnancy experiences, birth histories, acute and chronic conditions, and the usage of medication and health care services was also included in the data collection.

    Overall, the results of the study showed that while vaccinated children were less likely to have had chicken pox or pertussis, they were significantly more likely to develop other types of infections, allergies, and were more likely to be diagnosed with a neurodevelopmental disorder (referred to in the study as an NDD). NDDs were defined as autism spectrum disorders, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), a learning disability, or any combination of the three. Could it be that unvaccinated children are in many ways healthier? It certainly seems that way.

    Data reveals shocking disparities

    The specific details of these incidents are even more shocking. For instance, the study found that vaccinated children had a 7-fold higher chance of being diagnosed with any sort of NDD — or, in other words, a 700 percent increased risk. There was a 2-fold increase in autism spectrum disorder diagnosis, a 2-fold increase in ADHD diagnosis and a 2-fold increase in learning disabilities.

    Vaccinated children also exhibited a 900-percent increase in other allergies besides allergenic rhinitis (which boasted a 1-fold increase on its own). There was also a 9-fold increase in eczema and atopic dermatitis. There also appeared to be a 400-percent increase in chronic illnesses among vaccinated kids. There were no notable differences in less common conditions such as Tourette’s syndrome, cancer, Crohn’s disease, depression, diabetes (type 1 or type 2), juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, encephalopathy, and others. However, the researchers note that a larger sample size would be needed in order to detect differences in incident rates of these more rare conditions.

    In regard to acute conditions, while vaccinated children were significantly less likely to have had chicken pox or whooping cough, they were also more likely to develop middle ear infections — with a 3.8-fold increase in occurrence. Vaccinated kids also had a 5.9-fold increased chance of having pneumonia compared to unvaccinated children.

    When it came to Hepatitis A or B, high fever in the past 6 months, measles, mumps, meningitis (viral or bacterial), influenza, or rotavirus, there were no substantial differences between the vaccinated and unvaccinated.

    After controlling for other factors, Mawson and his team determined in regression anaylses that there was a 3.1-fold increase in NDD among the vaccinated. Furthermore, a possible synergy between vaccination and preterm birth was discovered during the research. The team found that the interaction of preterm birth and vaccination was associated with a 6.6-fold increase in NDD.

    Big Pharma and their shills will be quick to try to discredit this study by saying that they “can’t verify the results” because of the anonymity of the survey data — however, as Grundvig recalls, the CDC used the exact same survey method in 2015 to produce the 1-in-45 rate of autism occurrence in newborn babies. It will be interesting to see them try to talk their way around that one.

    Sources:

    AgeOfAutism.com

    HealthcareInAmerica.us
    http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-03-0...-disorder.html
    Hosea 4:6
    "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children."

    There is a sacredness in tears. They are not the mark of weakness, but of power. They speak more eloquently than ten thousand tongues. They are the messengers of overwhelming grief, of deep contrition, and of unspeakable love. ~ Washington Irving (1783-1859)



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    That "study" has been debunked. Email survey of anti- vax people who were members of a particular website- not any scientific comparison of randomly selected individuals. The publishers even retracted it. http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/20...its-retracted/

    Antivaccinationists promote a bogus internet “survey.” Hilarity ensues as it’s retracted.
    From the publisher: https://twitter.com/FrontiersIn/stat...27519537258496

    This article was provisionally accepted but not published. In response to concerns raised, we have reopened its review.
    (an abstract was published at a pay- to- print site but the actual study has not been published).

    Other gems they published and then later retracted:

    In July, the same Frontiers journal retracted a study on chemtrails, an age-old conspiracy theory about the dangers of cloud trails released by jet planes.

    Earlier this month, another Frontiers journal retracted a paper about predicting whether people are dead or alive by looking at their photographs.
    http://retractionwatch.com/2016/11/2...avy-criticism/

    An anti-vax website spent $ half a million on collecting emails from less than 500 people to conduct the study (emails were sent to 666 but less than 500 responded). http://www.ageofautism.com/2012/11/u...right-now.html That is over $1,000 an email!
    Last edited by Zippyjuan; 03-08-2017 at 03:24 PM.

