Gotta get some common sense progressive POV to balance out the corporatist left wing on this forum.
Enter Jimmy Dore:
I just want objectivity on this forum and will point out flawed sources or points of view at my leisure.
Originally Posted by spudea on 01/15/24
This guy explains it, not sure how viable it is, or if it's even worth it.
“I don’t think that there will be any curtailing of Donald Trump as president,” he said. "He controls the media, he controls the sentiment [and] he controls everybody. He’s the one who will resort to executive orders more so than [President] Obama ever used them." - Ron Paul
nice. Lawrence O'Donnell is one of my journalist heros.
I just want objectivity on this forum and will point out flawed sources or points of view at my leisure.
Do you think the Russian Ambassador is a spy?
http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...not-a-spy.htmlTo make matters more interesting, CNN has characterized Kislyak as more than a mere foreign ministry official, but as “a top spy and recruiter of spies,” citing current and former U.S. intelligence officials.
Last edited by spudea; 03-03-2017 at 06:55 PM.
I just want objectivity on this forum and will point out flawed sources or points of view at my leisure.
hahah seems like CNN's Russia hacked our election line isn't doing so well. EH!
Karma.
Not even worth it - this guy does NOT explain anything really as Sessions statement was consistent with prior question asked.
The volunteered statement to Franken's hypothetical that wasn't answered by Sessions,
is (very important to a perjurious investigation of a material fact falsified)
supported by his previous affidavit testimony to a Sen. Leahy question - they would have to both be materially false for there to be a perjury.
Sessions was only volunteering (instead of answering) to a "What would you do ?" when he stated
"He didn't know of any of those instances and although he was regarded as a surrogate, he didn't have those conversations either."
Last edited by Jan2017; 03-04-2017 at 12:24 PM.
He's saying exactly what the prosecutors would do if they were to pursue a perjury charge. They might not be successful, but that is what they would do. Win or lose, they could tie this admin up in court for most of the term if they wanted to.
“I don’t think that there will be any curtailing of Donald Trump as president,” he said. "He controls the media, he controls the sentiment [and] he controls everybody. He’s the one who will resort to executive orders more so than [President] Obama ever used them." - Ron Paul
You are not even close to what prosecutors would do.
The first they could try to do is find a contradiction of the material fact in question somewhere else in the testimony.
They find the opposite, an affirmation and clarification of a jaded interpretation by whoever or outright ambiguous meaning.
The first "defense" or what the court could look for - is that somewhere else under oath the same item was addressed. It was.
Now, you would need someone under oath to contradict the fact claimed that Sessions did not have those conversations.
So, get the Russian ambassador to testify under oath before Congress - LOL
For me, it's time to mock the Russia hysteria -
I will explicitly ask for Russian dressing on salads now forever, even at the Pizza Hut (or Cici's) salad bar for the chuckle.
Last edited by Jan2017; 03-04-2017 at 01:09 PM.
How long do you think that will take? How many subpoenas and pretrial hearings?
“I don’t think that there will be any curtailing of Donald Trump as president,” he said. "He controls the media, he controls the sentiment [and] he controls everybody. He’s the one who will resort to executive orders more so than [President] Obama ever used them." - Ron Paul
The testimony is under 4 fours and already in the Congressional record.
Pretrial hearings ? LOL
The upcoming Special Prosecutor is coming up to the onramp with all lanes of the information superhighway leading to Hillary perjury.
Last edited by Jan2017; 03-04-2017 at 01:25 PM.
If he would have simply recused himself and stopped talking about it, the Dems wouldn't be trying to call him back. Instead, he gave this statement:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...ence-annotated
“I don’t think that there will be any curtailing of Donald Trump as president,” he said. "He controls the media, he controls the sentiment [and] he controls everybody. He’s the one who will resort to executive orders more so than [President] Obama ever used them." - Ron Paul
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Connect With Us