Over Three Million Illegal Immigrants Voted in 2016 Election

[TheCount]

Look, everyone agrees that tons of illegal immigrants voted.

Trump supporters' pocket mice seem to have multiplied since the election.

[TheCount]

This is America. Speak English here.

لا

[Zippyjuan]

A strong anomaly in CA results: a national average of 54% of registered voters would suggest 10 million votes in CA, not 13 million.


Wikipedia shows that the average number of registered voters, who voted in 2016 election, is 54%. California is a deep blue state, where major candidates did not even campaign, as it was a forgone conclusion that California will vote for a Democrat for president. What’s more, in prior elections Republicans had some incentive to vote because there was at least a Republican candidate for senate. However, a couple of years ago California past the “top two law”. What it meant is that all candidates from all parties competed in one pool in the primary in all races aside from the presidential race. Two top finishers regardless of party affiliation proceeded to the general election. That meant is that two Democrats could end up competing in the general election and that is exactly what happened in 2016 the senate race in CA. So, there was very little excitement in CA, particularly among Republicans and Independents. Even among Democrats there wasn’t much excitement, as most knew that CA will go for Hillary for president and people did not care much which one of the two Democrats will be the US senator from California.


However, the numbers that are being reported are astonishing. California voter and party profiles shows that there are only 17.9 million registered voters in California. So, if Californians were to vote at the same percentage as the nation as a whole, meaning 54% of registered voters, we would expect about 9.7 million votes. However, considering an apathy, lack of campaigning by the major candidates in California, lack of GOP candidate for senate, we would expect more like 50% of the registered voters to cast the ballot, roughly 9 million votes.


New York Times 2016 election results http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/president shows that 8,292,725 cast their vote for Hillary in Ca, 4,276,750 for Trump and 41,832 voted for the third parties. Hillary’s vote alone was nearly equal to what we expected for all the parties combined in California. The total numbers showed that about 13 million people voted in California or 78% of the registered voters. This number is a huge outlier. It means that 24% more voted in California than nationwide. We never saw such numbers. Additionally, we have seen reports in state newspapers and local radio stations that some people observed large stacks of ballots being mailed to the same addresses. So, we have seen 3 million votes cast more in California than it was expected based on 54% nationwide average and nearly 4 million votes more than what was expected based on general apathy in California. This is more than the total popular vote lead that Clinton has. She states that, though Trump won in the electoral vote, he does not have a mandate because Clinton won the popular vote. Well, Clinton’s lead came from 3-4 million questionable votes in California. There is a high suspicion that those are votes of non-citizens, dead voters, bogus voters or people voting in multiple states. It is imperative that the incoming Attorney General, Jeff Sessions, launch an investigation of California voter rolls and 2016 votes in California to solve this mystery and help us, Californians, have clean elections in the future.


http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/a-strong...ca-not-13-mln/

Orly Taiz? The Birther Queen?

California is a deep blue state, where major candidates did not even campaign,

Just here in San Diego we had Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump.

[Superfluous Man]

A strong anomaly in CA results: a national average of 54% of registered voters would suggest 10 million votes in CA, not 13 million.


Wikipedia shows that the average number of registered voters, who voted in 2016 election, is 54%. California is a deep blue state, where major candidates did not even campaign, as it was a forgone conclusion that California will vote for a Democrat for president. What’s more, in prior elections Republicans had some incentive to vote because there was at least a Republican candidate for senate. However, a couple of years ago California past the “top two law”. What it meant is that all candidates from all parties competed in one pool in the primary in all races aside from the presidential race. Two top finishers regardless of party affiliation proceeded to the general election. That meant is that two Democrats could end up competing in the general election and that is exactly what happened in 2016 the senate race in CA. So, there was very little excitement in CA, particularly among Republicans and Independents. Even among Democrats there wasn’t much excitement, as most knew that CA will go for Hillary for president and people did not care much which one of the two Democrats will be the US senator from California.


However, the numbers that are being reported are astonishing. California voter and party profiles shows that there are only 17.9 million registered voters in California. So, if Californians were to vote at the same percentage as the nation as a whole, meaning 54% of registered voters, we would expect about 9.7 million votes. However, considering an apathy, lack of campaigning by the major candidates in California, lack of GOP candidate for senate, we would expect more like 50% of the registered voters to cast the ballot, roughly 9 million votes.


New York Times 2016 election results http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/president shows that 8,292,725 cast their vote for Hillary in Ca, 4,276,750 for Trump and 41,832 voted for the third parties. Hillary’s vote alone was nearly equal to what we expected for all the parties combined in California. The total numbers showed that about 13 million people voted in California or 78% of the registered voters. This number is a huge outlier. It means that 24% more voted in California than nationwide. We never saw such numbers. Additionally, we have seen reports in state newspapers and local radio stations that some people observed large stacks of ballots being mailed to the same addresses. So, we have seen 3 million votes cast more in California than it was expected based on 54% nationwide average and nearly 4 million votes more than what was expected based on general apathy in California. This is more than the total popular vote lead that Clinton has. She states that, though Trump won in the electoral vote, he does not have a mandate because Clinton won the popular vote. Well, Clinton’s lead came from 3-4 million questionable votes in California. There is a high suspicion that those are votes of non-citizens, dead voters, bogus voters or people voting in multiple states. It is imperative that the incoming Attorney General, Jeff Sessions, launch an investigation of California voter rolls and 2016 votes in California to solve this mystery and help us, Californians, have clean elections in the future.


http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/a-strong...ca-not-13-mln/

Turnout in California wasn't exceptionally high.
http://www.electproject.org/2016g