  4. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    That "study" has been debunked. Email survey of anti- vax people- not any scientific comparison of randomly selected individuals. The publishers even retracted it. http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/20...its-retracted/



    From the publisher: https://twitter.com/FrontiersIn/stat...27519537258496



    (an abstract was published at a pay- to- print site but the actual study has not been published).

    Other gems they published and then later retracted:



    http://retractionwatch.com/2016/11/2...avy-criticism/
    As predicted...

    Big Pharma and their shills will be quick to try to discredit this study by saying that they “can’t verify the results” because of the anonymity of the survey data — however, as Grundvig recalls, the CDC used the exact same survey method in 2015 to produce the 1-in-45 rate of autism occurrence in newborn babies. It will be interesting to see them try to talk their way around that one.
    Hosea 4:6
    "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children."

    There is a sacredness in tears. They are not the mark of weakness, but of power. They speak more eloquently than ten thousand tongues. They are the messengers of overwhelming grief, of deep contrition, and of unspeakable love. ~ Washington Irving (1783-1859)

  5. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by donnay View Post
    As predicted...

    Big Pharma and their shills will be quick to try to discredit this study by saying that they “can’t verify the results” because of the anonymity of the survey data — however, as Grundvig recalls, the CDC used the exact same survey method in 2015 to produce the 1-in-45 rate of autism occurrence in newborn babies. It will be interesting to see them try to talk their way around that one.
    Link to that survey? (Natural News conveniently doesn't provide one).

    Actually that one was a random survey of people contacted by the CDC- not members of a certain group self-reporting information in the OP survey. http://health.usnews.com/health-news...method-changes

    More than 11,000 families were asked to complete the survey in 2014. They were asked about one child in their household between ages 3 and 17. The parents were asked if a health professional ever told them that their child had autism, Asperger's disorder, pervasive developmental disorder or autism spectrum disorder.

    Slightly more than 2 percent of parents answered yes. That works out to about one in 45 children, the researchers said.
    The techniques are not at all alike. It would be akin to asking people on this website if they like Hillary Clinton. Would those results be comparable to a national, random survey of likely voters if they like Hillary Clinton? No because the source is made up of people with basically the same opinion. It is not representative of the public at large.
    Last edited by Zippyjuan; 03-08-2017 at 02:24 PM.

  6. #5
    Censored Study of Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated sees Daylight

    President Trump needs to launch Vaccine Safety Commission ASAP

    by James O. Grundvig

    If the goal of identity politics is to drown out public discourse by forming alliances based on race, religion, and social class, then “identity vaccines” should be the term used to expose the massive wealth transfer from U.S. taxpayers to the pharmaceutical industry, by way of the declining health of American children, especially nonwhite populations.

    After 30 years of the government immunizing the vaccine makers from harm, the long-delayed, first-of-its-kind study on “vaccinated versus unvaccinated” children has arrived. From five years of designing and conducting the epidemiology survey to more than one censorship roadblock from scientific journals to thwart the study’s findings — a damning indictment against vaccines being a false flag cure-all — it appeared in the public domain.

    For six hours on Valentine’s Day, the 34-page study breached daylight for six hours before the url link vanished. Leaked from a source, giving the release the half-life of a firefly, afforded enough time to download the document and share with the study’s author, who confirmed its authenticity.

    Vaccination and Health Outcomes: A Survey of 6- to 12-year-old Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Children based on Mothers’ Reports, by Anthony R. Mawson, et al., reads like dozens of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) population-based studies that found “no association” between vaccines and autism. Except this came out of Dr. Mawson’s School of Public Health Initiative at Jackson State University, Jackson, Mississippi, co-financed by non-profit organizations in Generation Rescue, Inc., and the Children’s Medical Safety Research Institute, with not a single government dime spent.

    Why hasn’t the CDC ever sponsored such a study? Did the health agency neglect doing so by design? After reading Mawson’s conclusions, that appears to be the case since it would have run counter to CDC’s messaging that all “vaccines are safe.”

