hmm
I find some of this troubling.
1) The constitution doesn't grant rights; rights are inherent; the constitution affirms rights.
2) The constitution doesn't allow for public roads
3) In most jurisdictions pedestrian comes first; you cannot ram a protester with a vehicle; the man on foot has right of way.
Which is why the only thing the man was charged with is the statutory and ambiguous "disorderly conduct".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disorderly_conductdisorderly conduct statutes give police officers and other authorities fairly broad discretion
to arrest people whose activities they find undesirable
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us