Psychiatry for population control

[Firestarter]

In April, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved an electronic device to treat children that have been sentenced to the non-existent Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).
The Monarch external Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation (eTNS) System is meant for 7 to 12 years old children with ADHD, who aren’t taking prescription drugs. It is intended to give electroshocks (of a relatively low 9 volt intensity) all through the night, while the kid sleeps.

The device gives the electroshocks through electrodes placed on the forehead of the ADHD victim.


A “scientific” sham trial of 62 patients with ADHD that were shocked nightly with the Monarch eTNS device for 4 weeks, showed that they became more docile compared to placebo. Their ADHD Rating Scale score decreased from 34.1 to 23.4 compared with 33.7 to 27.5 for placebo.

Commonly reported effects include drowsiness, trouble sleeping, teeth clenching, headache, fatigue and increased appetite.



McCough et al. – Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled, Pilot Study of Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (2019)
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6m65g8s8

There is no larger trial than a mere 62 subjects and there is no information on long-term adverse effects. But for the FDA that apparently didn’t matter!

In June 2016, a meta-analyse was published on 13 likewise randomised trials, involving a total of 520 participants (that´s still quite small). This concluded that evidence fails to “support neurofeedback as an effective treatment for ADHD”.
It urged that future trial should focus on implementing “protocols, ensuring learning and optimizing clinical relevant transfer”. For some reason this 62-person study forgot to check.

One of the authors of this sham trial represents the management team of the device-maker NeuroSigma, Inc. He has been given “stock options” in the company.

They want to get the same electronic device approved for treating post- traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/b...elp-treat-adhd
(archived here: http://archive.is/kTMqQ)


When I first read about it, I couldn’t believe the name “Monarch”!
According to some “conspiracy theorists” Project Monarch was/is a subprogram under the notorious MKULTRA brainwashing program of the CIA: https://conspiracy.fandom.com/wiki/Monarch_program


See the following video with psychiatrist Peter Breggin, who expresses his serious doubts not only on the Monarch electrodes, but also on his profession.

[Firestarter]

Many ADHD victims are on Ritalin or other drugs for years, despite that their long-term adverse effects aren’t known.

In 2016, a study showed that Ritalin (methylphenidate) changed the brain structure of children after only 4 months. The distribution of white matter, important for learning and coordinating communication between regions of the brain, significantly changed.
A similar trial on adults showed no white matter changes between the Ritalin and placebo groups: https://www.madinamerica.com/2016/08...eloping-brain/


There is evidence that shows that poisoning ADHD kids with drugs doesn´t reduce the “ADHD” symptoms in a longer term than 14 months.

The long-term effects of poisoning children sentenced to the non-existent attention-deficit/hyperactive disorder (ADHD) with hard drugs (like Ritalin) includes reduced growth (height): https://www.madinamerica.com/2017/03...h-suppression/


The official story is that ADHD children are less able to concentrate and focus in school because of a chemical imbalance, “brain disorder”.
If in ADHD children learning is impaired, they would have a lower IQ...

A study shows that in 16 of 20 groups, the ADHD cohort had higher IQs than the control group. In the other 4 groups, the difference in IQ score wasn’t significant (2 points or less).


This suggests that the objective of psychiatric abuse of children is to make the smart children of the lower classes stupid...

Another study reported with big headlines that ADHD children have smaller brains, in another example of pseudoscience.
According to this “scientific” report, 58% of the ADHD youth in this sample had a lower accumbens volume than the control group, while 42% of the ADHD youth had a higher accumbens volume.
Statistically speaking this difference isn’t significant, and when we assume a normal distribution, there would be a 96% overlap between the two groups: https://www.madinamerica.com/2017/04...-enigma-study/


In the early 1990’s, less than 5% of children in the US were sentenced to ADHD.
In 2003 it jumped to 7.3%, then to 9.5% by 2007, more than 11% by 2011, and climbing.
These days a whopping more than 1 in 9 children from ages 4 to 17 are sentenced to ADHD in the US, with 2/3 of them boys.
About 2/3 of the children sentenced to ADHD are poisoned with psychotropic drugs.

In 2017-18, in England (only) 1.5% of boys and 0.35% of the girls between ages 6 and 17 (75,000 children) where poisoned with ADHD medication.

In reality, most young children diagnosed with ADHD do not have a mood disorder. Children are simply not meant to always sit still, pay attention for long periods, or hide their moods the way “socialised” adults do.
Will Stanton elaborates:

The education system is predominantly left-brain oriented. It rewards conventionality and discourages out-of-the-box thinking. The tragedy of this kind of model is that not all children are left-brain learners, yet they are treated as such. When these children perform poorly within the academic mould they are often viewed as having a learning impediment. In many cases — and I can verify this from my own experiences in the teaching arena — these children act out and develop behavioural problems. Except they are not ‘problem’ children. They are just operating within a system that does not see them for who they are…

The adverse effects of ADHD drugs include: headache, anxiety, nausea, dizziness, drowsiness, fatigue, insomnia, hallucinations, liver damage, vomiting, abdominal pain, weight loss, itching, impaired appetite, increased risk for type 2 diabetes, and hypotension (low blood pressure).
Low blood pressure can result in serious heart, endocrine and neurological disorders, and deprive the brain and other vital organs of oxygen and nutrients.
Dr. Peter Breggin explains:

These drugs damage developing brains. We have a national catastrophe… This is a situation where we have ruined the brains of millions of children. In controlling behavior, antipsychotics act on the frontal lobes of the brain — the same area of the brain targeted by a lobotomy…
These are lobotomizing drugs. Of course, they will reduce all behavior, including irritability.