    Some of the study’s findings are eye opening, such as chronic issues disproportionately affecting children along racial, gender, and social class fault-lines in ways that neither the authors nor sponsors imagined.

    “In summary, vaccination, nonwhite race, and male gender were significantly associated with NDD after controlling for other factors . . . Preterm birth combined with vaccination was a strong and synergistic factor for NDD in the final model, more than doubling the odds of NDD compared to vaccination alone.”

    The study defined NDD as “Autism Spectrum Disorder, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, and/or a learning disability.”

    The Study Accepted, Released, Censored

    Frontiers Journal received the study on September 17, 2016. After a two-month peer review process, published it on November 21 for its “68,000 on board editors” from institutions around the world (www.frontiersin.org), with the National Institute of Health (NIH) and Harvard University being the top two providing the science editors.

    Over the course of four days, more than 80,000 views of the study found it important enough to read, going “viral” according to one familiar with its release. Then on November 28, the bottom fell out when Frontiers scrapped the publication. In one week, it went from being accepted, published, and then retracted. The abstract can still be found online.

    The paper, however, wasn’t retracted; it was “unaccepted,” according to Mawson via email. That means Frontiers didn’t retract it, since it was never officially published. What’s left for a study after its accepted, reviewed 80,000 times in less than 100 hours? . . . Censorship.

    Beyond that clarification, Mawson wrote: “I am not allowed to comment on the paper/work by my Dean.”

    Melissa Cochrane, the communications manager for Frontiers Journal, which is headquartered in Lausanne, Switzerland, replied via email:
    “As we have previously noted, this article was provisionally accepted but not published. In response to concerns raised regarding the abstract and the provisional PDF — which were made provisionally available online — Frontiers then reopened its review. Following further manuscript assessment by the Field Chief Editor of Frontiers in Public Health, in consultation with an external expert, the manuscript was subsequently rejected, not retracted as retraction can only occur once a paper has been officially published and indexed.

    “The rejection was due to severe limitations in the validity of the results.”

    A day later, Ms. Cochrane replied to an email seeking clarification on the “rejection” process, writing:
    “The reasons for the rejection were communicated in more detail to the corresponding author but I am unable to give you the reviewer’s comments as the Frontiers’ review process involves an open and collaborative dialogue between the reviewers and the authors, all of whom participate with the understanding and security that Frontiers will keep these exchanges confidential, as explained in our terms of use. You can read more about the Frontiers peer review process here.”

    Vaccines Cause Health Issues Big and Small

    Some of the unsuspected data pulled from the study, includes:
    “Vaccinated children were significantly less likely than the unvaccinated to have been diagnosed with chickenpox and pertussis, but significantly more likely to have been diagnosed with pneumonia, otitis media [ear infection], allergies and NDDs.”

    “Numerous reports of AOM [acute otitis media] have been filed with VAERS. A search of VAERS for ‘Cases where age is under 1 and onset interval is 0 or 1 or 2 or 3 or 4
    or 5 or 6 or 7 days and Symptom is otitis media, revealed that 438,573 cases were reported between 1990 and 2011.”

    Since the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) qualifies that “‘Under-reporting’ is one of the main limitations of passive surveillance systems, including VAERS,” (https://vaers.hhs.gov/index), the number of ear infection cases is far greater than is recorded in VAERS, by a factor of twenty times, according to one Atlanta-area scientist, who wants to remain anonymous for fear of retaliation.

    “The vaccinated were also more likely to have used antibiotics, allergy and fever medications; to have been fitted with ventilation ear tubes; visited a doctor for a health issue in the previous year, and been hospitalized.”

    So now vaccines cause a lot more than tics, autism, ADHD, and learning disabilities. To the glee of Big Pharma, they also cause allergies, ear problems, and pneumonia.

    Thus, vaccines are akin to a gardener growing weeds to pull them — a robust reoccurring revenue stream.

    Vaccines Reprogram the Immune System

    “In a final adjusted model, vaccination but not preterm birth remained associated with NDD, while the interaction of preterm birth and vaccination was associated with a 6.6-fold increased odds of NDD (95% CI: 2.8, 15.5),” the study concluded.

    For Kevin Barry, father of an autistic teenage boy, and author of Vaccine Whistleblower, the book on the domestic fraud committed by Dr. William Thompson at the CDC, he said,

    “Fully vaccinated, premature, boys is a real danger zone, which isn’t a surprise to anyone in the autism community. But the increase in allergies in the fully vaccinated group is additional circumstantial evidence of the adverse effects of tinkering with an immature immune system.”

    What isn’t circumstantial is CDC recommending more vaccines to pregnant women, vaccines that haven’t been tested for safety or efficacy.

    Why is the Deep State monolith of CDC and Big Pharma pushing for more jabs that target pregnant women and their fetuses? Is it just for greed and money? Or is there more to this plan to vaccine humans from womb and cradle to grave?

    CDC clearly knows what Mawson’s study found: Vaccines cause an array of health issues in unborn babies, triggering their immune and nervous systems in unnatural ways.

    “Neuro-immunological interfaces of fetal, neonatal and childhood brain development are among the most complex choreographed cell signaling and tissue architecture processes in all of mammalian and human biology. There is no doubt for many scientists and physicians that the vulnerabilities inherent in these complex systems of development are linked. From a systems analysis, it is no surprise to many of us watching this train wreck from afar that injected metals risk both immunological dysregulation and neurological injury,” said Dr. Edward Fogarty in a telephone interview. He is the chairman of the Department of Radiology at the University of North Dakota, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Southwest Campus Building, and is a father of an autistic teenage son.

    Censorship of Scientific Research

    In learning about the content of the study, Dr. Fogarty said, “As an academic and clinical imager who’s specialty is grounded in the ethics of transparency, it is terribly disturbing that this manuscript is getting censored. It begs the question as to why.” He paused, his voice growing irate, and added, “Nowhere else in academia do we see
    the degree of censorship of inquiry than in this arena. In fact, the economic, professional and political risks of anyone driving safety science in this sphere of U.S public health is so great that it has served to muzzle virtually an entire professional class. Concerned physicians who are surgeons, radiologists, pathologists, primary care physicians, and even pediatricians face whispered threats of loss of licensure for even speaking out from within the profession.”

    For Anthony Mawson, who has submitted the study to another scientific journal, it is a waiting game. The key difference between his population-based study and that of the CDC, which hired a Danish mercenary scientist to cook data on fraudulent studies, is that Mawson didn’t change the study’s design parameters midstream, or found out what happens if he cut out a swath of data because he didn’t like the results.

    Sure, Mawson and his study will be attacked by the paid Big Pharma shills and the mainstream media, saying they “can’t verify the results,” because the study design was an anonymous survey of mothers in four states with the unvaccinated children being home-schooled. But that red herring is baseless, since the CDC used the same survey method in 2015 that produced a stunning 1 in 45 incidence rate of autism in newborn children.

    Not liking the results of the skyrocketing incidence rate of autism, CDC’s principal investigator for that study, Benjamin Zablotsky, PhD, said in a telephone interview on November 17, 2015, that his study was “merely a survey” and that the CDC would use its “gold standard” surveillance system that, somehow, produced the same 1 in 68 babies born with autism in 2016 in 2014. But now that alleged CDC fraud of omitting surveillance sites data has been outed, with yet another CDC whistleblower filing a lawsuit in Utah in 2016.

    So what are the next steps for the Trump Administration to deliver safer vaccines for America’s children?

    One would take Mawson’s study to the next logical level and have the new leaders at the CDC fund a placebo-based vaccinated versus unvaccinated clinical trial, and not a back-tested, epidemiological study as the agency did in Denmark.