The “chemical imbalance” theory that is claimed for all sorts of mental “disorders” has never been scientifically proven.
Brain scan technology has actually disproven the chemical imbalance theory.

Before 1900, ADHD symptoms were claimed to be caused by poor parenting.
In 1902, Sir George Still suggested that behavioural disorders were inherited from parents with psychiatric problems.
Later it was believed that ADHD symptoms were caused by brain damage, and in 1937 it was shown that stimulants (like amphetamines) could reduce the symptoms.

In 1952, a group of tubercular patients became euphoric when given the drug Iproniazid. It was established that this drug raised levels of epinephrine and norepinephrine in the brain.
In 1955, it was simply assumed that depression was caused by low levels of serotonin, a chemical imbalance in the brain (without evidence of course).
Also in 1955, Ritalin was approved for treating ADHD symptoms (supposedly caused by a chemical imbalance).

In 1968, the big pharma-controlled DSM voted the official “hyperkinetic impulse disorder“ into existence (the predecessor of the ADHD label), at the same time that a new drug for this “disorder” was introduced.
In 1980, the name was changed to Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD); in 1994 the name became Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).
In 1996, the stimulant/amphetamine Adderall was introduced to poison ADHD-victims, and diagnoses once again skyrocketed.

There appears to be a correlation between the rise in ADHD diagnoses and the implementation of the US Elementary and Secondary Education Act known as ‘No Child Left Behind’ (NCLB) that was implemented nationwide in 2002.
The NCLB standardised teaching methods across the US makes the smarter children bored senseless from lack of academic challenge. Bored, discouraged children are known to “act out”.
Schools have also been given financial incentives to “improve” ADHD rates...

A study by the University of Adelaide in Australia found that fish oil reduces ADHD symptoms more than ADHD drugs like Ritalin and Concerta, but without any of the adverse effects.
The behaviour of 130 ADHD children aged 7 to 12 dramatically improved within 3 months of taking fish oil capsules daily. After seven months, the children showed improvements in concentration, reading abilities and vocabulary: http://web.archive.org/web/20190301090829/https://www.theparentingcentre.com.au/images/wakeup-world.com-The_Fiction_of_ADHD_and_the_Chemical_Imbalance_The ory_of_Mental_Illness.pdf

[Firestarter]

The Danish doctor Peter C. Gotzsche, exposes the pharmaceutical industries and their fraudulent behaviour, disregard for human lives and their charade of research and marketing.
In his 2013 book “Deadly Medicines and Organised Crime; How Big Pharma Has Corrupted Healthcare”, Gotzsche argues that big pharma is actively racketeering.

I found the freely viewable chapter 18 from Gotzsche´s controversial 2013 book. It´s about psychiatry.
While the information is good, I found it difficult to read (and this isn´t because I´m not familiar with the topic). Maybe this is because it´s no good to start reading a book in the middle or maybe because English isn´t Gotzsche´s first language.
Here´s my summary of the chapter.


Rigging medical trials
An internal Pfizer memorandum shows that a medical trial was rigged deliberately:

If we were going to have to increase dothiepin dosage from 75 mg to 100 mg, we should do so at 1 week rather than at 2 weeks, which would result in a high drop- out rate on dothiepin due to side effects. By 2 weeks, patients have learnt to live with side effects.

Cipramil/Cipralex fraud
Before the patent for citalopram expired, Lundbeck patented the active half and called the same drug Cipralex (Celexa, Lexapro), which it launched in 2002. After the patent for citalopram expired, Cipramil became much cheaper, but the price of Cipralex remained high. In 2009, in Denmark Cipralex cost 19 times as much as Cipramil.
A paper was published in a journal edited by a person who is paid by Lundbeck with the claim that the same drug Cipralex worked faster than Cipramil in some cases. One of the academic authors was Stuart Montgomery, who once concealed that he worked for Pfizer at the same time as he worked for the UK drug regulator that approved Pfizer´s drug sertraline.
Gorman appeared as an expert and said that 80% of the compulsive shoppers had slowed their purchases on Cipralex. Even though such a disorder hasn´t even been invented by the almighty DSM.
While medical doctors were stimulated to poison depressed children with Cipralex, Forest executives for 3 years kept the results of a medical trial secret that didn’t show any benefits of Cipralex as a depression treatment for children.


Weight gain – Zyprexa, Seroquel
Lilly agreed to pay more than $1.4 billion for illegal marketing for off-label uses of Zyprexa, although its adverse effects are substantial, inducing heart failure, pneumonia, weight gain and diabetes.
In 2006, internal Lilly documents were leaked, which demonstrate that in 1999 Lilly’s chief scientist, Alan Breier, told employees in 1999 that “weight gain and possible hyperglycemia is a major threat to the long-term success of this critically important molecule”, but Lilly kept the 1999 study secret, which also showed that blood sugar levels in the victims increased steadily for 3 years. Lilly’s own studies showed that 30% of the patients gained at least 10 kg in weight after only a year on Zyprexa.

AstraZeneca silenced a trial that showed that quetiapine (Seroquel) led to high rates of treatment discontinuation and significant weight increases, while the company at the same time claimed that the drug helped psychotic patients lose weight.
Kit and at least one journal article wrote that quetiapine didn’t increase body weight while internal data showed that 18% of the patients had a weight gain of at least 7%.


GlaxoSmithKline - Paxil
In 2001, GlaxoSmithKline published a fraudulent scientific report that Paxil (Seroxat, paroxetine) was effective with minimal adverse effects. GlaxoSmithKline lied to its sales force that a trial showed “REMARKABLE Efficacy and Safety”, while the company in internal documents admitted that the study shows that Paxil wasn’t effective at all.
At least 8 children became suicidal on Paxil versus 1 on placebo (a significant difference).
There were 11 serious adverse effects in 93 children posioned with Paxil and 2 among 87 children on placebo (this was also significant).

GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly and Pfizer, routinely added suicide cases to the placebo arm of their trials, although they occured before the patients were randomised to placebo.
In data submitted by GlaxoSmithKline to the FDA in the late 1980s and early 1990s, the company had included suicide attempts from the washout period before the patients were randomised in the results for the placebo arms of trials.

In 2004, a researcher used the full reports of Glaxo’s trials that were made available as a result of litigation, and he found that Paxil significantly increased suicidal tendencies.
He included 3 trials, among them the unpublished study 377, which showed that Paxil isn´t better than placebo.


Suicidal from the drugs
Some of the psychiatric drugs that cause suicides are:
Prozac;
Zoloft;
Cipralex.

Even though his mother Nancy put information on the internet on the suicide of her son Brennan after he was poisoned with Cipralex, but “search” engines don’t find it.

An internal Lilly memo from 1984, shows that the German drug agency described 2 suicides and 16 suicide attempts among only 1427 patients on Prozac (fluoxetine). A Lilly Germany memo listed 9 suicides in 6993 patients on fluoxetine.
This doesn´t add up, when compared to only 5 suicides in FDA’s analysis of 52,960 victims on SSRI drugs. This is less than 1 per 10,000 patients, although you would expect 13 per 10,000 victims.

In a 1995 meta-analysis, 5 suicides in 2963 patients on paroxetine were reported (17 per 10,000). This meta-analysis wrongly reported 2 suicides on placebo, which occurred in the washout period.

The UK drug regulator reported 11 suicide attempts in 3455 victims on paroxetine and 1 in 1978 on placebo.


Higher death rates by psychiatric drugs
Antipsychotics increase the risk of dying through a variety of causes, including suicide, cardiac arrhythmias, diabetes and weight gains.
The use of psychiatric drugs both off-label and “legal” is exploding. The use of antipsychotics went up eight-fold between 1993–1998 and 2005–2009, and doubled in adults.

In 2007, more than 20 million people were poisoned with Zyprexa (olanzapine).
A meta-analysis shows that victims poisoned with Zyprexa that were diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease or dementia had a 3.5% death rate compared to 2.3% on placebo. Thus, for every 100 patients poisoned, there was one additional death on the drug. The true death rate is likely even higher.
If we take one death in a hundred for a reasonable estimate of the deaths caused by Zyprexa, this would mean that 200,000 of the 20 million died because of Zyprexa alone.


Chapter 18 from Gotzsche - “Deadly Medicines and Organised Crime; How Big Pharma Has Corrupted Healthcare” (2013): http://web.archive.org/web/20150226033136/http://www.radcliffehealth.com/sites/radcliffehealth.com/files/samplechapter/gotzsche_chpt18.pdf


On 13 September 2018, Peter Gotzsche was expelled from the Cochrane Collaboration (both from its Board and as a member) that he co-founded, even though Cochrane’s hired Counsel had found no evidence of wrong-doing.
Gotzsche claims he was expelled because he objected against Cochrane becoming to positive on our destructive healthcare.

Gotzsche estimates that about 200,000 persons die annually just in the US from side effects or medical errors. Many patients/victims die, because of drugs, the third biggest killer in the world.

The main reason we take so many drugs is that drug companies don´t sell drugs, they sell lies about drugs. This is what makes drugs so different from anything else in life… Virtually everything we know about drugs is what the companies have chosen to tell us and our doctors… the reason patients trust their medicine is that they extrapolate the trust they have in their doctors into the medicines they prescribe.

The patients don’t realize that, although their doctors may know a lot about diseases and human physiology and psychology, they know very, very little about drugs that hasn’t been carefully concocted and dressed up by the drug industry… If you don t think the system is out of control, please email me and explain why drugs are the third leading cause of death… If such a hugely lethal epidemic had been caused by a new bacterium or a virus,or even one-hundredth of it, we would have done everything we could to get it under control.

[Firestarter]

A scientific looking report among more than 15,000 elderly people (older than 65 years) in England and Wales shows that the rate of antidepressant use has increased with more than 150% in less than 20 years (from 4% at the beginning of the 1990s to 10.7% around the year 2010).
Depression rates in this period decreased slightly, from 7.9% in 1991-1993 (CFAS I) to 6.8% in 2008-2011 (CFAS II), even though antidepressants cause depression.

The number of care home residents taking antidepressants quadrupled in less than 20 years, from 7% to 29%.
Yet the proportion of people in care homes with depression remained about 10%: https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_relea...-nod100319.php
(http://archive.is/XOsMn)

It is obvious that elderly victims are misdiagnosed with depression and that antidepressants are overprescribed.
Most people with case-level depression weren’t on antidepressants, while most of those on antidepressants did not have depression. Look at the increasing rates of not-depressed elderly poisoned with antidepressants!


Antony Arthur et al. – Changing prevalence and treatment of depression among older people over two decades (2019): https://www.cambridge.org/core/servi...wo_decades.pdf

[Firestarter]

In 1975, director of Laboratories of Experimental Neuropsychology at Veterans Administration Hospital in Kansas City Don R. Justesen unwittingly leaked National Security Information, when he published an article in “American Psychologist” on the influence of microwaves. He quoted results of an experiment described to him by Joseph C. Sharp, who was working on Pandora, a secret project of the American Navy.
It has interesting information on the possible health effects of microwaves, but more interesting on experiments on sending voices directly to the brain using microwaves…

Such technology can and is used to drive Targeted Individuals insane…
See some excerpts.

The impetus for a renaissance of research activity in the United States occurred in the late 1960s because of political events in the Soviet Union. The interpretation of biological data from the so-called Tri-Service studies (see, e.g., Peyton, 1961) had been at variance with the Soviet's interpretation—American rats and dogs apparently did not develop the neurasthenic syndrome, even after intense radiation by microwaves in the laboratory.
(...)
One of the American pioneers of microwave research is Allan Frey (see, e.g., Frey, 1961, 1965; Frey & Messenger, 1973), a free-lance biophysicist and engineering psychologist. Frey's major accomplishment was discovery or at least confirmation and dissemination of one of the more intriguing data that link microwaves and behavior. Human beings can "hear" microwave energy. The averaged densities of energy necessary for perception of the hisses, clicks, and pops that seem to occur inside the head are quite small, at least an order of magnitude below the current permissible limit in the United States for continuous exposure to microwaves, which is 10 mW/cm2.

To "hear" microwave energy, it must first be modulated so that it impinges upon the "listener" as a pulse or a series of pulses of high amplitude. At first spurned by most microwave investigators in the United States, the radio-frequency hearing, or Frey effect, was repeatedly dismissed as an artifact until behavioral sensitivity to low densities of microwave energy was demonstrated in rats in an exquisitely controlled study by Nancy King (see King, Justesen, Si Clarke, 1971). Shortly after completion of the study and its informal dissemination via the invisible college, the skeptics began to appear in appropriately equipped microwave laboratories in the United States with requests fo "listen to the microwaves." A majority was able to "hear" the pulsed microwave energy, thereby belatedly confirming the claims made by Frey for nearly a decade.2
(...)
Communication has in fact been demonstrated. A. Guy (Note 1), a skilled telegrapher, arranged for his father, a retired railroad' telegrapher, to operate a key, each closure and opening of which resulted in radiation of a pulse of microwave energy. By directing the radiations at his own head, complex messages via the Continental Morse Code were readily received by Guy. Sharp and Grove (Note 2) found that appropriate modulation of microwave energy can result in direct "wireless" and "receiverless" communication of speech. They recorded by voice on tape each of the single-syllable words for digits between 1 and 10. The electrical sine-wave analo'gs of each word were then processed so that each time a sine wave crossed zero reference in the negative direction, a brief pulse of microwave energy was triggered. By radiating themselves with these "voicemodulated" microwaves, Sharp and Grove were readily able to hear, identify, and distinguish among the 9 words. The sounds heard were not unlike those emitted by persons with artificial larynxes. Communication of more complex words and of sentences was not attempted because the averaged densities of energy required to transmit longer messages would approach the current 10 mW/cm2 limit of safe exposure. The capability of communicating directly with a human being by "receiverless radio" has obvious potentialities both within and without the clinic.
(...)
What these scientists have discovered is that the central nervous system is a biological amplifier whose output as manifested in behavior provides a highly sensitive litmus of reactivity to electromagnetic energy. This sensitivity, particularly the demonstration of the Frey effect, will inevitably give rise to the question, Are there substantive implications here for paranormal phenomena, especially from the vantage of the Soviet scientist for whom ESP means "electrosensory" (not extrasensory) perception?
(…)
Not at all a cynic, but very much the skeptic, I conclude:
ElectroMagnetic receivers we are, A light-wave we can see;
As E-M emitters our wave fronts are weak, Hardly enough for ESP.

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B3V8...4O&hl=en&pli=1


An overview on sending sounds into a brain by radio signals (RF hearing) by Motorola (a manufacturer of cell phones) - Auditory Perception of RF Pulses: http://www.stopthecrime.net/Human%20...on%20FINAL.pdf

The following inventions can be used to send sound to your brain (they require a quiet surrounding):
US patent 3647970 (1972): http://www.google.com/patents/US3647970
US patent 4877027 (1989): http://www.google.com/patents/US4877027
US patent 4858612 (1989): http://www.google.com/patents/US4858612
US patent 6052336 (2000): http://www.google.com/patents/US6052336
US Patent 6587729 (2003): http://www.google.com/patents/US6587729

[Firestarter]

The following documentary from 2008 (?), rips the mask off the $330 billion psychiatric industry that does more harm than good – Making A Killing – The Untold Story Of Psychotropic Drugs.

It shows how big pharma has pushed internet surveys that advise about half of the people taking them to seek help from a psychiatrist because they might suffer from a mental disorder.
Of course psychiatrists have been trained to “label” anybody with some sort of mental disorder. Whether you’re shy (SAD “Social Anxiety Disorder”), tired, happy, depressed or full of life; there’s a disease invented for each of those moods for which supposed “miracle pills” have been marketed that the doctors will prescribe.

After being poisoned with psychiatric drugs, people go through life in an altered mental state, suffering adverse side effects that in many cases are worse than the condition they have been prescribed for.
These drugs now kill an estimated 42,000 people every year, with the death count rising…

It contains more than 175 interviews (which reminds of the interviews with “175” (former) staff of UHS that I’ve posted about in this thread) with lawyers, mental health experts, the families of victims and the survivors themselves.
Maybe I’ve already heard too many of these horrible stories, but I don’t even find the statements of the family of the suicide victims “shocking” anymore…


https://www.bitchute.com/video/K7y0OSBAyCsv/

[Firestarter]

In the UK, “scientists” have proposed the latest in population control. Poisoning the population with the psychiatric drug lithium through tap water (lithium of course causes mental health problems and increases the suicide rate...).

According to Anjum Memon:

In these unprecedented times of COVID-19 pandemic and the consequent increase in the incidence of mental health conditions, accessing ways to improve community mental health and reduce the incidence of anxiety, depression and suicide is ever more important.

https://futurism.com/neoscope/adding...ive-drug-water

Lithium blocks the functioning of the nervous system to result in a drowsy, lethargic and slowed up (zombielike) feeling. On the short term this stops the exited, manic state in manic-depressed people, but on the long term there’s only adverse effects (like all psychiatric drugs). Lithium causes permanent memory and mental dysfunction (dementia), depression, a decline in neurological function and quality of life. Long-term lithium exposure also causes severe kidney failure. Withdrawal from Lithium can cause manic-like episodes and psychosis.

[Firestarter]

In science fiction, the pinnacle of human evolution is a brain that connects directly to a computer.
The US Department of Defense has started the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) to explore the possibilities of brain implants for psychiatric warfare purposes.
In short these implants both monitor brain signals and electrocute the brain.

You will think twice about talking or posting politically incorrect opinions, with a microchip in your brain to cure you of "mental disorders" through electroshocks.

ATAI Life Sciences, backed by the freedom-hating CIA asset billionaire Peter Thiel, specialises in experimental treatment of mental disorders with psychedelic drugs.
ATAI has bought a majority stake in Psyber that is working on melding the mind with machines for psychiatric treatment. In the best imaginable imitation of the neo-Pavlovian conditioning of Brave New World, the developed therapies include electroshocks to cure somebody of "bad" behaviour...

Elon Musk-backed Neuralink is one of Psyber’s main competitors in the race to install chips into the human brain to control the population. Recently Neuralink released a video of a monkey wirelessly playing Pong through an implanted chip in its brain : https://gizmodo.com/peter-thiel-back...f-b-1846654014

[Firestarter]

It must be the wet dream of these eugenics psychopaths to have sadistic psychiatrists sentence promising poor kids to ADHD, drug them senseless with amphetamines (ritalin)... and there you have the proof that the low classes are "inferior" to the elite.

Wouldn't you want to know that our modern day "Brave new world" psychiatry was founded on the principles of the eugenics movement, in a nice collaboration between the German Nazis and the Anglo-American allied "heroes"?!?


In the 1860s, British capital got John D. Rockefeller started in the oil business.
The Rockefeller Foundation funded "psychiatric genetics" in the occupied German republic. This combination of psychiatry with the concepts of eugenics was developed in London's Galton Laboratory and its offshoot Eugenics Societies in England and America.

The Rockefeller Foundation created and directed the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry in Munich (before Rockefeller funding it was called the Kraepelin Institute), and the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Eugenics, and Human Heredity. Rockefellers' chief in both Kaiser Wilhelm Institutes was the Swiss fascist psychiatrist Ernst Rudin, assisted by Rockefeller functionaries Otmar Freiherr von Verschuer and Franz J. Kallmann.

The Kraepelin institute had initially been founded with 11 million marks, from Gustav Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach (head of the Krupp steel and arms family) and James Loeb (Paul Warburg's brother-in-law), an expatriate American of the Kuhn-Loeb banking family, who mobilised his Jewish-American friends to support the institute.
Loeb's in-laws, the Warburgs who owned the Kuhn Loeb bank, were the banking partners of William Rockefeller (president of Standard Oil of New York, later Mobil, and founder of National City Bank, later Citibank). Together they set up the Harriman family in business, with capital from the British royal family's personal banker Sir Ernst Cassell. The Rockefeller, Warburg, and Harriman families, together with British Crown agencies, sponsored much of the eugenics enterprise described here.

In 1911, John D.'s brother, William Rockefeller, employed the high-ranking British secret intelligence service officer Claude Dansey.
Dansey personally got his loyal American follower, Gen. Marlborough Churchill (a distant relative of Britain's Winston Churchill), appointed as director of U.S. military intelligence. After World War I, General Churchill headed the New York-based "Black Chamber'' espionage group. Marlborough Churchill also launched the medical research organisation, Macy Foundation, for the Rockefellers and British intelligence.

In 1932, the British-led eugenics movement selected the Rockefellers' Dr. Ernst Rudin as president of the worldwide Eugenics Federation. At the time the eugenics movement called for killing and sterilisation of people whose heredity made them a public burden.
Hitler selected Rudin as head of the Racial Hygiene Society in Nazi Germany. Rudin and his staff were part of the Task Force of Heredity Experts, chaired by SS chief Heinrich Himmler, that designed the sterilisation law. It was adopted in July 1933, and printed in the September 1933 "Eugenical News" (in the USA), described as an American model law.
The Rockefeller group drew up other race laws, based, like the German sterilisation law, on existing statutes from the Commonwealth of Virginia.

Eugenics psychiatrist Franz J. Kallmann, protegé of Ernst Rudin, in 1935 argued for the sterilisation of schizophrenics along with "even the apparently healthy relatives" of these schizophrenics, to eliminate all the "defective germ plasm".
Kallmann was however forced to leave Nazi Germany, as he was "half-Jewish''. Without missing a step, Kallmann emigrated to the US to become director of research in the New York State Psychiatric Institute, attached to Columbia University in Manhattan. The Scottish Rite's Dr. Lewis freemason was director of the institute.

While Dr. Josef Mengele got some bad press, his high-level Rockefeller boss, Otmar Verschuer, could continue his "scientific research" with the help of the Bureau of Human Heredity. In 1947, the Bureau of Human Heredity moved from London to Copenhagen (Denmark), where Verschuer continued his "research" .
Dr. Kallmann helped save Verschuer by testifying at his denazification proceedings. Kallmann, a director of the American Eugenics Society, became an icon at the New York State Psychiatric Institute.

In 1944, Montagu Norman who as governor of the Bank of England had helped finance Nazi Germany, began the British National Association for Mental Health. In 1948, the National Association for Mental Health organised an International Congress on Mental Health in London. At this congress, the World Federation for Mental Health was formed, Montagu's wife, Lady Norman, was named to its executive board. Norman picked the chief of the British military's psychological warfare department, Tavistock Institute chief Brig. Gen. Dr. John Rawlings Rees, as president of this World Federation.
At the same time, a New York agent of Montagu Norman named Clarence G. Michalis as chairman of the board of the Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation that had been founded by Marlborough Churchill. The Macy foundation would finance much of the dope dealing and other subversive activities of the World Federation and Tavistock in the US (including for MK-Ultra).

In 1961, during MK-Ultra, the NIMH, led by freemason Robert Felix, had created a 150-member elite group, American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, with many important MK-Ultra participants.
In 1967, an inner group of this college, the Study Group for the Effects of Psychotropic Drugs on Normal Humans, held a conference to outline the desired course for the United States to the year 2000, which

concluded that the present breadth of drug use may be almost trivial when we compare it to the possible numbers of chemical substances that will be available for the control of selective aspects of man's life in the year 2000...
The American culture ... [is] moving toward a 'sensate society.'...
A greater emphasis is being placed on sensory experience and less upon rational or work-oriented philosophies. Such a philosophical view, coupled with the means to separate sexual behavior from reproduction or disease, will undoubtedly enhance sexual freedom...
It seems ... obvious that the youth of today are no longer afraid of either drugs or sex.

Anton Chaitkin - British Psychiatry: From Eugenics to Assassination: https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1...m_eugenics.pdf

[Firestarter]

Mental health care sounds soo much better than torturing innocent people into submission! Don't you agree?

In 1971, the Behavior Research Institute was founded by Matthew Israel in Providence, Rhode Island and in 1976 he opened new centres in Massachusetts and California..
The Behavior Research Institute specialised (and still does) in torturing the "special needs" residents.

In 1981, the first resident died at the institute and an investigation was started that revealed countless acts of abuse against the residents, both physical and psychological torture. Residents were humiliated, beaten, restrained, and denied food. After the investigation, the institute was banned from torturing and withholding food for punishment.
So far, 6 residents have died of preventable causes since 1971.
In 1994, the Institute changed its name to the Judge Rotenberg Educational Center in honour of the judge who helped to keep the torture program running.

The Rotenberg Center states that the GED shocking device is only used as a “last resort to prevent violent or self-injurious behavior when positive behavioral support had failed”.
Torturing "special need" kids, to prevent the children from hurting themselves?!?

In 2006, it was reported that the GED device was regularly used for:
Failing to be neat;
Wrapping one’s foot around the leg of a chair;
Stopping work for more than 10 seconds;
Closing one’s eyes for more than 5 seconds;

Using the bathroom without permission;
Urinating on oneself after being refused the right to use the bathroom;
Screaming while being shocked;
Trying to remove the GED.

To top it all, recently a court ruled that the Center can continue torturing special needs kids.

In another strange twist, Matthew Israel set up an entire Wizard Of Oz theme at the facility. MK-ULTRA victims have complained about Wizard Of Oz themes in mind control programming, which often used electric shocks.



Is it just another "coincidence" that in the film Return To Oz, Dorothy is hooked up to an electrical shock device: http://www.renegadetribune.com/jewis...eeds-children/
(https://archive.is/69HeJ)

[acptulsa]

In 1971, the Behavior Research Institute was founded by Matthew Israel in Providence, Rhode Island and in 1976 he opened new centres in Massachusetts and California...

In 1994, the Institute changed its name to the Judge Rotenberg Educational Center in honour of the judge who helped to keep the torture program running.

Better they should have named their kennel after Pavlov.

[Firestarter]

Better they should have named their kennel after Pavlov.

Or maybe Aldous Huxley, who in Brave New World wrote about neo-Pavlovian conditioning?

And who was involved in the MKULTRA that serves as a blueprint for modern-day psychiatry...

[Firestarter]

Thomas Szasz is one of those notorious psychiatrists that has actually talked about the horrors of modern-day psychiatry...
In the following clip Szasz explains that (most of) so-called "mental disorders" aren't diseases at all (only 4 minutes).

[Firestarter]

It seems that these days you can be declared insane for just about anything, whether you're happy, sad, energetic, tired, extrovert, everything could be labelled a "mental disorder". But in the 2020s, when you "come out" to claim that you're trapped in the body of the wrong gender, you should be praised for your courage...
All in all this shows that psychiatric diagnoses have more to do with politrics than health care.


In the (not so) good old days, African American slaves were diagnosed with Drapetomania (drapetes, runaway slave, and mania, meaning crazy) if they had the “uncontrollable urge” to run away from their “masters”. The “treatment” was “whipping the devil out of them”.
Other slaves were declared to suffer from Dyasethesia Aethiopis (laziness and impaired sensation) if they didn't work hard enough.

In March of this year, the almighty DSM panel voted the new Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders into existence to make it even easier to torture psychiatric victims. Pyschiatrists use the DSM to label "disorders" whenever requested, resulting in prescribing drugs that do more harm than good.
In this update of the DSM, new additions to the "disorders" include excessive grief and racism. There are certainly examples when excessive grieving can be a mental disease, but how to decide when this is the case when there is no objective "chemical imbalance"?

This update of the DSM, also includes expanded guidelines for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). No doubt this will result in even more kids getting drugged senseless with amphetamine-like narcotics.
In 1994, the DSM-IV introduced the non-existent mental disorder ADHD, which has made children acting like.. children a mental disorder. In 2014, The rate of ADHD in the US had already tripled to a ridiculous 11% (with no end in sight!).

Psychiatric disorders are also used to medically kidnap children. After a school teacher or social worker recommends a psychiatric evaluation, and the parents disagree to have their child drugged senseless... the parents are then charged with "neglect" and their children are [s]stolen[/s] taken to be put in the "care" of the State.
The DSM diagnoses are also used for medical kidnapping of adults, if they disagree to the label given to them by (insane) psychiatrists. In 2018, about 1.3 million adults were forcibly treated for mental disorders that had over $50 billion of their assets "confined" after a judge declared them “mentally incompetent” (guilty without proof?): https://healthimpactnews.com/2022/up...ed-with-drugs/

[Firestarter]

In November 2021, Dr. Melvin Bruchet and his friend Dr. Daniel Nagase, filed criminal charges against government officials in British Columbia (Canada) over the lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and vaccine passports. The complaint included reference to a dramatic rise in stillbirth deaths at a Vancouver hospital that was probably caused by the COVID “vaccines”.

In December 2021, the Canadian authorities sent 3 RCMP squad cars and 6 RCMP officers to the elderly Dr. Melvin Bruchet (in his early 80s) and hauled him off in handcuffs for a “psych evaluation”. No surprise, the "respected" psychiatrists declared him insane so he could be locked up against his will and treated for being a horrible thoughtcriminal.

Dr. Nagase tried to get his friend out of the gulags. Nagase thought they had drugged Bruchet senseless as he was slurring his words, a common effect of anti-psychotic drugs.

They say that the MKULTRA program was stopped, but it is an open secret in that program (that has served as the blueprint for "modern" psychiatry) dissidents were publicly exposed as having “mental illnesses” and drugged (so they would act strange) to discredit them: https://rairfoundation.com/soviet-ca...oms-interview/

[Firestarter]

I don't know why, but I had my doubts about COVID denialist, lockdown sceptic, antivaxxer Andrew Kaufman, who denies that viruses exist that cause disease.
When I learned he is a psychiatrist that was almost enough to convince me that he's a "shill"...

Then I found the following interview with Kaufman by Thomas Cowan, and thought maybe he is "for real" after all.
Kaufman gives some honest criticism of psychiatry, which is arguably more his expertise than infectious diseases.


See the following video and 2 quotes of things he said:

Well I started just questioning it and didn’t wanna participate and then at some point I refused to do it. And I’ve gone through that kind of evolution where many times over as I found injustices with psychiatric medications. You know at first I was forced to prescribe them as a trainee because that was the standard of care. And then all my subsequent clinical work, that was the main function of a psychiatrist. But as I uncovered that, first, I saw the medicines were not helpful. And then I started realizing that they were harmful. And this was when I scrutinized the research literature and then compared it with my own experiences I started seeing that there was consistency here and those respects but that’s not what the main authorities of medicine would be saying about it but that’s what was in the actual research finding.
(...)

I wanna look at objective outcome measures. So in other words, like something tangible that’s improved in a person’s life. Like if they’re depressed and they can’ function, they can’t shop or grocery so take care of their kids or go to work, well I wanna see them resume doing those things. If they have a horrible conflict in their important relationships in their life, I wanna see that relationship improved. Right? All of those aspects and that’s not what I’m seeing at all. Surely with antidepressants I never saw that. I don’t want to give the impression that no psychiatric drugs ever work in any person… There are some very limited examples but they’re rare and they’re probably overused and overgeneralized. But with antidepressants no, I’ve never seen one person have a true benefit from an antidepressant.

https://www.weblyf.com/2020/09/dr-an...nd-depression/

[Firestarter]

One of the sub-topics in this thread is that psychiatry is designed for population control, including drugging talented poor children senseless, to prove that the lower classes are inferior (that's eugenics). Of course they especially want to neutralise those anti-authoritarian children that could grow up to be rebels and upset the pyramid of control.

So in 1980, Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) was added to the DSM-III disorders. When children (or young adults) display 4 out of the following 8 defiance of authorities symptoms "often" in the last 6 months, they can be sentenced to ODD: loses temper; touchy or easily annoyed; angry and resentful; argues with authority figures; actively defies or refuses to comply with requests from authority figures or with rules; deliberately annoys others; blames others for his or her mistakes or misbehavior; spitefulness or vindictiveness.

Many ODD victims get poisoned with psychiatric drugs including antipsychotics with severe adverse effects. These of course have no positive effects (unless you count walking around as a zombie as an improvement), so the adverse effects are THE effects.
Personally I think that our Brave new world would be a better place if more people would stand up to authorities that do us harm...

In the early 1980s, the ODD diagnosis was criticised as medicalisation of normal behaviour of children, but these days drugging rebellious kids "of low socioeconomic status" is considered "normal" by insane psychiatrists.
Other invented similar labels have been added to the DSM that can be used to sentence anti-authoritarian kids to non-existent mental disorders and drug them senseless, like: Conduct disorder (CD) and (the well-known) Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

The following link is the most informative I found on the (official) story of Oppositional Defiant Disorder: https://archive.is/kmZ5t

[Firestarter]

Apparently those terrible anti-vaxxers cause heart attacks of these brave COVID vaxxed, by "fear mongering and misinformation" that causes stress and anxiety, "if subjects are panicked, concerned, stressed or scared of the vaccination, their arteries will constrict and become smaller in and around the time of receiving the vaccine".

I'm almost sure that these vaxxed don't get stressed out by the government propaganda - fear, panic, hysteria: https://off-guardian.org/2022/11/24/...ety-seriously/


I can't say that I'm surprised about this...
The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (Canada) suggests drugging the unvaccinated into compliance.

To "manage anxieties" (for the immune destroying COVID vaccines), “Responsible use of prescription medications and/or referral to psychotherapy are available options”, because with these "anxieties", the doctors cannot "properly inform..." them about those untested vaccines (trust the "science")!


Drugging antivaxxers senseless will surely prove that they (we?) suffer from mental disorders, as this is the result of psychiatric drugs: https://archive.ph/fqlR6

[Firestarter]

In the following video, the Citizens Commission on Human Rights International makes a strong case that psychiatrists ARE some of the worst criminals.