    “Mawson’s pilot study needs to be expanded and conducted by the highly respected international, independent public health organization the Cochrane Collaboration,” said Kevin Barry, president of the non-profit organization, First Freedoms. “The CDC cannot be trusted to conduct a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study honestly.”
    To correct the top heavy vaccine ship that has run aground an entire generation of children, detrimentally impacting the health on millions, President Trump needs to erect the Vaccine Safety Commission ASAP, so a ‘less is more’ approach to the CDC immunization schedule can offer the next generation of children healthier lives.
    https://healthcareinamerica.us/censo...c1c#.3b38d2sym
    Hosea 4:6
    "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children."

    There is a sacredness in tears. They are not the mark of weakness, but of power. They speak more eloquently than ten thousand tongues. They are the messengers of overwhelming grief, of deep contrition, and of unspeakable love. ~ Washington Irving (1783-1859)

  7. #6
    "Study" was pulled because it was a crappy study. Not because of some "cover-up" or "censorship". Ron Paul was king of online surveys. Yet he only got a few percent in the national elections. Online surveys are completely unreliable when you try to apply them to the general population. They do not produce reliable information.

  8. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    "Study" was pulled because it was a crappy study. Not because of some "cover-up" or "censorship". Ron Paul was king of online surveys. Yet he only got a few percent in the national elections. Online surveys are completely unreliable when you try to apply them to the general population. They do not produce reliable information.
    Study was pulled because there is censorship, plain and simple.

    One can only hope that the CDC and FDA would go away. They are in collusion with Big pHARMa and the AMA.
    Hosea 4:6
    "My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children."

    There is a sacredness in tears. They are not the mark of weakness, but of power. They speak more eloquently than ten thousand tongues. They are the messengers of overwhelming grief, of deep contrition, and of unspeakable love. ~ Washington Irving (1783-1859)

  9. #8
    Interesting correlation. Hopefully someone will conduct a scientific study on the subject to see if it is non-anecdotal.
    Amash>Trump

    ΟΥ ΓΑΡ ЄCΤΙΝ ЄξΟΥCΙΑ ЄΙ ΜΗ ΥΠΟ ΘЄΟΥ

    "Patriotism should come from loving thy neighbor, not from worshiping graven images" - Ironman77

    "ideas have the potential of being more powerful than any army....The concept of personal sovereignty was pulled screaming from the ether into this reality by the force of men believing in a self evident truth, that men are meant to be free." - The Northbreather

    "Trump is the security blanket of aggrieved white men aged 18-60." - Pinoy



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    "Study" was pulled because it was a crappy study.
    He admits the study is not available to view, but still expresses his belief that it was pulled because it was "crappy," in the absence of any facts to support his conclusion. Classic Zippy "logic"....
    There is no fear in love, but perfect love casts out fear. For fear has to do with punishment, and whoever fears has not been perfected in love.
    (1 John 4:18)

  12. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Created4 View Post
    He admits the study is not available to view, but still expresses his belief that it was pulled because it was "crappy," in the absence of any facts to support his conclusion. Classic Zippy "logic"....
    He's referring to known facts about the methodology of the study.
    Amash>Trump

    ΟΥ ΓΑΡ ЄCΤΙΝ ЄξΟΥCΙΑ ЄΙ ΜΗ ΥΠΟ ΘЄΟΥ

    "Patriotism should come from loving thy neighbor, not from worshiping graven images" - Ironman77

    "ideas have the potential of being more powerful than any army....The concept of personal sovereignty was pulled screaming from the ether into this reality by the force of men believing in a self evident truth, that men are meant to be free." - The Northbreather

    "Trump is the security blanket of aggrieved white men aged 18-60." - Pinoy



Similar Threads

  1. Study: Unvaccinated Children Healthier Than Vaccinated Kids – Doctors Agree
    By Created4 in forum Personal Health & Well-Being
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: 12-26-2016, 06:45 PM
  2. Replies: 90
    Last Post: 08-27-2014, 08:11 PM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-30-2014, 05:45 PM
  4. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-14-2011, 04:58 PM
  5. New study - Flu vaccine for children = 3 times the risk of hospitalization
    By Anti Federalist in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-24-2009, 09:44 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •